Yoong family everyday support until pants dropped

Start accumulate

Sack the $100m a year Tan Sri first

Tesla nothing to do with Insas

Good price to enter

Worth taking a second look

Still stagflation :(

Revisit this soon

Time to exit this stock something is amiss

Tong is not a Malaysian only, he is also a Canadian. So what he said is not really the truth

You won't be surprised but you will be disappointed

Talk like no talk

Salted fish also follow 1Mtalkingkangkung and wikileaks, so follow them lagi chun

Bought today

or limps all the way to general hospital

Want to pang sai please go elsewhere lah

Sentiment no good for this stock

Next week can see 15 to 16 level since no more impetus

Bad Q1 expected. Run......

Nice buyer's Q

1
1
9
6
7

..if u get d meaning.. Funny

hy physically go to U.K. We can write or email to request or use the dipolmatic channels or use Shafie Abdullah here itself, if wants to know who has the right of pocession.One can use all the resources which is available online to study maritime laws and international laws. Do not waste raayat's money at your whims.

Hogwash! Still lying to cover up and treating Malaysians as idiots. If pressed further, they will say "national security".

It is amazing how many utterly stupid people have found their way into government. I have to conclude that this government feels that its primary responsibility is to employ the unemployable.

Have we been consumed by greed for profits only that we do not care about the image of our National airlines?

MAS probably overpaid for the nasi lemak and all the other meals. THis is business , Malaysia Bolih style.

After 2 days of higher volume, everything is back to dead pond

Need to prop up the shares price so that LONBIS' book will look good, now that so much voices were heard for the management to pare down the debt. Where can you inflate value of your investment immediately since so much money were poured into PPE except the KHEESAN shares price?

http://www.kinibiz.com/story/corporate/58188/london-biscuits-mum-over-ppe-costs-and-growing-debts.html

JinLinTao, it is a no man land, anybody can join. But your id sounds funny 真令头 in hokkien :-)

1.60以上好好招乎你, 嘿嘿

BIG

BIG

BOMB

just exploded on www.liihen.com

I dun want to get my backside toast

who said i disappear? the girl who looks for sugar daddy? lol

ku hwa seng not free today

simple mah, see how Ministry of Tourism can pay GBP 3m for advertising in Cardiff City stadium you know the lubang loh

ytlcorp also like that

talk2 for fun

before RM1 we die first

Please don't get personal. The long term lease that I meant is not those financial lease term that you talked about at length. What I meant was long term tenancy agreementlah. And I actually said specifically to read in conjunction with the related party transaction mandates. Period.

The one that had lost creditability should be you as all my rebuttals to your accusation went undefended and it was you who had shifted goal post with newer subjects. Nothing that I posted was unsubstantiated, the facts are all over the net. So please be a gentleman in uttering your feeling.

Let's just wait who will have the last laugh when the earth is shaken in Muar SOON eventually.

kakaka, thats what I say the sexmaker always jump the gun with his prejudiced stance. I just tickled him that the minority shareholder with the 100 shares in early June had built a position large enough to fill a Form29A, he responded with 2 full paragraphs about the financials of Lii Hen. Please dig deep into the book of Lii Hen, most of the good lands and buildings are owned privately by the directors and on long term lease to Lii Hen. The good assets are with the directors while the so-so ones are with Lii Hen. These are clearly visible in the related party transaction mandates.

The liquid working capitals are mainly constituted by banking facility. Again, this may evaporate if the negative news hit them hard. Bankers are known for retracting umbrellas during rainy days, please don't forget that.

I see the theory of NSH testing water another fictional dream by the sexmaker, alongside all his earlier speculations of bitter loss, remisier trying to vindicate himself or dumping after Q2 result.

Please note while it is the old saying of innocent until proven guilty, the stock market investors practise a different approach once a key man or men of Lii Hen is nabbed, it is "Shoot First Ask Later". All those with the Lii Hen shares in hands will be lame hen instead!

Sexmaker, I dare to accused Tan Bee Eng and Chua Lee Seng committing the alleged CBT because it is in the police report, therefore it is a fact. Dare the two and you to prove me wrong.

As for whether evidences will be revealed by the activists to the minority shareholders, the truth is already on the net. It is only a matter of time some directors will be nabbed. Mark my word today Sept 24, 2013 5.43pm. You can hang on to your Lii Hen shares if you chose to believe otherwise. Like you have said, it is a free market.

By the way, the shareholder that has 100 share in early June that filed the legal suit on Lii Hen has built a position large enough to fill up Form 29A soon, based on the latest documents in court. Let just wait to see when Lii Hen will announce these court documents, pretty sure they will do it after someone complain again....

May I ask what are you doing as a constructive minority shareholder for the good of other minority shareholders at large except belittling the activists with your prejudiced stance of a 'good' corporate accountability on Lii Hen? The only strong points presumably still on your side may be the superficial financials which could dissipates into thin air once the directors are hauled in

Dear Sensemaker,

After reading through your lengthy comments which were premised undoubtedly on many bare speculations and assumptions, I would like to raise a few pointers here just to share with our fellow investors on Lii Hen :

1) It may be true that the 10+ commentators may know each other just like yourself and Jenny6088, going by the Q & A and interval time between you two. A lot of investors and remisiers do use the forum as a mean of market communication besides Facebook or Whatsapp. I myself is one. Therefore your speculation that the 10+ commentators may be originated from a same person may be a little bit far fetched, solely based on your assumption of interval time between their comments.

