90 cents per qtr, 360 cents per annum for RM 14 Billion investment (RM 46 per share) sounds logical as they are looking ahead into the benefit they can get by supporting their retail segments...
I must really salute probability for having such sharp and forward thinking to be able to see through all this while others are still nitpicking over temporary hiccup is share price movement!
As what I have commented earlier , a return of US 600 million or RM 2400 million per year from an investment of RM 14 billion is worth it . Based on Petronm's announcement ,the RM 14 billion upgrade will enable petronm to have a total capacity of 178 kbpd ( 88+90) . Whether HY ( current capacity of 112kbpd) is worth RM 14 billion with its planned upgrade by borrowing another RM 1.7 billion recently is not clear to us . HY do has a licenced capacity of 156 kbpd but no one know how much is required to upgrade to this 156 kbpd capacity .
Petronm has the retailed business which is not assessed in this topic . Its 580 petron stations earned more than half of the total earnings ( refinery + retail) .
Future Eyes didnt add in the strong eps from retail segment..............that means higher total eps for future years !!!!!!!!! Yeah yeah.......will win big big
1. How is the 14B fund is used, any detail announcement from the company yet ? what happen if only part of it is used for refinery , the rest is used for retailing ,petrochemical and other, then your calculation and comparison are wrong. how it is executed , can not be a JV or other business model?
2. this sentence is very misleading. "....Perhaps, the above may also answer what could be the fair valuation of Hengyuan, RM 14 Billion?" why ? if all the 14B is dump into refinery, how do you know Petronm 14B new plant has the same efficiency as Hengyuan which costs less than 2B, any data to support you claim . do not tell me the chinaman can do magic
3. The article indirectly implies that Hengyuan is a better buy than Petronm . this is not right Hengyuan has only refinery Petronm has refinery, 560 petrol stations, petrol chemical and land asset
no value investor will think a high risk business like hengyuan where its earning rely heavily on crack spread and got to pray everyday there is less maintenance plant shut down and mishap ,is better than a well integrated business like Petronm
4. management efficiency Petronm management has already proven its ability to reward the shareholders with handsome dividend , to bring the company to net cash status with zero borrowing from the billion borrowing at the time of acquisition and now a mega expansion plan to upgrade the company to the next level growth
what about hengyuan? nothing, still current huge borrowing of 1.3B + a new borrowing of 1.7B for upgrading any dividend ? nothing ! but EPS RM3.6 what about Petronm? paid 22 cents dividend with the EPS less than 1.60
Conclusion: THE BLIND ALSO CAN SEE LAH..... WHICH ONE IS BETTER
Well, yes and no. Petron's refinery is designed to process sweet and light crude. By definition their raw material has low sulphur content. While I'm not privy to exactly how much sulphur is in their fuel oil, it should be low because the raw material is sweet.
The plant cost, technology level, and the value addition on products should be higher in sequence as per below:
simple refinery with sweet crude > simple refinery with sour crude > complex refinery with sweet crude > complex refinery with sour crude
There would have been no incentive for petron to have the 88k bpd with sweet crude designed originally to have products meeting IMO 2020 specification back then.
It is still a simple refinery designed for a less demanding task originally.
Unless simple refinery install scrubbers they would not be able to meet the IMO 2020 requirements on fuel oil.
Petron must be thinking far ahead to go for complex refinery all together to support their retail requirements which are mainly petrol and diesel.
Posted by soojinhou > Feb 5, 2018 09:16 AM | Report Abuse
Well, yes and no. Petron's refinery is designed to process sweet and light crude. By definition their raw material has low sulphur content. While I'm not privy to exactly how much sulphur is in their fuel oil, it should be low because the raw material is sweet.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
Report Abuse
Please Sign In to report this post as abuse.
Market Buzz
No result.
Featured Posts
MQ Trader
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
MQ Trader
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
0:17
New IPO: Solar PV EPCC services provider, Northern Solar Holdings Berhad aims to list on the ACE Market!
MQ Trader 51 views | 13 h ago
0:17
New IPO: CBH Engineering Holdings Berhad, an electrical engineering service provider, aims to list on the ACE Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Mohd Fahmi Bin Jaes
29,479 posts
Posted by Mohd Fahmi Bin Jaes > 2018-02-03 22:04 |
Post removed.Why?