KLSE (MYR): KONSORT (6157)
You're accessing 15 mins delay data. Turn on live stream now to enjoy real-time data!
Last Price
1.54
Today's Change
0.00 (0.00%)
Day's Change
0.00 - 0.00
Trading Volume
0
Market Cap
388 Million
NOSH
252 Million
Latest Quarter
30-Sep-2013 [#3]
Announcement Date
21-Nov-2013
Next Quarter
31-Dec-2013
Est. Ann. Date
26-Feb-2014
Est. Ann. Due Date
01-Mar-2014
QoQ | YoY
-209.11% | -289.78%
Revenue | NP to SH
285,484.000 | -1,516.000
RPS | P/RPS
113.24 Cent | 1.36
EPS | P/E | EY
-0.60 Cent | -256.10 | -0.39%
DPS | DY | Payout %
10.00 Cent | 6.49% | 0.00%
NAPS | P/NAPS
0.77 | 2.00
QoQ | YoY
-122.05% | -108.66%
NP Margin | ROE
-0.53% | -0.78%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
30-Sep-2013 | 21-Nov-2013
Latest Audited Result
31-Dec-2012
Announcement Date
23-May-2013
Next Audited Result
31-Dec-2013
Est. Ann. Date
23-May-2014
Est. Ann. Due Date
29-Jun-2014
Revenue | NP to SH
268,627.000 | 16,573.000
RPS | P/RPS
106.55 Cent | 1.45
EPS | P/E | EY
6.57 Cent | 23.43 | 4.27%
DPS | DY | Payout %
10.01 Cent | 6.50% | 152.21%
NAPS | P/NAPS
0.78 | 1.97
YoY
-36.14%
NP Margin | ROE
6.17% | 8.42%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
31-Dec-2012 | 26-Feb-2013
Revenue | NP to SH
290,338.666 | -372.000
RPS | P/RPS
115.16 Cent | 1.34
EPS | P/E | EY
-0.15 Cent | -1,043.68 | -0.10%
DPS | DY | Payout %
-
NAPS | P/NAPS
-
QoQ | YoY
-103.57% | -101.57%
NP Margin | ROE
-0.13% | -0.19%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
30-Sep-2013 | 21-Nov-2013
Trailing 4 Quarters | Trailing 8 Quarters | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Available Quarters | 4 Quarters | 8 Quarters | ||
Continuous Quarters Of Revenue Growth | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Total Positive Profit Years | 2 / 4 | 50.00% | 5 / 8 | 62.50% |
Continuous Quarters Of Positive Profit | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Profit Growth | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Adjusted EPS Growth | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Total Dividend Years | 1 / 4 | 25.00% | 2 / 8 | 25.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Dividend | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Dividend Growth | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Adjusted Dps Growth | 0 / 4 | 0.00% | 0 / 8 | 0.00% |
Average ROE | -0.22% | 0.90% | ||
Average Net Profit Margin | -1.21% | 2.67% |
Last 5 Financial Years | Last 10 Financial Years | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Available Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | ||
Continuous Quarters Of Revenue Growth | 1 / 5 | 20.00% | 1 / 10 | 10.00% |
Total Positive Profit Years | 4 / 5 | 80.00% | 7 / 10 | 70.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Positive Profit | 2 / 5 | 40.00% | 2 / 10 | 20.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Profit Growth | 0 / 5 | 0.00% | 0 / 10 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Adjusted EPS Growth | 0 / 5 | 0.00% | 0 / 10 | 0.00% |
Total Dividend Years | 5 / 5 | 100.00% | 7 / 10 | 70.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Dividend | 5 / 5 | 100.00% | 7 / 10 | 70.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Dividend Growth | 0 / 5 | 0.00% | 0 / 10 | 0.00% |
Continuous Quarters Of Adjusted Dps Growth | 0 / 5 | 0.00% | 0 / 10 | 0.00% |
Average ROE | 5.33% | 1.10% | ||
Average Net Profit Margin | 5.02% | 0.29% |
T4Q | Annualized | Annual (Unaudited) | Last 10 FY Average | Last 5 FY Average | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 285,484 | 290,338 | 268,627 | 245,156 | 264,252 |
NP to SH | -1,516 | -372 | 16,573 | 2,902 | 12,636 |
Dividend | 25,244 | 0 | 25,225 | 29,157 | 47,240 |
Adjusted EPS | -0.60 | -0.15 | 6.57 | 1.15 | 5.01 |
Adjusted DPS | 10.00 | 0.00 | 10.01 | 11.57 | 18.74 |
NP to SH = Net Profit Attributable to Shareholder, EPS = Earning Per Share, DPS = Dividend Per Share
All figures in '000 unless specified.
