Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The worst performance of any government is indeed its failure to act swiftly and decisively against vigilantes. Vigilante actions undermine the rule of law, erode trust in official institutions, and can lead to a breakdown of social order. Governments have a responsibility to protect their citizens from harm and ensure that justice is administered through legal channels, not through vigilante justice, which often results in arbitrary and unjust outcomes. Failing to address vigilante activities promptly and effectively only perpetuates a cycle of violence and lawlessness, ultimately harming the very fabric of society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

On curbing vigilantism: Arrest today, not tomorrow

In cases of terrorism, all parties involved play a significant role in the perpetration of violence and must be held accountable for their actions:

1. The person with deemed divine knowledge who preaches is guilty because they have the power to influence individuals' beliefs and actions. If their teachings promote or condone violence, they contribute to creating an environment conducive to terrorism.

2. The person with caliber and position who incites is equally culpable as they have authority and influence over a larger audience. Their words can sway public opinion and motivate others to commit acts of terror.

3. The person with little grey matter who commits the arson act is directly responsible for the violent act itself. However, their actions are often influenced by the rhetoric and ideologies spread by those in positions of power and authority.

4. Responsible enforcers who fault to act prophylactically by stopping the perpetual instigators

Therefore, in the context of terrorism, each party plays a role in the chain of events leading to violence, and all must face consequences for their contributions to promoting or inciting such acts.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Perpetual instigators often escalate their actions if not stopped early. When enforcers overlook or ignore warning signs and early indications of criminal behavior, they contribute to the escalation of conflicts and incidents, potentially leading to more serious crimes like arson or acts of terrorism.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 weeks ago | Report Abuse

Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear.
2. Encourage or participate in violent or retaliatory actions outside of legal channels.
3. Demonize certain communities or individuals, leading to a sense of injustice or persecution.
4. Exploit existing tensions or grievances for personal or political gain.
5. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice at any cost" mentality.
6. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante actions.
7. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

Political leaders play a crucial role in preserving harmony within a society. However, when they act irrationally and fuel tensions, they sow the seeds of extremism. This behavior not only undermines the trust and unity among communities but also encourages individuals to resort to extreme measures in expressing their grievances. Such actions disregard the far-reaching repercussions on society as a whole, as they foster hatred and division instead of promoting peace and understanding. It is imperative for us to unite and strongly condemn these irresponsible actions to prevent further escalation of extremist behaviors and uphold the values of tolerance and coexistence.

Posted by speakup > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

Anwar is one wolf in sheep clothing. Fooled me for years!

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

The combination of interpretation variability, cultural influences, historical precedents, power dynamics, and external factors creates a fertile ground for selective lawlessness to occur within religious settings. Addressing these complex dynamics requires a nuanced approach that considers both religious principles and broader societal factors.