UEM SUNRISE BERHAD
KLSE (MYR): UEMS (5148)
You're accessing 15 mins delay data. Turn on live stream now to enjoy real-time data!
Last Price
0.98
Today's Change
-0.06 (5.77%)
Day's Change
0.98 - 1.06
Trading Volume
13,428,800
Financial
Market Cap
4,957 Million
NOSH
5,058 Million
Latest Quarter
30-Sep-2024 [#3]
Announcement Date
21-Nov-2024
Next Quarter
31-Dec-2024
Est. Ann. Date
27-Feb-2025
Est. Ann. Due Date
01-Mar-2025
QoQ | YoY
22.01% | 175.76%
Revenue | NP to SH
1,221,481.000 | 77,349.000
RPS | P/RPS
24.15 Cent | 4.06
EPS | P/E | EY
1.53 Cent | 64.09 | 1.56%
DPS | DY | Payout %
0.75 Cent | 0.77% | 49.05%
NAPS | P/NAPS
1.34 | 0.73
QoQ | YoY
23.37% | 12.34%
NP Margin | ROE
6.67% | 1.14%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
30-Sep-2024 | 21-Nov-2024
Latest Audited Result
31-Dec-2023
Announcement Date
30-Apr-2024
Next Audited Result
31-Dec-2024
Est. Ann. Date
30-Apr-2025
Est. Ann. Due Date
29-Jun-2025
Revenue | NP to SH
1,339,060.000 | 75,727.000
RPS | P/RPS
26.47 Cent | 3.70
EPS | P/E | EY
1.50 Cent | 65.46 | 1.53%
DPS | DY | Payout %
0.75 Cent | 0.77% | 50.10%
NAPS | P/NAPS
1.35 | 0.73
YoY
-5.97%
NP Margin | ROE
6.42% | 1.11%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
31-Dec-2023 | 27-Feb-2024
Revenue | NP to SH
1,066,010.666 | 66,681.333
RPS | P/RPS
21.07 Cent | 4.65
EPS | P/E | EY
1.31 Cent | 74.34 | 1.35%
DPS | DY | Payout %
-
NAPS | P/NAPS
-
QoQ | YoY
23.39% | 3.35%
NP Margin | ROE
6.27% | 0.98%
F.Y. | Ann. Date
30-Sep-2024 | 21-Nov-2024
Show?
| Last 10 FY Result | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,066,010 | 1,221,481 | 1,339,060 | 1,473,428 | 1,211,216 | 1,136,881 | 2,909,461 | 2,043,986 | 2,903,442 | 1,841,479 | 1,749,866 | 2,661,674 | -7.34% | |
| PBT | 99,700 | 127,756 | 138,945 | 133,543 | -215,200 | -195,331 | 384,528 | 416,384 | 438,653 | 217,648 | 343,039 | 609,167 | -15.13% | |
| Tax | -32,832 | -46,300 | -53,043 | -51,479 | 1,796 | -81,385 | -161,858 | -135,566 | -157,045 | -69,309 | -86,049 | -129,391 | -9.42% | |
| NP | 66,868 | 81,456 | 85,902 | 82,064 | -213,404 | -276,716 | 222,670 | 280,818 | 281,608 | 148,339 | 256,990 | 479,776 | -17.38% | |
| - | ||||||||||||||
| NP to SH | 66,681 | 77,349 | 75,727 | 80,539 | -214,326 | -277,284 | 223,801 | 280,333 | 280,085 | 147,302 | 257,212 | 479,927 | -18.53% | |
| - | ||||||||||||||
| Tax Rate | 32.93% | 36.24% | 38.18% | 38.55% | - | - | 42.09% | 32.56% | 35.80% | 31.84% | 25.08% | 21.24% | - | |
| Total Cost | 999,142 | 1,140,025 | 1,253,158 | 1,391,364 | 1,424,620 | 1,413,597 | 2,686,791 | 1,763,168 | 2,621,834 | 1,693,140 | 1,492,876 | 2,181,898 | -5.97% | |
| - | ||||||||||||||
| Net Worth | 6,778,358 | 6,778,358 | 6,828,943 | 6,778,358 | 6,677,188 | 6,879,527 | 7,305,272 | 7,078,399 | 7,078,399 | 6,851,528 | 6,806,154 | 6,352,410 | 0.80% | |
| Equity | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Worth | 6,778,358 | 6,778,358 | 6,828,943 | 6,778,358 | 6,677,188 | 6,879,527 | 7,305,272 | 7,078,399 | 7,078,399 | 6,851,528 | 6,806,154 | 6,352,410 | 0.80% | |
| NOSH | 5,058,476 | 5,058,476 | 5,058,476 | 5,058,476 | 5,058,476 | 5,058,476 | 4,537,436 | 4,537,436 | 4,537,436 | 4,537,436 | 4,537,436 | 4,537,436 | 1.21% | |
| Ratio Analysis | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP Margin | 6.27% | 6.67% | 6.42% | 5.57% | -17.62% | -24.34% | 7.65% | 13.74% | 9.70% | 8.06% | 14.69% | 18.03% | - | |
| ROE | 0.98% | 1.14% | 1.11% | 1.19% | -3.21% | -4.03% | 3.06% | 3.96% | 3.96% | 2.15% | 3.78% | 7.56% | - | |
