What exactly is value investing?
Most people have the opinion that value investing is buying cheap stocks – those that are trading at low price to earnings or low price to book value. I am not surprised that some people even think that value investing is buying low-priced stocks, those penny stocks selling for a few cents.
Of late I even heard a guy saying that value investing is to buy any of those 30 component stocks forming the FBM KLCI, those with big capitalization. He incessantly saying that investing other than those big capitalized stocks, for example, investing in stocks in the ACE market is gambling and fraudulent. You can read his comments repeated scores of times in this thread here.
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/120082.jsp
This is new to me and I am sure very foreign to most true value investors too. But how far is it true?
Just fathom that; how can one find good value in Genting, Maybank, public Bank, IOI, KLK, Maxis, BAT, etc. when every fund manager must own them?
Yes, buying the stocks above can be value investing too, only when they are selling cheap, and only when there is a big sale in the market when there is a crisis, or a temporary set-back to their earnings. But generally, they are often already fully valued, or even overvalued because of the action of bidding up their prices by all the fund managers and institutional investors.
On the contrary, almost all value investors look at the forgotten and beaten path, trying to find values where others, i.e. the fund managers, institutional investors are not interested in because of the sheer size of their fund under management, and have no mandate to invest in. Or like that guy above who has not the slightest idea of what value investing is, and hence avoid looking at them at all costs.
Isn’t this the purpose of value investing, to buy a stock when it is selling cheap?
What did Buffett say about value investing?
In his 1992 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Warren Buffett wrote…
“We think the very term ‘value investing’ is redundant. What is ‘investing’ if it is not the act of seeking value at least sufficient to justify the amount paid? Consciously paying more for a stock than its calculated value – in the hope that it can soon be sold for a still-higher price – should be labelled speculation (which is neither illegal, immoral nor – in our view – financially fattening).”
“Whether appropriate or not, the term ‘value investing’ is widely used. Typically, it connotes the purchase of stocks having attributes such as a low ratio of price to book value, a low price-earnings ratio, or a high dividend yield. Unfortunately, such characteristics, even if they appear in combination, are far from determinative as to whether an investor is indeed buying something for what it is worth and is therefore truly operating on the principle of obtaining value in his investments.”
So, it’s the ‘processes of picking up bargain stocks that value investing is all about. It is not as simplistic as some investors think. You must know what you are getting into.
Charlie Munger, Berkshire Hathaway’s Vice Chairman, who has influenced Buffet in purchase of Coca Cola and other seemingly high price acquisitions mentioned it out clearly.
“All intelligent investing is value investing - acquiring more than you are paying for. You must value the business in order to value the stock.”
Munger explained further,
“You’re looking for a mispriced gamble. That’s what investing is. And you have to know enough to know whether the gamble is mispriced. That’s value investing.”
So, value investing is intelligent investing. Value investing is about looking for a mispriced gamble, getting more than you are paying for. It is not just about buying growth stocks, or cheap stocks.
It is not about if the stock is listed in the DJI, S&P 500, NASDAQ, or Russel 5000 etc. It is not about if it is listed in the Main Board, or the ACE Market of Bursa.
Seth Klarmen said,
“Picking through the crumbs left by investment elephants can be rewarding.”
Value investors follow a proven process, to buy good companies selling at reasonable or cheap price. You must know enough about the business and hence the value the business. The figure below gives us an idea how the thought and analitical process is,
It is still a gamble, nothing is for sure in this world except death and taxes, but by knowing the business and its value well enough, the probability of winning is higher. yes, it is a probabilistic outcome.
Value investing is both a mind-set as well as a rigorous discipline.
Value investing focuses not only on how much money one can make from the market, knowing that everybody is trying to do that and hence it is not easy, but also avoid mistakes, resisting market fads, and hence the risks of losing with the investing motto of,
“Focus on the downside and the upside will take care of itself” Mark Sellers
Value investing is considered as a marathon, with winners and losers identified over a period of several years, not days, weeks or months, although value investors may not keep investment for ten years or decades.
