Short time offer.grab now or no more

Got special offer now. If you marry our Dayak ladies, your children will get bumi status. Can own properties here. Come to Sarawak u rich guys

We Sarawakians will not be affected by his fanatic rules. Here, we prefer a secular state, not an islamic one

On the other hand, a deep understanding of fundamentalism can potentially divide people eternally for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.

2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.

3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.

4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts.

6. **Fear of Change:** Fundamentalism often resists change and modernization. Deeply understanding the fear of change can perpetuate divisions as fundamentalists resist evolving societal norms and values.

7. **Echo Chambers:** Fundamentalist communities can serve as echo chambers, reinforcing their beliefs and shielding members from alternative viewpoints. This reinforces division and hinders open dialogue.

8. **Religious or Ideological Superiority:** Fundamentalism can breed a sense of religious or ideological superiority, making it difficult to engage in respectful discussions with those perceived as inferior or misled.

While deep understanding can be valuable for promoting empathy and dialogue, it can also, paradoxically, solidify divisions when it leads to a more entrenched commitment to fundamentalist ideologies. Breaking down these divisions often requires patience, open-mindedness, and efforts to foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems.

A deep understanding of fundamentalism can potentially divide people eternally for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.

2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.

3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.

4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts.

6. **Fear of Change:** Fundamentalism often resists change and modernization. Deeply understanding the fear of change can perpetuate divisions as fundamentalists resist evolving societal norms and values.

7. **Echo Chambers:** Fundamentalist communities can serve as echo chambers, reinforcing their beliefs and shielding members from alternative viewpoints. This reinforces division and hinders open dialogue.

8. **Religious or Ideological Superiority:** Fundamentalism can breed a sense of religious or ideological superiority, making it difficult to engage in respectful discussions with those perceived as inferior or misled.

While deep understanding can be valuable for promoting empathy and dialogue, it can also, paradoxically, solidify divisions when it leads to a more entrenched commitment to fundamentalist ideologies. Breaking down these divisions often requires patience, open-mindedness, and efforts to foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems.

A deep understanding of fundamentalism can potentially divide people eternally for several reasons:

1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.

2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.

3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.

4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts.

6. **Fear of Change:** Fundamentalism often resists change and modernization. Deeply understanding the fear of change can perpetuate divisions as fundamentalists resist evolving societal norms and values.

7. **Echo Chambers:** Fundamentalist communities can serve as echo chambers, reinforcing their beliefs and shielding members from alternative viewpoints. This reinforces division and hinders open dialogue.

8. **Religious or Ideological Superiority:** Fundamentalism can breed a sense of religious or ideological superiority, making it difficult to engage in respectful discussions with those perceived as inferior or misled.

While deep understanding can be valuable for promoting empathy and dialogue, it can also, paradoxically, solidify divisions when it leads to a more entrenched commitment to fundamentalist ideologies. Breaking down these divisions often requires patience, open-mindedness, and efforts to foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems.

I had said many times. They learn from Jesus. God took a piece of Adam's rib bone to give life to Eve.

Quote: "...lead no where. It does benefit the status "

Status quo and unchanging Dao are illusions. Change is the only constant in the universe

A profound grasp of science fosters strong unity among people, connecting them at a fundamental level. In contrast, religion can bring people together on a surface level but eternally leads to irreconcilable divisions.

Deep understand of science unites the ppl deeply. Religion unites superficially, but divide unconcilably

Deep understand of science unites the ppl deeply. Religion unites superficially, but divide unconcilably

A common human body contains approximately 4 x 10^27 hydrogen atoms and 2 x 10^27 oxygen atoms. Even if we accumulate these atoms randomly, on average, each of us has hundreds of billions of atoms that once resided inside every other person and pig on Earth a year ago.

(Furthermore, your body not only contains atoms from all the people on Earth but also from King Solomon and dinosaurs that existed thousands and millions of years ago, respectively.)

A common human body contains approximately 4 x 10^27 hydrogen atoms and 2 x 10^27 oxygen atoms. Even if we accumulate these atoms randomly, on average, each of us has hundreds of billions of atoms that once resided inside every other person and pig on Earth a year ago.

