......of fertile ground for vigilante culture

It is be highly detrimental to the rule of law in countries that uphold high moral standards. The reasons are:

1. **Undermining Legal Processes:** Vigilante actions bypass legal procedures and due process, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. This can lead to arbitrary judgments, lack of accountability, and the erosion of trust in the legal system.

2. **Risk of Misidentification:** Vigilantes may act based on incomplete information or personal biases, leading to wrongful accusations and harm to innocent individuals. This not only violates the rights of the accused but also damages the reputation of the legal system in ensuring accurate justice.

3. **Escalation of Violence:** Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

4. **Diminished Deterrence:** When vigilantes take the law into their own hands, it weakens the deterrent effect of official law enforcement. Criminals may perceive a lack of consistent consequences, emboldening them to commit more offenses.

5. **Unaccountable Authority:** Vigilante groups or individuals operate outside the framework of accountability and oversight that governs official law enforcement agencies. This unchecked power can lead to abuses and excesses that go unchecked.

6. **Legal Precedent and Norms:** Allowing vigilante culture to thrive sets dangerous precedents and normalizes extrajudicial actions. It sends a message that individuals or groups can act as judge, jury, and executioner, undermining the rule of law's foundational principles.

7. **Social Division:** Vigilantism can deepen social divisions by pitting groups against each other based on perceived grievances or biases. This fractures community cohesion and makes it harder to address underlying issues through constructive dialogue and legal reforms.

In conclusion, while vigilantes may believe they are upholding their personal living values, their actions ultimately erode the rule of law, weaken societal trust, and contribute to a less just and orderly society. It is crucial to uphold legal processes, accountability, and the principles of justice to maintain a stable and fair legal system.

Vigilante culture is be highly detrimental to the rule of law in countries that uphold high moral standards. The reasons are:

1. **Undermining Legal Processes:** Vigilante actions bypass legal procedures and due process, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. This can lead to arbitrary judgments, lack of accountability, and the erosion of trust in the legal system.

2. **Risk of Misidentification:** Vigilantes may act based on incomplete information or personal biases, leading to wrongful accusations and harm to innocent individuals. This not only violates the rights of the accused but also damages the reputation of the legal system in ensuring accurate justice.

3. **Escalation of Violence:** Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

4. **Diminished Deterrence:** When vigilantes take the law into their own hands, it weakens the deterrent effect of official law enforcement. Criminals may perceive a lack of consistent consequences, emboldening them to commit more offenses.

5. **Unaccountable Authority:** Vigilante groups or individuals operate outside the framework of accountability and oversight that governs official law enforcement agencies. This unchecked power can lead to abuses and excesses that go unchecked.

6. **Legal Precedent and Norms:** Allowing vigilante culture to thrive sets dangerous precedents and normalizes extrajudicial actions. It sends a message that individuals or groups can act as judge, jury, and executioner, undermining the rule of law's foundational principles.

7. **Social Division:** Vigilantism can deepen social divisions by pitting groups against each other based on perceived grievances or biases. This fractures community cohesion and makes it harder to address underlying issues through constructive dialogue and legal reforms.

In conclusion, while vigilantes may believe they are upholding their personal living values, their actions ultimately erode the rule of law, weaken societal trust, and contribute to a less just and orderly society. It is crucial to uphold legal processes, accountability, and the principles of justice to maintain a stable and fair legal system.

Vigilante culture is be highly detrimental to the rule of law in countries that uphold high moral standards. The reasons are:

1. **Undermining Legal Processes:** Vigilante actions bypass legal procedures and due process, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. This can lead to arbitrary judgments, lack of accountability, and the erosion of trust in the legal system.

2. **Risk of Misidentification:** Vigilantes may act based on incomplete information or personal biases, leading to wrongful accusations and harm to innocent individuals. This not only violates the rights of the accused but also damages the reputation of the legal system in ensuring accurate justice.

3. **Escalation of Violence:** Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

4. **Diminished Deterrence:** When vigilantes take the law into their own hands, it weakens the deterrent effect of official law enforcement. Criminals may perceive a lack of consistent consequences, emboldening them to commit more offenses.

5. **Unaccountable Authority:** Vigilante groups or individuals operate outside the framework of accountability and oversight that governs official law enforcement agencies. This unchecked power can lead to abuses and excesses that go unchecked.