How profitable is value investing?
In a paper titled “The Super Investors of Graham and Doddsville”, Warren Buffet showed the track records of each of nine disciples of Benjamin Graham showing that they all generated annual compounded returns of between 18% and 29% over track records lasting between 14 to 30 years. Is it likely that these individuals from the same school of thought could all beat the market over a generation if the stock market was a place of luck? Warren Buffett doubted it most eloquently when he said, “I'd be a bum on the street with a tin cup if the market was always efficient”.
Let’s have a look at their profit history...
Investor |
No. of Yrs |
Annualised Return |
S&P / Dow Return |
Buffett Partnership |
13 |
29.5% |
7.4 % (Dow) |
Walter Schloss |
28 |
21.3% |
8.4% |
Tweedy Browne |
16 |
20% |
7% |
Bill Ruane |
14 |
18.2% |
10% |
Charlie Munger |
14 |
19.8% |
5.0% (Dow) |
Pacific Partners |
18 |
32.9% |
7.8% |
Perlmeter Investments |
18 |
23% |
7.0 % (Dow) |
How fantastic have been the outcomes of some super investors in their value investing endeavour. Take for example Walter Schloss. $100000 invested by him for 28 years earnings a CAR of 21.3% became $22.3m, compared to $957k invested in the broad S&P 500 during the same period.
In his latest book, “The value Investors, Lessons from the World’s Top Fund Managers” published in 2012, Ronald W. Chan interviewed twelve top fund managers from US, Europe, and Asia using various forms of value investing expounded by the Super Investors of Graham and Doddsville. The evidences showed it has worked all over the world.
I just listen to the presentation of Dato Sri Cheah Cheng Hye of Value Partners of Hong Kong, who is well known as Warren Buffett of Asia this morning. He started to become famous was when he started his fund invested in small and mid-sized capitalization stocks, which institutional investors scorned of, and made barn-storming return. His USD5m AUM 23 years ago has grown to USD16b now. The cumulative return of the fund is 2530%, or a CAGR of 15.5%, even after going through a few crisis such as the major ones in Internet Bubble in 2001, and the subprime housing crisis in the US in 2008, and a few minor ones.
We also have our Malaysian super investor, Fong SL, or Cold Eye. He has been obtaining fantastic return from his value investing. And there are many of his stocks are small capitalized stocks.
But does value investing work for me in Bursa? What and where are the evidence? This is always a pertinent question.
I had just written an article, “Luck or Skill, who is lucky and who is skillful?” in i3investor in the link below,
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/119863.jsp
In the link above, it shows a portfolio of 10 stocks of mine, named “GE13 Watch” set up in i3investor on the same date on 23rd January 2013, and another one, “Stock Pick Challenge 2H 2013” on 1st August 2013. The stocks in there are all small and medium capitalization stocks. There is nothing to be shameful about when you are investing in good companies at cheap prices.
On the first one, “GE13 Watch”, this is the summary of the total return as on today on 6th April 2017,
“During this period, the average return of the portfolio of ten stocks is 143.3%, or a median return of 92.5%, widely out-performed the gain of the broad market KLCI of just 20.6%. The compounded annual return of the portfolio (CAR) is high at 24%”.
On the second portfolio, “Stock Pick Challenge 2103 2H”,
“During this period, the return of the broad market was up by 8.4%. The portfolio of stocks out-performed the broad KLSE market with an average return of 145%, or a median of 71%. The CAR of the portfolio is 30%, even better than the “GE13 Stock Watch” above. if I could put aside RM1000 a month and invest in the share market for a return of 30%, I would have accumulated a total of about RM9m in 30 years, a huge sum of money.”
There were a few stocks which were, or once were from the Mesdaq or ACE market before such as Willow, Datasonic, Homeritz, Fibon, Jobstreet etc. they were all barn-stormers, with multi-bagger returns of 505%, 482%, 159%, 200% respectively, in just 3 and a half years.
