Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Advocating for the closure of vernacular schools is contempt of court, in light of the judiciary’s recent verdict affirming the legality of such schools. The courts, after due process, have upheld the constitutional right to vernacular education as part our education system, recognizing it as compliant with the Federal Constitution. Contempt of court occurs when actions undermine the authority of the judiciary or disobey its rulings. After a court has made a definitive ruling on a matter, calling for the closure of vernacular schools, especially with the intent to disregard or challenge the legal status affirmed by the courts, would be deemed as an affront to the judiciary's authority. Such calls disregard the court’s legal interpretation of vernacular schools' constitutional standing, undermining the finality of its decision. Moreover, promoting the idea of closing vernacular schools in defiance of the court’s decision would inevitably fuel societal discord, as it disregards the legal recognition of linguistic and cultural diversity in the educational system, further aggravating tensions. This type of advocacy not only disregards the legal framework set by the court but also risks polarizing the nation by ignoring the societal value of educational plurality. Given that the courts have already decided the matter, continuing to push for vernacular schools' closure suggests disrespect for legal processes and outcomes, thereby opening the door for contempt proceedings to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary and uphold the rule of law. Kedaulatan undang-undang! Hidup Rukun Negara! Happy Malaysia Day!!