社论点评
爱尔德斯(Iretex 7183) 与11人遭股东起诉,前董事死缠烂打抵赖不走“目的何在”?钱真的能使鬼推磨?
2017年9月6日 - 爱尔德斯(IRETEX)与11名人士包括前董事和公司秘书遭股东陈燕芝起诉。公司在2017年8月25日股东特别会议顺利通过后,招频频阻止股东会议进行的前董事包括麦麟坤、陈伟忠、莫哈末沙利夫和阿莫阿姆林,以及前秘书陈栋梁(人名译音)刁难拖延缴交公司文件。秘书更“顺理成章自甘被”非法劫持包庇和私藏股票交易所新闻发布系统密码,还让前董事擅自滥用股票交易所系统宣告“会议无效”,阻止新董事执行任务。股东以陈燕芝领先,于8月28日起诉包括爱尔德斯,4名前董事(Mak Lin Kum, Felix Chin Wui Choong, Shariff, Amryn), 公司秘书陈栋梁(Tan Tong Lang), 以及其它6 名人士。
6 Sep 2017 - Iretex Corp Bhd shareholder sued Iretex and 11 others, including ex directors Mak Lin Kum, Felix Chin Wui Choong, Sharif and Amryn, as well as company secretary Tan Tong Lang, which collude together preventing shareholders from exercising their rights on their own company Iretex, including abuse of court process to interrupt EGM, trying to procure an injunction on shareholders from voting, and self-declare "invalidating" EGM results, among other abuses, are reckless law breakers never seen in Malaysia capital market.
The motive and objective is already apparent and known to the public it's all monetary driven. Obvious motives could be summarized as follows.
1st, the collusion of Mak Lin Kum, Felix Chin Wui Choong and defendant Teh Eng Huat, where Mak & Felix Chin fabricated excuses to put blame on Kong Hon Kay and Christopher Purcell, in order to take control of Iretex board to make way for themselves to drop 2 materials legal suit on Teh Eng Huat. First suit is Teh's RM6.3mil profit guarantee to Iretex, and second suit is the RM3mil potential cheating crime of CBT (illegal stolen company money where evidence was proven by auditor and Bursa Malaysia). The collusion had also surfaced the already known master mind in all man made turbulence on "companies where Dato Ooi and Dato Tey invested", count Iretex was one of their portfolio. The mastermind is Chong Ket Pen of Protasco Bhd had surfaced when Teh Eng Huat uses David Lai & Co, the law firm of one Tan Yee Boon, where Tan is a director on Protasco Bhd board standing side by side with Chong Ket Pen. It's direct conflict of interest for Teh Eng Huat to use David Lai & Co in law suit which simply named "Dato Tey" as one of his defendant. Such move did not took market by surprise. In fact, the reckless law suit had confirmed the collusion of such organized pack of potential organised commercial criminals gang up together in looting public company for personal interest, with the use of fabricated blames as smoke screen.
The economic benefits and motives among the gang would leave to the authorities to investigate and procecute. It doesn’t need a PhD to see what each of them would gain. In a nutt shell, if there is no “Dato’ Ooi & Dato’ Tey” which spent their money to saved Chong Ket Pen, there won’t be opportunist such as Teh Eng Huat, Mak Lin Kum, Felix Chin Wui Choong, and bunch of cheerleaders such as Tan Yee Boon, Tan Tong Lang and coy. Do up the link.
2nd is the AGM notice in a rush, which market believes the now ex directors Mak Lin Kum and Felix Chin Wui Choong had concealed the information of court order which instructed Iretex to conduct AGM before 20 September 2017. No announcement was made on Bursa pertaining to such material information.
However, as soon as the now ex directors’ loss the 25 August 2017 EGM drama, the same day itself, company secretary was "pressured" to not make any EGM results in Bursa announcement, but rather announced the twisted AGM Notice. The notice was rather bizarre when shareholders found out that Mak Lin Kum and Felix Chin Wui Choong had proposed making "director fees and benefits" total RM2.3million for year 2016, and RM2million for year 2017 "in advance" (ahead of December 2017). Totaled RM4.3million stolen, as far as was presented, is a jaw dropping public looting. More ridiculous when the culprits further expecting shareholders to endorse the culprits wrongdoings in the coming AGM.
Instead of being voted against, such rush-in announcement is in hope that they can "place an injunction & prevent" shareholders from voting in AGM, and find ways to legitimize what they had stolen from Iretex, at least RM4.3 million within the period of their existence in Iretex. Such potential serious CBT and abuse of power would be another key reason for the ex directors to continue fighting for their stay in Iretex.
Company secretary Tan Tong Lang after assisted all the mess announcements, resigned on 28 August 2017.
The unjust event had also invited reputable businessman, Dato' Donald Lim Xiang Chai to buy shares of Iretex. Dato' Donald was former deputy finance minister and having many successful businesses. The entry of Dato' Donald had given shareholders hope for justice and further gave investors in the capital market regain some trust in the integrity and dignity of Bursa Malaysia as a whole. Shareholders in hope the authorities would move faster to give the control back to shareholders, in the wake of seeing the real motive and objective of the pack of wolfs on sheep skin.
