As long as average price below 2.45, proft$ guaranteed

I'm back

Ensuring the production of quality doctors and other professionals fundamentally hinges on maintaining a strict admission criteria that selects the most qualified and capable candidates. Here’s why:

1. **Intellectual Aptitude and Rigorous Training**:
Professions like medicine require individuals with a high level of intellectual capability and a strong foundation in the sciences. By implementing strict admission criteria, educational institutions can ensure that only those with the necessary academic prowess and problem-solving skills are admitted. This is crucial for tackling the demanding and rigorous training involved in these fields.

2. **Commitment and Resilience**:
Stringent admission standards help identify individuals who are not only intelligent but also highly motivated and resilient. These traits are essential for surviving the challenges of professional education and the demanding nature of careers in medicine and other fields. A strict selection process can better gauge a candidate’s dedication and ability to persevere.

3. **Ethical and Professional Standards**:
High standards during the admission process can also evaluate the ethical and professional values of candidates. For professions that directly impact human lives, such as medicine, it's vital to admit individuals who exhibit integrity, empathy, and a strong sense of responsibility. This can be achieved through comprehensive interviews and psychological evaluations during the admission process.

4. **Resource Optimization**:
Educational resources, especially in professional training programs, are often limited and expensive. By selecting the most capable candidates, institutions ensure that these resources are invested in students who are most likely to succeed and contribute positively to society. This also minimizes dropout rates and ensures a higher return on educational investment.

5. **Peer Learning and Competition**:
Admitting top-tier candidates creates an environment of excellence, where students learn not only from their instructors but also from their peers. This fosters healthy competition, collaborative learning, and innovation. Being surrounded by equally capable peers pushes students to excel and continually improve their skills.

6. **Future Contributions to Society**:
Professionals who emerge from rigorous and selective programs are more likely to contribute significantly to their fields and society. They are better equipped to handle complex problems, lead research and innovation, and provide high-quality services. In medicine, this translates to better patient outcomes, advancements in medical research, and overall improvements in public health.

In summary, maintaining strict admission criteria ensures that only the most qualified, dedicated, and capable individuals enter professional programs. This not only enhances the quality of education but also ensures that the professionals who graduate are well-prepared to meet the demands of their respective fields and contribute meaningfully to society.

Hospital Changkat Melintang case - a case of admitting low quality ppl into medic course

Malaysia should reduce civil servants, too many!! and you see lately, some teacher go enjoy life flying everywhere for holidays during school time, pathethic. This type of civil servants should be fired and not waste our money


EngineeringProfit

18,076 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 0 seconds ago | Report Abuse

Wrong. The official number has to be divided by 5. For every 1 minister, DG, head of department, toilet cleaner or sweeper, there are 4 other little napoleans baby sitting them.

Given this point, the perception of a 1 to 5 productivity ratio between Malaysian and Singaporean government workers is mainly fueled by kulitocracy selection of impotent people from top down

Wrong. The official number has to be divided by 5. For every 1 minister, DG, head of department, toilet cleaner or sweeper, there are 4 other little napoleans baby sitting them.

Given this point, the perception of a 1 to 5 productivity ratio between Malaysian and Singaporean government workers is mainly fueled by kulitocracy selection of impotent people from top down

No, must keep until ex-date. Can sell on ex-date

Need more power. Don't forget to pawn your castles, mansions and bungalows - all in here pls

Gonna overtake KSL - said this last month

I'm back.................

Need more power. Don't forget to pawn your castles, mansions and bungalows - all in here pls

Buying back later. Profit$😀

Yup, I am back

Too huat to think...

Nice

Can recollect

Need more power. Don't forget to pawn your castles, mansions and bungalows - all in here pls

Was away whole morning. How come so huat suddenly?

Can buy now

Masih laku kah? Huat ar

lai.....lai......lai................

Kena boikot by usa - msia semiconductor tak laku

Kena boikot by usa - msia semiconductor tak laku

Still not enough power, try to pawn your old socks too

Wah....like dat sure very huat one

AllIsVanity

I guess I have to borrow from Ah Long or pawn my underwear and all in MYEG.

No, tsh is just George of the Jungle- as strong as u and me

The decline of the Islmic civilization in the 11th century is attributable to the increasing emphasis on religious orthodoxy and the proliferation of type m religious schools, which contributed to a shift in the negative intellectual as well as counterproductive cultural landscape.

