The disappearance of proper jobs is largely be attributed to the misallocation of public funds, which are squandered on bureaucratic inefficiencies rather than used to drive improvement and enable better services. Significant resources are funneled into "paper mills" within government departments, institutions, and ministries, creating unnecessary bureaucratic positions that add little value to society. This includes hiring "Little Napoleons," petty bureaucrats who enforce excessive and often redundant regulations. Such practices result in an inflated bureaucracy that stifles genuine talent and productivity. Talented professionals are restricted by excessive red tape and bureaucratic obstacles, preventing them from performing efficiently and innovatively. Instead of supporting those who provide excellent services, the bureaucratic system handicaps and suffocates them, leading to frustration and a decline in service quality. The overall effect is a restrictive environment where funds that could foster job creation and economic growth are wasted, pulling back individuals who could otherwise drive significant improvements in public services and the economy. To reverse this trend, public funds need to be redirected towards productive investments and streamlined processes that support rather than hinder talented service providers.

The disappearance of proper jobs is largely be attributed to the misallocation of public funds, which are squandered on bureaucratic inefficiencies rather than used to drive improvement and enable better services. Significant resources are funneled into "paper mills" within government departments, institutions, and ministries, creating unnecessary bureaucratic positions that add little value to society. This includes hiring "Little Napoleons," petty bureaucrats who enforce excessive and often redundant regulations. Such practices result in an inflated bureaucracy that stifles genuine talent and productivity. Talented professionals are restricted by excessive red tape and bureaucratic obstacles, preventing them from performing efficiently and innovatively. Instead of supporting those who provide excellent services, the bureaucratic system handicaps and suffocates them, leading to frustration and a decline in service quality. The overall effect is a restrictive environment where funds that could foster job creation and economic growth are wasted, pulling back individuals who could otherwise drive significant improvements in public services and the economy. To reverse this trend, public funds need to be redirected towards productive investments and streamlined processes that support rather than hinder talented service providers.

Moral 101: Truth vs lies

In the 21st century, gender equality, rather than patriarchy, is essential for preserving healthy relationships in marriage and other social aspects of modern living. This shift towards equality reflects evolving societal values and the recognition of individual rights and contributions, regardless of gender. Here are several arguments to support this stance:

1. **Mutual Respect and Partnership**: Gender equality fosters mutual respect and partnership in relationships. When both partners have equal say and responsibility, it creates a balanced dynamic where decisions are made collaboratively. This reduces resentment and power struggles, leading to healthier, more stable relationships.

2. **Economic Benefits**: Equal participation in the workforce and household duties allows both partners to contribute financially and domestically. This shared responsibility can relieve stress and financial burdens, making the relationship more resilient to economic challenges.

3. **Personal Fulfillment**: Gender equality allows individuals to pursue personal goals and career aspirations without being confined to traditional gender roles. This leads to greater personal satisfaction and fulfillment, which positively impacts their relationships and overall well-being.

4. **Positive Role Models**: Gender-equal relationships provide positive role models for children, teaching them the value of fairness and respect. This helps to break down harmful stereotypes and promotes a more inclusive society.

5. **Reduced Domestic Violence**: Societies that promote gender equality tend to have lower rates of domestic violence. When power is shared equally, there is less likelihood of abusive dynamics where one partner seeks to dominate the other.

6. **Legal and Social Recognition**: Modern legal frameworks and social policies increasingly support gender equality. Aligning relationships with these principles ensures compliance with laws and social norms, reducing conflicts and fostering harmony.

7. **Emotional Well-being**: Equality in relationships enhances emotional well-being by ensuring that both partners feel valued and heard. This emotional support is crucial for mental health and the overall quality of the relationship.

8. **Adaptability and Growth**: Gender-equal relationships are more adaptable to change, as both partners are encouraged to develop skills and share responsibilities. This adaptability is crucial in a rapidly changing world where traditional roles may no longer be practical or relevant.

In conclusion, gender equality is fundamental to building and maintaining healthy relationships in the 21st century. It ensures fairness, respect, and shared responsibility, which are essential for personal fulfillment and societal progress. Embracing gender equality is not only a moral imperative but also a practical approach to fostering stronger, more resilient relationships and communities.

Educators and policy makers can't be too simpleton and thoughtless. Shielding children from important knowledge, such as understanding responsible moderate alcohol consumption, the risks of addiction, and the potential negative consequences, is both dangerous and naïve. Such an approach fails to equip young individuals with the critical information they need to make informed decisions and navigate real-world situations effectively.

First and foremost, keeping children in the dark about alcohol can foster ignorance and curiosity-driven experimentation. When young people are not adequately educated about alcohol, they are more likely to seek out information on their own, often from unreliable sources or peers. This can lead to risky behaviors and uninformed decisions regarding alcohol consumption. A comprehensive education that includes the benefits and risks associated with alcohol allows children to understand the full spectrum of its effects.

Moreover, ignorance about responsible drinking can leave children unprepared to handle situations where alcohol is present. By teaching children about moderate drinking, parents and educators can impart valuable lessons on self-control and the importance of setting limits. Children who are educated about responsible drinking are more likely to make measured decisions, avoiding the pitfalls of overconsumption and addiction. Studies have shown that early education about alcohol can reduce the likelihood of binge drinking and alcohol-related problems in adolescence and adulthood .

Understanding the risks of addiction is equally crucial. Alcohol addiction, or alcoholism, can have devastating consequences on an individual's health, relationships, and overall well-being. By being transparent about these risks, parents and educators can help children recognize the warning signs of addiction and understand the long-term implications of alcohol misuse. This awareness is essential for fostering a healthy relationship with alcohol and preventing the development of harmful patterns of behavior.

Furthermore, shielding children from the reality of alcohol's negative consequences can create a false sense of security. When children eventually encounter alcohol, they may be ill-prepared to handle its effects or recognize the dangers of overindulgence. Educating children about the potential negative consequences of alcohol, such as impaired judgment, accidents, and health issues, helps them understand the gravity of irresponsible drinking. This knowledge can act as a deterrent and encourage more cautious behavior.

