Posted by shinado > 2015-11-29 01:51 | Report Abuse
On another note, stock screeners usually have limited data that you can extract. But it also depends on what criteria you look for.
Some noteable criteria that most stock screener are lacking:
1. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
2. Free Cash Flow (FCF)
3. Return on Asset (ROA)
4. Cash Return on Invested Capital (CROIC)
5. Earnings Before Interest & Taxes over Enterprise Value (EBIT/EV)
6. Profit Margins (Gross profit, net profit etc)
7. Other financial ratios such as debt ratio, current ratio, dividend payout ratio etc
You may or may not use these for selection criteria but ultimately it depends on what you are really looking for. I think you have a good start.
No result.
1
3
4
save malaysia!
Visa-free travel to China extended for Malaysians to 30 days
5
6
7
Good Articles to Share
8
Good Articles to Share
Four convicted in Spain over homophobic murder that sparked nationwode protests
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
shinado
413 posts
Posted by shinado > 2015-11-29 01:26 | Report Abuse
I like how you try to develop a point system for your stock selection. It's interesting. But I must say, sometimes for NTA/price it makes no sense.
For example, take Nestle.
Last Q report shows that NTA is at RM3.45. Trading price is RM73.60. But does it make it a bad stock? Not really. And it can be the other way round too. Some companies have high NTA/price, but fundamentally it's a bad stock.
I don't know how you intend to make changes for it. But from my point of view, the stocks you have selected based on this system are mostly good stocks. Congrats!