1. Protect capital and avoid permanent loss is critical, but this has nothing to do with volatility of the market, as long fundamental remain intact, selling is foolish, unless you found another opportunity than provide lower downside and bigger upside.
2. In the history of sharemarket, the biggest gain and losses normally happens right next to each other, in lumps, meanings the biggest gains are followed by biggest drops. Assume you stay on the sideline during the bear market, and wait until everything clears up, your portfolio return will be way behind the market in the long run. Unless you think you have the best market timing, and i think everyone thinks that they do lol.
3. Looking back the mirror is always easy, you would have convince yourself that had you bought Citigroup stock at $1 at the peak of GFC you would have made 5000% return as of today. But putting yourself at the peak of GFC, when US banks are falling left and right and lehman brothers are collapsing, do you think you would have the balls to buy Citigroup at $1?
4. Cut loss is only possible during the normal market situation, it is like trying to rescue fire because you didn't properly do your homework. Cut loss is possible when there are 'buyers' liquidity', when someone is willing to take the other side of trade. During the height of market panic, who is going to take the other side of your trade, you will cut your loss but at double digits.
Hi JT yeo , good explanation for the cut loss theory . i suggest to buy more if a good fundamental stock is falling down like there is no tomorrow. but the concern is you have to prepare some extra cash for this situation . i believe most of us will use all the cash especially during the bull market .
FF has resumed dumping shares on 2nd Sep 15. FF's stakes in KLSE remains more than RM 10.7 billion. This year alone FF has disposed over RM 16 billion worth of shares. Slim chance in generating capital gain given the current weak sentiments. Capital preservation is more important. I'm applying 80/20 rule.
Some still stayed fully invested since 2010, some even before 2000! The question is always whether ordinary investors should stay fully invested at all times for the long term, or try to time major market peaks and troughs.
Good luck everybody, happy and prosperous investing/trading.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
JT Yeo
1,637 posts
Posted by JT Yeo > 2015-09-05 21:29 | Report Abuse
1. Protect capital and avoid permanent loss is critical, but this has nothing to do with volatility of the market, as long fundamental remain intact, selling is foolish, unless you found another opportunity than provide lower downside and bigger upside.
2. In the history of sharemarket, the biggest gain and losses normally happens right next to each other, in lumps, meanings the biggest gains are followed by biggest drops. Assume you stay on the sideline during the bear market, and wait until everything clears up, your portfolio return will be way behind the market in the long run. Unless you think you have the best market timing, and i think everyone thinks that they do lol.
3. Looking back the mirror is always easy, you would have convince yourself that had you bought Citigroup stock at $1 at the peak of GFC you would have made 5000% return as of today. But putting yourself at the peak of GFC, when US banks are falling left and right and lehman brothers are collapsing, do you think you would have the balls to buy Citigroup at $1?
4. Cut loss is only possible during the normal market situation, it is like trying to rescue fire because you didn't properly do your homework. Cut loss is possible when there are 'buyers' liquidity', when someone is willing to take the other side of trade. During the height of market panic, who is going to take the other side of your trade, you will cut your loss but at double digits.