These are longer duration portfolio of more than 4 years. I have a number of shorter-term portfolios. They behave the same, making outsized return, all of them. Value investing is supposed to work for long-term. It also works for me in the short-term, so far, without fail. You can find them in i3investor where I share my investing knowledge and experience all these years.
[Flintstones Hi KC, have you spot any bargains in the market lately? Looking forward to your next stock call]
Sorry, I seldom share stock pick in public forum any more, for the simple reason that I can’t be right all the time. if I am right, even every time, you won’t thank me. But if I am wrong just once, you will scorn and ridicule me. So, what for?
However, I do have a stock pick service giving to my past and present investment course participants. This service come with detail analysis and valuation of stock picks, plus carefully selected watch lists. They can evaluate and understand my investment thesis and make up their own decision. They don't blindly buy what I have written. I am glad to say that a number of them have obtained about 30% return from less than a year ago, with the highest at 33+%.
Hence, at least as it is now, no one can ridicule with with statement like this,
[Posted by Flintstones > Dec 2, 2016 12:05 PM | Report Abuse
Posted by paperplane2016 > Dec 2, 2016 12:03 PM | Report Abuse
hahahaha.,.,.,.,.,.,kc chong write fancy FA studies, but still fail to make money.
Reason: Tak ADA COMMON SENSE mah!!!!
hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
He probably makes more money from his followers lah]
Anyway, that is how value investing is rewarded; willing to drive down the forgotten and beaten track.
But beware, it is true that there are many traps in the ACE market too, and many people do lose their pants there; not because these stocks are listed in ACE, but because they know nothing in investing, and merely listening to rumours, hopes, hypes and fads. There are easier to be manipulating and hence more pump and dump activities there too.
Is Value Investing Easy?
“Investing is not easy, anyone thinks it is easy is stupid.” – Charles Munger
Most new “value investors” are upset after one week, mad after one month, and gone after one year when value investing doesn’t work. In fact, most investors aren’t cut out for value investing. This is simply because value investing can get really painful, and human nature shrinks from pain. Making money on value stocks – which is the goal of every value investor – is harder than it sounds and can take years to play out.
In fact, identifying a value stock and buying it is a relatively easier proposition, provided you must, at the minimum, know the language of business, that is understand and know how to read financial statements, understand shareholder value creation, and able to do some valuations. But value investing is difficult because…
In all, value investing requires hard work. This is probably the reason you won’t find many value investors out there. But whoever has had the patience to practice value investing in its real form, has done wonders for his stock portfolio. My documented personal experience in i3investor has proven so. Yes, it does all the time.
Why not? Value investing is intuitive, plauseble, buying a basket of good companies when they are selling cheap. Your job is to have the necessary knowledge and experience in how to identify good companies, and what is cheapness means.
So, do you want to become a value investor?
Happy value investing.
K C Chong (ckc13invest@gmail.com)
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 22, 2024
Which to buy, Insas or Insas WC?
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 15, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 01, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Dec 25, 2023
Created by kcchongnz | Oct 02, 2022
If you have a theoretical portfolio last few months
You want to lose money also cannot, near to impossible.
How come real life still got people lose money?
2017-04-10 00:36
In this market, every day you will have a new sifu in the market trying to sell you their services........lol
2017-04-10 00:43
And without exception, they always quote Warren Buffet.................lol.
2017-04-10 00:47
If they really have the midas touch, why they still need to sell you their services?
2017-04-10 02:23
If follow i3 2017 stock competition result kc chongnz is nobody with 177th placing. Why he think himself very great?
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/ibot/120209.jsp
2017-04-10 04:04
Might be service sold is sure money?
Posted by stockmanmy > Apr 10, 2017 02:23 AM | Report Abuse
If they really have the midas touch, why they still need to sell you their services?
2017-04-10 04:04
chamlo - still so cham in 2017? hows your buddies curious,sell,donfollowblindly LOL
go mandi bunga la - tat thing works for me LOL
2017-04-10 04:27
You don't fear KC attack on KNM?