(Furthermore, your body not only contains atoms from all the people on Earth but also from King Solomon and dinosaurs that existed thousands and millions of years ago, respectively.

Science unites. Religion divides - the people, you see

After all, all blue eyes link back to a single ancestor who lived between 6000 and 10000 years ago.

Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, etc etc

And expel our land occupiers

Just imagine - one day we Dayaks, Jakuns and Penans want to reclaim Sundaland

The argument that Israelis have entitlement to their land due to the historical presence of King Solomon and King David is rooted in the historical and religious narratives of the Jewish people. While it's important to note that historical claims can be complex and subject to interpretation, here's an argument based on this perspective:

1. Historical and Religious Significance: King Solomon and King David are prominent figures in Jewish history and religion, playing essential roles in the establishment of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the construction of the First Temple. Their presence in the land is significant to the Jewish identity and faith.

2. Biblical Promises: For many Jews, the land of Israel is central to their religious beliefs, as it is often seen as the promised land given to them by God. The biblical narratives, particularly in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), highlight the divine covenant with the Jewish people, including promises of the land as their inheritance.

3. Centuries of Jewish Presence: Throughout history, there have been Jewish communities living in the region, even after periods of exile and dispersion. This continuity of Jewish presence in the land is seen as a strong historical claim.

4. International Recognition: The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 received international recognition and support, in part due to historical ties and the injustices suffered by Jewish communities over the centuries.

And all Sapiens migrated out of Africa anyway - and settled somewhere , made their claims somehow

Quote: "Jewish are settlers on Arab Palestine land...."

History of mankind must be taken in the full stretch of timeframe. Their kings David and Solomon had settled there, right? Why not their land?

Quote:"Hamas longstanding goal is of an Theocracy Caliph Islamist ...."

It's important to note that some religious scriptures clearly contain passages to justify coercion or force conversion, as well as prescription of discriminatory treatment of those who reject conversion.

In a school where young minds bloom and grow,
Fundamentalism's shadow, an unsettling blow.
It divides the children into groups so stark,
Believers and nonbelievers, a division in the park.

In the core of their faith, they firmly stand,
An ingroup formed by beliefs so grand.
But in this division, the outgroup takes its place,
Isolation and ostracism, a sad and bitter taste.

Polarization brews, prejudice takes hold,
Innocent hearts, once warm, now turning cold.
In the classroom, intolerance rears its head,
Cooperation and understanding, too often left for dead.

Let's strive for unity, in diversity we'll find,
A world where all beliefs peacefully bind.
For in the hearts of children, there's hope to be seen,
A future where acceptance reigns, in every shade and sheen.

What really promote unity is this: Promoting education that fosters empathy and understanding among the next generation is a crucial step toward preventing war and reducing divisions based on false beliefs and dogma. Encouraging critical thinking and tolerance can help bridge gaps between people and reduce the impact of divisive ideologies.

Quote: "Religion unites people. That is the function of religion"

That's too superficial - seeing from one side of the coin. Not the big picture

It's the quality. Not just the quantity that matters

Elon Musk's maternal grandmother is a Jews. Traditionally he's one too

How to tell what is evil in disguise, what is truly heavenly?

Second question: Which religion has brought to the world more wars, conflicts and unrest since it was introduced to mankind?

............................................

In the context of WW3, which group of people is most likely to be significantly impacted or affected?

A. Individuals with a strong genetic predisposition towards skepticism regarding belief in deities.

B. Those who possess genetic tendencies towards extreme religious fanaticism.

C. People who remain neutral and don't strongly lean towards atheism or religiosity.

Clash of the titans (Caucasian Vs Asian)

In WW3, which group of humna will be neutralised to the max?

A. Those who carry a strong set of genes for skepticism about dwelling into any form of the god delusion?

B. Those who have genetic susceptibility to indulge in religion fanaticism?

C. Those who are sitting on the fence- neither proatheistism or pro-religiosity?

Which right minded parents would want their kids to mix around with those exposed to such confusing terminology?

