Be the first to like this.

10 comment(s). Last comment by Adi_Investor 2017-05-16 10:53

supersaiyan3

3,137 posts

Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2017-05-13 20:50 | Report Abuse

還是那句話,你試試開一個檔口,賣炒粿條,如果你能賺錢的話,你就了解什麼叫做實業。

來,試試生產一點東西,哪怕是一顆糖果、一碟炒麵,做一個有用的人!

supersaiyan3

3,137 posts

Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2017-05-13 20:52 | Report Abuse

街邊的賣菜婆都知道,人要吃飯,喝水,穿衣,住房,賴以生存。也許你不一樣,抱著黃金就可以存活。

特種豬!呵呵

supersaiyan3

3,137 posts

Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2017-05-13 21:04 | Report Abuse

真的,有時候去網上測試一下你的IQ,試試看,別怕,哦!

【当然,那些有车有房以及拥有其他资产的美国人们往往为了买这些负债累累,这也是事实。然而,如果一个美国人违约,他或者她的资产并不会消失或者丧失其可用性。通常,所有权会转给借贷机构,之后该机构再转卖一个美国人买家。我们国家的财富仍然完好无损。正如格特鲁德-斯泰因指出得那样,“钱总在那里,只是装钱的口袋不断变化”】。

至於這段話,巴菲特的意思是,東西是東西,錢是錢。錢轉來轉去,擁有權換來換去,東西卻不會消失。真正有用處的財富是東西,不是金錢。你誤解了「我们国家的财富仍然完好无损」這句話的意思,巴菲特的意思並不是違約了可以賴皮,而是東西是不會消失的。

最起碼你要了解他的意思才能夠批評吧。其實他已經說得非常明確了。

supersaiyan3

3,137 posts

Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2017-05-13 21:07 | Report Abuse

你有良知?荒謬。

要有良知,首先要明辯是非,錯了要認錯。你是非曲直都分不清楚,整天惡意誹謗別人,抬高自己(雖然這方面你是完敗的),好自為之吧!

Sky Soo

331 posts

Posted by Sky Soo > 2017-05-14 09:37 | Report Abuse

An idiot trying to denounce the world greatest investment billionaire. You are absolutely not qualified. Only out of jealousy and ignorant.

supersaiyan3

3,137 posts

Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2017-05-14 10:36 | Report Abuse

唐吉訶德

popo92

578 posts

Posted by popo92 > 2017-05-14 20:13 | Report Abuse

warren buffet simply do not like fixed assets who don't generate income like commodities, there's huge differences when an asset can keep generate income for you vs commodities who don't generate income at all. In among assets which generate income, stocks equity come to the first place for him because of the growth potential, unlike bonds. Do you have any ideas how the power of compounding power can be? If one prefer something, let him be. You can stick with your preferable investment like commodities, but don't accuse people out of the air. He has already proven very much in his age what he is doing is right, no need conspiracy and trick & fool people in order to make himself rich.

Posted by Adi_Investor > 2017-05-14 21:29 | Report Abuse

选前反对某人并骂对方,
但对方当选后态度一百八十度转变。
这是什么品性?

sherlock

311 posts

Posted by sherlock > 2017-05-14 23:13 | Report Abuse

这叫"接受民主选举结果”,这也是美国一直以来的选举传统,当年奥巴马和希拉里竞争总统候选人时,也是互相攻击,后来奥巴马还不是让希拉里出任国务卿?难道不喜欢新总统,就该一直骂,一直骂,想尽办法扯对方后腿,把波夏克的投资统统卖光,让美国股市暴跌,祸国殃民,才是理想的品性?就你这么狭义的眼光,还敢出来教人理财和投资?你知道什么是真正的民主吗?

试问,是巴菲特品性有问题,还是你的品性有问题?

Posted by Adi_Investor > 2017-05-16 10:53 | Report Abuse

牆頭草.....有奶便是娘

Post a Comment
Market Buzz