6. **Legal Precedent and Norms:** Allowing vigilante culture to thrive sets dangerous precedents and normalizes extrajudicial actions. It sends a message that individuals or groups can act as judge, jury, and executioner, undermining the rule of law's foundational principles.

7. **Social Division:** Vigilantism can deepen social divisions by pitting groups against each other based on perceived grievances or biases. This fractures community cohesion and makes it harder to address underlying issues through constructive dialogue and legal reforms.

In conclusion, while vigilantes may believe they are upholding their personal living values, their actions ultimately erode the rule of law, weaken societal trust, and contribute to a less just and orderly society. It is crucial to uphold legal processes, accountability, and the principles of justice to maintain a stable and fair legal system.

Vigilante culture is be highly detrimental to the rule of law in countries that uphold high moral standards. The reasons are:

1. **Undermining Legal Processes:** Vigilante actions bypass legal procedures and due process, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. This can lead to arbitrary judgments, lack of accountability, and the erosion of trust in the legal system.

2. **Risk of Misidentification:** Vigilantes may act based on incomplete information or personal biases, leading to wrongful accusations and harm to innocent individuals. This not only violates the rights of the accused but also damages the reputation of the legal system in ensuring accurate justice.

3. **Escalation of Violence:** Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

4. **Diminished Deterrence:** When vigilantes take the law into their own hands, it weakens the deterrent effect of official law enforcement. Criminals may perceive a lack of consistent consequences, emboldening them to commit more offenses.

5. **Unaccountable Authority:** Vigilante groups or individuals operate outside the framework of accountability and oversight that governs official law enforcement agencies. This unchecked power can lead to abuses and excesses that go unchecked.

6. **Legal Precedent and Norms:** Allowing vigilante culture to thrive sets dangerous precedents and normalizes extrajudicial actions. It sends a message that individuals or groups can act as judge, jury, and executioner, undermining the rule of law's foundational principles.

7. **Social Division:** Vigilantism can deepen social divisions by pitting groups against each other based on perceived grievances or biases. This fractures community cohesion and makes it harder to address underlying issues through constructive dialogue and legal reforms.

In conclusion, while vigilantes may believe they are upholding their personal living values, their actions ultimately erode the rule of law, weaken societal trust, and contribute to a less just and orderly society. It is crucial to uphold legal processes, accountability, and the principles of justice to maintain a stable and fair legal system.

KKaakakakk

While addressing grievances is important, it should be done through fair and proportionate means that uphold justice, respect human rights, and promote long-term solutions rather than punitive measures that exacerbate problems. Due consideration must be given to:

Economic Impact: Revoking the factory license not only affects the supplier but also has ripple effects on employees, their families, and the local economy. It leads to job losses, financial instability, and potential social hardships.

Lack of Due Process: The sudden revocation of a license without proper investigation or legal procedures undermines the principles of due process and procedural justice. It denies the affected party the opportunity to defend themselves or seek recourse through legal channels.

Potential for Retaliation: Such harsh actions can breed resentment and retaliation, creating a cycle of conflict and hostility instead of promoting understanding, reconciliation, and constructive dialogue.

Humanitarian Considerations: Consideration should be given to the human impact of these decisions, ensuring that punitive measures are proportionate, fair, and respectful of human dignity.

Each has his own niche while ringgit continues to burn- until education is reformed to produce quality thinking human beings who would stand together to brainstorm real world issues of AI-dominant hypermodern era.

Posted by BuyAndHold88888 > 4 hours ago | Report Abuse

Those racist politicians stayed in a safe seat especially in the places where their race are a majority whether it is Malays or Chinese.Middle of the road politicians can survived in Mixed seats

Unfortunately it happened as the last straw, following vernacular and bkt challenges.

BATmobile puncture lagi?

Such a mentality is a billion times more threatening to Madani living than the mistake

The worst deterioration of human quality occurs when individuals engage in a cycle of tit for tat behavior, refuse to forgive, show mercilessness, and engage in defamation through slander, shifting blame for unidentified tailoring errors onto others.

1. **Tit for Tat Behavior:** This behavior perpetuates negativity and escalates conflicts rather than resolving them. It fosters a culture of revenge and retaliation, leading to a breakdown of trust and cooperation among individuals and communities.

