Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:06 | Report Abuse

alo... I wont know d yield to FIL ok... if u said FIl bot cheap.. d yield to it is very high ok

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:07 | Report Abuse

u don't even know how to value stocks and u said this is a lousy deal.

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:08 | Report Abuse

fil already bought jobstreet since 2008, their return excluding dividend already hit 400%. for them they got a very good deal and they can reinvest the proceeds in other opportunities to generate better returns

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:09 | Report Abuse

haha.. u know d yield to FIL??

u r taken in by wat they put in d announcement ok... BTW d 30,000,000 is not out from SEEks pocket ok.. it is from JOBSTs.. notice or not

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:09 | Report Abuse

I m saying JOBST has a future ok.. keep for its good dividend n future why sell at abt 2.4??

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:11 | Report Abuse

ya... FIL wil likely invest in SEEK la.. d good stuff is now in SEEK mah.. JOBST is totally screwed now..

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:11 | Report Abuse

u are asking silly questions again. buyer side need investment banker and seller side also hire invesyment banker. seek hired goldman and cimb , job hired hwangdbs ...they both also paid the investment banking fees not just jobstreet is paying, seek also paid to goldman and cimb. you are very wrong, u notice or not?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:12 | Report Abuse

u were d one who said SEEK is paying 30,000,000 to investment banker ok

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:12 | Report Abuse

and...why u calculate dividend yield base on cost? come on...u should really read books

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:13 | Report Abuse

yes...seek is paying to investment banker, jobstreet also need to pay to investment banker.

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:14 | Report Abuse

seek is paying to goldman sachs , job is paying hwangdbs. u never read announcement from australia exhange? u get your info wrong again

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:15 | Report Abuse

if u say selling price is important why sell at a lousy price??

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:16 | Report Abuse

u were d one who said SEEK is paying 30,000,000 to investment banker ok .. 30,000,000 is JOBSTs

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:17 | Report Abuse

n... how come other institution shareholders r not selling???? answer tis Q

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:18 | Report Abuse

again, u think lousy price , fil won't think like how u think. jobstreet management get lots of praise including from mswg for being able to get high valuation in this deal. only u keep on saying lousy deal everyday

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:19 | Report Abuse

yes, again, seek is paying aud 10 million to investment banker. u should get information from asuatralia stock exchange not on bursa anouncemnt. u are damn wrong again

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:20 | Report Abuse

U U U U U U were d one who said SEEK is paying 30,000,000 to investment banker ok

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:20 | Report Abuse

n... how come other institution shareholders r not selling???? answer tis Q

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:20 | Report Abuse

this is common knowledge. seek already hired goldman sachs to advise them. u think they no need to pay in fees? come on....

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:21 | Report Abuse

yes, Seek is paying aud10 million to IB...how come u don't understand?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:22 | Report Abuse

FIL is selling its shares at 2.43 ok. .lousy price

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:22 | Report Abuse

i already answered. if u cannot understand , then u won't understand no matter how many times i reply

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:23 | Report Abuse

if all it takes is >10% to block.. why not solve d pn 17 now first??

I m saying it is a good deal if no pn17 ok

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:25 | Report Abuse

why FIL didn't sell earlier whn JOBSTs prices were better b4 d announcement... why only sell now at 2.43??

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:25 | Report Abuse

u don't understand what the reason the got into pn17. how to solve pn17 if they have not complete the deal? sell the unit one year by one year? so that they won't trigger the pn17 rules?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:25 | Report Abuse

n wit such urgency???

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:27 | Report Abuse

for the fees they r charging shdnt they come out wit a more complete deal??

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:28 | Report Abuse

if they can solve it later they can surely solve it now... remember all d 1.7 bils wil b taken out.. why not keep some ??

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:34 | Report Abuse

1.7 billion will be paid to shareholders it's a good thing but the way u said is like paying dividend is a devil kind of thingy. and there are many ways to do reorganize a pn17 company, but u keep on relating pn17 scenario to doom day, this is a very false comment

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:36 | Report Abuse

aiya...i also don't know how to convince u, in fact i shouldn't. u continue to think your way la.

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:36 | Report Abuse

Creat value for shareholders of d co.. not pay thm back their money n let d co pn 17.. u get it?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:40 | Report Abuse

pn17 is not a doom scenario, u get it?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:41 | Report Abuse

not point for u to stress on pn17 if a pn17 can be reorg

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:42 | Report Abuse

and even if they don't pay the dividend jobstreet will still fall into pn17 because they don't have sufficient revenue

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:42 | Report Abuse

Why not not going in at all now... instead of pulling it out later?

Don't u think tis uncertainty screwed up investors plan?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:42 | Report Abuse

u get it?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:47 | Report Abuse

Keep some of d 1.7 bil.. do some acquisitions.. u get it?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:48 | Report Abuse

why keep if there's a possibility of getting out from pn17 without using extra cash? u get it?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:51 | Report Abuse

HaHa.. u n ur hope..

Hope la.. no money in d co anymore.. how? Take back d 2.40 by rights issue?

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 13:54 | Report Abuse

In investing.. ppl want clarify n certainty ok... not possibility

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 13:58 | Report Abuse

if u don't dare to take risk, u should just put money in your fd...investment is about taking calculated risk

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 14:00 | Report Abuse

It is not abt profit la... it is abt not having a core biz ok get it or not?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 14:01 | Report Abuse

it's about profit ok?

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 14:03 | Report Abuse

On December 31, it submitted an application to Bursa for a waiver to submit a regularisation plan and upliftment of Adventa from PN17.
The company has managed to record quarterly net profits of RM1.30 million, RM1.33 million and RM1.66 million in the last three quarters, which fulfilled the requirement of recording a minimum of two consecutive quarters of profit to exit the PN17 status.

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 14:14 | Report Abuse

u r wrong ok... go chk again

n ths investments r not even JOBSTs' subsidiaries.. not under JOBSTs control..

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 14:16 | Report Abuse

go chk again...



n if u r correct.. JOBSTs account wld b


REVENUE -

profit from investment 2,000,000 say

r u sure??

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 14:19 | Report Abuse

come on...they got 20% stakes in associates, it will be accounted as joint profit from associates not dividend from investment. u should really get your informations right.

Posted by SexC > 2014-03-13 14:20 | Report Abuse

ya so wat.... d point is REVENUE "0".. get it??

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 14:20 | Report Abuse

and read this properly "which fulfilled the requirement of recording a minimum of two consecutive quarters of profit to exit the PN17 status."

Posted by bursacow > 2014-03-13 14:20 | Report Abuse

the key word is profit