Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-08-14 19:46 | Report Abuse

Since the motives behind the ban are to slander Hew and suppress dissenting viewpoints for political gain, the actions of DUMNO and PASout are hypocritical, especially if these parties position themselves as defenders of morality and good values. Engaging in slander, even indirectly by supporting the ban, would be in direct contradiction to the ethical standards they purport to uphold. Such behavior would be considered sinful in any religious contexts, as it involves knowingly spreading falsehoods or exaggerations to harm another's reputation and income. ### Conclusion The motives behind the ban on Hew Kuan Yau's book could indeed be argued as sinfully slanderous if they were driven by political opportunism, fear-mongering, and a desire to suppress dissent rather than genuine concern for national security. By framing the book as a threat and pushing for its ban, UMNO and PAS may have been engaging in morally questionable behavior that not only undermines intellectual freedom but also sows division and distrust in society for their own political gain. Such actions, if proven to be motivated by slanderous intent, would represent a serious ethical breach, contradicting the values these parties claim to represent.