2. **Refusal to Forgive:** Forgiveness is a fundamental aspect of human relationships and societal harmony. When people refuse to forgive, they hold onto grudges and resentments, poisoning their own well-being and hindering opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

3. **Mercilessness:** Lack of mercy and compassion towards others reflects a disregard for human dignity and empathy. It can result in unjust treatment, cruelty, and the dehumanization of individuals, eroding the moral fabric of society.

4. **Defamation through Slander:** Engaging in slanderous behavior, especially when attributing unidentified errors to others maliciously, not only damages reputations but also contributes to a culture of falsehoods and deceit. It undermines trust, spreads misinformation, and can have severe consequences for individuals and communities.

By indulging in these destructive behaviors, individuals not only harm others but also diminish their own moral character and the overall quality of human interactions. Instead, fostering forgiveness, compassion, and honesty can contribute to a healthier and more harmonious society.

The worst deterioration of human quality occurs when individuals engage in a cycle of tit for tat behavior, refuse to forgive, show mercilessness, and engage in defamation through slander, shifting blame for unidentified tailoring errors onto others.

1. **Tit for Tat Behavior:** This behavior perpetuates negativity and escalates conflicts rather than resolving them. It fosters a culture of revenge and retaliation, leading to a breakdown of trust and cooperation among individuals and communities.

2. **Refusal to Forgive:** Forgiveness is a fundamental aspect of human relationships and societal harmony. When people refuse to forgive, they hold onto grudges and resentments, poisoning their own well-being and hindering opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

3. **Mercilessness:** Lack of mercy and compassion towards others reflects a disregard for human dignity and empathy. It can result in unjust treatment, cruelty, and the dehumanization of individuals, eroding the moral fabric of society.

4. **Defamation through Slander:** Engaging in slanderous behavior, especially when attributing unidentified errors to others maliciously, not only damages reputations but also contributes to a culture of falsehoods and deceit. It undermines trust, spreads misinformation, and can have severe consequences for individuals and communities.

By indulging in these destructive behaviors, individuals not only harm others but also diminish their own moral character and the overall quality of human interactions. Instead, fostering forgiveness, compassion, and honesty can contribute to a healthier and more harmonious society.

Each has his own niche while ringgit continues to burn- until education is reformed to produce quality thinking human beings who would stand together to brainstorm real world issues of AI-dominant hypermodern era.

Posted by BuyAndHold88888 > 4 hours ago | Report Abuse

Those racist politicians stayed in a safe seat especially in the places where their race are a majority whether it is Malays or Chinese.Middle of the road politicians can survived in Mixed seats

The worst deterioration of human quality occurs when individuals engage in a cycle of tit for tat behavior, refuse to forgive, show mercilessness, and engage in defamation through slander, shifting blame for unidentified tailoring errors onto others.

1. **Tit for Tat Behavior:** This behavior perpetuates negativity and escalates conflicts rather than resolving them. It fosters a culture of revenge and retaliation, leading to a breakdown of trust and cooperation among individuals and communities.

2. **Refusal to Forgive:** Forgiveness is a fundamental aspect of human relationships and societal harmony. When people refuse to forgive, they hold onto grudges and resentments, poisoning their own well-being and hindering opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

3. **Mercilessness:** Lack of mercy and compassion towards others reflects a disregard for human dignity and empathy. It can result in unjust treatment, cruelty, and the dehumanization of individuals, eroding the moral fabric of society.

4. **Defamation through Slander:** Engaging in slanderous behavior, especially when attributing unidentified errors to others maliciously, not only damages reputations but also contributes to a culture of falsehoods and deceit. It undermines trust, spreads misinformation, and can have severe consequences for individuals and communities.

By indulging in these destructive behaviors, individuals not only harm others but also diminish their own moral character and the overall quality of human interactions. Instead, fostering forgiveness, compassion, and honesty can contribute to a healthier and more harmonious society.

..... deteriorating human quality

The worst deterioration of human quality occurs when individuals engage in a cycle of tit for tat behavior, refuse to forgive, show mercilessness, and engage in defamation through slander, shifting blame for unidentified tailoring errors onto others.

