Be the first to like this.
2 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 2024-06-01 18:59
Posted by StartOfTheBull > 2024-06-01 18:31 | Report Abuse
In a realistic world there is no such thing called "justice". More powerful people rules and can easily bully the weaker one.
Hope this time justice prevails.
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-06-01 18:59 | Report Abuse
The necessity of checks and balances against absolute power stems from the fundamental principle that power can corrupt, and absolute power can corrupt absolutely.
1. **Prevent Abuse of Power**: Without checks and balances, those in power may exploit their position for personal gain, abuse their authority, and make decisions that serve their interests rather than the public's. Historical examples, such as dictatorial regimes, illustrate how unchecked power leads to oppression, corruption, and human rights violations (Key lesson from learning history!)
2. **Ensure Accountability**: Checks and balances ensure that leaders and institutions remain accountable to the law and the public. Mechanisms such as independent judiciaries, free press, and opposition parties provide oversight and can hold leaders accountable for their actions.
3. **Promote Fair Governance**: By distributing power across various branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial), checks and balances prevent any single entity from monopolizing control. This balance promotes fair and equitable governance, where different branches can collaborate and counterbalance each other.
4. **Protect Individual Rights**: Checks and balances safeguard individual freedoms and rights by preventing the concentration of power that can lead to arbitrary and unjust actions against citizens. Constitutions and legal frameworks typically embed these mechanisms to protect civil liberties.
5. **Enhance Stability**: A system with checks and balances fosters political stability by preventing the rise of authoritarianism and ensuring that power transitions occur through democratic means. It reduces the risk of coups, revolutions, or civil unrest caused by tyrannical rule.
6. **Encourage Transparency**: Transparency in government operations is enhanced through checks and balances. Independent bodies, such as anti-corruption agencies and auditors, can scrutinize government activities, promoting openness and reducing the likelihood of covert corrupt practices.
7. **Foster Public Trust**: When people see that there are effective mechanisms to check government power, public trust in institutions increases. This trust is essential for the legitimacy of the government and the rule of law.
No result.
2
3
BFM Podcast
4
5
BFM Podcast
6
Axcapital's investment blog
KAB - Executing its way to a record quarter. Could more Petronas contracts be coming?
7
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
CPO price is rising rapidly as shown by chart below - Koon Yew Yin
8
Mercury Securities Research
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-06-01 18:24 | Report Abuse
In the context of an assault case involving a grab taxi driver named Ong IK, several breaches of trust, responsibility, and duty could be scrutinized, particularly among the involved police officers and the perpetrators. ### 1. Breach of Trust by Police Officers **Failure to Protect the Victim:** - Police officers have a fundamental duty to protect citizens from harm. If they fail to respond adequately to calls for help or to intervene in situations where someone's safety is at risk, they breach this trust. - Inaction or delayed response can lead to a situation escalating, resulting in harm to individuals like Ong IK. **Complicity or Corruption:** - If any officers were found to be colluding with the perpetrators or accepting bribes to ignore the crime, this would be a severe breach of trust. - Such actions not only betray the victim but also undermine the integrity of the police force and public confidence in law enforcement. ### 2. Breach of Responsibility by Police Officers **Improper Investigation:** - Conducting a lackluster or biased investigation can hinder justice. This includes failing to gather critical evidence, not interviewing witnesses properly, or neglecting to follow up on leads. - Poor investigative practices can result in the perpetrators escaping accountability and further endanger public safety. **Misconduct:** - Instances of police misconduct, such as abusing their authority or mistreating the victim during the reporting process, constitute a breach of their professional responsibility. - Victims may feel further victimized and reluctant to seek justice if mistreated by the very officers meant to protect them. ### 3. Breach of Duty by Perpetrators **Legal and Ethical Violations:** - The perpetrators have a clear legal and ethical duty not to harm others. Engaging in assault is a direct violation of this duty. - Such actions demonstrate a disregard for the law and the rights of others, contributing to a breakdown in societal norms and safety. **Intimidation or Retaliation:** - If the perpetrators attempt to intimidate or retaliate against the victim or witnesses, they further breach their duty to uphold the peace. - This behavior can hinder the legal process and deter other victims from coming forward. ### 4. Broader Implications **Public Perception and Trust:** - Breaches by both police officers and perpetrators affect public trust in the justice system. When law enforcement fails to act appropriately, it creates a perception of impunity for criminal behavior. - Such breaches can lead to a loss of confidence in authorities and a reluctance among the public to cooperate with police efforts in the future. **Systemic Issues:** - The incident might reflect broader systemic issues within the police force, such as inadequate training, lack of accountability, or pervasive corruption. - Addressing these systemic problems is crucial for restoring trust and ensuring that similar breaches do not occur in the future. ### Conclusion In summary, breaches of trust, responsibility, and duty among police officers and perpetrators in the assault case of Ong IK can have serious repercussions. They not only affect the immediate parties involved but also have broader implications for public confidence in the justice system and societal safety. Ensuring accountability and addressing systemic issues are essential steps in preventing such breaches and maintaining the integrity of law enforcement.