In addition, education about responsible alcohol consumption can promote a culture of openness and trust between parents and children. When parents discuss alcohol openly and honestly, it fosters a sense of mutual respect and encourages children to seek guidance when faced with difficult decisions. This open dialogue is essential for building a supportive environment where children feel comfortable discussing their experiences and concerns.

Finally, equipping children with knowledge about alcohol empowers them to make informed choices that align with their values and goals. Understanding both the benefits and risks of alcohol allows children to weigh their options carefully and make decisions that promote their well-being and success. Ignorance, on the other hand, leaves them vulnerable to peer pressure and the potential for harmful behaviors.

In conclusion, the danger, ignorance, and naivety of keeping children from being exposed to important knowledge about responsible moderate alcohol drinking, the risks of addiction, and the negative consequences are clear. Comprehensive education on alcohol is essential for fostering informed decision-making, promoting responsible behavior, and protecting young individuals from the potential harms associated with alcohol. By providing children with the knowledge they need, parents and educators can help them navigate the complexities of alcohol consumption and develop healthy, balanced relationships with alcohol.

Educators and policy makers can't be too simpleton and thoughtless. Shielding children from important knowledge, such as understanding responsible moderate alcohol consumption, the risks of addiction, and the potential negative consequences, is both dangerous and naïve. Such an approach fails to equip young individuals with the critical information they need to make informed decisions and navigate real-world situations effectively.

First and foremost, keeping children in the dark about alcohol can foster ignorance and curiosity-driven experimentation. When young people are not adequately educated about alcohol, they are more likely to seek out information on their own, often from unreliable sources or peers. This can lead to risky behaviors and uninformed decisions regarding alcohol consumption. A comprehensive education that includes the benefits and risks associated with alcohol allows children to understand the full spectrum of its effects.

Moreover, ignorance about responsible drinking can leave children unprepared to handle situations where alcohol is present. By teaching children about moderate drinking, parents and educators can impart valuable lessons on self-control and the importance of setting limits. Children who are educated about responsible drinking are more likely to make measured decisions, avoiding the pitfalls of overconsumption and addiction. Studies have shown that early education about alcohol can reduce the likelihood of binge drinking and alcohol-related problems in adolescence and adulthood .

Understanding the risks of addiction is equally crucial. Alcohol addiction, or alcoholism, can have devastating consequences on an individual's health, relationships, and overall well-being. By being transparent about these risks, parents and educators can help children recognize the warning signs of addiction and understand the long-term implications of alcohol misuse. This awareness is essential for fostering a healthy relationship with alcohol and preventing the development of harmful patterns of behavior.

Furthermore, shielding children from the reality of alcohol's negative consequences can create a false sense of security. When children eventually encounter alcohol, they may be ill-prepared to handle its effects or recognize the dangers of overindulgence. Educating children about the potential negative consequences of alcohol, such as impaired judgment, accidents, and health issues, helps them understand the gravity of irresponsible drinking. This knowledge can act as a deterrent and encourage more cautious behavior.

In addition, education about responsible alcohol consumption can promote a culture of openness and trust between parents and children. When parents discuss alcohol openly and honestly, it fosters a sense of mutual respect and encourages children to seek guidance when faced with difficult decisions. This open dialogue is essential for building a supportive environment where children feel comfortable discussing their experiences and concerns.

Finally, equipping children with knowledge about alcohol empowers them to make informed choices that align with their values and goals. Understanding both the benefits and risks of alcohol allows children to weigh their options carefully and make decisions that promote their well-being and success. Ignorance, on the other hand, leaves them vulnerable to peer pressure and the potential for harmful behaviors.

In conclusion, the danger, ignorance, and naivety of keeping children from being exposed to important knowledge about responsible moderate alcohol drinking, the risks of addiction, and the negative consequences are clear. Comprehensive education on alcohol is essential for fostering informed decision-making, promoting responsible behavior, and protecting young individuals from the potential harms associated with alcohol. By providing children with the knowledge they need, parents and educators can help them navigate the complexities of alcohol consumption and develop healthy, balanced relationships with alcohol.

This is 21st Century. Children should be encouraged to live by evidence, not hearsay. The fact is educators must nurture skills in decision-making and practical knowledge in children- preaching them nothing- no lies, but only the most up-to-date truth. Moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with a longer lifespan in several studies with clear beneficial effects on cardiovascular health. Research has shown that moderate drinking can lead to a reduction in the risk of coronary artery disease and other heart-related conditions. For instance, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that moderate alcohol intake was linked to a lower risk of myocardial infarction in men. The study highlighted that men who consumed moderate amounts of alcohol had a 30-35% lower risk of heart attack compared to non-drinkers .

The American Heart Association acknowledges that moderate alcohol consumption can raise levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, also known as "good" cholesterol, which helps protect against heart disease. HDL cholesterol facilitates the removal of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or "bad" cholesterol, from the bloodstream, reducing the risk of plaque buildup in arteries and subsequent cardiovascular events .

A large-scale study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology further supports these findings. The study analyzed data from over 333,000 participants and concluded that moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a lower risk of death from all causes, particularly cardiovascular disease. The researchers noted that moderate drinkers had a 25% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular diseases compared to abstainers .

Additionally, the antioxidant properties of certain alcoholic beverages, such as red wine, have been credited with promoting heart health. Red wine contains resveratrol, a compound that has been shown to protect the lining of blood vessels in the heart and reduce inflammation and blood clotting. This was supported by research published in Nature, which demonstrated that resveratrol could mimic the effects of caloric restriction, a practice known to extend lifespan in various organisms . Certain alcoholic beverages, like beer and wine, contain essential nutrients and antioxidants. For example, beer contains B vitamins, selenium, and silicon, which can contribute to bone health. Wine, particularly red wine, contains polyphenols, which have been studied for their potential health benefits.

While the benefits of alcohol is undeniable, not all of its consumption has the same effect.Hence, iIt is essential to educate, emphasize and differentiate between moderate, responsible drinking and excessive, harmful consumption. Overgeneralizing by claiming that alcohol is 100% bad ignores the nuances and context-dependent nature of its effects.