EPS & DPS's figures in Cent.
LQ QoQ | LQ YoY | CQ YoY | LQ vs Average of T4Q | LQ vs Average of T8Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | -30.28% | -13.09% | 8.39% | -14.99% | -11.23% |
NP to Owner | -209.11% | -289.78% | -101.57% | -1,350.13% | -374.99% |
Dividend | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Adjusted EPS | -209.11% | -289.78% | -101.57% | -1,350.13% | -374.99% |
Adjusted DPS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQ = Latest Quarter, CQ = Cumulative Quarter, T4Q = Trailing 4 Quarters, T8Q = Trailing 8 Quarters, QoQ = Quarter on Quarter, YoY = Year on Year
T4Q vs LFY | T4Q vs AL5FY | T4Q vs AL10FY | AQR vs LFY | AQR vs AL5FY | AQR vs AL10FY | LFY YoY | LFY vs AL5FY | LFY vs AL10FY | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 6.28% | 8.03% | 16.45% | 8.08% | 9.87% | 18.43% | 3.83% | 1.66% | 9.57% |
NP to Owner | -109.15% | -112.00% | -152.23% | -102.24% | -102.94% | -112.82% | -36.14% | 31.15% | 470.97% |
Dividend | 0.08% | -46.56% | -13.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -76.69% | -46.60% | -13.49% |
Adjusted EPS | -109.13% | -111.97% | -152.11% | -102.24% | -102.94% | -112.82% | -36.14% | 31.15% | 470.97% |
Adjusted DPS | -0.06% | -46.63% | -13.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -76.69% | -46.60% | -13.49% |
T4Q = Trailing 4 Quarters, T8Q = Trailing 8 Quarters, AL5FY = Average of Last 5 Financial Years, AL10FY = Average of Last 10 Financial Years, LFY = Latest Financial Year AQR = Annualized Quarter Result, YoY = Year on Year
because just to rile up donkey dave vis-a-vis petgas! hahahaha
i never even see gasmsia numbers! LOL
2013-01-07 15:39
same theory as this:
Posted by Raymond Tiruchelvam > Jan 7, 2013 02:52 PM | Report Abuse
when tun mahathir was asked.... as Petronas advisor, did you advise the contracts to be given to kencana.... he blatantly replied YES... i asked all the contracts to go to my son's company...
2013-01-07 15:41
Sometimes we failed to understand tun M tounge in cheek response. We are too naive.
2013-06-01 22:52
still nobody notice ? future oil and gas play ? (please note new board of directors, headed by Rahman, ex CEO of Media Prima). Equinas as the controlling shareholder. New directors from Petronas.
2013-07-30 09:27
Jim, you are great - like you said earlier, more to come in the afternoon !
2013-10-24 14:51
i am quite familiar with how this sotck behaved (played before). The last round it went up like this, it was followed by announcement of massive dividend of 47 sen per share (!!!!). So this round I am very confident something good is coming.
2013-10-24 14:55
PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY KL AIRPORT SERVICES SDN BHD (“KLAS”), EFFECTIVELY A 100%-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF DRB-HICOM, OF 155,462,322 ORDINARY SHARES OF RM1.00 EACH REPRESENTING APPROXIMATELY 61.61% EQUITY INTEREST IN KONSORTIUM LOGISTIK BERHAD (“KLB”) FOR A CASH CONSIDERATION OF RM240,966,599.10 ON THE BASIS OF RM1.55 PER SHARE (“PROPOSED ACQUISITION”); AND
2013-10-25 18:47
banjuoooo8305, not necessarily - just see how the market reacts on Monday !
2013-10-26 21:55
Purchaser who buys over at RM 1.55 per share will work towards creating KLB enterprise value higher than RM 1.55 per share on medium to long term basis.
2013-10-27 23:15
RM 1.54 now after the mandatory acquisition announcement by KLAS. Will the momentum continue since the volume is picking up... Pls share your comment and forecast.. Thx.
2013-12-10 10:56
Yeap.. and the buying & selling volume is getting stronger, just wondering will the price head north after this..? Pls address your comment n view..
2013-12-23 15:26
Thought this stock is already offered GO at 1.55? Still buy?
Please check announcement. Company may be delisted.
Disclaimer: I am not sure but please do check first.
