Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Undermining Intelligence and Autonomy

Intelligence and Religious Knowledge: Zaid highlights a fundamental issue: implying that Muslims cannot independently navigate decisions related to halal food or appropriate shopping venues suggests that the entire system of Islamic education has failed. After decades of formal and informal education on Islamic dietary laws, it’s reasonable to expect that most Muslims would have developed the necessary understanding to make informed decisions on their own. Constantly issuing new guidelines on where to eat or shop undermines this intellectual development.

Insulting the People’s Intelligence: By pushing these guidelines, authorities or organizations seem to be questioning the very intelligence of the Muslim community. Zaid rightly points out that those pushing for these rules must not have a high opinion of the people they are supposedly protecting. If Muslims have been educated extensively on the intricacies of halal, why would they still need such granular guidance? It’s almost as if they are being infantilized, treated as though they are unable to apply their knowledge without external intervention.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Overreach and Unnecessary Control

Unnecessary Bureaucracy: There is a bureaucratic overreach when religious bodies feel the need to regulate the everyday decisions of Muslims. Zaid is correct to imply that this level of control is unnecessary and reflects a low level of confidence in the ability of individual Muslims to exercise personal judgment. In a country like Malaysia, where Islamic principles are deeply ingrained in the fabric of society, there’s no reason to micromanage such personal choices.

Excessive Regulations: The idea that Muslims require guidelines on where to eat and shop reflects a deeper desire by some to regulate the faith in every aspect of life, even where it isn’t needed. This overregulation doesn’t just insult the intelligence of Muslims; it also risks creating resentment and eroding the sense of personal responsibility in practicing faith. Zaid’s critique highlights the need for trust in individual judgment, rather than a top-down imposition of rigid rules.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Empowering Muslims Through Trust

Fostering Independent Thought: Part of growing in one’s faith is the ability to apply religious teachings to real-world situations independently. Zaid’s argument supports the idea that Muslims should be trusted to take ownership of their religious practices without needing constant external oversight. This approach encourages personal responsibility and critical thinking, empowering individuals to navigate their daily lives with confidence in their faith.

Avoiding Overprotection: Constantly offering guidance on what should be a personal decision creates a culture of overprotection. Zaid points out the flaw in treating Muslims as though they are perpetually in need of assistance. This infantilizing attitude stifles growth and maturity within the community. Instead, allowing Muslims to exercise their knowledge freely would foster a stronger sense of agency and religious understanding.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Contradiction of Islamic Education’s Purpose

Islamic Education’s Goals: Islamic education is meant to provide Muslims with the knowledge and tools to live in accordance with their faith. Zaid’s critique brings to light a contradiction: if decades of education have not equipped Muslims to make basic decisions like where to eat or shop, then what was the purpose of that education? It would be absurd to believe that after all these years, Muslims are still incapable of applying what they’ve learned.

Devaluing Education: By continuously issuing new guidelines, religious authorities may be inadvertently devaluing Islamic education. Zaid’s argument underscores that the ultimate goal of religious education should be to empower individuals with enough knowledge to act independently. When new rules keep being introduced, it signals that Islamic education has failed to fulfill its purpose, which cannot be true given the substantial investments made in religious schooling in Malaysia.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Freedom and Accountability

Encouraging Personal Accountability: A key aspect of faith is personal accountability. Muslims are taught that they are responsible for their actions and decisions. Zaid’s critique suggests that micromanaging where Muslims eat and shop strips them of the responsibility that is integral to religious practice. Instead of depending on guidelines, individuals should be held accountable for making their own informed choices based on their understanding of Islamic principles.

Balancing Faith and Modern Life: Zaid’s argument also implies that, in today’s modern, globalized world, Muslims are capable of balancing their faith with their daily lives without being spoon-fed guidelines. Muslims are navigating complex social, economic, and cultural environments, and they have the intelligence and religious understanding to make these decisions. Over-guidance limits their ability to integrate faith with their modern lifestyle.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Holier than thou: Zaid Ibrahim’s argument is a sharp and necessary critique of the over-regulation of everyday Muslim life in Malaysia. The idea that, after decades of Islamic education, Muslims still need detailed guidance on where to eat or shop undermines their intelligence and independence. It also reflects a lack of faith in the very education system that was designed to equip Muslims with the knowledge to make such decisions. By pushing unnecessary guidelines, authorities are creating an over-controlled environment that stifles personal responsibility and growth. Muslims in Malaysia deserve the trust and respect to apply their faith independently, without the constant intervention of those who doubt their capacity to do so.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Amanah should get Zaid as advisor to champion these principles, opposing its rival paspus' darksystem agenda, and win big in GE17 or 18

Posted by Sslee > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Unfortunately Islamic syllabus that was adopted by Malaysia education neglected instruction in the Islamic way of life (knowledge building) and its character-building values (ad-din). Emphasis was instead placed largely on the proper performance of the rituals. Islam was taught as a religion of ritual, of dos and don’ts of formalistic requirements and prohibitions, not as a religion of far-reaching human and moral responsibility, not as a way of life.

Worse, many of the Islamic religious teachers were supporters of PAS, who took opportunity — and abused their position and public trust — to implant political creed and outlook into the minds of their young students.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Have they been keep poisoning majority of the ppl esp young ones?