This is 21st Century. Children should be encouraged to live by evidence, not hearsay. The fact is educators must nurture skills in decision-making and practical knowledge in children- preaching them nothing- no lies, but only the most up-to-date truth. Moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with a longer lifespan in several studies with clear beneficial effects on cardiovascular health. Research has shown that moderate drinking can lead to a reduction in the risk of coronary artery disease and other heart-related conditions. For instance, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that moderate alcohol intake was linked to a lower risk of myocardial infarction in men. The study highlighted that men who consumed moderate amounts of alcohol had a 30-35% lower risk of heart attack compared to non-drinkers .

The American Heart Association acknowledges that moderate alcohol consumption can raise levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, also known as "good" cholesterol, which helps protect against heart disease. HDL cholesterol facilitates the removal of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or "bad" cholesterol, from the bloodstream, reducing the risk of plaque buildup in arteries and subsequent cardiovascular events .

A large-scale study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology further supports these findings. The study analyzed data from over 333,000 participants and concluded that moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a lower risk of death from all causes, particularly cardiovascular disease. The researchers noted that moderate drinkers had a 25% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular diseases compared to abstainers .

Additionally, the antioxidant properties of certain alcoholic beverages, such as red wine, have been credited with promoting heart health. Red wine contains resveratrol, a compound that has been shown to protect the lining of blood vessels in the heart and reduce inflammation and blood clotting. This was supported by research published in Nature, which demonstrated that resveratrol could mimic the effects of caloric restriction, a practice known to extend lifespan in various organisms . Certain alcoholic beverages, like beer and wine, contain essential nutrients and antioxidants. For example, beer contains B vitamins, selenium, and silicon, which can contribute to bone health. Wine, particularly red wine, contains polyphenols, which have been studied for their potential health benefits.

While the benefits of alcohol is undeniable, not all of its consumption has the same effect.Hence, iIt is essential to educate, emphasize and differentiate between moderate, responsible drinking and excessive, harmful consumption. Overgeneralizing by claiming that alcohol is 100% bad ignores the nuances and context-dependent nature of its effects.

Arguably, nothing could be worse than misusing of fund to fuel fundamentalism among young children. Funding and spreading fundamentalism, characterized by a strict adherence to specific theological doctrines often in reaction against modernist theories, has profoundly detrimental effects on societies, making it one of the worst uses of resources. Such funding fosters intolerance and extremism, promoting an "us versus them" mentality that leads to social fragmentation, sectarian conflicts, and the suppression of religious, cultural, and intellectual diversity essential for a progressive society.

Fundamentalism stifles the exchange of ideas and mutual respect, creating an environment of suspicion and hostility- see what happened in supposedly and rationally "non-issue" cases like kk socks and vern shoes. Additionally, it impedes progress by advocating for outdated educational practices that reject scientific advancements and critical thinking, hindering intellectual growth and innovation.

This regression leaves societies ill-equipped to deal with modern challenges and results in economic stagnation and poverty, as businesses avoid investing in regions plagued by instability and regressive policies. The threat to human rights is significant, as many fundamentalist movements impose severe restrictions on nonbelievers', outgroup's, minors' and women's rights and freedoms, perpetuating gender inequality and discrimination while suppressing freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly. This suppression leads to persecution of dissenters and those who question the prevailing ideology.

Global security risks also escalate as funding fundamentalism can lead to the radicalization of individuals who may resort to violence, vigilantism and even terrorism , posing a significant threat to global security through terrorist activities and destabilizing entire regions, leading to conflicts and wars. Such instability has far-reaching consequences for global peace and security.

From a moral and ethical perspective, investing in fundamentalism represents a gross misallocation of resources that could be better used for proper and productive education, up-to-date healthcare, and poverty eradication. It prioritizes dogma over human welfare, contradicting the ethical responsibility of individuals and nations to promote peace, tolerance, and understanding. Funding fundamentalism contributes to a more divided and violent world, undermining social cohesion and impeding progress. Instead of fueling fundamentalism, resources should be directed towards initiatives that promote education, tolerance, innovation, and peace, thereby contributing to a more just and prosperous world. By doing so, we can foster intellectual growth, economic development, gender equality, and global security, ensuring a brighter future for all.

Arguably, nothing could be worse than misusing of fund to fuel fundamentalism among young children. Funding and spreading fundamentalism, characterized by a strict adherence to specific theological doctrines often in reaction against modernist theories, has profoundly detrimental effects on societies, making it one of the worst uses of resources. Such funding fosters intolerance and extremism, promoting an "us versus them" mentality that leads to social fragmentation, sectarian conflicts, and the suppression of religious, cultural, and intellectual diversity essential for a progressive society.

Fundamentalism stifles the exchange of ideas and mutual respect, creating an environment of suspicion and hostility- see what happened in supposedly and rationally "non-issue" cases like kk socks and vern shoes. Additionally, it impedes progress by advocating for outdated educational practices that reject scientific advancements and critical thinking, hindering intellectual growth and innovation.

This regression leaves societies ill-equipped to deal with modern challenges and results in economic stagnation and poverty, as businesses avoid investing in regions plagued by instability and regressive policies. The threat to human rights is significant, as many fundamentalist movements impose severe restrictions on nonbelievers', outgroup's, minors' and women's rights and freedoms, perpetuating gender inequality and discrimination while suppressing freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly. This suppression leads to persecution of dissenters and those who question the prevailing ideology.

Global security risks also escalate as funding fundamentalism can lead to the radicalization of individuals who may resort to violence, vigilantism and even terrorism , posing a significant threat to global security through terrorist activities and destabilizing entire regions, leading to conflicts and wars. Such instability has far-reaching consequences for global peace and security.

From a moral and ethical perspective, investing in fundamentalism represents a gross misallocation of resources that could be better used for proper and productive education, up-to-date healthcare, and poverty eradication. It prioritizes dogma over human welfare, contradicting the ethical responsibility of individuals and nations to promote peace, tolerance, and understanding. Funding fundamentalism contributes to a more divided and violent world, undermining social cohesion and impeding progress. Instead of fueling fundamentalism, resources should be directed towards initiatives that promote education, tolerance, innovation, and peace, thereby contributing to a more just and prosperous world. By doing so, we can foster intellectual growth, economic development, gender equality, and global security, ensuring a brighter future for all.

