Hiring a bankrupt to hold a key position in government service is inexcusably wrong for obvious reasons:
1. **Legal and Ethical Violations**: Public service positions, especially key ones, often require the utmost integrity and adherence to legal standards. A bankrupt individual is legally restricted in many jurisdictions from holding certain public offices. Hiring such a person disregards these legal stipulations and undermines ethical governance principles.
2. **Trust and Credibility**: Public trust in government institutions is paramount. Employing a bankrupt individual in a key position severely undermines public confidence. It signals a tolerance for financial irresponsibility and potential mismanagement, eroding the credibility of the institution and its ability to manage public resources effectively.
3. **Risk of Corruption**: A bankrupt individual may be more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.
4. **Misuse of Public Funds**: Public funds are meant for the public good and must be used responsibly. Hiring a bankrupt individual represents a gross misuse of these funds, as it prioritizes individual interests over the collective welfare. This decision could lead to inefficient or corrupt management of resources, ultimately harming the public.
5. **Precedent Setting**: Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.
6. **Accountability and Responsibility**: Government officials are expected to be accountable and responsible stewards of public resources. A bankrupt individual has already demonstrated a significant lapse in financial management, raising serious concerns about their ability to fulfill these responsibilities effectively.
In conclusion, using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources. Such actions compromise the integrity and efficiency of public service, making it an inexcusable and criminally wrong decision.
Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.
Using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources.
A bankrupt individual is much more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.
Criminal breach of public trust to disregard general order
A bankrupt individual is much more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.
Philosophy applied is "AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT CAUGHT, YOU ARE INNOCENT" and "EVEN IF YOUR CONDITIONS ARE UNFAVOURABLE, YOU ARE ACCEPTABLE IF YOU ARE OUR KIND AND THE REST ARE JUST TECHNICALS."
Have they caught the accomplice who signed his appointment letter?
Posted by DickyMe > 43 minutes ago | Report Abuse
Philosophy applied is "AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT CAUGHT,.....
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
Report Abuse
Please Sign In to report this post as abuse.
Market Buzz
No result.
Featured Posts
MQ Trader
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
MQ Trader
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
0:17
New IPO: The onshore and offshore support services provider for the O&G industry, Steel Hawk Bhd aims to list on the Ace Market!
MQ Trader 2944 views | 2 d ago
0:17
New IPO: The largest mini-market player and a leading groceries retailer in Malaysia, 99 Speed Mart Retail Holdings Bhd aims to list on the Main Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-23 07:38 | Report Abuse
Hiring a bankrupt to hold a key position in government service is inexcusably wrong for obvious reasons: 1. **Legal and Ethical Violations**: Public service positions, especially key ones, often require the utmost integrity and adherence to legal standards. A bankrupt individual is legally restricted in many jurisdictions from holding certain public offices. Hiring such a person disregards these legal stipulations and undermines ethical governance principles. 2. **Trust and Credibility**: Public trust in government institutions is paramount. Employing a bankrupt individual in a key position severely undermines public confidence. It signals a tolerance for financial irresponsibility and potential mismanagement, eroding the credibility of the institution and its ability to manage public resources effectively. 3. **Risk of Corruption**: A bankrupt individual may be more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations. 4. **Misuse of Public Funds**: Public funds are meant for the public good and must be used responsibly. Hiring a bankrupt individual represents a gross misuse of these funds, as it prioritizes individual interests over the collective welfare. This decision could lead to inefficient or corrupt management of resources, ultimately harming the public. 5. **Precedent Setting**: Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time. 6. **Accountability and Responsibility**: Government officials are expected to be accountable and responsible stewards of public resources. A bankrupt individual has already demonstrated a significant lapse in financial management, raising serious concerns about their ability to fulfill these responsibilities effectively. In conclusion, using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources. Such actions compromise the integrity and efficiency of public service, making it an inexcusable and criminally wrong decision.