Now Calvin is trying to selling his hdd- calling bilises to buy so that he can return to plantation - big discount now

No more that big, Calvin. Since they started selling land, now down to <70,000 hectares only

Academic apartheidism in Bolehland refers to the systemic segregation and preferential treatment in the education system based on ethnicity. This practice has contributed significantly to brain drain, where highly skilled and educated individuals leave the country for better opportunities abroad. Here’s how academic apartheidism has fueled this exodus:

### 1. **Quota Systems in Higher Education**
The implements of quota systems that favor certain ethnic groups, particularly in university admissions. This policy often limits access to higher education for qualified students from non-preferred ethnic groups. As a result, many talented students seek education opportunities abroad where admission is based solely on merit.

### 2. **Limited Scholarships and Funding Opportunities**
Government scholarships and funding are often distributed unevenly, with a preference for students from specific ethnic backgrounds. This disparity discourages talented students from non-preferred groups, pushing them to pursue education in countries where financial aid and scholarships are more equitably available.

### 3. **Job Market Discrimination**
Even after obtaining higher education, graduates from non-preferred ethnic groups may face discrimination in the job market. Preferential hiring practices and limited career advancement opportunities can drive these individuals to seek employment in countries with more equitable job markets, leading to brain drain.

### 4. **Stifling of Academic Freedom**
Academic apartheidism can create an environment where academic freedom is stifled. Researchers and academics may find their work undervalued or underfunded based on their ethnicity, leading them to move to institutions abroad where their research and contributions are more appreciated and supported.

### 5. **Lack of Inclusivity in Policy Making**
Policies shaped by academic apartheidism often exclude voices from diverse ethnic backgrounds. This lack of inclusivity can result in educational and research policies that do not cater to the needs of all groups, prompting those who feel marginalized to seek opportunities in more inclusive environments abroad.

### 6. **Impact on Social Cohesion**
The systemic segregation and discrimination foster a sense of alienation among affected groups. This erodes social cohesion and creates a less conducive environment for collaboration and innovation, pushing talented individuals to leave in search of more supportive communities.

### 7. **Global Opportunities and Competitiveness**
In an increasingly globalized world, many Malaysians are attracted to the idea of studying and working in countries that offer better infrastructure, research facilities, and career opportunities. Academic apartheidism amplifies this by making the local academic and professional environment less appealing in comparison.

### Consequences of Brain Drain:
1. **Loss of Talent**: The departure of highly skilled professionals leads to a shortage of expertise in critical sectors.
2. **Economic Impact**: The loss of potential innovators and entrepreneurs can stifle economic growth and innovation.
3. **Reduced Competitiveness**: A country’s global competitiveness is hampered when its brightest minds contribute to advancements elsewhere.
4. **Social Fragmentation**: Brain drain can exacerbate existing social divides, as those who feel marginalized leave, leading to less diverse and inclusive communities.

Addressing academic apartheidism and its resultant brain drain requires a comprehensive approach to creating a more inclusive and merit-based education and employment system, promoting policies that value diversity and equal opportunity for all citizens.

And the corruptible SC officers too?

Posted by NatsukoMishima > 14 hours ago | Report Abuse

If in spore all the conmen already in jail atleast for 18 years , boleh land really boleh !

The segment & factory have been converted to produce affordable ssd for data centre

....and in cuci money

They are "golfing buddies"

Or Eritrea from Ethiopia

Sabah should follow Sarawak- the way forward - do NOT split the Borneo counterpart like what happened to India-Pakistan;

In bolehland u can simply punch ppl and police will protect u by getting the victim to withdraw report....hehe

Likewise, here SC will help to close case so quickly

TP MYR 0.70 to MYR 0.80

Jepun Boleh!

Japan is indeed working on an ambitious project related to space transportation, but it's not exactly a bullet train to the moon in the traditional sense. The project, spearheaded by Kyoto University and Kajima Construction, involves the creation of an interplanetary transportation system known as the Hexatrack. This system aims to facilitate travel between Earth, the Moon, and Mars by using capsules with a hexagonal shape that maintain Earth-like gravity (1G) to mitigate the effects of prolonged exposure to low gravity during space travel.

Additionally, the project includes developing a habitat called "The Glass," a rotating conical structure designed to create artificial gravity and replicate Earth's environment with amenities such as green areas and water bodies. These habitats, dubbed "Lunaglass" on the Moon and "Marsglass" on Mars, are envisioned to support long-term human habitation..

While the complete implementation of these projects is expected to take several decades, with prototypes anticipated by 2050, the ultimate goal is to enable space migration and interplanetary tourism by the latter half of the 21st century.

The necessity of checks and balances against absolute power stems from the fundamental principle that power can corrupt, and absolute power can corrupt absolutely.

