Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

Self-inflicted Harm to Domestic Businesses & Employment Opportunity: Many multinational companies targeted by the boycott have local branches, partnerships, and supply chains in Malsia. Boycotting these companies could harm local employees, suppliers, and small businesses that depend on these relationships.

Be the first to like this.

10 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 2 hours ago

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

These result in reduced exports, loss of foreign investments, and decreased economic growth.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

Industries that rely on international partnerships, such as technology, finance, and manufacturing, may suffer if Malsia’s boycott leads to retaliatory actions or decreased investor confidence. This could result in job losses, reduced innovation, and a weakened economic position.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

Lousy economic actions bring insignificant influence to Israel’s policies or the situation in Gaza. Without broader international support, a unilateral boycott from Malsia is not generating enough pressure to effect change.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

Undermining Malsia’s Leadership & Global Standing: Malsia’s actions might be seen as symbolic rather than substantive, reducing its credibility and influence in global discussions on Middle Eastern issues.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

Engaging in a boycott may close off avenues for economic collaboration and technological exchange that could benefit Malsia’s development. Instead of isolating itself, Malsia could pursue balanced policies that protect its economic interests while advocating for peace and justice in Gaza.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

ountries or businesses affected by Malaysia’s boycott could retaliate by imposing trade barriers or withdrawing investments, further damaging Malsia’s economy.

JJPTR

128 posts

Posted by JJPTR > 3 hours ago | Report Abuse

suppringly, who corruptly siphon of rakyat of $50b was not boycott, instead trying to free him. In US 1mdb court case, 2 criminals from Petro Saudi who siphoned of $1.9b USD were jailed.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse

Supporters of corrupt leaders are often driven by vested interests or are actively involved in the corruption network. Their motivations typically include personal gain, political power, and economic incentives, or they are directly complicit in corrupt activities. This support plays a crucial role in perpetuating corruption, undermining democratic institutions, and hindering social progress. Addressing corruption effectively requires not only holding leaders accountable but also addressing the network of supporters who sustain and benefit from corrupt systems.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse

These supporters got easy money from corrupt leaders- at the expense of national resources and tax payers' money

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse

If macc is not lazy, should be eeasy for them to track them down in the shortest possible time in this era of digital banking

Post a Comment
Market Buzz