KUALA LUMPUR (July 9): The following is a press release by YTL Communications Sdn Bhd, reproduced in full.
Setting the Record Straight
YTL Communications is extremely disappointed that the press statement issued by the Ministry of Education on 5 July 2019 and statements made at the press conference on the same day have made us appear to have taken advantage of the Government.
As a business, we have always sought to resolve matters amicably. Nevertheless, we cannot allow our reputation to be sullied by unfounded claims. Hence, we have to set the record straight.
As a corporate citizen of this country that won an open tender for a major project, we are entitled to rely on fair business dealings.
At the time of the award of the project, broadband infrastructure was in its infancy in the country. To address this, the National Broadband Initiative was launched with the aim of increasing broadband penetration across the population. Bidders were therefore required to invest in building telecommunication towers or lay fibre to rural areas as more than 70% of schools in this country were rural and remote schools. The project was recognised by the Ministry as a means of providing broadband services to the schools as well as to the communities around the schools.
The contract entered into between the Ministry and YTL Communications acknowledged the 15 year term of the project but provided that the project would be implemented in rolling phases. The process by which each phase was to be awarded was clearly set out in the project documents; there would be a joint review on performance, changes in technology, basic educational needs and price prior to the expiry of each phase and before parties reach agreement on the next phase.
Notwithstanding the right to a joint review, YTL Communications did not object to the Ministry’s announcement that it would call a fresh tender at the beginning of 2019. Price transparency was clearly important to the new Government and YTL Communications was fully supportive of this.
BUT after the announcement, we waited 9 months for the tender to be called and it was only at a meeting on 23 April that we were informed that the Ministry was not ready for the tender.
It was at the Ministry’s request that we offered in good faith to provide internet services and the Frog Virtual Learning Environment (Frog VLE) to the Ministry during the interim period of 6 months from 1 July to 31 December (interim period) free of charge. Our offer, contained in our letter of 31 May to the Minister of Education, (disclosed in our press statement of 3 July), was clear, simple and unconditional. We reiterate strongly that we did not ask for any special preference for providing this free service which was requested by the Ministry in the first place.
But on 27 June, without even responding to our letter offering free services for the six months period, the Ministry announced the award of the internet services for the interim period to Telekom Malaysia, Celcom Axiata and Maxis.
As no joint review was undertaken as required under the contract and no open tender called, we regard this as a breach of our contract.
At the press conference, the Ministry gave reasons to justify the rejection of our offer. We address each of these in the Appendix* to this statement.
The justifications proffered are baseless and clearly an afterthought and do not obviate the fact that the Ministry failed to comply with its obligations under the contract. No joint review was carried out as required. If a review had been undertaken, it would have identified the areas of improvement for the next phase. Pricing could also have been set against current market prices and there would be clarity as to implementation.
The alternative of an open tender announced by the Ministry for the period from 1 July also did not materialise. An open tender would have established the most competitive prices against a defined specification and would have left little room for speculation. Instead, we are left wondering about a process that was flawed from the outset.
If the Ministry had accepted our offer for the free services during the interim period, the Ministry would have saved millions, prevented disruption to the schools in the middle of the school year, as well as had the time to conduct a tender exercise following which they would have a properly defined solution and price.
As a company that has worked with the Ministry over the past 7 years implementing a world class nationwide learning solution that the country should be proud of, we cannot help but be disappointed. We, however, remain committed to playing our part in improving education in the country.
Issued 9 July 2019
* Appendix Attached
Ministry of Education’s Reasons for not Accepting Offer from YTL Communications for Free Services during 6 months interim period YTL Communications’ Response 1 Kos tersembunyi (hidden cost) Bermula Kontrak Perkhidmatan 1Bestarinet Fasa 2 sehingg
'On the alleged cost for the usage of FrogVLE platform under YTL Communications as opposed MoE's proposed replacement Google Classroom, the company said it has offered to provide both internet service and the platform usage free of charge during the six-month period.'