Safe haven from should-be-banned terminology in schools

Using derogatory terms like "kafir" or "caphir" to label non-Muslims, especially among school children, can have several harmful consequences:

1. **Promotion of Intolerance**: It encourages an atmosphere of religious intolerance and discrimination. Such labels can lead to prejudice and hatred against individuals of different faiths, fostering division and hostility.

2. **Bullying and Harassment**: This can lead to bullying and harassment of non-Muslim students. It creates a hostile environment where children are singled out and mistreated based on their religious beliefs.

3. **Psychological Impact**: Being called derogatory names can have a lasting psychological impact on children. It can lead to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and even mental health issues.

4. **Eroding Social Cohesion**: Schools should be places where diversity is celebrated, and respect for different backgrounds is fostered. The use of derogatory terms undermines these principles and weakens social cohesion.

5. **Educational Impact**: Such behavior can disrupt the learning environment, as students may be more focused on their safety and well-being than on their studies.

6. **Legal and Ethical Concerns**: In many countries, using derogatory terms to target individuals based on their religion may be considered a hate crime or a violation of anti-discrimination laws.

In essence, using derogatory terms against non-Muslims, or against any religious or cultural group, is harmful and goes against the principles of tolerance, respect, and inclusivity that should be promoted in schools and society at large. It's important for educators, parents, and communities to address and prevent such behavior and teach children about the value of diversity and respect for all.

Using derogatory terms like "kafir" or "caphir" to label non-Muslims, especially among school children, can have several harmful consequences:

1. **Promotion of Intolerance**: It encourages an atmosphere of religious intolerance and discrimination. Such labels can lead to prejudice and hatred against individuals of different faiths, fostering division and hostility.

2. **Bullying and Harassment**: This can lead to bullying and harassment of non-Muslim students. It creates a hostile environment where children are singled out and mistreated based on their religious beliefs.

3. **Psychological Impact**: Being called derogatory names can have a lasting psychological impact on children. It can lead to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and even mental health issues.

4. **Eroding Social Cohesion**: Schools should be places where diversity is celebrated, and respect for different backgrounds is fostered. The use of derogatory terms undermines these principles and weakens social cohesion.

5. **Educational Impact**: Such behavior can disrupt the learning environment, as students may be more focused on their safety and well-being than on their studies.

6. **Legal and Ethical Concerns**: In many countries, using derogatory terms to target individuals based on their religion may be considered a hate crime or a violation of anti-discrimination laws.

In essence, using derogatory terms against non-Muslims, or against any religious or cultural group, is harmful and goes against the principles of tolerance, respect, and inclusivity that should be promoted in schools and society at large. It's important for educators, parents, and communities to address and prevent such behavior and teach children about the value of diversity and respect for all.

Using derogatory terms like "kafir" or "caphir" to label non-Muslims, especially among school children, can have several harmful consequences:

1. **Promotion of Intolerance**: It encourages an atmosphere of religious intolerance and discrimination. Such labels can lead to prejudice and hatred against individuals of different faiths, fostering division and hostility.

2. **Bullying and Harassment**: This can lead to bullying and harassment of non-Muslim students. It creates a hostile environment where children are singled out and mistreated based on their religious beliefs.

3. **Psychological Impact**: Being called derogatory names can have a lasting psychological impact on children. It can lead to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and even mental health issues.

4. **Eroding Social Cohesion**: Schools should be places where diversity is celebrated, and respect for different backgrounds is fostered. The use of derogatory terms undermines these principles and weakens social cohesion.

5. **Educational Impact**: Such behavior can disrupt the learning environment, as students may be more focused on their safety and well-being than on their studies.

6. **Legal and Ethical Concerns**: In many countries, using derogatory terms to target individuals based on their religion may be considered a hate crime or a violation of anti-discrimination laws.

In essence, using derogatory terms against non-Muslims, or against any religious or cultural group, is harmful and goes against the principles of tolerance, respect, and inclusivity that should be promoted in schools and society at large. It's important for educators, parents, and communities to address and prevent such behavior and teach children about the value of diversity and respect for all.