19 September 2017 is the company AGM, where investors shall see if there is still law in this country. Until then, the ex directors are restrained from doing anything without the consent from new directors.
(吉隆坡5日讯)爱尔德斯(IRETEX,7183,主板工业产品组)与11名人士遭股东陈燕芝起诉。该公司董事部在文告中说,面对起诉的包括该公司、副主席叶达杰、首席执行员沙哈伦尼占,以及一众董事江汉凯、陈炳辉、莫哈末马修丁和莫哈末法哈米。
同时,前董事包括麦麟坤、陈伟忠、莫哈末沙利夫和阿莫阿姆林,以及前秘书陈栋梁(人名译音)也遭起诉。
法庭将在下周二(12日)听审,并已发出禁令,禁止该公司、叶达杰和江汉凯之外的9名人士召开股东特大或展延本月19日的股东大会,以及提出新的控诉。
此外,该公司和陈栋梁之外的10名人士,也不可在未获得4名前董事和上月25日之前委任的董事批准前,删除、下载或复制陈燕芝拥有的机密数据等讯息。
星洲日报/财经‧2017.09.06
IRE-TEX CORPORATION BERHAD |
Type | Announcement |
Subject | MATERIAL LITIGATION |
Description |
IRE-TEX CORPORATION BERHAD (Ire-Tex or the Company) Kuala Lumpur Originating Summons WA-24NCC-350-08/2017 (Suit 350) |
This suit was commenced by Tan Yeang Tze and the Defendants named therein are as follows:-
The Board of Directors of Ire-Tex wishes to announce that on 28.8.2017, Tan Yeang Tze commenced an action vide Suit 350 against the Company and the Defendants named above. Tan Yeang Tze also filed an application for an ex-parte injunction (“Enclosure 4”) against the above Defendants and the same was fixed for hearing on 29.8.2017. The Court upon hearing Enclosure 4 granted an injunction as follows: 1. An injunction to restrain the Defendants and each of them from issuing any statements or announcements through Bursalink on the Bursa Malaysia website or on the Company’s website or otherwise howsoever except to provide latest information on material litigation or on non-contentious matters wherein: 1.1. the contents of the announcement must be approved by the 1st to 4th Defendants and the Board as appointed by the 25th August EGM whose decision shall be conveyed by Hamdan bin Mohd Nor or Y.M Raja Hizad bin Raja Kamarulzaman, and
1.2.all such announcements that have been approved by both sides only shall be published by the Company Secretary for the time being of the Company 2. An injunction to prohibit the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th Defendants and each of them except with the approval of the Board as appointed by the 25th August EGM whose decision shall be conveyed by Hamdan bin Mohd Nor or Y.M Raja Hizad bin Raja Kamarulzaman from: 2.1. calling or convening any other general meeting of the Company other than the Company’s AGM or from appointing any more directors to the Board of the Company
2.2. taking any action to postpone or delay the Annual General Meeting of the said Company which has been called for Tuesday, 19th September 2017 (the Company’s AGM”)
2.3. entering the Plaintiff’s premises in Kulim, Kedah save for the 2nd 7th and 8th Defendants pursuant to their contracts of employment with the Company
2.4. lodging any police reports on behalf of the Company in relation to the dispute among shareholders
2.5. issuing any payments from the Company or any of its subsidiaries except for the payment of the following: (a) Salary, statutory deductions, income tax for the employees of the Company which sums shall not include any payments to any of the 1st to 10th Defendants claiming to be a director of the Company as named-above save and except the salary, statutory deductions and income tax of the 7th and 8th Defendants in their capacities as employees of the Company (b) Suppliers following the terms of usual course of business; (c) Payments to Messrs UHY (as the Company’s auditor) and Boardroom.com Sdn Bhd (as the Company Secretary and Share Registrar) (d) Such payments as are required for the proper convening of the Company’s AGM on 19th September 2017 at the Kulim Golf and Country Club; and (e) Any other payment that is agreed by the 1st to 4th Defendants and the Board as appointed by the 25th August EGM whose decision shall be conveyed by Hamdan bin Mohd Nor or Y.M Raja Hizad bin Raja Kamarulzaman 2.6. commencing any fresh litigation or entering into any judgment by consent or suffering any judgment to be entered against the Company 3. An injunction to restrain the 1st to 10th Defendants from removing and/or downloading and/or copying any confidential data, information, documents or materials owned by the Plaintiff, except with the approval of both the 1st to 4th Defendants and the Board as appointed by the 25th August EGM whose decision shall be conveyed by Hamdan bin Mohd Nor or Y.M Raja Hizad bin Raja Kamarulzaman 4. No order was made as to the costs of the ex parte hearing The Court has fixed the matter for inter-partes hearing on 12.9.2017 at 8.30 a.m. before the learned Judge, Yang Arif Azizul Azmi Bin Adnan at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, Jalan Duta. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course. This announcement is dated 5th September, 2017. Source: http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/5534961
|
Chart | Stock Name | Last | Change | Volume |
---|
Created by RealNews | Jan 11, 2018
Created by RealNews | Sep 20, 2017
Created by RealNews | Sep 14, 2017