Even science doesn't guarantee 100% as science is about building models and theories that best explain the available evidence with a certain level of confidence. It embraces uncertainty- rather than making guarantee. Trueducation focuses on increasing our understanding of the world through a continuous process of testing, revising, and refining. This probabilistic approach allows scientific knowledge to remain flexible and adaptive in the face of new discoveries and evidence.

If you want guarantee entry to heaven, join the majority lots- to the place of altars

Dead cat rebound kah?

The argument that young children's minds intoxicated by fundamentalism is not better than the analogy of grown-up minds intoxicated by alcohol hinges on several key points.

1. **Impaired Judgment**: Both situations result in impaired judgment. Fundamentalism can limit children's ability to think critically and objectively, just as alcohol impairs an adult's ability to make sound decisions.

2. **Influence on Behavior**: Just as alcohol can lead to erratic and harmful behavior in adults, fundamentalism can instill rigid, intolerant, and sometimes extreme behaviors in children. Both conditions can lead to actions that are harmful to themselves and others.

3. **Long-term Impact**: The effects of both can be long-lasting. Chronic alcohol use can lead to lasting physical and mental health issues. Similarly, early indoctrination into fundamentalism can lead to lifelong difficulties in accepting diverse perspectives and adapting to a rapidly changing world.

4. **Social Consequences**: Both intoxication scenarios can lead to social problems. Alcoholism can strain relationships and disrupt families, while fundamentalism can create societal divisions, intolerance, and conflict.

5. **Loss of Potential**: Alcohol addiction can rob individuals of their potential, career opportunities, and personal growth. Similarly, fundamentalism can restrict a child's educational and personal development, limiting their ability to reach their full potential.

6. **Dependency**: Just as alcohol can create a dependency that is hard to break, fundamentalist indoctrination can create a psychological dependency on rigid beliefs and authority figures, making it difficult for individuals to think independently and question their surroundings.

In summary, both scenarios involve a form of intoxication that impairs judgment, influences behavior negatively, has long-term impacts, leads to social issues, results in a loss of potential, and creates dependency. Therefore, exposing young children to fundamentalist ideologies is as detrimental as an adult being addicted to alcohol.

Arguably knowing that nothing can guarantee anything is the hallmark of trueducation (vs fakeducation that guarantees heaven and h*ll with 100% certainty

Education Reform 202:

Fundamentalism, characterized by rigid adherence to specific doctrines and an uncompromising attitude towards different beliefs, can be more toxic and cloud the mind than alcohol for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Thinking and Closed-Mindedness**:
Fundamentalism promotes black-and-white thinking, discouraging critical thinking, questioning, and open-mindedness. It often requires followers to reject any evidence or perspectives that contradict their beliefs, leading to intellectual stagnation and a closed mind.

2. **Intolerance and Division**:
Fundamentalism fosters intolerance towards different viewpoints and lifestyles, often resulting in social division and conflict. This divisiveness can erode the social fabric, fostering hatred, discrimination, and even violence against those perceived as "other."

3. **Suppression of Individuality and Freedom**:
Fundamentalist doctrines often demand strict conformity, suppressing individual thought and expression. This suppression can stifle personal growth, creativity, and the pursuit of knowledge, trapping individuals in a mental straitjacket.

4. **Perpetuation of Ignorance**:
By rejecting scientific and empirical evidence that contradicts its dogmas, fundamentalism perpetuates ignorance. This can hinder progress in fields like medicine, education, and social sciences, negatively impacting society as a whole.

5. **Emotional Manipulation and Fear**:
Fundamentalism frequently uses fear and emotional manipulation to maintain control over its followers. The threat of eternal damnation, social ostracization, or divine retribution can create a constant state of anxiety and fear, clouding judgment and rational thought.

6. **Inhibiting Social Progress**:
Fundamentalist ideologies often resist social change and progress, clinging to outdated practices and beliefs. This resistance can delay or prevent advancements in human rights, gender equality, and overall societal development.

7. **Psychological Harm**:
The mental rigidity and fear instilled by fundamentalism can lead to significant psychological harm, including stress, anxiety, and depression. The internal conflict between personal beliefs and fundamentalist doctrines can also cause profound emotional turmoil.

In contrast, while alcohol can impair cognitive functions and decision-making temporarily, its effects are usually short-lived and can be mitigated with responsible use. Alcohol's toxicity primarily affects physical health and does not inherently dictate or restrict one's belief systems, intellectual curiosity, or capacity for empathy and social harmony.

Thus, while both alcohol and fundamentalism can be harmful, fundamentalism's pervasive influence on the mind and society can be far more insidious and long-lasting.

Problem with narrow mindedness of a significant portion of the society

Arguing against the demand that no compromise should be given to donations from beer companies involves addressing several key points:

### Economic Impact
1. **Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contributions**: Many companies, including beer companies, engage in CSR activities to give back to the community. These donations fund essential services such as healthcare, education, and disaster relief, which benefit society at large.
2. **Economic Growth**: Beer companies contribute significantly to the economy through job creation, taxes, and local investments. Banning their contributions could harm economic stability and reduce available funding for social programs.

### Ethical and Social Considerations
1. **Neutrality of Funds**: The source of donations should not automatically disqualify them if they are used for positive social outcomes. Rejecting these funds purely based on the company's industry can be seen as a form of bias.
2. **Community Benefit**: Many communities benefit from donations made by beer companies, especially in times of crisis. Disallowing these contributions could deprive vulnerable groups of much-needed support.

### Counterproductive Outcomes
1. **Reduction in Charitable Contributions**: If beer companies are prohibited from donating, the overall pool of charitable funds may decrease. This reduction can negatively impact social services and community development projects.
2. **Inefficiency in Resource Utilization**: By refusing donations from specific industries, organizations might spend more time and resources seeking alternative funding sources, which could be less efficient and delay important initiatives.

### Real-world Examples
1. **Case Studies**: Numerous case studies show how beer companies' donations have positively impacted communities. Highlighting these examples can demonstrate the tangible benefits of accepting such contributions.
2. **Global Practices**: In many countries, beer companies are recognized for their positive contributions to society. Adopting a more inclusive approach aligns with global best practices and encourages responsible corporate behavior.