4 Tidak dapat meneroka teknologi terkini dan bersesuaian untuk KPM KPM tidak berpeluang untuk mencuba teknologi alternatif yang mungkin lebih baik kepada para pelajar dan guru serta menjimatkan perbelanjaan Kerajaan. Notwithstanding that the project is for 15 years, the contract does not prevent the Ministry from exploring the latest technology. In fact the Ministry has from time to time conducted trials in the schools. Switching the entire school system to 3 new ISPs that are providing technology similar to what was provided under phase 2 is not exploring new technology.
The joint review process at the end of each phase allows changes in technology to be addressed.
The Ministry had announced its intention to have an open tender for the next phase which YTL Communications was happy to participate in. If this had been carried out, the Ministry would have been able to specify its requirements for technology and discovered the prices for such technology. The Ministry instead decided to appoint the 3 ISPs without a tender.
5 Dapatan Hasil Kajian Impak dan Hala Tuju Pendidikan Digital Negara Hasil kajian yang dijalankan ke atas guru, pelajar dan pentadbir mendapati kualiti capaian internet yang dibekalkan tidak memuaskan dan tidak dapat memberikan pekhidmatan yang terbaik kepada pihak Kerajaan. In phase 2, YTL Communications provided a range of technologies ranging from mobile internet to fibre and has provided the Ministry with bandwidth of up to 100 Mbps.
All bandwidth specification under the contract was determined by the Ministry and not by YTL Communications. We have at all times provided the bandwidth as specified. Our performance is measured by SLAs, all of which we have satisfied.
Therefore, if the teachers are dissatisfied with the internet speeds, it would be because the bandwidth that the Ministry specified do not satisfy the requirements of the schools.
It is unjustified to blame YTL Communications.
6 KPM telah mengenal pasti Google Classroom (GC) sebagai alternatif bagi menggantikan perkhidmatan Frog VLE di bawah projek 1BestariNet.
GC diberi secara PERCUMA kepada semua institusi pendidikan (sekolah, negeri dan Kementerian) di seluruh dunia.
The FrogVLE has far more features than Google Classroom as it is a total teaching and learning solution customised to the requirements of the Ministry.
It is a private secure platform that protects students from unsafe and inappropriate content It provides teachers with a library of curated content (including ready-to-use lessons and quizzes) for all subjects (including those for Chinese and Tamil schools) that is mapped to the Malaysian curriculum, from Standard 1- Form 5. It allows for self-learning and revision through a gamified quiz engine It has automated assessments and analytics which helps teachers identify and address each studentfs learning gaps It is clear in our offer to the Minister on 31st May that for the interim period, there would be no cost for the Frog VLE.
Other Matters Raised 7 Cost to the Ministry in the interim period YTL Communications has offered to provide internet services and the Frog VLE entirely free of charge during the interim period of 6 months.
If the Ministry had accepted our offer for the free services during the interim period, the Ministry would have:
saved the millions which it is now paying to the 3 ISPs; avoided disruption to the schools in the middle of the school year; and the time to conduct a tender exercise following which they would have a properly defined solution and price. There is no justification whatsoever for the Ministry to award the internet services for the interim period to the 3 ISPs in the face of YTL Communications’ offer.
8 Price Comparison During the interim period, no price comparison is required as we have offered our services for free.
If the Ministry was interested to undertake a price comparison, this could only have been undertaken in one of 2 ways:
Undertake a joint review as provided in the contract on both price and technology; Calling an open tender with clear specifications and scope of work. Trying to compare prices in any other way is mere speculation.
It should be noted that the price for phase 2 was for a different specification and a different time period. For example, the provision of dedicated fibre connections to rural schools required high capital cost. The Ministry evaluated this on the basis of capital investment and timing and deemed that our price was appropriate and the best for the time. It is not justified to compare this to available infrastructure that can easily be connected. Over 50% of the 1000 schools which were provided with dedicated fibre connections were in Sabah and Sarawak.
As reported in The Star, the Secretary General confirmed in the press conference that YTL Communications was awarded phase 2 because we were still the best service provider at that point of time.
Interesting to look at note 4. According to YTL, switching to new ISP is not exploring new technology. Think they missed the point... using 98” smart board IS NEW TECHNOLOGY.
