Dear DK, Care to explain what is this accounting one-off gain? The Property Development & Investment division achieved a revenue of negative RM3.2 million for the current quarter. However, a higher profit before tax of RM129.3 million in the current quarter was recorded as compared to a loss before tax of RM17.9 million in the third quarter of 2019. This was mainly due to the one-off gain arising from the disposal of the 51% equity interest in one of the subsidiary. The disposal resulted in a gain before tax of RM174.4 million and after taking into account the Non-controlling interest portion, the gain of RM89.0 is recognised by the Group.
With the need to make RM30.5 million allowance for doubtful debts in the current quarter, the Investment Holding & Others division recorded a higher loss before tax of RM35.3 million in the quarter under review as compared to a loss before tax of RM4.2 million incurred in the preceding year’s corresponding quarter. This allowance for doubtful debts are mainly in relation to the amount due following the disposal of the subsidiary above.
Is IR@JAKS misleading me when I wrote in to ask? Refer Affin Hwang Research: https://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/staticfile/403027.jsp JIC would still need to raise new funding to pay the buyers the LAD owed which is currently around RM165m (accumulated since 4Q16). Apart from that JIC also owes JAKS around RM35.4m, which JAKS had previously loaned to JIC for the construction cost and bank guarantee of the Pacific Star project Question 4: Please explain how JIC will settle this RM35.4 m with JAKS? Answer: Any amounts owing by JIC is to be settled in the ordinary course of business
So is making RM30.5 million allowance for doubtful debts an ordinary course of business?
You should direct the question to the BOD. Nonetheless, making doubtful provision is indeed in the ordinary course of business.
I take it as a package deal. As JIC is short of cash flow, it is logical that the 49% partner will negotiate to takeover the company on a NET basis without intercompany debts. Hence, I would rather take this as a net gain of 59m (89m-30m) from the disposal of JIC.
It is also my speculation that in the event the RM50m BG claimed by The Star is recovered, the doubtful provision will be written back. Logical ?
Anyway, appreciate if you could get the response from the BOD.
Thank you.
Sslee Dear DK, Care to explain what is this accounting one-off gain? The Property Development & Investment division achieved a revenue of negative RM3.2 million for the current quarter. However, a higher profit before tax of RM129.3 million in the current quarter was recorded as compared to a loss before tax of RM17.9 million in the third quarter of 2019. This was mainly due to the one-off gain arising from the disposal of the 51% equity interest in one of the subsidiary. The disposal resulted in a gain before tax of RM174.4 million and after taking into account the Non-controlling interest portion, the gain of RM89.0 is recognised by the Group.
With the need to make RM30.5 million allowance for doubtful debts in the current quarter, the Investment Holding & Others division recorded a higher loss before tax of RM35.3 million in the quarter under review as compared to a loss before tax of RM4.2 million incurred in the preceding year’s corresponding quarter. This allowance for doubtful debts are mainly in relation to the amount due following the disposal of the subsidiary above.
Is IR@JAKS misleading me when I wrote in to ask? Refer Affin Hwang Research: https://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/staticfile/403027.jsp JIC would still need to raise new funding to pay the buyers the LAD owed which is currently around RM165m (accumulated since 4Q16). Apart from that JIC also owes JAKS around RM35.4m, which JAKS had previously loaned to JIC for the construction cost and bank guarantee of the Pacific Star project Question 4: Please explain how JIC will settle this RM35.4 m with JAKS? Answer: Any amounts owing by JIC is to be settled in the ordinary course of business
So is making RM30.5 million allowance for doubtful debts an ordinary course of business? 27/11/2020 7:06 PM
interesting results revenue drop but profit up due to one off gain from disposal next monday 50%:50% up or down speakup bought 66sen. if down = paper loss. if up = paper gain
new comers please go read DK many facts and figures articles to understand Jaks prospect better. there are too much noises here full with speculation that tend to misled.
This company the quarter report look similar like fintec, profit increase but negative cash flow. Fintec still has 33mil cash. Both issues RI but profit increase. :) in boleh land everything also boleh
Who Will be so foolish to discharge jaks due to this qr?We all invest jaks because it's powerplant, invest in future,jaks future is bright coz pp cod already,no more uncertainty.coming year jaks will be the shining star in bursa
Jaks Q3 result was out yesterday .This give a rolling annual eps of 2.3 sen and a PE of 28 at yesterday price of 66s. For those who would like to take mfcb as a precedent by investing in jaks, I would like to make a comparison in.the journey of investing in power plant business. When mfcb announced its COD in the first week of Jan 2020, its share price was.with a multiple of 22 which is lower than 28 despite mfcb was in.a better financial situation.than jaks plus other potential businesses like packaging ,solar and resource。Today, mfcb has demonstrated and prove itself with 9 months of real power generating. business on.Don.Sahong. Market is giving a PE of 11 to 12. The lower PE was caused by market pricing did not grow as fast.as eps which has grown from 25 sen.to 63 sen in the last one year. The share price grew only 50% while earnimg.grew 2.5 x.Hope jaks can replicate mfcb performance and deliver as per prediction.
SDR245, by next year Nov, Jaks power plant would have 2 qtrs of actual.profit. If it can perform as per prediction ,then tgt price will be 1.1 based on 30 % ownership and 1.48 based on 40 %.ownership.This is based on.PE of 10.
Dear All, No offence intended. Since I hold MFCB for years getting good dividend and MFCB being compare with JAKS, I liked to offer my opinions on the comparison.
MFCB power plant being hydro-electric, no feed stock required i.e. free energy and environmental friendly, renewable energy and energy of the future.
JAKS feed stock coal will be obsolete in the near future with UK and many other countries banning soon, depleting and non-envronmental friendly..
I wonder why new coal power station still being built..just my 2 sens. TQ
Point 2:
                  JAKS(JHDP)  MFCB (DS)
Capacity   480MW       208MW
At full capacity after JHDP 2nd Turbine running, JHDP profit shall be more than DS? It is because point 1; more costly to run coal power plant?
Point 3:
Projected Payback Period - 8 years (JHDP) vs 5.5 years (DS).
Obviously, MFCB has the advantage; still based on forecast.
Conclusion: I am trying to defence my investment in MFCB, not admonishing JAKS. No matters JAKS riding on MFCB PE or MFCB riding on JAKS hot stock, hope both stocks will 'huat' together..
Happy Trading
Disclaimer: The above opinion does not represent a buy or sell recommendation; just a personal opinion and for sharing purposes only. Any offences and errors are unintentional; my apology in advance.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
hohoho123
3,165 posts
Posted by hohoho123 > 2020-11-27 17:40 | Report Abuse
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/market_information/announcements/company_announcement/announcement_details?ann_id=3109181