### Practical Solutions
1. **Regulated Acceptance**: Instead of outright rejecting donations, implementing strict guidelines and transparency measures ensures that the funds are used ethically and effectively.
2. **Public Awareness Campaigns**: Educating the public on the positive impacts of these donations can shift the narrative and reduce irrational opposition.

By considering these points, it becomes clear that an uncompromising stance against beer company donations is irrational and counterproductive, ultimately hindering societal progress and development.

Solution for the many "lazy, poor" : Remove all the little napoleans in all corners

The existence of "little Napoleons" in Malaysia—individuals in minor positions of authority who wield their power in a self-serving, obstructive, or overly bureaucratic manner—plays a significant role in creating and perpetuating poverty by demotivating and disenfranchising the population. These individuals often act as gatekeepers who hinder progress, innovation, and efficiency, leading to systemic issues that disproportionately affect the poor.

1. **Bureaucratic Barriers**: Little Napoleons create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles that obstruct access to essential services and resources. For the poor, who already struggle to navigate complex systems, these additional barriers can be insurmountable, leading to further marginalization and a lack of upward mobility.

2. **Corruption and Mismanagement**: The self-serving nature of little Napoleons often leads to corruption and mismanagement of funds and resources. This diverts resources away from programs that could benefit the poor, such as education, healthcare, and social services. As a result, the poor remain trapped in a cycle of poverty with limited opportunities for improvement.

3. **Demotivation and Disillusionment**: Encountering obstructive and corrupt officials can demotivate individuals, particularly the poor who might already feel disenfranchised. When people see that hard work and merit are not rewarded, but instead, navigating the system requires bribery or knowing the right people, it creates a sense of hopelessness and reduces motivation to strive for better opportunities.

4. **Education System Impact**: In the context of education, little Napoleons can stifle reform and innovation. They may resist changes that threaten their power or require accountability, leading to an outdated and ineffective education system. This particularly affects the poor, who rely on public education to escape poverty. Without a quality education, the cycle of poverty continues.

5. **Economic Stagnation**: By obstructing efficiency and innovation, little Napoleons contribute to economic stagnation. A dynamic and growing economy is crucial for job creation and improving living standards. When bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption are prevalent, economic growth is stifled, and the poor suffer the most as job opportunities remain limited.

Removing these little Napoleons is essential for meaningful reform and progress. By dismantling this rogue dark system, Malaysia can pave the way for a more transparent, efficient, and equitable society. Education reform, free from obstructive bureaucracy, can ensure that all citizens, regardless of their socio-economic background, have the opportunity to succeed and contribute to the nation's growth. This would ultimately lift many out of poverty and create a more motivated and empowered population.

Education Reform 101: The Very First Step......

Removing "little Napoleons"—those individuals in positions of minor authority who exercise power in a self-serving, obstructive, or overly bureaucratic manner—could indeed be a crucial first step toward education reform in Malaysia. Here are some points to support this argument:

### 1. **Improved Efficiency and Decision-Making**

**Argument**: Little Napoleons often create unnecessary red tape and bureaucratic hurdles, which can stifle innovation and slow down necessary reforms. By removing these individuals, the education system can operate more efficiently.

**Example**: Streamlined processes allow for quicker implementation of new curricula, educational technologies, and teaching methods. Teachers and lecturers can focus more on teaching and less on administrative tasks.

### 2. **Empowerment of Educators**

**Argument**: Teachers and lecturers, who are on the front lines of education, understand the needs of their students better than distant bureaucrats. Removing obstructive middle management empowers educators to make decisions that directly benefit their classrooms.

**Example**: Empowered teachers can adapt teaching methods to better suit their students' learning styles and needs, fostering a more dynamic and responsive educational environment.

### 3. **Enhanced Morale and Job Satisfaction**

**Argument**: The presence of little Napoleons can lead to a toxic work environment, where educators feel micromanaged and undervalued. Eliminating these figures can significantly boost morale and job satisfaction among teachers and lecturers.

**Example**: A supportive and respectful work environment encourages educators to be more passionate and committed to their work, which in turn benefits student learning outcomes.

### 4. **Promotion of Meritocracy**

**Argument**: Little Napoleons often rise to power not through merit but through connections or bureaucratic maneuvering. Removing them helps establish a meritocratic system where promotions and responsibilities are based on capability and performance.

**Example**: A merit-based system ensures that the most competent and dedicated individuals are in leadership positions, leading to better decision-making and more effective educational policies.

### 5. **Focus on Student-Centered Education**

**Argument**: Bureaucratic obstacles can shift the focus away from student needs and towards administrative compliance. Removing these obstacles allows for a greater focus on student-centered education.

**Example**: Policies and practices can be directly tailored to enhance student engagement, critical thinking, and holistic development, rather than merely meeting bureaucratic standards.

### 6. **Adaptability to Global Educational Trends**

**Argument**: In a rapidly changing global educational landscape, flexibility and adaptability are crucial. Little Napoleons often resist change, preferring to maintain the status quo. Their removal facilitates quicker adaptation to global best practices and innovations.

**Example**: Malaysia can more readily adopt international educational trends such as digital learning, interdisciplinary studies, and competency-based education, ensuring students are well-prepared for a globalized world.

### Conclusion

Removing little Napoleons from the educational system in Malaysia is not just about reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies. It's about creating an environment where teachers and lecturers can thrive, where decisions are made based on merit and student needs, and where the education system can swiftly adapt to global trends. This foundational change is essential for any further reforms to be effective and sustainable, ultimately leading to a more dynamic, responsive, and high-quality education system for all.

Catch and mental rehab their mentors, tutors and lecturers

In Malaysia, the presence of so-called "little Napoleons" in various government premises, departments, institutions, and ministries represents a significant misuse of taxpayers' funds. These individuals, often entrenched in positions of minor authority, tend to focus on bureaucratic control and self-serving agendas rather than contributing to the efficiency and job satisfaction of the dedicated workforce.

