Encourage a Knowledge-Based Economy: Encourage Malaysians to shift from valuing consumption toward valuing knowledge, creativity, and entrepreneurship; as well as differentiating facts from delusions and falsehood.

In the AI era, settling for the "lesser evil" in politics is no longer viable. AI-driven accountability and transparency demand optimal performance from leaders. Politicians must meet these high standards or risk being replaced by AI systems, which offer greater efficiency, transparency, and corruption-free governance.

In order for democracy to truly function as a system *of the people, for the people, and by the people*, active and continuous civic engagement is crucial. Elections are only one part of the democratic process; the real work begins afterward, when elected officials assume power. If citizens disengage once the election results are in, they risk allowing their representatives to drift away from the core mission of serving the public good. Democracy is meant to empower citizens, but this empowerment does not end at the ballot box. Without accountability, politicians may become complacent, prioritizing personal ambitions, indulging in globe-trotting diplomatic tours, or focusing on matters detached from the everyday needs of their constituents.

Where he has made incorrect or inflammatory statements, failing to issue a proper apology or retraction shows a lack of emotional maturity. A leader worthy of the youth’s respect would acknowledge mistakes, offer sincere apologies, and work to rebuild trust. Without this, young people may be misled into believing that arrogance and stubbornness are acceptable traits in leadership.

In order for democracy to truly function as a system *of the people, for the people, and by the people*, active and continuous civic engagement is crucial. Elections are only one part of the democratic process; the real work begins afterward, when elected officials assume power. If citizens disengage once the election results are in, they risk allowing their representatives to drift away from the core mission of serving the public good. Democracy is meant to empower citizens, but this empowerment does not end at the ballot box. Without accountability, politicians may become complacent, prioritizing personal ambitions, indulging in globe-trotting diplomatic tours, or focusing on matters detached from the everyday needs of their constituents.

In order for democracy to truly function as a system *of the people, for the people, and by the people*, active and continuous civic engagement is crucial. Elections are only one part of the democratic process; the real work begins afterward, when elected officials assume power. If citizens disengage once the election results are in, they risk allowing their representatives to drift away from the core mission of serving the public good.

Democracy is meant to empower citizens, but this empowerment does not end at the ballot box. Without accountability, politicians may become complacent, prioritizing personal ambitions, indulging in globe-trotting diplomatic tours, or focusing on matters detached from the everyday needs of their constituents. When voters keep a vigilant eye on their elected leaders, it ensures that they remain focused on their roles as *servant leaders*—leaders who serve the interests of the people who put them in power, rather than pursuing self-serving agendas or unnecessary external engagements.

Furthermore, public scrutiny and ongoing involvement act as a check against corruption, mismanagement, and policy inertia. It reinforces that elected officials are employees of the people, hired through elections to manage and govern effectively. If voters disengage after the election, politicians may drift toward elitism or authoritarianism, losing the sense of responsibility that comes with serving a democratic society.

To sustain democracy, therefore, the people must remain actively involved—questioning, protesting, and holding politicians to account. This engagement ensures that government works *for the people*, and it transforms democracy into a dynamic system where elected officials remain on their toes, consistently striving to meet the needs of the nation rather than pursuing detached, unaccountable interests.

Indoctrination, particularly when it is rigid and extreme, can significantly affect cognitive development, especially during formative years when the brain is most plastic and vulnerable. The prefrontal cortex (PFC), responsible for higher-order functions like critical thinking, decision-making, problem-solving, and regulating emotions, matures gradually and is susceptible to environmental influence. When indoctrination dominates an individual's environment, it stifles the development of these essential functions, resulting in underdevelopment of the PFC.

The deep-seated dogma, resistance to critical thinking, and social isolation can stifle their intellectual and emotional growth, making it harder for them to engage with the broader, more inclusive, and scientifically grounded understanding of the world. Overcoming these barriers requires a supportive environment that encourages open-mindedness, curiosity, and intellectual humility.

