tipu what? if counter dont go up even though we praise it night and day not tipu lah .. compare csl and hexza .. hexza is a graham net net mah .. anyway its ok 2014 resolutions - being more patient and less "fighting" hahahaa
negative enterprise value , a graham net net qualifier, with good nta - ding dong ding dong .. anytime true value can be "unlock" - as prudent investors, we are here not to be a "kaki lima fortune teller" but more of "fortune-telling" secara berhemah ... kikiki
hexza - a high yield dividend play , if put in 100 units based on current dividend pay out one can easily get MYR $600+ ... dont forget his moat, sustainability and pretty strong fundamental as growth stock .. negative enterprise value coupled with sustainability is a rare hidden gem "undervalue" stocks in the present market ...
tjhldg: if tj grab 100u keep it till end of year .. AT at 0.771 :-) TJ still can make money with 10% dividend ... Hexza like marco good high yield dividend play ....
bye bye ... kuchai if tomorrow got vol sure tj hantam kasi dia 9696 .. takut dia back to sleep shj .. like tj punya kawan every day up but no chance to tambah ... sian !
Guys, I m also holding this stock, since the price is not moving much and the stock is not so hot yet, I d like to share my view on the intrinsic value of Hexza which I have studied.
kcchongnz has already done a most conservative valuation on Hexza using Graham net net as shown in this link, A Graham net net valuation is most suitable for a company that has a high amount of quality assets. Hexza has a whole load of that with its excess cash of RM0.65 per share.
From his analysis, Hexza is worth at least RM0.81.
Hexza is no doubt in tough period with the chemical industry going through some consolidation However, take note the its depreciation charges is high (around RM5-6mil per year) relative to earnings. Since depreciation is a non-cash expense, Hexza actually generates very high amount of free cashflows from its business (15% of total revenue last year) even though EPS looks poor. If Hexza were to be valued based on PE ratio, its PE would be 15.5x whereas if we look at Hexza from enterprise value perspective its EV/EBIT ratio its only 2.3x based on closing price of RM 0.655. No wonder nobody is looking at this stock ! Everyone is so focused on PE ratio.
As Hexza is consistently generating high free cashflows in bad and good times, lets take a look at Hexza's valuation using a Discounted cash flow method :-
Table 6.1: Assumptions Current stock price $0.66 Share outstanding (Mil) 200380 This year FCF $12,726 Next year's FCF (mil) $13,362 Growth for the next 5 and 10 years 5.0% 5% Teminal growth rate, g 3.00% Discount rate, R 15.0% 10.0%
PV of FCFF of core operations $124,000 Non-operating cash $129,290 Investment properties $0 Interest in associates $0 Debts $0 PV of FCFE $253,290 Less minority interest ($11,607) 4.6% FCFE $241,683 Number of shares 200380 FCF per share $1.21 84% higher than = $0.66 MOS 46%
Using a FCF base of RM12.7 mil (average from 6 years since last year's FCF was exceptionally high), and using a discount rate of 15%, Hexza's valuation based on the assumption of 5% growth in FCF for the next 10 years and 3% thereafter. is RM1.21 which presents a 46% margin of safety.
What is the market expectation of Hexza's cashflow growth based on its current price. The fact that Hexza holds so much excess cash per share, Hexza's FCF would have to decline by a rate of 50% per year for the next 10 years to justify its share price at current levels. We should ask ourselves if this is a realistic scenario thus presenting how undervalued this stock really is.
Concerns at a glance: 1) 3% terminal growth rate assumed is too optimistic given its flat earnings performance in the past 3 years. 2) 6% dividend yield is not bad but that is all. It gives all earnings as dividends. That means little upside on dividend payout. 3) High depreciation charge results or comes from high capex outlay, which alarmingly has only generated lower sales each year since 2009 crisis.