1. **Inefficiency and Redundancy**: The primary issue with these "little Napoleons" is their propensity to create redundant and obstructive policies. This not only hampers workflow but also leads to inefficiencies that waste valuable time and resources. Instead of streamlining processes, they introduce unnecessary layers of bureaucracy that complicate tasks for those genuinely committed to their work.

2. **Demoralization of Committed Employees**: The constant imposition of arbitrary and ever-changing rules by these minor officials demoralizes employees who are dedicated to their jobs. The lack of consistency and the unpredictable nature of these rules create a stressful and unstable working environment, leading to dissatisfaction and burnout among the workforce.

3. **Exodus of Talent**: High job satisfaction is crucial for retaining talented and committed employees. When these employees face persistent bureaucratic obstacles and a lack of support from their superiors, they are more likely to leave for better opportunities elsewhere. This exodus of skilled workers undermines the overall productivity and effectiveness of government institutions.

4. **Misallocation of Taxpayers' Funds**: Hiring and maintaining positions for individuals who do not contribute positively to the workforce is a clear misallocation of taxpayers' money. These funds could be better utilized in initiatives that directly enhance public services and employee satisfaction, such as training programs, technological upgrades, and incentives for exemplary performance.

5. **Negative Impact on Public Services**: The inefficiencies and demoralization caused by "little Napoleons" ultimately affect the quality of public services. When dedicated employees leave, their expertise and experience are lost, leading to a decline in service delivery. The public, who are the ultimate beneficiaries of government services, suffer the consequences of these internal inefficiencies.

In conclusion, the presence of "little Napoleons" in Malaysia's government sectors is a significant drain on resources and a barrier to achieving a high-performing public service. Addressing this issue requires a commitment to reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies, promoting merit-based appointments, and fostering a supportive environment for dedicated employees. By reallocating funds towards initiatives that genuinely improve job satisfaction and service delivery, Malaysia can better utilize taxpayers' money for the benefit of all citizens.

Also stop paying multi-level little napoleans in every gomen department, institution and ministry with $$$$$$ from alcohol and betting businesses

Big fat ugly msians

### Hypermodern Education Blueprint for the Children of the Current Millennium

#### Vision
To cultivate a generation of critically thinking, economically empowered, and socially responsible individuals equipped to thrive in and shape the post-Industrial Revolution 4.0 era.

#### Objectives
1. **Foster Critical Thinking and Intellectual Independence**: Encourage children to question, analyze, and understand the world around them.
2. **Promote Economic Self-Sufficiency**: Equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary for economic independence and growth.
3. **Ensure Transparent and Inclusive Governance Understanding**: Educate students on the importance of transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in governance.
4. **Develop Socially Responsible Citizens**: Instill values of social justice, equity, and civic responsibility.

#### Key Components

1. **Curriculum Reform**
- **Critical Thinking Skills**: Incorporate philosophy, logic, and debate into the curriculum to foster independent thinking.
- **STEM Education**: Emphasize science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to prepare students for future job markets.
- **Financial Literacy**: Teach personal finance, entrepreneurship, and economics to promote economic self-sufficiency.
- **Civic Education**: Include courses on governance, law, and political science to develop an understanding of transparent and inclusive governance.
- **Ethics and Social Justice**: Integrate lessons on ethics, human rights, and social justice to foster a sense of civic responsibility.

2. **Teaching Methods**
- **Project-Based Learning**: Encourage hands-on, real-world problem-solving projects.
- **Interdisciplinary Approach**: Promote learning that crosses traditional subject boundaries.
- **Technological Integration**: Use advanced technologies like AI, VR, and digital platforms to enhance learning experiences.
- **Collaborative Learning**: Foster teamwork and communication through group projects and discussions.

3. **School Environment**
- **Inclusive Culture**: Create an environment that respects diversity and promotes equality.
- **Safe Spaces for Dialogue**: Establish forums for open discussions on social, political, and economic issues.
- **Community Engagement**: Encourage students to participate in community service and local governance initiatives.

4. **Teacher Training and Development**
- **Continuous Professional Development**: Provide ongoing training for teachers in the latest educational methodologies and technologies.
- **Mentorship Programs**: Pair experienced educators with new teachers to share knowledge and best practices.
- **Performance Incentives**: Offer incentives for teachers who excel in promoting critical thinking and student engagement.

5. **Parental and Community Involvement**
- **Parent Education Programs**: Educate parents on the importance of critical thinking and economic self-sufficiency.
- **Community Partnerships**: Collaborate with local businesses, NGOs, and government bodies to provide practical learning experiences and opportunities.

6. **Assessment and Evaluation**
- **Holistic Evaluation**: Use a combination of standardized tests, project assessments, and peer reviews.
- **Feedback Loops**: Implement regular feedback systems for students, teachers, and parents to continually improve the educational process.

#### Policies to Ban and Reform

1. **Ban Religious Indoctrination in Public Education**
- **Secular Curriculum**: Ensure that public education remains secular, focusing on critical thinking and scientific inquiry rather than religious teachings.
- **Balanced Worldviews**: Teach about various religions and belief systems objectively without promoting any particular ideology.

2. **Reform Government Policies**
- **Transparent Governance**: Implement policies that promote transparency and accountability in government operations.
- **Anti-Corruption Measures**: Strengthen laws and regulations to combat corruption and ensure fair governance.
- **Inclusive Economic Policies**: Develop policies that promote economic opportunities for all, reducing dependency on exploitative promises.

3. **Address Structural Inequalities**
- **Equal Opportunity Programs**: Implement affirmative action and other programs to level the playing field for marginalized communities.
- **Universal Access to Quality Education**: Ensure that all children, regardless of their socio-economic background, have access to high-quality education.

By implementing this hypermodern education blueprint, we can break the self-perpetuating cycle of poverty and dependency, empower the next generation, and build a more equitable and progressive future.

The notion that "rich and poor is formed by history and temporary" is a simplistic view that fails to account for the complex and entrenched systems of economic disparity that persist over time. Historical factors certainly contribute to the distribution of wealth, but these disparities are perpetuated through systemic inequalities in education, employment opportunities, and social mobility. Wealth often consolidates through generational inheritance, where the affluent can provide their descendants with better resources, networks, and opportunities, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of privilege. Conversely, the poor face structural barriers that inhibit their ability to ascend economically, such as inadequate access to QUALITY education, CORRUPT discriminatory hiring practices, and limited access to capital due to PUBLIC FUND LEAKAGE. Just like the hiring and placement of multi-layered little napoleans in every gomen department, institution and ministry, these structural issues are deeply rooted and not easily resolved by itself without real effort. Often, simpletons only seen the final changes, but fail to appreciate the underlying heroic process.