| Per Share | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPS | 21.07 | 24.15 | 26.47 | 29.13 | 23.94 | 22.47 | 64.12 | 45.05 | 63.99 | 40.58 | 38.57 | 58.66 | -8.45% | |
| EPS | 1.31 | 1.53 | 1.50 | 1.59 | -4.24 | -5.48 | 4.93 | 6.00 | 6.17 | 2.97 | 5.67 | 10.58 | -19.50% | |
| DPS | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 3.00 | -14.26% | |
| NAPS | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.61 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.51 | 1.50 | 1.40 | -0.40% | |
| Adjusted Per Share Value based on latest NOSH - 5,058,476 | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPS | 21.07 | 24.15 | 26.47 | 29.13 | 23.94 | 22.47 | 57.52 | 40.41 | 57.40 | 36.40 | 34.59 | 52.62 | -7.34% | |
| EPS | 1.31 | 1.53 | 1.50 | 1.59 | -4.24 | -5.48 | 4.42 | 5.54 | 5.54 | 2.91 | 5.08 | 9.49 | -18.52% | |
| DPS | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 2.69 | -13.22% | |
| NAPS | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.4442 | 1.3993 | 1.3993 | 1.3545 | 1.3455 | 1.2558 | 0.80% | |
| Price Multiplier on Financial Quarter End Date | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | 30/09/24 | 30/09/24 | 29/12/23 | 30/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 29/12/17 | 30/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | - | |
| Price | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.815 | 0.255 | 0.32 | 0.495 | 0.705 | 0.665 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.41 | - | |
| P/RPS | 4.75 | 4.14 | 3.08 | 0.88 | 1.34 | 2.20 | 1.10 | 1.48 | 1.63 | 2.59 | 2.90 | 2.40 | 2.80% | |
| P/EPS | 75.86 | 65.40 | 54.44 | 16.02 | -7.55 | -9.03 | 14.29 | 10.76 | 16.85 | 32.34 | 19.76 | 13.33 | 16.91% | |
| EY | 1.32 | 1.53 | 1.84 | 6.24 | -13.24 | -11.07 | 7.00 | 9.29 | 5.94 | 3.09 | 5.06 | 7.50 | -14.44% | |
| DY | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 2.13 | -8.90% | |
| P/NAPS | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.01 | -5.61% | |
| Price Multiplier on Announcement Date | ||||||||||||||
| AQR | T4Q | 31/12/23 | 31/12/22 | 31/12/21 | 31/12/20 | 31/12/19 | 31/12/18 | 31/12/17 | 31/12/16 | 31/12/15 | 31/12/14 | CAGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | 21/11/24 | 21/11/24 | 27/02/24 | 23/02/23 | 23/02/22 | 24/03/21 | 24/02/20 | 26/02/19 | 27/02/18 | 27/02/17 | 25/02/16 | 26/02/15 | - | |
| Price | 0.965 | 0.965 | 1.04 | 0.26 | 0.355 | 0.45 | 0.615 | 0.845 | 1.13 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 1.38 | - | |
| P/RPS | 4.58 | 4.00 | 3.93 | 0.89 | 1.48 | 2.00 | 0.96 | 1.88 | 1.77 | 2.83 | 2.59 | 2.35 | 5.87% | |
| P/EPS | 73.21 | 63.11 | 69.47 | 16.33 | -8.38 | -8.21 | 12.47 | 13.68 | 18.31 | 35.42 | 17.64 | 13.05 | 20.40% | |
| EY | 1.37 | 1.58 | 1.44 | 6.12 | -11.94 | -12.18 | 8.02 | 7.31 | 5.46 | 2.82 | 5.67 | 7.66 | -16.93% | |
| DY | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 2.17 | -11.52% | |
| P/NAPS | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.99 | -2.75% | |
PBT = Profit before Tax, NP = Net Profit, NP to SH = Net Profit Attributable to Shareholder, Div = Dividend, NP Margin = Net Profit Margin, ROE = Return on Equity, NOSH = Number of Shares, RPS = Revenue per Share, EPS = Earning Per Share, DPS = Dividend Per Share, NAPS = Net Asset Per Share, EOQ = End of Quarter, ANN = Announcement, P/RPS = Price/Revenue per Share, P/EPS = Price/Earning per Share, P/NAPS = Price/Net Asset per Share, EY = Earning Yield, DY = Dividend Yield.