Yes I am the one who supported too at 0.04 cents up to 4.50pm but was press down by day trader as they have to sell within the day. Sorry friend I too wish it break 0.04 cents and above for day trader team to make money We look after each other
WHY KYY SHOULD PUT MONEY INTO THIS HIDDEN JEWEL STOCK? Author: diehardunited Publish date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019, 3:30 PM Close
Eduspec is on the path of upward earnings growth trajectory and distributes free money to its shareholders;
(1) Eduspec is expected to be a major beneficiary from a contract rollout for a virtual learning environment (VLE) from the Government.
Don't forget that Kencana Capital, which owns by Mokhzani Mahathir and Prof. Dato' Raja Munir, currently a Director of MyEG Services Berhad are in Eduspec. With Mokhzani as a proxy and experience and expertise from Raja Munir, the prospect for Eduspec to secure a billion contract of VLE project is high.
Since Eduspec uses Google Classroom and is already working with the Education Ministry together with Sharp to intro 100 classrooms with their smart classroom tech, Eduspec is the clear frontrunner to win a new Billion Ringgit contract.
(2) Eduspec is giving out free money to its shareholders! Eduspec has proposed bonus issue of up to 550.9m free warrants in Eduspec on the basis of 1 Warrant B for every 2 shares in Eduspec. This proposal has been approved by Bursa Malaysia. The date will be determined and announced later.
Interestingly, we can make money from the potential rally in Eduspec’s share price soon due to strong investors’ interests in the stock for free warrants and the rally in free warrants price upon its listing. If you look at Scomnet’s share price in recent weeks, which the company also gave out free warrants to its shareholders, had a strong run-up before the Ex-date for the entitlement of free warrants. AND the warrants price itself has been rallying and trading at a premium since its debut.
This stock usual pattern , when volume high reached 0.035 then next few days will drop to 0.025 n 9.030. But hopefully will break 0.040 today then will fly highl... if not , all the contra player be careful.
0.04 and 0.045 resistance because of short term investors want to earn fast profit. after short term investors have selling all now the eduspec can fly. just wait the short term players finish their start
my target is 0.15 is enough. no need to wait to the 0.3. since the Google Classroom has been started on 1 July 2019. may be next quarter will tell the story.
WHY KYY SHOULD PUT MONEY INTO THIS HIDDEN JEWEL STOCK? Author: diehardunited | Publish date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019, 3:30 PM
Eduspec is on the path of upward earnings growth trajectory and distributes free money to its shareholders;
(1) Eduspec is expected to be a major beneficiary from a contract rollout for a virtual learning environment (VLE) from the Government.
Don't forget that Kencana Capital, which owns by Mokhzani Mahathir and Prof. Dato' Raja Munir, currently a Director of MyEG Services Berhad are in Eduspec. With Mokhzani as a proxy and experience and expertise from Raja Munir, the prospect for Eduspec to secure a billion contract of VLE project is high.
Since Eduspec uses Google Classroom and is already working with the Education Ministry together with Sharp to intro 100 classrooms with their smart classroom tech, Eduspec is the clear frontrunner to win a new Billion Ringgit contract.
(2) Eduspec is giving out free money to its shareholders! Eduspec has proposed bonus issue of up to 550.9m free warrants in Eduspec on the basis of 1 Warrant B for every 2 shares in Eduspec. This proposal has been approved by Bursa Malaysia. The date will be determined and announced later.
WHY SHOULD PUT MONEY INTO THIS RECESSION PROOF STOCK? Author: diehardunited | Publish date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019, 4:36 PM
At this current challenging market and economic slowdown, there is no other good stocks besides utilities, healthcare and education - which is EDUSPEC. There is no way people stop taking education, particularly primary and secondary schools in regardless of economic situation is good or bad. EDUSPEC has a recession proof business. EDUSPEC specialises in providing e-learning products to primary and secondary schools.
Don't forget that Kencana Capital Sdn Bhd owns 36.62 million shares in EDUSPEC. Annual report data shows that Tan Sri Mokhzani Mahathir owns Kencana Capital. With the new government - PH led, the Company's outlook look secure and will be even brighter now!
Looking at EDUSPEC, it finally turned around in the last quarter results for FY19 (ended in March 2019) and we could expect a full-year black in its FY20 (ended in March 2020). There will be more to come based on the way in which the Company restructured its operation.