Government Exploitation via money-losing, public-fund-bailing GLCs that pay a hefty sums to their own families and cronies at the expense of increasing country debt and foreign borrowing- chanelling these ill-gotten money to overseas- continue to impoverish the majority of the morbidly deluded folks....

Intellectual Stagnation:

Lack of Education: By underfunding education and discouraging critical thinking, the government ensures that the population remains intellectually stunted. This prevents the poor from seeking alternative solutions or questioning the status quo.

Suppressing Innovation: An uneducated populace is less likely to innovate or pursue entrepreneurial ventures, thereby limiting economic growth and maintaining the cycle of poverty.

Higher Education Plan 2026-2035

The spiraling down phenomenon where the poor vote for religious promises of a heavenly afterlife while the government exploits them by keeping them poor and uneducated is a deeply concerning cycle. Breaking this cycle requires a concerted effort to promote education, critical thinking, and economic opportunity, coupled with political reform that ensures transparency and accountability. By addressing the root causes of poverty and promoting intellectual and economic empowerment, society can move towards a more equitable and progressive future.

How?

Empowerment Through Education:

Critical Thinking, not Indoctrination: Promoting education and critical thinking skills can empower the poor to question the status quo and seek alternative solutions to their problems.

Economic Opportunity: Providing opportunities for economic growth and development can reduce dependency on religious promises and create a more self-sufficient populace.

Political Reform:

Transparent Governance: Ensuring transparent and accountable governance can reduce exploitation and corruption, allowing for policies that genuinely address poverty and promote social mobility.

Inclusive Policies: Developing inclusive policies that promote equal opportunity and social justice has been consistently proven to break the cycle of poverty and dependency, fostering a more equitable society.

What to ban? Who to axe?- in breaking the Self-Perpetuating Cycle

Vicious Circle:

Entrenched Beliefs: As the poor become more entrenched in religious beliefs that promise a better afterlife, they are less motivated to seek immediate, practical solutions to their problems. This reinforces their reliance on religious and political figures who exploit these beliefs.

Reinforced Dependency: The government's failure to address structural issues perpetuates poverty and dependency, ensuring a steady supply of voters who are easily swayed by religious rhetoric.

The spiraling down phenomenon where the poor vote for religious promises of a heavenly afterlife while the government exploits them by keeping them poor and uneducated is a deeply concerning cycle. Breaking this cycle requires a concerted effort to promote education, critical thinking, and economic opportunity, coupled with political reform that ensures transparency and accountability. By addressing the root causes of poverty and promoting intellectual and economic empowerment, society can move towards a more equitable and progressive future.

How?

Empowerment Through Education:

Critical Thinking, not Indoctrination: Promoting education and critical thinking skills can empower the poor to question the status quo and seek alternative solutions to their problems.

Economic Opportunity: Providing opportunities for economic growth and development can reduce dependency on religious promises and create a more self-sufficient populace.

Political Reform:

Transparent Governance: Ensuring transparent and accountable governance can reduce exploitation and corruption, allowing for policies that genuinely address poverty and promote social mobility.

Inclusive Policies: Developing inclusive policies that promote equal opportunity and social justice has been consistently proven to break the cycle of poverty and dependency, fostering a more equitable society.

What to ban? Who to axe?- in breaking the Self-Perpetuating Cycle

Vicious Circle:

Entrenched Beliefs: As the poor become more entrenched in religious beliefs that promise a better afterlife, they are less motivated to seek immediate, practical solutions to their problems. This reinforces their reliance on religious and political figures who exploit these beliefs.

Reinforced Dependency: The government's failure to address structural issues perpetuates poverty and dependency, ensuring a steady supply of voters who are easily swayed by religious rhetoric.

Societal Implications:

Stifled Development: This cycle stifles societal development. A population focused on religious promises rather than economic and social progress is less likely to advocate for policies that promote education, healthcare, and economic opportunity.

Widening Inequality: As the gap between the wealthy and the poor widens, those in power can further entrench their position, creating an even greater disparity and perpetuating the cycle of exploitation.

Government Exploitation via money-losing, public-fund-bailing GLCs that pay a hefty sums to their own families and cronies at the expense of increasing country debt and foreign borrowing- chanelling these ill-gotten money to overseas- continue to impoverish the majority of the morbidly deluded folks....

Intellectual Stagnation:

Lack of Education: By underfunding education and discouraging critical thinking, the government ensures that the population remains intellectually stunted. This prevents the poor from seeking alternative solutions or questioning the status quo.

Suppressing Innovation: An uneducated populace is less likely to innovate or pursue entrepreneurial ventures, thereby limiting economic growth and maintaining the cycle of poverty.

Maintaining the Status Quo (but time and tide wait for no stupig people- see how SGD catches up with AUD; while RM continues to slide.......bottomless):

Political Manipulation: Governments may exploit religious promises to secure a loyal voter base. By emphasizing religious rhetoric, they divert attention from their failure to address poverty, education, and economic growth.

Control Through Poverty: Keeping the population poor and dependent makes them more susceptible to manipulation. A population struggling to meet basic needs is less likely to demand systemic change or question authority.

The phenomenon of the poor voting for religious promises of heavenly afterlife while the government takes advantage by keeping them in poverty and intellectually stifled is a dangerous and self-perpetuating cycle.

The poor often cling to religious promises of a better afterlife as a source of hope and psychological comfort. This offers a respite from their harsh realities. Religious leaderswould then conspire with politicians to exploit this emotional vulnerability by offering simplistic and emotionally charged promises of heavenly rewards, rather than tangible solutions to their worldly problems. It's kind of willing buyers and willing sellers....hehe

Wow!! Spot on! That's lacking in our education philosophy....hehe

Posted by Sslee > 38 minutes ago | Report Abuse

If your religion told you your fate already predetermined by almighty god or you are born poor because of your karma and will remain poor for your whole life.

