even at max capacity i doubt their growth would exceed 15%. so its fucking overvalue

old news

overvalue sold

sold all.

i leave there for 1 y+ come back earn 200% edi. awesome

nearly double liao

Gonna sell all and buy airasia

My warrant 25cents gg

chill choivo great mind is hard to fathom

Gamuda by far one of my biggest position glad to hold long term

Superb result

This result rm2 also no problem

My rm95c duno hold how loong

Gg

i like joetay pick. can see what kind of person she is from her pick

u are paying 11bil for company that is making roughly 200mil even if it grow by 10% every year which is considered superb performance. u will only get your return of 11bil 20 years later. U are still not making money after 20 years.

looking at its pattern of growth i would say 6% per annum is reasonable and u will start getting back your money after 26 years. Entering at this price is it feasable

actually your table is quite outdated. its actually up to 1gbps which is 10 times faster than unifi catching up to global leader xfinity which sells their service up to 2gbps. Theres a fine line between moat and niche and i dont think timecom have a moat even with the advantages it have among its peers here. In few years time, i see that its not an issue for timecom to take away consumers from tm due to the obvious difference starting from the whole klang valley using timecom.
however this kind of business can it be replicated? fibre optic business i cannot be certain.

Although it is undisputed that timecom is uncontested for now. and i dont really like u use the word cheap and moat together.

dksh and its sad margin. it is cheap for a reason

how is china con termination gamuda business lol

hantam

not sustainable. no way this result can last one year

ql has been very expensive since forever.

nothing drops forever

i believe its a correction due to high pe

gamuda is a no brainer buy

article out already. still dont run?

Most of tech stock is short life and in a more rapid speed. With each new technology implemented components will be different, methods will be different. Maybe semiconductor will be replaced by nano tech or hydrogen cell in the future who knows.

Typo it’s 3 bear years

Example only okay

Posted by 10154899906070843 > Jan 4, 2019 10:39 PM | Report Abuse

Godhand, if growing from 300 million revebue per quarter to 900 million revenue is not a sign of a growing moat, please do describe to me a company that does exactly what QL is doing and does it better. Market leaders generally have a moat. And please don't simplify moats to just brand recognition, management performance can be a moat (Warren), size can be a moat, first adopters can be a moat.

Anyway, I'll make it easier for you. Find me an Asian company in this part of the world that competes directly just with ql lifestock farming division at 1.9 billion in revenue ( animal feed raw material production, day old chicken and broilers) and does it better than ql resources.

Go ahead. I'll pay you your research fees and eat my hat.

You would recognize a moat if it bit you in the ass(et).


_____________________________________________

It is call growing not moat. Moat is something that is very very hard to get close to or impossible to attack. Think of it this way, when the castle is surrounded with deep trench filled with water, how does the land unit attack the castle?

Do you think its impossible to replicate ql egg business?? To me its a no.

and one more thing i have to strongly disagree with you brand is everything. Management will die off, brand will stay there forever. If the brand is tie to a person, the company is bound to die. Example = Apple

Reason is simple. If I have 10million. and i get average 12% cagr in 30 years i will have 500million.

Icon8888 Yes. Jon will very likely underperform in bull and in normal market

That is the weak link of his investing model

Which is why I until now is still not convinced that it is suitable for him
05/01/2019 06:11

As long as his cagr can beat the inflation of 4-5%, he will be growing his networth in value.
say he make 15% every year for 9 years in bull market. loss 15% in bear market. his cagr will be 12% . with capital of 100k u will get arnd 300k. in 28 years bull market 2 years bear market, u will get arnd 5 millions.
The most important factor is never to lose money in investing

what icon say is true, work on your capital first. however i have other perspective. dont gamble in your investment. u can risk in your business work on your earning power. say if your yearly income is 50k make it 500k first or 1million per year. then only focus on investment.

Icon8888 I am defending my brand

hahahahaha

Nestle on the other hand has moat. The moat is milo. The brand itself is a moat.

moat to be has only one meaning the possibility of the business to be replicated. It can be strong or weak. When a business cannot be copied, its irreplacable and therefore u can demand high margin. When u think of it, all good business have high margin.

Think of it this way can macdonald ever be replicated?
it can never be copied therefore it has a very strong moat. To me QL has some sort of weak moat or u could call it niche but far fetch from irreplacable.

Icon8888 Longer than Jon Choivo

lol

wdf only day 4

fuck im late again

Looking at your comment you are looking at surface only. U only know skin. U don’t even know what tony visions are. Budget Passenger carrier service is only to absorb market participation very much like grab or do U think it’s the only source of income? I notice u somehow trying to compared it to ql. I can tell u airasia is in another tier.

I would choose aeoncr anytime over rcecap business wise. I think it’s a so so company.

not interested in automobile industry. feel like it will get disrupted very easily . especially component manufacturing company. The only real money making machine is their stake in perodua.

10154899906070843 anyway, just some more information for you too digest to understand how ql works. when you try digest a lesser managed competitor LAYHONG try to look at their previous quarter results announcement. Why did they have a big loss? It was due to 8% increase in feedstock prices from soy etc, and a culling of chickens in tamparuli for their broiler farms. Why did this not happen to QL? They also had broiler farms nearby? It is because of their attention to biological safety and agricultural quality (no culling as all the chickens were safe). they also produce their own feedstock mix from palm oil kernels and other materials (which come from their plantations) so the rise in soy prices did not even affect QL.

Thats why when kids like Choivo capital thought they were making a good deal investing in LAYHONG they burned all their money, high revenue, very low margins, no vertical integration. When they got caught swimming naked, all their positions turned to dust.

These are not new things, and you could see it coming a mile away. It just takes business sense to see beyond just numbers and figures and truly understand how a business works, what challenges they face, and what their competitors are doing differently. PE will never tell you this.

that is called understanding your stock.

___________________________________________________________________
This is what we call business advantage.

dont touch anything u dont understand la

so much confident on gtronic eh

No offence but this pick very risky even if oil good year also not much gain

STOCKPICK 2019

Airasia 16%
Ahealth 12%
Kossan 10%
Wcehb 10%
Gamuda 10%
Ajinomoto 10%
Tongher 8%
Iqgroup 8%
Superlon 8%
Pohuat 8

This counter many years already depressed margin

buy good property and construction stock and hold. sure earn money

Vs competitive industries. business wise it has no competitive edge, can be copied very easily, can be bullied by client. good business will never be bullied by client. Business wise already fail.

U dont even know what is happening inside. Dont touch if u dont know

7 11 has 2000+ stores while QL has like 60 stores. Are u like downright retarded