A clean balance sheet is a plus and is its high cash per share. But they may stay that way without capital distribution longer than you can wait. Provided you have faith in the resilience of its biz, you may treat Hexza like a quasi- or leveraged deposit.
sensemaker 1. Earnings was flat or declining for past 5 years but FCF was still healthy and even expanding due to the dep 2. Dividend payments are supported by FCF. If business turns around, it can afford to pay more. 3. Hexza does not incur high capex for the past 5-6 years averaging about RM2-3mil. Eventually Hexza may need to replace its PPE, however as long as no major damaging acquisition is made, its cashflows should remain healthy.
Hexza is not a growth stock. It is a run down stock operating in a difficult environment, The investment thesis of investing in Hexza its limited downside due to its balance sheet strength and strong cash generation capabilities.
Market cap over FCF is 11 times. It is not cheap. Accounts Receivable are 75 days old on average- evidence of its weak pricing power and potential credit risk. Personally speaking, Hexza is not a buy at the current market price.
sense maker, why do you only look at market cap over FCF instead of enterprise value over FCF ? Think about it. Market cap only considers share price but Hexza has tons of excess cash and zero debt making its enterprise value very low.
Enterprise Value = Market Cap + Debt - Excess Cash
"I do not consider EV because I do not have control over it as I am not acquiring the controling interest."
That 's the whole idea of valuation in my opinion. Acting like business owners. Think about how attractive the price to privatize Hexza is with its excess cash already close to share price. The owner would be able to privatize for almost free after deducting excess cash and minority interests.
"Take out the Accounts Receivable and most of Property Plant and Equipment, and the net asset backing will shrink dramatically."
You re assuming that Hexza will not be able to collect any receivables and its PPE is worthless... all this by just looking at account receivables being 75 days old ? A bit too far fetched in my opinion. Have you actually seen evidence of significant bad debts being written off in the cashflow to make this claim ? How about other companies in similar industry. I m interested to know as well. The fact that its CFFO is positive for all these years already tells me that this is quite unlikely ?
Anyway, its good to hear your opposite views to keep my optimism in check.
Posted by sense maker > Feb 13, 2014 09:13 AM | Report Abuse
Market cap over FCF is 11 times. It is not cheap. Accounts Receivable are 75 days old on average- evidence of its weak pricing power and potential credit risk. Personally speaking, Hexza is not a buy at the current market price.
Agreed, well said sense maker, houseofordos, you are a bit optimistic, anyway, good comments, smile : )
I have invested in Hexza too because of its Graham net net stock as its cash alone less liabilities per share is more than its share price. It is in fact a negative enterprise value company if you consider some value in its PPE which is appropriate as a major portion of it is land and building.
Very rarely we see a Graham net net company is also a cash generator (instead of cash burner) like Hexza. This good cash generation also provides the ability for Hexza to give good dividends, twice the amount you can get from fixed deposit. Hence the risk of investing in Hexza is very low. It is an excellent defensive investing strategy which could be a more appropriate strategy in the present environment.
I fully agree with you that as Hezxa has huge amount of cash and cash equivalent, enterprise value is a more appropriate metric than market capitalization.
I opine that Hexza' business will still last for some time, but definitely not a growing business, unless something changes. If I were to value Hezxa using earnings based valuation, I would use the conservative EPV method at best.
Thanks for your comments. I used DCF method in view of the high free cashflows generated by Hexza. Even assuming very low growth or no growth I still found a large margin of safety from investing in it.
bought Hexza long time ago, few years back, still holding and adding more. Have been holding all good fundamental stocks like PBA, EKSONS, GUH, LCTH, CSCSTEL, PTARAS, PCHEM, GTRONIC, HIL, SHL, PLENITU, MFCB mostly for dividends. and one common thing of all, cash rich!
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
miketyu
464 posts
Posted by miketyu > 2013-12-15 22:58 | Report Abuse
Can anyone clarify if the depreciation of ringgit and strengthening of USD will erode the future earnings of Hexza?