Will you just resigned to your fate or have the courage to change your fate by working double hard?

Lazy poor are nations plagued by majority who choose blind belief and voting for leaders based on religious promises is a form of intellectual laziness that hinders personal and societal growth. In contrast, actively seeking truth, embracing paradigm shifts, and voting for technocrats who use the best available knowledge and technology to lead are crucial for advancing our understanding of the universe and improving human life. The pursuit of truth and innovation, coupled with informed decision-making, leads to a more enlightened and progressive society.

Break into 2 parts:

Part 1: "Lazy"

Lazy are blind believers find comfort in established religious doctrines without questioning or seeking deeper understanding. They got trap in the comfort zone that discourages intellectual curiosity and the pursuit of truth. Lazy is lacking of the vigour to pursuit modern days' answers but avoiding the complexities and uncertainties inherent in scientific inquiry and philosophical exploration.

Corresponding part 2: Poor

Poor are those who have eyes and sight but simply submit to blind adherence to fundamentalism that leads to resistance against new ideas and scientific discoveries that contradict traditional beliefs, stifling innovation and progress.

Coming up next: Solution- based on tackling the root cause- transfroming fakeducation to realducation

Magnum

1. Yes, there's a breakout this month. (yey!)

2. The first target to me is the 38.2% Fibonacci Retracement which points to RM1.45.

3. The second target to me is the 50% Fibonacci Retracement which points to RM1.59.

By emphasizing these unique strengths, Amanah can carve out a distinct and appealing identity among rural voters, particularly those who are seeking a balance between religiosity and modern governance, as well as those disillusioned with the status quo offered by PAS, UMNO, and even PKR- leading to irrreversible ballooning of country debt, progressive shrinking of ringgit value and inexcusable wastage of public funding of gaji buta little napoleans in every gomen building, institution, department and ministry.

Utilize social media platforms to reach out to younger voters, highlighting Amanah’s initiatives and success stories in a relatable manner.

Work with influential community figures, including local business owners, educators, and leaders, who can advocate for Amanah’s policies and vision.

Revitalise economic by transforming rural folks from morbid consumerism trap to empowered self-reliant industrial players, creating job opportunities in rural areas, including the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and rural tourism.

Amanah’s best strategy to gain ground among voters, particularly in rural areas, should focus on leveraging its unique strengths through programs that reflect programs that reflect Amanah’s values of social justice, inclusivity, and ethical governance. And promote policies that support women’s rights and gender equality, engaging with women’s groups and communities directly.

Cheap now I can recollect for another round

Keep doing the same thing will only get same outcome. Keep going down like the value of ringgit.

Posted by Sslee > 3 days ago | Report Abuse

Education had failed Malaysians.
Sekolah Kebangsaan is now almost like a religion school.

Soon every state will be like Kelantan if PAS managed to capture the state government.

Religiosity often relies on supernatural explanations for the origin and complexity of life and the universe. However, scientific principles from biology, thermodynamics, and the study of LUCA offer natural explanations that do not require invoking a deity. Evolution explains the diversity of life, thermodynamics describes the behavior of energy and entropy in the universe, and LUCA and abiogenesis provide insights into the origins of life. These scientific understandings highlight the redundancy of supernatural explanations, presenting a view of religiosity as unnecessary and potentially inconsistent with our knowledge of the natural world.

First, Forever First; Third, foever third: Quality of leaders, mentality of the people

First world takes lead - raise and pocket funding. Third world fork out borrowed money- hutang keliling pinggang - bayar bunga pun tak habis-habis; weakening their own currency and buying power; fueling even more intensive corruption and white collar crimes

Keep doing the same thing and expect different results????

The ruling coalition that faces an uphill battle to regain voter confidence and address the diverse concerns of Malaysia’s multiracial electorate, underscoring the importance of balanced and inclusive policies that resonate across all segments of the population

DAP : Failed social responsibilities - standing up against the weak, fighting against injustice, as well as punishing outlaw vigilante

The Democratic Action Party (DAP) has faced criticism for its perceived failure to protect businesses such as KK Super Mart and Vern Shoes from damaging accusations and business sabotage. Allegations of corruption, fitnah (slander), and targeted attacks have emerged, pointing to a lack of robust defense and advocacy from DAP in safeguarding these enterprises against unjust actions. This perceived inaction has led to concerns about the party's commitment to justice and business integrity, potentially undermining trust and confidence among the business community and the public.

DAP : Failed social responsibilities - standing up against the weak, fighting against injustice, as well as punishing outlaw vigilante

The Democratic Action Party (DAP) has faced criticism for its perceived failure to protect businesses such as KK Super Mart and Vern Shoes from damaging accusations and business sabotage. Allegations of corruption, fitnah (slander), and targeted attacks have emerged, pointing to a lack of robust defense and advocacy from DAP in safeguarding these enterprises against unjust actions. This perceived inaction has led to concerns about the party's commitment to justice and business integrity, potentially undermining trust and confidence among the business community and the public.

DAP is failing as MCA 2.0

The Democratic Action Party (DAP) has faced significant criticism for its perceived failure to effectively address economic inequalities and social issues impacting the Chinese and Indian communities in Malaysia. Despite being a part of the ruling coalition at various points, DAP has struggled to secure substantial business opportunities for these communities, often finding themselves outmaneuvered in the political arena where Bumiputera policies dominate. Funding for vernacular schools remains a contentious issue, with many Chinese and Indian schools receiving insufficient support compared to national schools. Additionally, equitable distribution of government resources continues to be a challenge, leaving many in these communities feeling marginalized and underserved. Critics argue that DAP's efforts have been insufficient in creating meaningful change and improving the socio-economic conditions of their constituents.

Backdoor policies and unis by wolves' in sheep's clothing are the surest ways to produce ignoble, self-deceiving and unscrupulous people to manage public fund irresponsibly and run the gomen and nation to lowliness

Of course, we wouldn't want to be part of the nation with endless backdoor policies, unis and people. We better combine the Ss- Singapore, Sabah & Sarawak to be the world top 1 in education, happiness and currency strength