HLFG own 1340m HLBANK shares HLFG total out-standing shares = 1134m Therefore, for every single share of HLFG that we own, it indirectly own 1.1817 share HLBANK.
For the last 4 quarters: HLBANK EPS=RM1.8873 HLFG EPS = RM2.514
HLFG EPS = 1.1817 * HLBANK EPS + other business EPS, other business EPS = 2.514 -1.1817 * 1.8873 = 0.2838,
(2.514 - 0.2838) / 2.514 = 88.7%, Meaning 88.7% of HLFG profit is from HLBANK.
Now, look at their Net Asset per share at 30th Sep 2023, HLBANK Net Asset per share = RM16.68, HLFG Net Asset per share = RM24.25,
Same way of calculation, HLFG other business Net Asset per share = 24.25 - 1.1817 * 16.68 = RM4.54 Meaning the ROE for HLFG other business = 0.2838 / 4.54 = 6.25%, Not Bad.
Now the question is why HLFG is trading at so much cheaper compare to HLBANK? Because there is a Conglomerate Discount or in Malaysia we call it holding company discount. But logically it should not be applicable to HLBANK / HLFG because 88.7% of HLFG profit come from HLBANK.
My opinion, Logically, holding company discount should only be applicable to those companies that owning non-controlling stake, which have no say in business operation, example INSAS holding INARI, ICAP holding a basket of companies.
But HLFG have full control of HLBANK and HLCAP, so to me, holding company discount is not applicable.
Does anyone have any idea about the carrying book value of hlfg's bank of chengdu 19.8% investment vs the current valuation of BOC in chinese stock exchange? EPS and NBV of BOC as well?
HLFG vs HLBANK (last fin yr info) Price 16.28 vs 18.96 (closing on 9th Feb) EPS(cts) 246.1 vs 186.37 NTA 23.62 vs 16.59 PE 4.51 vs 10.96 S-Issued 1.147B vs 2.167B
Today, I finally took a position in both HLB and HLFG. Compared to other local banks, in which I've had position since Covid, HLB seems to be the cheapest. Over the last few years, the profitability of HLFG has increased; and, yet, the price seems not to have kept pace. I wonder why. True, it is not that strong, financially, but so are other banks in Malaysia.
> what you meant by "True, it is not that strong, financially, but so are other banks in Malaysia."?
Over the last ten years, the Revenue per Share of HLFG has grown from RM 4.24 to RM 5.47. During the same period, the Tangible Book per Share has almost tripled from RM 8.16 to RM 22.67. Which raises questions (to me, at least) about the quality of the assets that are being accumulated.
Now, I also look at the Cash & Equivalents over the same 10-year period and compare it with Total Liabilities. Between the periods 2014-2020, the group's cash position was between RM16.3 bil and RM24.8 bil. Total Liabilities on the other hand has tended to be below RM200 bil. However, if we look at the current values, the Cash position has dwindled to RM 11.1 bil whereas the Liabilities has ballooned to RM 278 bil.
good analysis @i3gambler and @Thirai Thiraviam ..... im planning to enter HLFG mainly due to its low PER, based on current qtr eps of 72.1c, this works out to T4 PER of 6.06x.... which is so low!!! Or shd I just get into Ambank and RHB? Objective..... recession prove investment into financial services
raymondroy: > im planning to enter HLFG mainly due to its low PER, based on current qtr eps of 72.1c, this works out to T4 PER of 6.06x.... which is so low!!! Or shd I just get into Ambank and RHB
I increased my position in HLFG again today. It seems terribly undervalued. As per my estimates, it should be trading at around RM27. So, I really don't understand why it is selling at such a deep discount. I don't mind holding on to HLFG for the long-term, but with a dividend yield south of 3% (owing to a very low dividend payout ratio), I recognise it'll be pain. As to your question, both RHB and Ambank appear to be undervalued, as well. But RHB pays good dividend (payout ratio > 0.6). I have been holding on to RHB for four years now. No regrets.
Also, look at this forum. HLFG is one of the largest PLCs in Malaysia, and is part of the FBM KLCI, and yet, so few people post here.
I avoid HLFG and prefer HLBANK but my holdings in HLBANK is significantly smaller due to the Quek factor. He owns too much. Additionally, none of his children are likely to succeed him. Shares that are willed to children who don't take over from such a dominant person are likely to be sold, and the market simply cannot absorb ...
So, the combination of very high % holding, stinginess to share profits with shareholders, the longer it goes, the worse it'll get.
This is more likely to turn out to be a value trap i.e. if the payout is barely matching FD, I can't be interested to buy.
Malaysia is not the same as the US. There are too many situations where PE and PB is so cheap, but due to tight control, there's just no way for market/activists to take a seat in the Board to force unlocking and without a mechanism to unlock, and Quek decides on the % of profits to share with shareholders whilst he is still alive, it'll be a long long wait.
As usual, just my view, you are responsible for your own trading and investing decision.
thx @DividendGuy67 ...... did not know these info.... quek kids are not following his footsteps as in none will take over from him? Why dont other parties slowly take up the shares in open market..... can possibly reach a point for MTO :-) sad to see the state of affairs in the quek family like this..... will need a white knight
I don't think QLC cares about HLFG valuations. Put yourself in his shoes. He's in his 80s. Why should he divest his shares when he's alive, if this risks someone else kicking him out? "Over my dead body!" - QLC cries out! ;-)
Put yourself in the acquirer shoes - why should they pay a premium to buy QLC out, when MV is so low? First, QLC won't allow it - same "over my dead body" argument.
I'm sure there's better ways (e.g. cousins in Singapore, bypassing children?). I'm sure there's a solution somewhere if several parties are willing, but problem is willingness is not certain when multiple parties are involved. So, this looks like a 7 foot hurdle to me than a 1 foot hurdle. I'll let someone brighter and smarter figure this one out. So, I personally pass HLFG.
Imagine trying to go against the guy who owns 78% of the shares. What can anybody do? Let say someone plans to do a hostile takeover - he starts buying up the remaining 22% shares. In the process, he bids the price up. QLC can just ignore him. