"Your big opportunity may be right where you are now" Napoleon Hill
I have three portfolios of stocks set up in i3investors for the past two years for sharing purpose. Almost all the stocks chosen were accompanied with their investment thesis as published in i3investor. As we begin with a brand new year, it is good to examine the returns of these portfolios, what have gone right or wrong with the strategies, and what are the necessary actions to be taken for improvement.
You would notice that all stocks in my portfolio are small to medium capitalized stocks. I am a value investor trying to find good companies trading at cheap price. It is hard to find them in the large capitalized stocks which are closely followed and owned by local and foreign funds and hence would likely to be fully or overvalued.
My Third Portfolio
Table 1 in the Appendix shows my latest portfolio of stocks, My Third Portfolio, selected for the past one year. My report on each individual stock selected were published in i3investor. It is made up of a combination of investing principles; the Greenblatt Magic Formula (MF) mostly and the Graham Net Current Asset Value (NCAV) for Kuchai, Plenitude and Perak Corporation, and a couple of company warrants as leveraged instruments in MRCB and BIMB based on Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model Valuation.
This portfolio made an average return of -1.3% compared to the loss of 1.5% of the broad KLCI index. The winners outperformed the losers by 8 to 7 with a median return of +5.0%.
The return of the portfolio is skewed by the gain of 45.3% of Latitude Tree, and Pintaras of +31.2%. Thanks for the booming furniture export industry and the booming construction industry. The big losers are the two company warrants of MRCB Wa of -40.0% and BIMB Wa of-34.1%, and the aborted selected capital reduction proposal of Perak Corp of -36.3%.
The lessons here are;
Invest in company warrants when they are undervalued by using a small amount of money and let the leverage takes care of itself, and not be greedy and punt with big sum of money and risk of getting caught with big losses when the market turns unfavourable. And most of all, understand what you are into.
Am I going to keep any of these stocks for the new year, and if so, which ones? We will have to examine each of them based on the principles of the MF or Graham NCAV.
My Second Portfolio
This portfolio of mine was published in i3investor by the courtesy of Tan KW as “Stock Pick and Trading Challenge 2013 2H”, on 1st August 2013, some 17 months ago.
http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/pfs/21089.jsp
Please note that the return as shown in the website above has not included some corporate exercises and dividend payments. The stocks were chosen mainly based on the principles of MF; i.e. buying good companies at cheap or reasonable price. I went a step further in examining their income statements, financial health and quality of earnings in cash flow.
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/51631.jsp
All the selections were accompanied with detailed analysis and published in i3investor.
My Second Portfolio returned an average of 54.4% compared to the return of KLCI of 3.4% during the same period 17 months ago as shown in Table 2 in the Appendix. The return is 10.3% higher than the return of 44.1% exactly a year ago on 31st December 2013, while KLCI retreated by 1.5% during the same period. I am quite happy with this performance.
The good return of My Second Portfolio was highly skewed by Datasonics, which with its split, bonus issue etc, has returned a whopping 275% in the seventeen months. Homeritz is another high performer returning 113%. Thanks to the booming furniture export market and the alert by an i3investor reader (and a student of mine) who has highlighted this stock. I often got good leads from some i3investor readers and participants of my course as I have limited knowledge of the opportunities available in Bursa.
The worst performer is Tien Wah but with a moderate loss of 20%. No thanks to the strict implementation by the relevant authorities for banning the use of labelling in cigarette packet.
Well that is what one needs, a few big gainers and as little losers as possible in your portfolio and you will be doing alright. There are only two out of eleven losers in the portfolio and their losses is minimal. That is the gist of value investing. Thanks to the principles of the Magic Formula. It even works for the short term.
The question is do the stocks still meet the principles of MF and to be kept for the new year?
My First Portfolio
This My First Portfolio, also set up by Tan KW, is the longest as published in i3investor, but just makes it to two years, although I have many stocks there since 5-6 years ago.
http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/pfs/13147.jsp
Also note that the return of stocks and the portfolio has not included the corporate exercises and dividends as shown in the website. These stocks were also chosen basing on the MF.
All 10 stocks in the portfolio have positive total returns which varies from the lowest of 3.5% for Kumpulan Fima to 171% for Jobstreet for the last two years. There is not even a single loser. The average return is 74.8% compared to 12.9% of the broad market during the same period. The high performers were Jobstreet (171%), Prestariang (164%), Pintaras (151%), and SKP Resources (103%). The only poor performer which lagged behind the index is Kumpulan Fima. The average return since a year ago improves by 22.4% from 52.4% to 74.8%, while the broad market retreated by 1.5%. Hence the excess return, alpha, of the portfolio has widened considerably to 62% (74.8%-12.9%) since the portfolio was first set up two years ago.
Three of those high gainers have gone through a corporate exercises; share split for Jobstreet and bonus issues for Prestariang and Pintaras. But actually it was their good performance with increasing revenues, profits and operational efficiencies which raised their valuations. But what is wrong with Kumpulan Fima regarding its lethargic share price. I have no answer.
Are the high returns of the portfolio accompanied by higher risk as suggested by the efficient Market Hypothesis? Not that I am aware of as shown in my previous analysis here:
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/44336.jsp
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/44334.jsp
Again that is what you need in investment, a few high performers and as little low performers as possible. That is the wonder of the Magic Formula and value investing. It also works well for the middle term.
The more important questions is which are the stocks still good and value stocks? In this portfolio, as many of them have risen in prices substantially, some of them have their business deteriorated, and they are no longer good or value stocks. We will examine them one by one later using the principles of the Magic Formula plus some minor tweaking.
For those who are interested to learn how to identify good companies, and most of all if their stocks are offerred cheap, for a fee, please contact me at
ckc13invest@gmail.com
Wishing everyone a Happy and Prosperous New Year.
K C Chong on 2015 New Year Day
Table 1: Performance of My Third Portfolio
Stock |
Ref Price |
Dividend |
31/12/2014 |
Total return |
Kuchai |
1.20 |
0.00 |
1.26 |
5.0% |
Prestariang |
1.25 |
0.05 |
1.44 |
19.2% |
Perak corp |
3.69 |
0 |
2.35 |
-36.3% |
Magni |
2.63 |
0.05 |
2.72 |
5.3% |
Latitude |
2.57 |
0.085 |
3.65 |
45.3% |
MFCB |
2.24 |
0.045 |
2.400 |
9.2% |
Padini |
1.75 |
0.055 |
1.46 |
-13.4% |
Pintaras |
2.95 |
0.14 |
3.73 |
31.2% |
Scientex |
5.74 |
0.08 |
7.09 |
24.9% |
Tasco |
3.15 |
0.05 |
2.78 |
-10.2% |
MRCB Wa |
0.275 |
0 |
0.165 |
-40.0% |
BIMB W |
0.660 |
0 |
0.435 |
-34.1% |
Plenitude |
3.15 |
0.06 |
2.29 |
-25.4% |
Tong Her |
2.35 |
0.06 |
2.02 |
-11.5% |
UchiTech |
1.33 |
0.05 |
1.43 |
11.3% |
|
|
|||
Ave Return |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
-1.3% |
Median return |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
5.0% |
KLSE |
1844 |
xxxx |
1761 |
-4.5% |
Table 2: Return of My Second Portfolio
New |
1/08/2013 |
31/12/2014 |
Dividend |
xxxx |
xxxx |
Pintaras |
2.495 |
3.730 |
0.185 |
1.420 |
56.9% |
Kfima |
2.060 |
1.930 |