Posted by Frank Soweto > Apr 10, 2017 04:27 AM | Report Abuse
chamlo - still so cham in 2017? hows your buddies curious,sell,donfollowblindly LOL
go mandi bunga la - tat thing works for me LOL
2017-04-10 04:34
Posted by chamlo > Apr 10, 2017 04:34 AM | Report Abuse
You don't fear KC attack on KNM?
LOL if I known Kc earlier we would have brought General Lee down to it knees instead of the big bad General taking my good fren yungshen1
2017-04-10 05:37
Kc always bring up his 2013 portfolio to justify the greatness of his investing skills. But one should always remember you are as good as your last trade, or in kc words investment. Kc is just like the liverpool football club of i3. Always trumpeting his past glory!
2017-04-10 08:12
Posted by Flintstones > Apr 10, 2017 08:12 AM | Report Abuse
Kc always bring up his 2013 portfolio to justify the greatness of his investing skills. But one should always remember you are as good as your last trade, or in kc words investment. Kc is just like the liverpool football club of i3. Always trumpeting his past glory!
Flintstone, it is hard for you to get it. I don't blame you.
VAlue investing is a long-term endeavour. It is not a 100m sprint. It is Maraton. Look at how WAlter Schloss in this article compounded his $100000 to $22.3 m in 23 years!
I have no intention to trumpet my return. It is merely used to show that in Bursa, value investing also works, in the long-term. To do that, I have to use my own personal experience, with published records rather than hearsay, and the longest portfolio I have is that of 2013.
This is also trying to show people like you who make funny comments like that, despising value investors, and continuously making personal attack, but you don't even know what it is. Open your mind, instead of living in a cocoon.
[Posted by Flintstones > Dec 2, 2016 12:05 PM | Report Abuse http://cdn1.i3investor.com/cm/icon/trans16.gif
Posted by paperplane2016 > Dec 2, 2016 12:03 PM | Report Abuse
hahahaha.,.,.,.,.,.,kc chong write fancy FA studies, but still fail to make money.
Reason: Tak ADA COMMON SENSE mah!!!!
hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
He probably makes more money from his followers lah]
2017-04-10 09:54
stockman, please share with us your calculation of GENTING and the intrinsic value that you got based on your valuation method...
i am not as good as sifu KC Chong. but i know i would rather use EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA to calculate instead of using MC/EBIT or MC/EBITDA... the former has a better reflection of its intrinsic value based on the debt/cash/minority interest.. that is also why it is better than using PE multiple... secondly, ROIC is another key thing to look into... then free cash yield... then only P/BV, DY, etc...
2017-04-10 12:24
based on all those i mentioned above, do you still think Genting is undervalued?
2017-04-10 12:24
i have not calculated all these in detail for Genting yet.. since you already bought into it, perhaps u can share with us?
2017-04-10 12:25
we have seen enough of your skill in plp'ing someone, ur self-blown skills of being a "dynamic" investor, but we havent seen a real case study how you value a stock.. pls enlighten us...
2017-04-10 12:27
haha... i am not bullying him la.. i am just having open discussion/debate with him...
2017-04-10 12:32
this kind of debate does not require our beloved, non-corrupt PDM to give permission to conduct.. :)
2017-04-10 12:33
Dolly chai.....
Why so much calculations?
The best investors in Genting do not need so much calculations. Its business, people then numbers in that order. Not any other order.
The best investors in Genting are those who do not intend to sell...unless it becomes ridiculous and go to $ 20.
All these number geeks.....keeping Genting nervously, I don't think they have what it takes to be a good investor.
2017-04-10 12:38
Thats why simple minded stock player like mammy...no need calculation...bcos not panlai mah.....!!
2017-04-10 12:40
Who sold Genting at below $ 8? It is all those nervous shareholders and numbers geeks.
You call them value investor...I call them nervous traders.