NOSH is estimated based on the NP to SH and EPS. Div is an estimated figure based on the DPS and NOSH. Net Worth is an estimated figure based on the NAPS and NOSH.
Div Payout %, NP Margin, ROE, DY, QoQ ⃤ & YoY ⃤ figures in Percentage; RPS, EPS & DPS's figures in Cent; and NAPS's figures in Dollar.
All figures in '000 unless specified.
Discussions
20 people like this. Showing 50 of 14,104 comments
UEM阳光的日线图，出现横摆突破形态。日线相对强度指数（RSI）处于72.43水平。股价或在短期继续上探1.15至1.18令吉的阻力水平，支撑位置处于1.01至1.04令吉。
1 week ago
The HSR could be one of the immediate catalysts for the sector moving into 1H25, and UEMS had been one of the most underperforming stocks over the last six months. While it may be speculative, if the HSR project is to be reinstated, UEMS will be the largest beneficiary among all other developers. More than 90% of its landbank is located in Iskandar Malaysia (4,471 acres worth MYR45bn GDV in Gerbang Nusajaya).
Although the alignment and stations are uncertain, having a station in Nusajaya/Forest City area is almost certain, in our view. Hence, given UEMS’ vast landbank there, it is wellpositioned to capture and benefit from the positive spillover.
1 week ago
the signing of a definitive agreement related to the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) and recent news flow on the KL-SG HSR and Bandar Malaysia will likely buoy sentiment on the sector.
https://klse.i3investor.com/web/blog/detail/rhbinvest/2025-01-03-story-h497668513-Real_Estate_Asset_Domination_The_New_Frontier_In_Real_Estate
1 week ago
Insyaallah monday another 10percent up. 25 million share still short position.
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20250102.pdf?t=1735902784
1 week ago
From the beginning the government already indicate that this HSR has to be privately funded before submission of proposal. Im sure all participants already find their way to fund it. If they cant fund it then why they submit proposal.
1 week ago
who want to put in money in Malaysia?
A clear cut case of a mega Thief siphoning off $50B, CERTIFIED BY HIGH COURT AND COURT OF APPEAL, 9 UNANIMOUSLY I confirmed FRAUD AND GUILTY, can be manipulated by the streets macais as unjust, therefore justify jail at home. Who dare to invest $50b again in Malaysia when court judgement can be manipulated as they like?
1 week ago
UEMs got any relation to HSR kah?
i buy gamuda and UEMS yst..one win one lose, in the end no gain
1 week ago
The idea of transforming Johor Bahru into a special economic zone (SEZ) similar to Shenzhen was noting new as it was proposed 20 years ago but never took off. This is largely because Malaysia is one of the last places Singapore would consider for investment due to historical tensions.
The Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) is different, not for economic reasons but due to political realities. Singapore aims to make Johor a buffer zone for the "green tsunami." Singapore will ensure the success of the JS-SEZ so that JB people focus on business rather than engaging in political discussions that could incite racial hatred which will make the foreign investors in Singapore mentally uncomfortable.
We can forget about the high-speed bullet train in the context of the JS-SEZ. Singapore is well aware that it won't make a difference, as foreign investors are unlikely to invest billions of dollars in Malaysia due to unstable political reasons. Singapore is more concerned that Johor Bahru turning green will negatively impact their economy, as Singapore heavily relies on JB's water supplies.
Lee Kuan Yew said: "I would sleep more comfortably with Umno in power as it is a party I have known since the 1940s"
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/mr-lee-kuan-yew-had-malaysias-interest-at-heart-too-ceo-the-star
1 week ago
The SEZ will push up land prices (UEMS, Sunway) and create a lot of construction jobs (Gamuda, Suncon). But most of the high value businesses are expected to remain in Singapore and Suzhou Industrial Park and only those labor intensive low margin business will go JB as Malaysia education system failed to produce high tech workers so the economic multiplier effects of SEZ will be limited.
1 week ago
李光耀的中國
马来西亚曾经绞尽脑汁打压新加坡成为《假想敌》，结果马来西亚的经济越来越弱，新加坡越来越强。同样道理，李光耀认为西方国家对中国的打压只会让中国越来越强大。
https://klse.i3investor.com/web/blog/detail/mindfullness/2024-12-30-story-h496951889
1 week ago
This economic zone was proposed 20 years ago to attract investments from the Middle East. However, after two decades of waiting, there are no signs of Middle Eastern funds showing interest in Malaysia. JSSEZ will become more of a political buffer zone for Singapore to distance or keep at bay the "green tsunami." If Johor turns green, Singapore would suffer the most, both economically and politically. As a result, Singapore will likely shift low-margin, labor-intensive industries (similar to JCY) to JSSEZ.