2) I do not buy your suggestion that those who have lost bitterly in 2004 wanted to see Lii Hen shares price crashed. Intention and ability to do a thing is entirely 2 different things. I mean to do that they would first need to build some substantial shareholdings before they can call the shot in the market to depress the price. Based on the names that appeared in www.liihen.com shareholding lists, I cannot find their names or anything close to that in the latest Annual Report 2012.

3) Consequently your next allusion that they are the one who dumped Lii Hen shares after the Q2 result was announced cannot stand. In furtherance thereof, your suggestion that they may be collecting now that the price has been smashed is pure fiction of your creation.

4) Your fourth possibility that the remisier is trying to incriminate the 2 directors in order to vindicate himself from the SC charge is a total utterance of the wildest imagination. Based on the articles and evidences adduced thus far in www.liihen.com, the remisier was lodging a complaint on allegation of Fraud/Criminal breach of trust/Forgery against Tan Bee Eng and Chua Lee Seng to the Police. I cannot see the relationship between the remisier's charge and the offences under the Penal Code. Market manipulation is under the purview of SC while the Penal Code is under the Police. How can he vindicates himself from a charge by the SC through the Police?

5) While the timing of the setting up of the website coincided with the slump in Lii Hen shares price, I actually was very happy that a shareholder activists movement was established as a watchdog over Lii Hen. FYI, this may be the very first shareholder activist in Malaysia and I will encourage and welcome with my open arms to others with the same noble intention in upholding a minority shareholder's rights. I would encourage you to look at Carl Icahn's story as a shareholder activist and how all of us maybe benefitted potentially by having this movement.

6) FYI the Board Charter inclusion on all issuers are now a requirement of the SC and Bursa.

7) Your conclusion that Mohd Qari Ahmad as the Chairman of Lii Hen was not re-elected by the largest shareholder (Assets Muar Sdn. Bhd) in the AGM because of his handling of a shareholder compromised your fairness in your view. FYI, Mohd Qari Ahmad ("MQA") was not re-elected because he is the partner of the remisier charged by SC. Please be guided that MQA took Lii Hen to listing in early 2000 and has since been a director of Lii Hen until this June 25. The "Muar carpenters" crucified MQA because of his partnership with Dato' Goh the remisier. And what could be a better platform to do it than in AGM? Their English may not be good but I would give them 100% for strategy plotting.

MQA is the most educated in the board of Lii Hen and highly qualified as an accountant and a former merchant banker. He is also the only Bumiputra in the board. For whatever reasons there maybe for the Muar carpenters to cut him lose from Lii Hen, brace yourself now as there will be more explosive evidences of malpractice and wrongdoings coming your way!

8) I must admit that based on the surface financials of Lii Hen with a PE of 3.61x and a NTA of RM 2.24 a share, Lii Hen does look a very compelling stock to buy with a steady dividend payouts. But one must asks seriously this : as FBMKLCI is at the historical high now, why is Lii Hen still trading at RM 1.45 a share today, a whopping 35% discount to its NTA? The meagre traded volume says it all.

In conclusion, there is no major buyer trying to accumulate a position to takeover Lii Hen as you had speculated. To harp on this will be a wild goose chase. At best, these are retail investors nibbling occasionally. Anyway, Lii Hen with 60m shares in issue may be just too small a fly to even interests the institutions to start looking at it.

Kudos to harvey for highlighting the violations. We need more activists like you to bring up the level of professionalism of our directors http://liihen.blogspot.com/2013/09/another-disdain-and-violation-of-rules.html

erkongseng : 老兄, 公司基本面只是门面, 现在连九年前的東西小股东也有本事挖出来, 里面到底有多少问题, 你我肯定不得而知. 现今摆在大家眼前的事实是有董事戥穿钱柜, 不只是伩心的问题, 而是诚信的问题.

不錯公司是慷慨派息, 但別忘了若是董事们挖銭, 他们挣大錢而我们只是拿到餅碎. 再者, 天曉得他们是否正在暗渡陳倉搞个马来西亜版的Bernard Madoff, 吸引着我们上釣?

第3季业绩应该不会太理想, 不然幹嘛董事先把本期的股息先減一半? 我想咱应该先观望一下, 反正最近利兴的坏消息層出不窮, 當今策略应该是先行迴避, 保本为上!

from www.liihen.blogspot.com ........ Together with his false trading price which caused a misleading appearance of active trading of Lii Hen shares, Tan Bee Eng should have been charged under the same Act together with Dato' Goh and Siow Chung Peng by now. The legal chain of criminal liabilities would also shackles all those who sold the Lii Hen shares from Avenue Securities under the same modus operandi.

Hey Securities Commission, are you going to do anything now that the evidences are out in the open???

from www.liihen.bolgspot.com .......By virtue of the foregoing, Tan Bee Eng is now caught red-handed under the same Section 84(1) in the sale and purchase of Lii Hen shares that did not involved any change of beneficial ownership because part of his sale proceed of RM 361,371.42 was used to purchase his Lii Hen shares by Dato' Goh

poor quality developer. Manufacturer of car number plate previously

talk2 only

lan

http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/09/11/silver-bird-falsifying-documents.aspx

SilverBird 's Tan Han Kook charged with falsifying documents to Bursa Malaysia.
Lii Hen soon will follow

ah