2017-04-10 12:44
let me ask u then stockmanmy:
why do you think it is ridiculous when Genting share price goes to RM20?
You should have a base to value why it is crazy or overpriced at RM20, right?
if the fundamentals (magic formula, ROIC, CY, etc) of a share suggest that RM20 is till undervalued, then it is.. every share has its intrinsic value, it is not say that a RM1 share is cheaper than RM10 share just because the share price is "cheaper".. similar thing, a share worth RM10 today may not be crazy or expensive if it hits RM20 after a few years.. if its intrinsic value keeps increasing due to improvement of fundamentals..
2017-04-10 12:47
i never bought or sold Genting share before.. i am not sure of other value investors though.. but i believe a real value investor would not have bought into a share if it does not have margin of safety...
2017-04-10 12:49
Leave genting for the fund manager loh....smaller investor better buy the forgotten beaten track stock loh....!!
2017-04-10 12:51
intrinsic value, magic formulas............hanging pig heads to sell dog meat.
I prefer Forest Gump with a bit of business sense. He makes more money.
2017-04-10 13:10
People who don understand or don use financial info....where got business sense leh ???
2017-04-10 13:13
haha... value investing is part of business sense, do you not know that?
2017-04-10 13:14
Surely those who refuse to use financial has no business sense...no matter how u define business sense loh...!!
2017-04-10 13:18
If you don't want to apply business sense in your investment, follow Calvin research house lor !!!
2017-04-10 13:21
Calvin research house = twisted financial information to suit his business sense lor !!
2017-04-10 13:23
In fact, if you look in detail, what is moving , what not, The market is behaving exactly this way:
Its business, people then numbers in that order. Not any other order.
This is what a bull market looks like.
You can go stick your intrisic values up your ass and no difference.
2017-04-10 13:23
Value investing = Financial information + business sense - Ca;vin research misleading method.
2017-04-10 13:24
I think calvin is using the classic Ben Graham investment tech....it take a long time to realize the gain....but it work too...his latest drb & pos recently did well mah...!!
2017-04-10 13:25
Yeah but business people...rely on the financial number mah...!!
So to interpret the business u need to look at the number loh...!!
Just like playing poker...u must look at the opponent cards...to make decision mah.....!!
Financial info....is ur opponent cards in investing loh...!!
2017-04-10 13:28
Hang pig head to sell dog meat is the most popular pass time in the town
People change their magic formulas to fit what they decided....that is the smarter way.
go ask any analyst in town.......
2017-04-10 13:28
Again sifu KC investment way works mah.....!!
I don see much complain or victim of massive losses...unlike KYY loh...!!
Very bad karma loh....!!
2017-04-10 13:30
Intrinsic Values are not Newtonian physics....It is quantum physics...........
The true nature of the being is Quantum Physics....not as intrinsic as you silly think....
One whole life time of propaganda...I am sure it is difficult for you to understand.
2017-04-10 13:46
Investment is not completely science but still intrinsic value is a good approximate to the true value loh
2017-04-10 13:48
quantum physics also deal with numbers
they also know the dual nature of reality
and uncertainties of intrinsic values.
I think it the smarter way and closer to reality.
2017-04-10 16:01
Rubbish loh....with figure u r close to reality loh...!!
The share price u r deal with everyday have illusion loh....!!
Remember warren buffet says, short term share price is a voting machine & longterm it is a weighing machine loh....!!
That mean longterm share price will trade close to intrinsic value loh...!!
On day to day share price may fluctuate based on Mr market mood...not necessary close to the share intrinsic value mah....!!
Value investor should sell when Mr Market give an overvalue buy price and buy when Mr Market pessimistic and sell at depressive price loh...!!
2017-04-10 16:09
stockmanmy
If the odds of wins and losing counters are equal the last few months.
The odds of getting 230 consecutive heads ( win ) is one in 2 to the power of 230.
That would be more atoms in the entire universe.
2017-04-10 00:35