Adventa’s subsidiary, Lucenxia Malaysia, has launched the Lucenxia INTELLIS, an Intelligent Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) cycler specifically designed for patients with chronic kidney disease.
The APD machines would be readily available for patients to be treated at home. Patients would have to undergo circa 10-12 hours of treatment, daily.
We expect government to pay Adventa circa RM3,200/month for each patient.
The number of patients suffering from diabetes and endstage renal disease is growing. With more than 3m cases of diabetes and 2m Malaysians having kidney diseases, we believe APD would be a better option for health maintenance (in certain circumstances) when compared to haemodialysis.
Following the footsteps of Thailand, Hong Kong and Mexico, Malaysia is currently in the midst of adopting a Peritoneal Dialysis First Policy, where APD would be the primary treatment for renal diseases.
We are positive on Adventa’s home dialysis business and expect contribution to kick in 2017 onwards. With the growing number of chronic disease patients and scarcity of equipment/ resources, this home dialysis business would be more convenient to kidney patients as well as a catalyst for Adventa.
Risks
Successful roll-out of the new and projected high-growth home renal dialysis business is dependent on a smooth transition of patients from hospitals and private treatment centres to home treatment. Trials are ongoing with further investments on patient care education and training as well as extending reach into rural regions.
Forecasts
Maintained.
Rating
HOLD , TP: RM1.02
Positives
(1) First-mover advantage in home renal dialysis treatment and almost monopolistic position in commercial sterilisation and warehousing activities within Asia; (2) Relatively high barrier to entry for potential rivals due to high cost of machinery and technological know-how; and (3) Sustainable longer-term growth prospects given increasing exposure to niche healthcare segments.
Negatives
(1) Strong projected group revenue and earnings growth rates are highly reliant on successful implementation and execution of the new home renal dialysis operations; (2) High working capital requirements estimated for new equipment and business expansion; and (3) The shares are tightly held currently, resulting in relatively low trading volumes.
Valuation
Maintain HOLD with TP of RM1.02 based on CY16 P/E of 19x, which is at a 25% discount to Asian healthcare players.
The report is incomplete without the cost of the APD machine and other ancillary costs. Perhaps the writer conveniently left them out to make it more convincing. Don't forget the Lucenxia APD machine was in operation as far back as 2012 or even earlier. The company is trying hard to have the machines accepted by the Health Ministry, by holding a SERIES of clinical trials at a number of hospitals. Furthermore, home hemodialysis is also available as well. Which is safer and more cost effective? In this context, users of these machines can educate us on this matter.
2016-01-26 15:09
Post a Comment
People who like this
Featured Posts
MQ Trader
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
MQ Trader
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
0:17
New IPO: Supreme Consolidated Resources Berhad, a distributor and warehouser of F&B products, aims to list on the ACE Market!
MQ Trader 379 views | 10 d ago
0:17
New IPO: O&G healthcare service provider, Metro Healthcare Berhad aims to list on the Ace Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
teareader
The report is incomplete without the cost of the APD machine and other ancillary costs. Perhaps the writer conveniently left them out to make it more convincing. Don't forget the Lucenxia APD machine was in operation as far back as 2012 or even earlier. The company is trying hard to have the machines accepted by the Health Ministry, by holding a SERIES of clinical trials at a number of hospitals. Furthermore, home hemodialysis is also available as well. Which is safer and more cost effective? In this context, users of these machines can educate us on this matter.
2016-01-26 15:09