These HMs, teachers, little Napoleans in the education ministry and the education minister herslef have lost their rationality and moral compass because of fanaticism. The root cause is fanticism. Terrorism has the same root. The danger is clear. Children must be kept away from this kind of bad influences.

These HMs, teachers, little Napoleans in the education ministry and the education minister herslef have lost their rationality and moral compass because of fanaticism. The root cause is fanticism. Terrorism has the same root. The danger is clear. Children must be kept away from this kind of bad influences.

It is immoral for educators to involve children in emotionally complicated Middle East war issues because children are not emotionally equipped to handle the complexities and trauma associated with such conflicts. Educators have a responsibility to prioritize the well-being and emotional development of their students, and exposing them to the harsh realities of war can have detrimental effects on their mental health and overall growth. Children should be provided with age-appropriate, balanced, and unbiased information to help them develop critical thinking skills and form their own opinions when they are mature enough to do so.

Young school children should not be dragged into complicated, complex, and controversial Middle East wars for several critical reasons:

1. Developmental Inappropriateness: Immature young children lack the cognitive and emotional maturity to understand the complexities and nuances of international conflicts. These issues are often rooted in historical, cultural, and political contexts that are beyond their comprehension.

2. Emotional Well-being: Involving children in war-related activities can lead to trauma, anxiety, and long-lasting emotional distress. Witnessing violence, suffering, and death can have a profound negative impact on their mental health and development.

3. Physical Safety: War zones are dangerous places with inherent risks to life and well-being. Children are particularly vulnerable, and their involvement in conflict zones places them at significant physical risk.

4. Education Interruption

Young school children should not be dragged into complicated, complex, and controversial Middle East wars for several critical reasons:

1. Developmental Inappropriateness: Immature young children lack the cognitive and emotional maturity to understand the complexities and nuances of international conflicts. These issues are often rooted in historical, cultural, and political contexts that are beyond their comprehension.

2. Emotional Well-being: Involving children in war-related activities can lead to trauma, anxiety, and long-lasting emotional distress. Witnessing violence, suffering, and death can have a profound negative impact on their mental health and development.

3. Physical Safety: War zones are dangerous places with inherent risks to life and well-being. Children are particularly vulnerable, and their involvement in conflict zones places them at significant physical risk.

4. Education Interruption: Involving children in wars disrupts their access to education, which is essential for their personal development and future prospects. Disrupted education can have long-term consequences on their ability to thrive and contribute positively to society.

5. Violation of International Laws: Using child soldiers or involving children in conflicts is considered a violation of international laws and human rights, as outlined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

6. Loss of Childhood: Children have a right to a safe and nurturing childhood. Involving them in war robs them of this fundamental right and forces them to confront adult challenges prematurely.

It is crucial to protect the well-being of children and ensure they grow up in safe and nurturing environments, shielded from the horrors of war and its complexities.

Yes, learn only from the best. Singapore has better historians to inform where plaestinians originated from

All are god's sons. No one should be coward this time. Both sides must go all out to fight. Winner takes all the land in the middle east

Long term will depend on how the country deal with their debt and strengthen their currency.

Every busybody country (including pmx gomen) is guilty for contributing to the greatest threat to human existence

Pmx is desperate and turning to ride on greenwave to explore potential new voters

Yup, PMX should just focus on more pressing domestic issues such as the free-falling ringgit or the spiralling high cost of living instead of having delusions of grandeur

We Sarawakians will not be affected by his fanatic rules.

Focus on Solving Real-World Issues:
When individuals and societies prioritize addressing real-world issues, they tend to focus on immediate concerns such as poverty, inequality, environmental challenges, healthcare, education, and social justice. By concentrating efforts and resources on these tangible problems, they can work towards creating a more equitable and sustainable world. Benefits of this approach include:

Tangible Progress: Solutions to real-world issues can lead to tangible improvements in people's lives and communities.
Unity: Addressing common challenges can bring people together and promote cooperation and social cohesion.
Long-Term Sustainability: Solving real-world issues can lead to a more sustainable and prosperous future for generations to come.

Not surprising. They got brainwashed to stay solidarity with Pas to further Islamisation-desecularisation agenda