Pakatan Harapan's Disconnect with Its Moderate Base: The Pakatan Harapan (PH) government, once seen as a champion of a pluralistic and united Malaysia, has seemingly alienated its moderate base, comprised of Malaysians who prioritize national unity over ethnic and religious divides. Instead of enacting the reforms promised during their campaign, PH often capitulated to conservative ethno-religious pressures, sidelining progressive policies and failing to challenge entrenched race-based systems. Their inability to deliver on institutional reforms and their reliance on cautious, appeasement politics left many of their core supporters disillusioned. This disconnect became evident in subsequent elections, where PH’s failure to uphold a Malaysia-first vision eroded the trust of urban, middle-class voters who had hoped for meaningful change. Ultimately, PH’s perceived abandonment of its core principles in favor of political survival has cost them the broad, multi-ethnic support that once brought them to power.

Imagine being on a class where a fellow pupil has started mocking another pupil because of their race. What would you do?

Such questions take us into the province of moral psychology. They concern moral judgment, reasoning and development. We should interested not only in what is the right thing to do – but also how it is that we can come to do the right thing.

Embracing Scientific Knowledge Is The Only Path To Progress And Prosper: No rocket science- the path to escaping poverty lies in rejecting those who falsely claim to defend faith while in reality defending systems of exploitation. Only by doing so, societies can embrace progress, equity, and prosperity, ensuring a better future for all.

The Wake-Up Call For The Poor: The poor and hand-out dependent commoners must realize that their plight is not a result of divine will but of structural injustices that must be addressed. They must ask themselves: "Are we merely supporting a system or group of elite people of power that benefits themselves at the expense of us (the poor)?"

It is immoral to spend borrowed money unaccountably.

Borrowing money to fund non-productive initiatives like moral policing increases national debt without producing tangible returns. This leads to long-term financial instability and dependence on foreign aid. Instead of moral policing, governments should prioritize education reforms that prepare their populations for the future—leveraging borrowed funds for building infrastructure, enhancing human capital, and fostering innovation ecosystems. Redirecting borrowed funds towards the productive sectors of the economy is key to escaping the cycle of poverty and underdevelopment.

Operating paying patient services in public hospitals fundamentally undermines their core mission of providing equitable healthcare. It creates a two-tier system where wealthier patients may receive faster or better treatment, exacerbating inequality and eroding trust in the public healthcare system. The diversion of limited resources—such as staff, equipment, and time—toward paying patients risks compromising care for non-paying patients, leading to potential unfair prioritization. Additionally, the financial incentives associated with paying patients can distort medical decision-making, introducing a conflict of interest. Public hospitals are founded on the principle of healthcare as a public good, accessible to all based on need, not wealth. Offering paid services contradicts this principle, shifting healthcare from a fundamental right to a commodified service. In essence, it is philosophically and ethically wrong for public hospitals to operate such services, as it compromises fairness, equity, and the integrity of the healthcare system.

Renewable Energy Leadership: By 2074, Sarawak’s mastery of clean energy, particularly fusion power, would allow it to generate enough energy to supply local and regional needs. Globally, its innovations in energy storage and distribution could inspire other nations to adopt similar practices. Sarawak could pioneer large-scale, efficient, and environmentally responsible energy grids, advancing global cooperation in energy-sharing agreements, propelling humanity toward Type 1 status.

The Wake-Up Call: Seeing Through the Facade

The poor and hand-out dependent commoners must realize that their plight is not a result of divine will but of structural injustices that must be addressed. They must ask themselve: "Are we merely supporting a system or group of elite people of power that benefits themselves at the expense of us (the poor)?"

In the 21st Century Childhood Indoctrination With Falsehood Is The Main Cause Of Cognitive Dissonance and Intellectual Confusion: Heavily indoctrinated children are often taught rigid dogmatic views that contradict well-established scientific knowledge, such as evolution or the idea of a common ancestry. When exposed to universalist ideas that emphasize the interconnectedness of humanity or scientific concepts that suggest all life shares a common origin, they may experience cognitive dissonance. This internal conflict can lead to confusion, anxiety, and a resistance to accept new perspectives, as their core beliefs may feel threatened.