6 days ago
For sure Johor GDP will overtake KL in five to ten years time because Singapore will shift their low value products or so called backyard industries to JSSEZ to take advantage of cheaper land and labour in this areas but some analysts could have overestimated the potential of this is economic zone. 30 years ago Malaysia told the world we will become an automobile super power so we bought outdated technology from Mitsubishi but after 30 years we still don't know how to produce our own engine head so can we rival the development of Shenzhen? The answer is pretty obvious:)
5 days ago
When 吉利 was producing cheap freezer we already setup mega factory to produce Proton car but this Proton car was really a nightmare sometimes the power windows cannot open during humid day and cannot close during raining day so after 30 years Proton can't survive the global competition and sold to 吉利 which is world's number one automobile company so can JSSEZ mirror the development of Shenzhen? We need to fix our education system so that our students can count the math correctly or else no way Malaysia can compete with Vietnam and not to mention even US cannot compete with China in terms of technology development.
5 days ago
Singapore syndicate will gang up to push up land prices and many foreign workers in Penang and KL will move to JB and JB will become metropolitan similar to Penang or KL and nothing more so it is over hyped to say JSSEZ will become Shenzhen. 20 years ago we sold some big volume of palm oil to USSR and this calculative Russian instead of fully settle the trade with cash they offer us a free seat for space travel and Malaysia twisted the story and told the world we will become an astronaut super power so after 20 years we still cannot see a single rocket designed and build by our local university but China has landed their lunar spaceship to the moon so can we rival the development of Shenzhen? Hahaha...
5 days ago
30 years ago we invited Bill Gates to become our MSC advisor and then we told the world we will become internet super power of the world and that time 马云 was still a tour guide in Hangzhou who can speak very well English so one day billionaire Yahoo founder Jerry Yang visted China Jack Ma voluntarily become his tour guide free of charge and both of them become good friend so Jack Ma asked Jerry Yang to invest in his startup Alibaba and Alibaba becomes an internet super power and our MSC corridor still without a single window so can JSSEZ rival the development of Shenzhen? We need to do one thing at a time. We are telling the world we like to design our own CHIP to rival Nvidia but most of our high school students failed their math so most likely it will be an empty talk again just like the Lynas case.
5 days ago
If we like to rival the development of Shenzhen, we need to totally revamp our education system as 90,000 failed maths, 52,000 failed English. Most importantly, we need to allow international students to wear short pant in UM library or else no way top international students will come here to study for obvious reason. Also in the special economic zone we need to allow foreign investors to renew all their business permits online as sometime the offline security guards are too busybody and require everyone to follow his highest moral standard and as we know foreign visitors are puzzled by our high moral standard and don't like to wear long pants to fully cover their legs so it will be a cultural shock to them to do business here. In the worst case scenario, we may need to allow them to wear rainbow watch or else they will prefer to setup factory in Thailand for obvious reason:
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/06/22/90000-failed-spm-maths-52000-failed-english-says-ngo/
5 days ago
Stock futures are little changed as Wall Street gears up for key data, earnings season: Live updates
2 days ago
Post a Comment
Featured Posts
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
MQ Trading Signals
Time
Signal
Duration
Type
2025-01-15 09:20:00
EMA 5
10 Mins
SELL
2025-01-15 09:10:00
EMA 5
10 Mins
BUY
2025-01-15 08:00:00
EMA 5
Daily
SELL
Apps
Top Articles
1
2
Good Articles to Share
Eli Lilly CEO on Fighting Cancer and Obesity, Drug Pricing (Correct)
3
Good Articles to Share
Evercore ISI's Julian Emanuel says its too early to buy weakness
4
Good Articles to Share
5
Good Articles to Share
6
Good Articles to Share
7
Good Articles to Share
Thousands help at huge Los Angeles wildfire donation center | REUTERS
8
Good Articles to Share
Tens of thousands demonstrate in nationwide strike in Belgium | REUTERS
#
Stock
Score
Daily Stocks
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Featured Advertisers / Partners
Ride The Bull Short The Bear
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
hng33
Last week, MRCB confirmed the termination of a teaming agreement it had with a consortium led by the Berjaya Group. The consortium was set up to put together a non-binding conceptual proposal for MyHSR Corporation Sdn Bhd regarding potential strategic opportunities.
According to reports, MRCB, which carries an AA-IS rating, likely withdrew from the multi-billion ringgit project given the massive financial risks which the company’s shareholders, which include the Employees Provident Fund, Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP) and Tabung Haji, would have been exposed to.
Reports have also suggested that MRCB, which has spearheaded large transport infrastructure projects such as the development of LRT3, made its decision after rumours suggested that a joint venture between YTL Construction and SIPP Rail would likely win the bidding exercise.
2 weeks ago