0.160 |
0.030 |
1.5% |
MFCB |
1.700 |
2.400 |
0.105 |
0.805 |
47.4% |
Haio |
2.670 |
2.200 |
0.220 |
-0.250 |
-9.4% |
Fibon |
0.330 |
0.400 |
0.0125 |
0.083 |
25.0% |
CBIP |
2.830 |
4.167 |
0.100 |
1.437 |
50.8% |
Tien Wah |
2.510 |
1.860 |
0.148 |
-0.502 |
-20.0% |
Homeritz |
0.430 |
0.860 |
0.058 |
0.488 |
113.4% |
Willow |
0.530 |
0.750 |
0.040 |
0.260 |
49.1% |
Daiman |
2.530 |
2.650 |
0.120 |
0.240 |
9.5% |
Datasonic |
0.335 |
1.230 |
0.025 |
0.920 |
274.6% |
|
|
||||
Average |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
54.4% |
Median |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
47.4% |
KLSE |
1773 |
1761 |
72.69 |
60.7 |
3.4% |
Alpha |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
xxxx |
51.0% |
Table 3: My First Portfolio
Date |
21/01/2013 |
31/12/2014 |
|
|
|
Stock Name |
Ref Price |
Price now |
Dividend |
Gain |
% gain |
Kfima |
2.02 |
1.93 |
0.16 |
0.070 |
3.5% |
Pintaras |
1.56 |
3.73 |
0.185 |
2.355 |
151% |
ECS |
1.06 |
1.18 |
0.13 |
0.250 |
23.6% |
Plenitude |
1.85 |
2.29 |
0.12 |
0.560 |
30.3% |
Jobstreest |
1.20 |
0.47 |
2.787 |
2.057 |
171% |
Pantech |
0.78 |
0.77 |
0.13 |
0.120 |
15.4% |
SKPRes |
0.34 |
0.640 |
0.05 |
0.350 |
102.9% |
NTPM |
0.47 |
0.62 |
0.07 |
0.220 |
46.8% |
Kimlun |
0.93 |
1.19 |
0.1 |
0.360 |
38.7% |
Prestariang |
0.605 |
1.44 |
0.16 |
0.995 |
164% |
|
|
||||
Average |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
74.8% |
Median |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
xxx |
42.8% |
FTSE Mid70 |
12294 |
13065 |
615 |
1386 |
11.3% |
KLSE |
1632 |
1761 |
82 |
211 |
12.9% |
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 22, 2024
Which to buy, Insas or Insas WC?
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 15, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 01, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Dec 25, 2023
Created by kcchongnz | Oct 02, 2022
johnny cash,
My email address ckc13invest@gmail.com
Oh yes, those interested in learning how to identify good companies, and most of all, how to know if it is not expensive to buy their stocks can contact me at the above address.
What else is more important that this?
2015-01-02 04:30
Hi kcchong : Under thread “Stock Pick Year 2014 - Final Update on 31-Dec-2014”, one of the forumer is so desperate to know your pick for 2015 till using ungraceful words. From one side, I am sorry for you receiving those ungraceful comments but on the flip side, it can be seen as a compliment to your great achievement(“kong fu”) albeit it was expressed thru undesirable way.
In fact I am very keen to know your pick too. I always educate my friends that if they want to make wealth thru Bursa, one of the proven way is thru “value Investing” in long term as shown by the unbelievable result by one of the forumer from NZ. I do wish that you compile your list of portfolio for 2015, so that I could use them as another solid example to show them that “value investing” really works effectively.
Unfortunately, I am a rotten old bird, cannot learn new trick anymore else I would have made some wealth from the past 2 years after knowing you. Worst still that the only 2 counters which I coincidentally having similar view with you are not the winners.
Mr kcchongnz : Thank you very much for your unabated great contribution to investing community and a Happy New Year to you.
2015-01-02 10:24
Kevin, happy new year to you too.
bsngpg, from the first question he asked, I know he came with malicious intentions. He must be using new ids all the time trying to do this and feel "siok" about it. It is ok with me as I can counter him, no problem. But I want to curb his "siokness", otherwise he will do it to many others who may be easily get hurt.