1. **Prevent Abuse of Power**: Without checks and balances, those in power may exploit their position for personal gain, abuse their authority, and make decisions that serve their interests rather than the public's. Historical examples, such as dictatorial regimes, illustrate how unchecked power leads to oppression, corruption, and human rights violations (Key lesson from learning history!)

2. **Ensure Accountability**: Checks and balances ensure that leaders and institutions remain accountable to the law and the public. Mechanisms such as independent judiciaries, free press, and opposition parties provide oversight and can hold leaders accountable for their actions.

3. **Promote Fair Governance**: By distributing power across various branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial), checks and balances prevent any single entity from monopolizing control. This balance promotes fair and equitable governance, where different branches can collaborate and counterbalance each other.

4. **Protect Individual Rights**: Checks and balances safeguard individual freedoms and rights by preventing the concentration of power that can lead to arbitrary and unjust actions against citizens. Constitutions and legal frameworks typically embed these mechanisms to protect civil liberties.

5. **Enhance Stability**: A system with checks and balances fosters political stability by preventing the rise of authoritarianism and ensuring that power transitions occur through democratic means. It reduces the risk of coups, revolutions, or civil unrest caused by tyrannical rule.

6. **Encourage Transparency**: Transparency in government operations is enhanced through checks and balances. Independent bodies, such as anti-corruption agencies and auditors, can scrutinize government activities, promoting openness and reducing the likelihood of covert corrupt practices.

7. **Foster Public Trust**: When people see that there are effective mechanisms to check government power, public trust in institutions increases. This trust is essential for the legitimacy of the government and the rule of law.

In the context of an assault case involving a grab taxi driver named Ong IK, several breaches of trust, responsibility, and duty could be scrutinized, particularly among the involved police officers and the perpetrators.

### 1. Breach of Trust by Police Officers
**Failure to Protect the Victim:**
- Police officers have a fundamental duty to protect citizens from harm. If they fail to respond adequately to calls for help or to intervene in situations where someone's safety is at risk, they breach this trust.
- Inaction or delayed response can lead to a situation escalating, resulting in harm to individuals like Ong IK.

**Complicity or Corruption:**
- If any officers were found to be colluding with the perpetrators or accepting bribes to ignore the crime, this would be a severe breach of trust.
- Such actions not only betray the victim but also undermine the integrity of the police force and public confidence in law enforcement.

### 2. Breach of Responsibility by Police Officers
**Improper Investigation:**
- Conducting a lackluster or biased investigation can hinder justice. This includes failing to gather critical evidence, not interviewing witnesses properly, or neglecting to follow up on leads.
- Poor investigative practices can result in the perpetrators escaping accountability and further endanger public safety.

**Misconduct:**
- Instances of police misconduct, such as abusing their authority or mistreating the victim during the reporting process, constitute a breach of their professional responsibility.
- Victims may feel further victimized and reluctant to seek justice if mistreated by the very officers meant to protect them.

### 3. Breach of Duty by Perpetrators
**Legal and Ethical Violations:**
- The perpetrators have a clear legal and ethical duty not to harm others. Engaging in assault is a direct violation of this duty.
- Such actions demonstrate a disregard for the law and the rights of others, contributing to a breakdown in societal norms and safety.

**Intimidation or Retaliation:**
- If the perpetrators attempt to intimidate or retaliate against the victim or witnesses, they further breach their duty to uphold the peace.
- This behavior can hinder the legal process and deter other victims from coming forward.

### 4. Broader Implications
**Public Perception and Trust:**
- Breaches by both police officers and perpetrators affect public trust in the justice system. When law enforcement fails to act appropriately, it creates a perception of impunity for criminal behavior.
- Such breaches can lead to a loss of confidence in authorities and a reluctance among the public to cooperate with police efforts in the future.

**Systemic Issues:**
- The incident might reflect broader systemic issues within the police force, such as inadequate training, lack of accountability, or pervasive corruption.
- Addressing these systemic problems is crucial for restoring trust and ensuring that similar breaches do not occur in the future.

### Conclusion
In summary, breaches of trust, responsibility, and duty among police officers and perpetrators in the assault case of Ong IK can have serious repercussions. They not only affect the immediate parties involved but also have broader implications for public confidence in the justice system and societal safety. Ensuring accountability and addressing systemic issues are essential steps in preventing such breaches and maintaining the integrity of law enforcement.

Calvin, your bulls have grown too old.....haha

Nice

Closing price?

True. Luckily my principle is not to chase high

Taken......holding foc tickets for now

Whay are you waiting for?

No, above 1.15, Calvin sold. Now bilises are cutting loss

Why bad?

Posted by hng33

But, too bad to our EPF return

What cake?

So good to be reloaded 110%...hehe