1. **Tit for Tat Behavior:** This behavior perpetuates negativity and escalates conflicts rather than resolving them. It fosters a culture of revenge and retaliation, leading to a breakdown of trust and cooperation among individuals and communities.

2. **Refusal to Forgive:** Forgiveness is a fundamental aspect of human relationships and societal harmony. When people refuse to forgive, they hold onto grudges and resentments, poisoning their own well-being and hindering opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

3. **Mercilessness:** Lack of mercy and compassion towards others reflects a disregard for human dignity and empathy. It can result in unjust treatment, cruelty, and the dehumanization of individuals, eroding the moral fabric of society.

4. **Defamation through Slander:** Engaging in slanderous behavior, especially when attributing unidentified errors to others maliciously, not only damages reputations but also contributes to a culture of falsehoods and deceit. It undermines trust, spreads misinformation, and can have severe consequences for individuals and communities.

By indulging in these destructive behaviors, individuals not only harm others but also diminish their own moral character and the overall quality of human interactions. Instead, fostering forgiveness, compassion, and honesty can contribute to a healthier and more harmonious society.

Defamation occurs when someone’s words cause harm to another person’s reputation or livelihood. A statement must be presented as fact, not opinion, in order to be considered slander. The statement must be made to a third party.

Now everyone can fly!

He should be the PM!

A very sensitive community which easily get offended- and rather unforgiving

..........which easily get offended- and rather unforgiving

Now, Google will boikot displaying information on currency exchange rate for ringgit

Firdauswon's approach without addressing the mistakes directly with the shop manager in private for resolution. This juxtaposition implies that Firdauswon's actions are not constructive/noble but rather detrimental/ignoble, akin to setting fire to the business chain specifically and the whole community generally. This highlights the severity of the situation and the need for accountability whereby sandering involves damaging statements about someone and/or something.

The argument for legal action centers on holding Firdauswon and gang accountable for their actions, which have allegedly caused financial losses and goodwill deficit to KKakakamart.

Little does that shallow-minded paper mill Cock Seong know, integration isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. In certain scenarios, segregation and avoidance can serve as proactive shields against slander and provocation in hypersensitive communities. It's not about exclusion but about protecting oneself amidst societal turbulence.

"bankrupt of idea" will be reflected by weakening of currency, increasing country debt and deteriorating human quality

Vernacular schools as sanctuary for the minority

Fostering unity in a diverse classroom requires embracing and celebrating differences rather than categorizing and dividing based on parental backgrounds. By promoting inclusivity, empathy, and open-mindedness, educators can create a more harmonious and supportive learning environment where all children feel valued and accepted regardless of their parents' religious beliefs. This approach not only promotes unity but also cultivates a culture of respect, understanding, and cooperation among students from diverse backgrounds.

Vernacular schools as sanctuary for the minority

labeling based on parents' religion can contribute to discrimination and prejudice. Children may face unfair treatment or exclusion based on stereotypes associated with their labeled group, leading to feelings of alienation and isolation. This can negatively impact their social and emotional well-being, impeding their overall development and integration within the classroom community.

Such labeling reinforces social divisions and hierarchies within the classroom. It can lead to cliques based on religious identities, where children may feel pressure to conform to certain norms or beliefs associated with their labeled group. This not only limits their freedom of expression but also inhibits the exchange of diverse perspectives and ideas among students.

Half-baked cock seong fails to understand and point out that labeling children based on their parents' religion can lead to division and exclusion within a diverse classroom. When a child is categorized solely based on their parents' religious beliefs, it can create barriers to understanding and acceptance among classmates from different backgrounds. This labeling can perpetuate stereotypes, hinder genuine interactions, and promote a sense of "us versus them" mentality.

Little does that shallow minded paper mill cock seong know that while integration has its merits, there are situations where segregation and avoidance may be seen as proactive measures for self-defense against slander and provocation in a hypersensitive community.



EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 13 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Protection of young children who tend to slip tongue when criticising beliefs (vernacular schools as sanctuary - safer place to make mistakes)

**Protection of Safety and Security:** In highly sensitive environments where tensions run high, segregating or avoiding certain interactions can be a way to protect individuals and communities from potential harm or conflict. It can prevent volatile situations from escalating.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 12 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Peaceful neighbourhood

**Preservation of Peace:** Segregation and avoidance can contribute to maintaining peace and stability within a community by minimizing contentious interactions that could lead to misunderstandings or confrontations.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 11 minutes ago | Report Abuse

All done for a noble reason

**Respect for Boundaries:** Respecting the boundaries and preferences of individuals and communities is crucial for fostering trust and avoiding unnecessary friction. Segregation and avoidance can be seen as a form of respecting these boundaries.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 8 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Suntze's art of war: To retreat by segregation is to advance harmonious agenda

**Focus on Positive Interactions:** Segregation and avoidance can redirect focus towards positive interactions and collaborations within the community, fostering a more harmonious environment where mutual respect and understanding can flourish.


EngineeringProfit

17,089 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 6 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Minimize unintentional friction and unnecessary confrontation: one man's medicine can be another man's poison

**Minimization of Provocation:** By avoiding situations that are known to provoke negative reactions or slander, individuals can protect themselves and others from unwarranted attacks or misunderstandings.

Minimize unintentional friction and unnecessary confrontation: one man's medicine can be another man's poison

**Minimization of Provocation:** By avoiding situations that are known to provoke negative reactions or slander, individuals can protect themselves and others from unwarranted attacks or misunderstandings.

Suntze's art of war: To retreat by segregation is to advance harmonious agenda

**Focus on Positive Interactions:** Segregation and avoidance can redirect focus towards positive interactions and collaborations within the community, fostering a more harmonious environment where mutual respect and understanding can flourish.

All done for a noble reason

**Respect for Boundaries:** Respecting the boundaries and preferences of individuals and communities is crucial for fostering trust and avoiding unnecessary friction. Segregation and avoidance can be seen as a form of respecting these boundaries.

Peaceful neighbourhood

**Preservation of Peace:** Segregation and avoidance can contribute to maintaining peace and stability within a community by minimizing contentious interactions that could lead to misunderstandings or confrontations.

Protection of young children who tend to slip tongue when criticising beliefs (vernacular schools as sanctuary - safer place to make mistakes)

**Protection of Safety and Security:** In highly sensitive environments where tensions run high, segregating or avoiding certain interactions can be a way to protect individuals and communities from potential harm or conflict. It can prevent volatile situations from escalating.

Unfortunately, in the context of cheap politicking, human errors are often exaggerated, leading to a vicious cycle of inflamed emotions within an intolerant and unforgiving community. This environment blurs the distinction between truth and manipulation, creating a dangerous dance of rhetoric, slander and deceit. As individuals or groups seek to advance their agendas, they resort to twisting facts, distorting reality, and exploiting vulnerabilities in public perception. This manipulative behavior has further polarized society, eroded trust in institutions, and undermined the pursuit of constructive dialogue and genuine understanding.

Posted by Sslee > 3 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Chinese just want to build a better life in this lifetime for himself, his family, his communities, his rightminded comrades and this country he call home.

Filling and reclamation can significantly expand living space to the sea, allowing for the development of new coastal cities, industrial zones, recreational areas, and infrastructure projects. However, these projects must be carefully planned, executed, and managed to balance human needs with environmental conservation and sustainability.

While no society is entirely free from racism or prejudice, these factors contribute to the argument that Chinese people, as a whole, tend to exhibit the least racism compared to many other societies:

1. **Education and Awareness:** Chinese education emphasizes the value of harmony, cooperation, and understanding among different ethnic groups. Schools promote cultural awareness and teach students about the importance of respecting diversity.

2. **Social Cohesion:** Chinese society places a strong emphasis on social harmony and unity. This collective mindset discourages divisive attitudes based on race or ethnicity, promoting a more inclusive and harmonious environment.

3. **Historical Perspective:** Chinese culture has a long history of tolerance and inclusivity. Throughout history, China has absorbed various ethnic groups and cultural influences, fostering a more inclusive worldview.

The impoverished collective mindset and low quality of the majority in any nation serve as barriers preventing it from ascending to the ranks of the world's wealthiest

Never will. The impoverished collective mindset and low quality of the majority in any nation would serve as barriers preventing it from ascending to the ranks of the world's wealthiest

Then just get a red QR only lah

Posted by UlarSawa > 1 minute ago | Report Abuse

YTLP debt almost 31.5bil leh. Every qtr now paying 456mil to interest payment alone leh. One year pun mau bayar at least 1.8bil interest leh. Alot leh. If anything goes wrong...

