this counter has a long way to go up lah,guys.Currently cheapest O&G by pe,only 10.If can reach pe 15 target is 1.65.But you have to have patience and hold on.
No lar Steve, it depends,I belief fear and greed are the most important things in moving stocks, which has profited me all along, I'm keeping this stock medium term, try 1.12, could clear I guess for today. . ..Opinion of a Small fish...
After all,the worldwide stock market rallies is due to US QE,and now they are hinting of putting their foot on the brake pedal,we have to be more cautious.
they have too,the Fed balance sheet is becoming too stretch.but the problem is the extra money from QE going into stocks will dwindle,so again,caution.
hai ya dont buy now save your bullets for cheaper entry later dividends in sep & oct this period mkt always kaput one best time to buy cheap cheap for the dividends
Will someone please sell Pantech...I want to acculmulate as much as I can...currently the only stock i am holding...not enough...paying dividend constantly...dividend yield better than fixed deposit..well managed and transparent...holds good future... i feel this is another Coastal Contract in the making..most likely institutional investors will start accumulating once other O & G counters are fully valued..i only see one thing...price going north in the mid to long term...not for speculators,please!
my target is RM1.20 within 1 month (however it depend on KLSE performance and external environment).
2) From their report there is an increment of profit by 10%. so it not This is shows that Pantech has a good fundamental. If they not good the reprt will come out same as KNM and other "low Ya' company. Further more Pantech declared 1.2 cents divident- so it should be a good company. and no excuse for me to throw this share although the price keep dropping unless there is 'Tsunami' in KLSE..
make money and worth to keep is difference, alam quarter report declare dividend but didn't see any annocement... if share price drop then wait for nothing... if the share got give out dividend then is ok better than wait nothing...
Nobody seems to agree with me that Pantech is already fully valued.
[Posted by kcchongnz > May 13, 2013 01:26 PM | Report Abuse X Pantech share price has an excellent run. It ran up from about 70 sen at the beginning of the year to about RM1 now, for a gain of more than 40%, in just 4 months. I hold Pantech for a long time already and happy with the return from it. I am still holding some. But is Pantech fully valued now? I opine so. Even if I take an assumption that it will grow at 15% for the next 5 years and 3% subsequently, which in my opinion is a fantastic feat, and a required return of 12%, Pantech at 1.00 is almost fully valued already.]
In discount cash flow analysis to find the intrinsic value of a company is very subjective, in particular, one has to input a growth assumption. A slight difference in this assumption yields a very different intrinsic value. But if you use the DCFA in a reverse way, ie, try various growth rate assumption as input and see what assumption yields an intrinsic value exactly equal to the market value, then you can see what the market is expecting its growth rate. Then you can gauge whether this expectation is realistic or not.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it is better to refer to what the magazines and what the analyst says. But let see what the analyst says about say MK Land, what is the target price by Public Bank 6 months ago? 80 sen. so when is MK land reaching 80 sen? Half a year gone already.
Now The edge report. Plenty of them of various target prices, show me how many achieve the target prices, how many didn't. What is the percentage of target prices achieved?
No, no, no, I am not saying I am right. I cannot be more right than analysts, no way. I am just offering a different opinion, basing on some analysis, not simple say anything. Isn't that good to have a different opinion before putting in your hard earned money?
For the one who always simply append the link without saying a word, this time is the Edge magazine, I am always ready for you in the following thread to discuss anything about finance and investment:
Posted by Steve Jub > Jul 25, 2013 12:27 PM | Report Abuse kcchong, don't the intrinsic value keep 'upgrading' if growth is still there?
When you estimate the intrinsic value, you have already incorporate an assumption of growth rate in it. Unless the company's growth rate increases higher than the assumption, intrinsic value won't be higher.
The growth rate assumption I used for Pantech is already high at 15% for the next 5 years.
Posted by BBB79 > Jul 25, 2013 12:31 PM | Report Abuse kcchongnz , people willing to buy and willing to sale, then the transaction is done, who will think of value or not...
BBB79, you are absolutely right. Trading is different from investing. Trading involves actions of traders who determine the short-term share prices, and not the intrinsic value of a company. the value of a company is determined by its business.
Yes, traders can make a lot of money if you are good, and more important, if you are lucky. No argument about it.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Steve Jub
4,203 posts
Posted by Steve Jub > 2013-07-25 10:10 | Report Abuse
wa powerlinker so high target ah? power la u hehe