Making sugar *haram* in Malaysia would be a bold move, but it is a necessary one considering the public health crisis the country faces. By framing the issue within the context of Islamic principles—such as the protection of life, moderation, and the prevention of harm—this argument suggests that it is not only rational but morally and religiously justified to regulate or even forbid sugar. Malaysia, as a country with a significant Muslim population, has the opportunity to lead the way in setting an example for how Islamic law can be applied to modern public health challenges.

Malaysia faces a growing epidemic of obesity and diabetes, with sugar being a major contributor. According to statistics, Malaysia has one of the highest rates of diabetes in Asia, largely driven by the overconsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods. Obesity, in turn, increases the risk of other metabolic diseases, including cardiovascular problems, hypertension, polycystic ovary and even certain cancers.

VETO POWER: Sarawak MUST be granted veto power to block any unilateral constitutional amendments by Peninsular Malaysia.

Yes, how they produce the $.....Printing, right? You want banana notes kah? Pas only sweet talk and make believe untuk orang kampung saja lah

No need. Not him. Those who disown their ancestral roots have already distanced themselves from the values and legacy of their forebears, may indeed feel little to no discomfort in shame or such a loss.

He lost all his 150 bets.....cannot take back money......and pejuang terus bungkus pula. Anyone should listen to him? Believable?

Sarawak provides a superior model for interracial integration and harmony compared to Peninsular Malaysia due to its deep-rooted cultural diversity, inclusive governance, and strong intercommunal relationships. Ethnic groups in Sarawak have historically coexisted with mutual respect and less racial division, supported by policies focused on equitable development rather than race-based preferences. The state also enjoys remarkable religious tolerance, with families often practicing different faiths. Power-sharing in government and communal living traditions further reinforce social cohesion. Unlike the Peninsular, where segregation in education and urban living contributes to ethnic tension, Sarawak’s integrated schools and communities foster early intercultural interactions, building long-lasting harmony. Sarawak exemplifies a more organic and sustainable model of national unity.

Sarawak provides a superior model for interracial integration and harmony compared to Peninsular Malaysia due to its deep-rooted cultural diversity, inclusive governance, and strong intercommunal relationships. Ethnic groups in Sarawak have historically coexisted with mutual respect and less racial division, supported by policies focused on equitable development rather than race-based preferences. The state also enjoys remarkable religious tolerance, with families often practicing different faiths. Power-sharing in government and communal living traditions further reinforce social cohesion. Unlike the Peninsular, where segregation in education and urban living contributes to ethnic tension, Sarawak’s integrated schools and communities foster early intercultural interactions, building long-lasting harmony. Sarawak exemplifies a more organic and sustainable model of national unity.

Let Sarawak lead the way toward transitioning Earth to a Type 1 civilization on the Kardashev scale by pioneering renewable energy solutions and environmental stewardship.

Jakim was established in 1997 to oversee Islamic affairs, but its influence is generally limited to Peninsular Malaysia. There has been growing concern, however, over the years that the federal government’s centralization efforts, including Jakim's activities, may infringe upon the autonomy of Sarawak in religious and cultural matters.

Unity Minister: From rightful KPI of -50% to potentially +100%

Stop makan gaji buta. Diversity is both our strength and its vulnerability. Prioritizing interracial relationships by mandating that the Unity Ministry reviews all proposals, initiatives, and legal drafts before public discussion or cabinet deliberation is a proactive approach to ensuring national unity. It will help build a more integrated, peaceful, and prosperous Malaysia, where all races work together towards common goals.

SARAWAK IS GEARING FORWARD (LEAVING PENINSULAR BEHIND) WITH GOVERNANCE PAR EXCELLENCE: Fundamentalism in politics creates environments where religious dogma dominates public life, curtails freedoms, fosters division, and often leads to undemocratic governance. The blending of fundamentalist ideology with political power challenges modern principles of equality, justice, and rational governance.

Fostering Mutual Respect through Food: Food has always been a powerful medium for bringing people together. By creating spaces where all Malaysians can dine together without concerns about exclusion based on religious or spiritual dietary restrictions, JAKSIM-certified eateries could help bridge cultural divides and encourage mutual respect through shared meals.