Danger is real

#luckilytailorswiftnothere

Case analyses:

The incident = a silly mistake?

The real culprits = one particular tailor? Innocent or with bad intention?

Sleeping on the job supervisor or store manager?

Ignoble whistleblowers, immature batu API and opportunistic gaslighters?

Victims = a long list from outlet workers to followers, 9999speedymart to factory staff,......

In a realm akin to Lincoln's ideal, where rules shield the vulnerable from mob tyranny, upheld by the virtuous, free of slander and political agendas, companies should embrace the kkakaka and 999speedymart ethos, ensuring utmost care for workers' well-being and livelihoods.

Kkakaka finds himself caught in a whirlwind of misfortune, bearing the weight of the animosity sparked by recent controversies in vernacular schools and the challenges faced with BKT listings. It's like the final blow for those harboring envy and resentment, making his situation all the more daunting.

Posted by DickyMe > 3 minutes ago | Report Abuse

When companies are targeted, there are more details to that.
Some groups may have reached out for donation or employment for a particular community. When not satisfied, they start a smear campaign using authorities and hence urge boycott.
This is a modus operandi, long employed by mostly religious groups.
It is an extortion.

Unfortunately, the outcry from goons isn't loud enough to boycott sponsoring too many unworthy foreign medical schools or to shut down public fund-wasting local paper mills.

Unfortunately, the outcry from goons isn't loud enough to boycott sponsoring too many unworthy foreign medical schools or to shut down public fund-wasting local paper mills.

Next boikot ideas: Individuals in apanama and pandorex papers who have channelled out national wealth and laundered sin $$$$$$$

While addressing grievances is important, it should be done through fair and proportionate means that uphold justice, respect human rights, and promote long-term solutions rather than punitive measures that exacerbate problems. Due consideration must be given to:

Economic Impact: Revoking the factory license not only affects the supplier but also has ripple effects on employees, their families, and the local economy. It leads to job losses, financial instability, and potential social hardships.

Lack of Due Process: The sudden revocation of a license without proper investigation or legal procedures undermines the principles of due process and procedural justice. It denies the affected party the opportunity to defend themselves or seek recourse through legal channels.

Potential for Retaliation: Such harsh actions can breed resentment and retaliation, creating a cycle of conflict and hostility instead of promoting understanding, reconciliation, and constructive dialogue.

Humanitarian Considerations: Consideration should be given to the human impact of these decisions, ensuring that punitive measures are proportionate, fair, and respectful of human dignity.

What???? Let"s wait for the soon-to-be public listed 99Speedy Mart steps up to sue for damages. The gang and goons must pay a hefty compensation for their unforgivable error of staging a boycott in front of their outlets, jeopardizing the prospects of their sales and compromising their billion-dollar goodwill.

There is a disparity in how the government handles legal matters related to online conduct. It suggests that while the government is quick to use vague legal provisions to target individuals for their social media comments, it is less proactive in addressing more serious offenses by groups that engage in threatening behavior and disclose private information.

This situation raises concerns about the impartiality of justice and the potential influence of public outcry or pressure on law enforcement actions. It implies that the enforcement of laws is not based solely on the severity of the offense or the principles of justice but can be swayed by external factors such as public attention or the vocal nature of certain groups.

In essence, the statement criticizes the government for its apparent prioritization of minor infractions over more significant breaches of privacy and safety, leading to a perception of selective enforcement and a lack of consistent application of the law.

Exactly. And now clearly the strongest message is mob rule rules!

There is a disparity in how the government handles legal matters related to online conduct. It suggests that while the government is quick to use vague legal provisions to target individuals for their social media comments, it is less proactive in addressing more serious offenses by groups that engage in threatening behavior and disclose private information.

This situation raises concerns about the impartiality of justice and the potential influence of public outcry or pressure on law enforcement actions. It implies that the enforcement of laws is not based solely on the severity of the offense or the principles of justice but can be swayed by external factors such as public attention or the vocal nature of certain groups.

In essence, the statement criticizes the government for its apparent prioritization of minor infractions over more significant breaches of privacy and safety, leading to a perception of selective enforcement and a lack of consistent application of the law.