2018 Kencana Capital Sdn. Bhd. 36,620,000 shares 3.32 % WHY Tan Sri Mokhzani Mahathir SELL out eduspec BECAUSE school have stupid principal , eduspec financial problem cash flow 1.3 millions debt 35.07 millions current liabilities 76.82 millions
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Bull13
1,097 posts
Posted by Bull13 > 2019-07-09 15:54 | Report Abuse
KUALA LUMPUR (July 9): The following is a press release by YTL Communications Sdn Bhd, reproduced in full.
Setting the Record Straight
YTL Communications is extremely disappointed that the press statement issued by the Ministry of Education on 5 July 2019 and statements made at the press conference on the same day have made us appear to have taken advantage of the Government.
As a business, we have always sought to resolve matters amicably. Nevertheless, we cannot allow our reputation to be sullied by unfounded claims. Hence, we have to set the record straight.
As a corporate citizen of this country that won an open tender for a major project, we are entitled to rely on fair business dealings.
At the time of the award of the project, broadband infrastructure was in its infancy in the country. To address this, the National Broadband Initiative was launched with the aim of increasing broadband penetration across the population. Bidders were therefore required to invest in building telecommunication towers or lay fibre to rural areas as more than 70% of schools in this country were rural and remote schools. The project was recognised by the Ministry as a means of providing broadband services to the schools as well as to the communities around the schools.
The contract entered into between the Ministry and YTL Communications acknowledged the 15 year term of the project but provided that the project would be implemented in rolling phases. The process by which each phase was to be awarded was clearly set out in the project documents; there would be a joint review on performance, changes in technology, basic educational needs and price prior to the expiry of each phase and before parties reach agreement on the next phase.
Notwithstanding the right to a joint review, YTL Communications did not object to the Ministry’s announcement that it would call a fresh tender at the beginning of 2019. Price transparency was clearly important to the new Government and YTL Communications was fully supportive of this.
BUT after the announcement, we waited 9 months for the tender to be called and it was only at a meeting on 23 April that we were informed that the Ministry was not ready for the tender.
It was at the Ministry’s request that we offered in good faith to provide internet services and the Frog Virtual Learning Environment (Frog VLE) to the Ministry during the interim period of 6 months from 1 July to 31 December (interim period) free of charge. Our offer, contained in our letter of 31 May to the Minister of Education, (disclosed in our press statement of 3 July), was clear, simple and unconditional. We reiterate strongly that we did not ask for any special preference for providing this free service which was requested by the Ministry in the first place.
But on 27 June, without even responding to our letter offering free services for the six months period, the Ministry announced the award of the internet services for the interim period to Telekom Malaysia, Celcom Axiata and Maxis.
As no joint review was undertaken as required under the contract and no open tender called, we regard this as a breach of our contract.
At the press conference, the Ministry gave reasons to justify the rejection of our offer. We address each of these in the Appendix* to this statement.
The justifications proffered are baseless and clearly an afterthought and do not obviate the fact that the Ministry failed to comply with its obligations under the contract. No joint review was carried out as required. If a review had been undertaken, it would have identified the areas of improvement for the next phase. Pricing could also have been set against current market prices and there would be clarity as to implementation.
The alternative of an open tender announced by the Ministry for the period from 1 July also did not materialise. An open tender would have established the most competitive prices against a defined specification and would have left little room for speculation. Instead, we are left wondering about a process that was flawed from the outset.
If the Ministry had accepted our offer for the free services during the interim period, the Ministry would have saved millions, prevented disruption to the schools in the middle of the school year, as well as had the time to conduct a tender exercise following which they would have a properly defined solution and price.
As a company that has worked with the Ministry over the past 7 years implementing a world class nationwide learning solution that the country should be proud of, we cannot help but be disappointed. We, however, remain committed to playing our part in improving education in the country.
Issued 9 July 2019
* Appendix Attached
Ministry of Education’s Reasons for not Accepting Offer from YTL Communications for Free Services during 6 months interim period YTL Communications’ Response
1
Kos tersembunyi (hidden cost)
Bermula Kontrak Perkhidmatan 1Bestarinet Fasa 2 sehingg