My granddaughter in USA has been in that field over 20 years- you'll see (better believe it)

jakimm stagnation vs JAKSIM progress

Sarawak JAKSIM-funded Energy Masterplan: By 2074, Sarawak’s mastery of clean energy, particularly fusion power, would allow it to generate enough energy to supply local and regional needs. Globally, its innovations in energy storage and distribution could inspire other nations to adopt similar practices. Sarawak could pioneer large-scale, efficient, and environmentally responsible energy grids, advancing global cooperation in energy-sharing agreements, propelling humanity toward Type 1 status.

Unlike the alternative that is gearing all out to tear our oredi fragile social fabric apart, our certification will foster unity like a glue- to progress towards attaining type 1 civilization

JAKSIM will get about 2 billion dollar every year- ho wmuch over 50 years.....hehe

Sarawak JAKSIM-funded Energy Masterplan: By 2074, Sarawak’s mastery of clean energy, particularly fusion power, would allow it to generate enough energy to supply local and regional needs. Globally, its innovations in energy storage and distribution could inspire other nations to adopt similar practices. Sarawak could pioneer large-scale, efficient, and environmentally responsible energy grids, advancing global cooperation in energy-sharing agreements, propelling humanity toward Type 1 status.

WE Sarawak will catch up in 50 years. But we need equal amount given to jakimm- about 2 billion dollar every year- for the next 50 years. With proper use of our special JAKSIM allocation, we can do it!

Posted by Balian de Ibelin > 13 minutes ago | Report Abuse

UK => 2030 fusion reactor completed
US => early 2030s fusion reactor completed
China => 2035 fusion reactor completed.

Next: (You'd better believe it) Sarawak as a Global Pioneer!!

Posted by Balian de Ibelin > 1 minute ago | Report Abuse

by 2035 Sarawak will go bankrupt

=> reason is due to mass construction of hundreds of thousands fusion reactors globally will make even Sarawak.......................

Reducing Inequality, Eradicate Poverty and Promoting Sustainability faster than peninsular: Alongside STEM education, Sarawak would invest in social reforms that reduce economic disparity, such as free or affordable education, healthcare, and access to renewable energy sources for all communities. By 2074, Sarawak could be a model of equitable development where resources are managed sustainably, and all citizens benefit from technological advancements. Its approach to reducing inequality would serve as a global template for balancing progress with fairness, helping to create a more unified world.

Global Unity and Ethical Transformation: With State autonomy in education, we can commit to education reforms that emphasize cooperation, ethical resource management, and social equity. Schools would teach the importance of global cooperation and shared responsibility in facing environmental and technological challenges. Sarawak’s education system could produce globally-minded citizens who contribute to international efforts in combating climate change, energy inequality, and poverty. Through collaborations with other nations and institutions, Sarawak could lead by example in showing how ethical governance, equitable resource management, and environmental consciousness can create sustainable prosperity.

Technological Innovations: AI, Space Exploration, and Smart Cities: Begin integrating AI and automation into education and daily life. Sarawak could adopt AI to manage energy consumption, optimize agricultural yields, and plan urban development. Space sciences would become part of school curricula, preparing students for careers in space exploration and research. By 2074, Sarawak could be a global hub for AI innovation, with AI-driven smart cities that are highly efficient in managing resources, transportation, and energy. Additionally, Sarawak could play a significant role in space exploration, with satellites and space research programs contributing to global knowledge of space colonization and energy harvesting from space. These technological advancements would also help drive humanity toward global unity, reducing competition over resources and focusing on collective survival.

Fusion and Energy Storage Mastery: Thanks to federal provision of billion dollars for JAKSIM, Sarawak can invest heavily in research and development of fusion technology and advanced energy storage systems. Education systems would prioritize engineering, quantum physics, and energy-related fields, with a particular emphasis on practical applications. By 2074, Sarawak could be at the forefront of fusion energy commercialization. Mastery of fusion power could allow the state to create virtually limitless clean energy, greatly reducing reliance on fossil fuels and curbing global warming. This energy surplus could catalyze advancements in other sectors such as space exploration, AI, and smart city infrastructure, contributing to humanity's journey toward becoming a Type 1 civilization.

