Something very very fishy with this company... they quickly sell the project to a private company ... even though it bring more suspicions to the company.. pump to dump on monday? wakakakaka
big red flagged. no way to hide. otak rosak baru ckp gap up. I see no reason to naik pun. so fishy. iris boss wanna cash out and run away. pls tangkap and forfeit his passport
From the attachment of above link, info summarize for IITS as below:-
- As at the date of SSA, the total issued and paid-up shares capital of IITS is Six Million (6,000,000-00) ordinary shares and Ringgit Malaysia Six Million (RM6,000,000-00) respectively.
- the net profits attributable to the Company and net assets value are RM0.48 million and RM37.50 million respectively.
- As at the date of SSA, the Company had advanced a total amount of Ringgit Malaysia Thirty Three Million Four Hundred Four Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Nine And Sen Fifty Three (RM33,404,859.53) only to the IITS as Shareholder’s Advances, which forms a debt owing by IITS to the Company.
- Upon completion of the Proposed Disposal, the Company is expected to realize a gain of RM7.22 million in the financial year ending 31 March 2024.
Based on the above details, just monetize investment in IITS which is 'draining' cash flow with still 20% ownership and RM7.22 million gain. Other than that, it will most likely supply manpower to support IITS projects…up or down will be control by Mr Market, Happy Trading and TradeAtYourOwnRisk.
Based on my past experience in putra jaya contractors will be asked t submit a number of documents comprising of finance,technical capability,organisations & structure,human resources,safety policy, procurement capability,bank guarantee s ,most important its price estimate for the project.Securing a contract is no easy task as we look into various factors after RFP,clarifications due process done.After that we rank them according to their performance based submission. In a nutshell i tend to agree that the award to iris was via proper process no hanky panky or,pushovers,knowing very well on iris experience, technical capabilities before. Currently MACC is investigating the case n if they found out that iris price is reasonable compounded by past tech.experience notably its past passport jobs then no reason iris is involved in those allegations.
Robin Tan, Paul Poh, Ling Hee Keat, Ralph Marshall all masuk Iris by subscribing private placement 20¢. All trapped at high floor. Now they all must call their fathers/bosses Vincent Tan, Quek Leng Chan, Ling Leong Sik, Ananda Krishnan to rescue them.
"Peace99 > @BLee, Just wondering how the figure gain 7.22 mil comes about. Is it possible to get this number out of the other figures in the announcement?"
Hi @Peace99, I am also wondering how this RM7.22 mil projected profit calculated as book value and expenses won't be known until a certain cutoff date?? I presume this RM70 mil minus all the known obligation and book value will be the projected profit; bear in mind the Shareholder’s Advances of RM33,404,859.53 shall be waived and/or written off in two (2) stages subject to and only if payments towards the Disposal Consideration are made by the Purchaser to the Company. Therefore it seems NOT a clean RM70 mil cash into account balance sheet?? All these details can be found in the announcement attachment..
hi @BLee, Thanks for your reply. I don't know proper accounting way, so i just hantam, haha: 80% of (6mil+NAV 37.5+Advances 33.4)=0.8*76.9=61.5mil, so profit 70-61.5=8.5mil?
Selepas pendedahan siasatan SPRM kes salahguna kuasa melibatkan mantan PM dan mantan Menteri Dalam Negeri dalam anugerah projek NIISE (sistem IT utama Jabatan Imigresen bernilai rm1. 1billion) , sykt Iris kini telah jual Iris Tech (sykt yg mengendalikan projek NIISE) kepada TassTech. Siapakah TassTech dan kenapa Iris jual?
1. Projek NIISE telah diiktirafkan sebagai projek Sakit oleh projek Steering Committee sebab sampai sekarang selepas hampir 3 tahun, Iris masih tak boleh melaksanakan Fasa 1 iaitu Bahagian Analisa Keperluan dan Rekabentuk. Jelasnya Iris tidak berupaya melaksanakan projek ini.
2. Kenapa Iris jual? Memang lah Iris akan jual sekarang kerana Iris tak berkeupayaan untuk laksanakan projek dan dibawah pimpinan baru, semua fakta akan terdedah.
3. Siapa TassTech dan kenapa beli? TassTech adalah syarikat miliki Dato Seri Amin atau lebih dikenali sebagai Amin Bangla, warga Bangladesh dan pemilik Bestinet yang telah monopoli pemerdagangan hamba dari Bangladesh ke Malaysia. Dia telah menelan berbillion ringgit dengan caj Rm20ribu seorang hamba dan mengakibatkan kerugian besar kepada syarikat Malaysia seperti Sime Darby dan Top Glove apabila produk syarikat kita di tahan di Amerika Syarikat. Patutlah Amin Bangla nak beli sebab dengan menguasai projek NIISE dan sejurusnya sistem Jabatan Imigresen, dia bole menguasai kemasukan warga asing dan monopoli berniaga hamba sekali lagi.
Adakah kerajaan kita akan biarkan seorang warga asing yang terbukti terlibat dalam 'human traficking' menguasai projek sekuriti negara yg paling mustahak???
Robin Tan, Paul Poh, Ling Hee Keat, Ralph Marshall all masuk Iris by subscribing private placement 20¢. All trapped at high floor. Now they all must call their fathers and bosses Vincent Tan, Quek Leng Chan, Ling Leong Sik, Ananda Krishnan to rescue them. Their fathers and bosses probably give them a good kaw kaw scolding
Robin Tan, Paul Poh, Ling Hee Keat, Ralph Marshall all masuk Iris by subscribing private placement 20¢. All trapped at high floor. Now they all must call their fathers/bosses Vincent Tan, Quek Leng Chan, Ling Leong Sik, Ananda Krishnan to rescue them.
NIISE is a game changer for IRIS and the company has been investing time and effort for this for many years to get this contract and now they are selling the stake of 80% for RM70 million? This is a dubious deal as it proposed to sell it for an insignificant amount. Bear in mind beside the cost of developing and implementing of the new immigration system, it has a component of maintenance which is highly lucrative and with recurring income
The right way if is under investigation is to get it investigated and subsequently revoke its contract by immigration. Then to do a re-tender again to other providers
Anyway, this development will have negative impact to Iris in the mid term, like it or not. First, on the reputation and its financial position as they have deployed many staff and capex on this. With RM70 million it is too little. Investigation by MACC on both parties is a must
This is hard hit to its credentials, especially to bid new projects in the region. Hence, we need to seek the Board of Directors to seek an explanation on this. IRIS would not left unscathed with this negative development
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
sheep
3,850 posts
Posted by sheep > 2023-02-11 10:38 | Report Abuse
Something very very fishy with this company... they quickly sell the project to a private company ... even though it bring more suspicions to the company.. pump to dump on monday? wakakakaka