2014-01-15 00:25
till now KLB NOT GENERATED PROFIT even the name changes to Pos Logistics Berhad(PLB) under Pos Malaysia a.k.a DRB Hicom. loss 174 mil. i think will changes the shared holder back to PLB stock price , separated between Pos Malaysia
2019-05-22 16:23
Pos Malaysia’s group CEO, Syed Najib Syed Md Noor, said the loss was a result of the continuing decline in mail volume (13% year-on-year), coupled with high costs related to serving the Universal Service Obligation.
Pos Malaysia’s group CEO, Syed Najib Syed Md Noor, said the loss was a result of the continuing decline in mail volume (13% year-on-year), coupled with high costs related to serving the Universal Service Obligation.
PETALING JAYA: Pos Malaysia Bhd recorded a net loss of RM165.7mil for the financial year ended March 31, 2019 – its biggest-ever loss for a full year.
The group had reported a net profit of RM93.25mil during the preceding year.
Pos Malaysia said the net loss was attributed mainly to widening losses from mail and impairment charges of RM39.6mil from the loss of goodwill in Pos Logistics.
“The losses from mail is a result of a continuing double-digit contraction in mail volume and bill payments, reflecting the increasing substitution of letters with electronic media.
“The impairment of goodwill in Pos Logistics is a result of a performance that was below expectations due to competitive market conditions,“ the group said in a statement.
Pos Malaysia’s group CEO, Syed Najib Syed Md Noor, said the loss was a result of the continuing decline in mail volume (13% year-on-year), coupled with high costs related to serving the Universal Service Obligation.
“We are working closely with the regulator for an overall tariff rebalancing to update the tariff that was last changed in 2010 accordingly to reflect the growing costs to serve the nation with an increase of 17% new postal addresses.
“We expect a positive outcome from the regulators on the tariff rebalancing,” he said.
He added that the goodwill impairment for Pos Logistics was due to increasing competition, which has resulted in poor performance.
“This impairment is a one-off expense,” he said.
During the period, the group also recorded a lower revenue of RM2.3bil, representing a decrease of 4.8%.
The lower revenue, the group said, was mainly due to reduced income from the logistics segment, which the group said was on the back of the completion of its project related to the Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Development project in Pengerang.
The postal services segment also registered a lower revenue of RM697.6mil, as compared to RM734.3mil previously, due to “accelerating decline in traditional mail volume, largely due to electronic substitution”.
Another segment that saw a significant drop in revenue was the international segment, which saw revenue fall by RM13.2mil on the back of lower volume in transshipment, following the loss of a major customer account.
During the fourth quarter, Pos Malaysia recorded a net loss of RM141.1mil, while revenue also came in lower at RM594.7mil.
Moving forward, the group said its business outlook remained generally challenging.
“One major challenge is the continuing contraction in mail volume, as business enterprises are increasingly communicating with their customers via electronic and digital channels, foregoing mail-based communications,” it said.Syed Najib said, however, that Pos Malaysia would be making significant investments into digital transformation and expanding its capabilities to serve the growing demand for e-commerce.
“The outlook for e-commerce and Pos Malaysia over the next few years is very promising.
“We are looking at the double-digit growth to continue, as more and more people shop online in Malaysia,” he said.
Via ongoing investments, he said the foundation would be set for Pos Malaysia to expand its business with the best infrastructure and solutions to serve the market.
Pos Malaysia said the net loss was attributed mainly to widening losses from mail and impairment charges of RM39.6mil from the loss of goodwill in Pos Logistics.
“The losses from mail is a result of a continuing double-digit contraction in mail volume and bill payments, reflecting the increasing substitution of letters with electronic media.
“The impairment of goodwill in Pos Logistics is a result of a performance that was below expectations due to competitive market conditions,“ the group said in a statement.
Pos Malaysia’s group CEO, Syed Najib Syed Md Noor, said the loss was a result of the continuing decline in mail volume (13% year-on-year), coupled with high costs related to serving the Universal Service Obligation.
“We are working closely with the regulator for an overall tariff rebalancing to update the tariff that was last changed in 2010 accordingly to reflect the growing costs to serve the nation with an increase of 17% new postal addresses.
“We expect a positive outcome from the regulators on the tariff rebalancing,” he said.
He added that the goodwill impairment for Pos Logistics was due to increasing competition, which has resulted in poor performance.
“This impairment is a one-off expense,” he said.
During the period, the group also recorded a lower revenue of RM2.
2019-05-22 16:36
KC Loh
fc to apamende? football club?
2013-01-07 15:28