Environmental Stewardship and Climate Change Mitigation: By embedding environmental ethics in its education system, Sarawak could train future leaders in eco-friendly urban design, conservation biology, and sustainable agriculture. Initiatives such as reforestation, biodiversity preservation, and carbon capture could be key focus areas. Sarawak could be globally recognized as a biodiversity and sustainability hub by 2074, contributing significantly to global carbon reduction goals. With vast forests and rich ecosystems, Sarawak could become a living model of balancing human progress with environmental preservation, influencing global climate policies and practices.

Renewable Energy Leadership: By 2074, Sarawak’s mastery of clean energy, particularly fusion power, would allow it to generate enough energy to supply local and regional needs. Globally, its innovations in energy storage and distribution could inspire other nations to adopt similar practices. Sarawak could pioneer large-scale, efficient, and environmentally responsible energy grids, advancing global cooperation in energy-sharing agreements, propelling humanity toward Type 1 status.

To delearn & relearn: A good start in their reprogramming would be to teach these children the scientific truth about shared human ancestry, genetics, and the common struggles and triumphs of humanity. Education based on truth can dismantle harmful ideologies, foster genuine empathy, and promote unity by helping children understand that they are part of a global human family, bound by shared DNA, history, and destiny. This is the path toward greater compassion, understanding, and lasting peace.

The Urgent Need for Education Reform

Restoring Personal Responsibility: To counter this manipulation, there must be a clear separation of religious and political power. Secular governance ensures that individuals are held accountable for their actions without hiding behind religious justifications for irresponsible or harmful behavior.

Promoting Genuine Morality: By keeping faith separate from political authority, religious teachings can focus on promoting genuine moral responsibility—values like accountability, care for the vulnerable, and personal integrity. This helps prevent the exploitation of faith for personal or societal gain.

When the mind is controlled by wolves in sheep’s clothing—exploitative leaders who manipulate faith for their own ends—almost any behavior can be justified, no matter how harmful or irresponsible. This manipulation can lead to a society where personal accountability is eroded, and irresponsibility, like fathering 34 children without providing for them, is excused through twisted religious justifications. The separation of power and religion is crucial to prevent such moral decay and to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions, with faith serving as a source of genuine moral guidance, not a tool for manipulation.

The Consequences of Moral Manipulation

Cultural Acceptance of Irresponsibility: When exploitative religious rhetoric justifies irresponsibility, it can normalize these behaviors in society. People begin to accept such actions as part of the social fabric, no longer questioning the harm done to others, particularly those who are vulnerable.

The Erosion of Social Responsibility

Undermining Personal Accountability: When religion is used as a political tool, it can erode the value of personal responsibility. Individuals may be led to believe that their actions are not their own to control, and that they are merely fulfilling a "divine" plan. This can lead to moral passivity, where they ignore the real-world implications of their behavior on others.

Excusing Irresponsible Behavior: In this manipulated mindset, individuals may absolve themselves of the duty to provide for their families or communities, believing that religious adherence or faith alone is sufficient. The neglect of practical responsibilities, like providing for children or nurturing them, can be excused by claiming that these tasks fall outside of their divine obligations.

Irresponsibility Framed as Righteousness

Twisting Morality: When religious teachings are co-opted by exploitative leaders, they can be twisted to justify any behavior, even those that are deeply harmful. For example, a man who fathers 34 children without providing for their well-being could justify his actions by claiming that "God will provide" or that his role is solely to reproduce without the need for active parental responsibility.

Avoiding Consequences: The manipulated mind may genuinely believe that their actions are excusable, leading to a cycle of irresponsibility that causes harm to the most vulnerable—like children in this case—without facing societal consequences or moral self-reflection.

The Role of Manipulative Authority

Shifting Accountability: In this manipulated mindset, personal accountability is often sidelined. Religious or ideological rhetoric may paint irresponsibility as an act of faith or submission to higher powers, leading people to avoid responsibility for the consequences of their actions.