To me value investing is the way to go for long term wealth building. But it is difficult, not because the things you do in value investing is difficult, but it is the psychological aspect of it. Few can stay a "value investor" after seeing his portfolio devastated by 20%, 30%. But that happen often. It is only in the long term, value investing will show results, provided you do the right value investing.
My portfolio is nothing as I have a lot of limitations as an individual. You can actually find many good value portfolios in the 2015 stock pick challenge now going on. Try scout from there.
But one thing for sure, those value portfolios there will do well in the long term, but not in a one-year competition like that.
Of course to have better chance of success, one has to learn and do the value investing the right way. Something too simple is unlikely to yield extra-ordinary results. But it doesn't mean value investing has to be complicated.
Don't say you are old, I doubt you are older than me. It is the willingness to spend time and effort, and most of all truly believe value investing works. The last one is the hardest.
2015-01-02 15:16
“simple is unlikely to yield extra-ordinary results” : superficial calculation is simple but data verification and understanding are very difficult.
“the difficult part is psychological aspect of it” : seeing value evaporates by 20-30% is still bearable, the most torturing part is seeing other’s up by 20-30% but our own selection is not moving.
“TRULY believe value investing works”: in early days I argued with you that I am a value investor too. Now I know I am not a TRUE one, maybe a half-boiled one. I believe there are many half-boiled out there but self-presume that they are value investors. Nevertheless, we, half-boiled, do good to the market by contributing fund and sentiment to it but letting value investors to spot and catch the value. He! He! What a pity half-boiled.
2015-01-02 16:17
@bsngpg, you may consider to join Mr. Chong's course. You should able to equip yourself with some good hunting tools from the course.
2015-01-02 22:34
20-30% losses when market is at its all time high not scary? You must be kidding.
2015-01-03 07:40
KC will refute my statement by asking 'What is it's IV?' After observing the price & IV for sometimes, I notice that price seldom catch up with IV. Very often IV will deteriorate with company fundamental (without much warning) & fell to the market's anticipated price (especially small cap). I believe in value investing. Shall we be skeptical as well (half boiled)?
2015-01-03 07:53
Skepticism is utmost necessary in investing. There is no Holy Grail in investing. Independent and critical thinking are other important traits in investing.
Value investing as I have said many times before, doesn't necessary works for everyone. If it does, it would have all been arbitraged away in a seemingly efficient market, and nobody can benefit from the market using this strategy any more. However the evidence has shown again and again it is otherwise.
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/50988.jsp
Well so far, it certainly works for me as shown in the portfolios above, not for the last few months, but a longer period of 2 years for my first portfolio, and 17 months for the second portfolio. Even those periods are too short to be meaningful.
2015-01-03 10:10
Posted by SS661M > Jan 3, 2015 07:40 AM | Report Abuse
20-30% losses when market is at its all time high not scary? You must be kidding.
I agree. Must have no losses otherwise be like Leno Bo Cash C.
2015-01-03 10:27
If 20-30% is something unbearable, you must be very optimistic on the behavior of the market. I envy you. I am an ordinary participant in the market, I see it as a norm albeit it is an unpleasant fact.
2015-01-03 13:02
I perceive the relatively less outstanding portfolio #3 is mainly due to the 2 Wa and the timing of its inception when market stood at as high as at 1844. Some may think that value is irrelevant to timing(index), but I do believe ratio of risk to return will increases along the index, and thus value decreases. Wrong concept? Maybe that is the reason I am still drifting in the market.
2015-01-03 13:23
Only after 3 bear cycles or minimum of 15years, will we know how good a investor really is.
After 3 years, we will know how good a market timer one really is! Or, should we say how lucky instead?
2015-01-03 19:49
johnny cash
Kcchongnz thanks it s very helpfull....please can you provide your e mail address?
2015-01-01 23:56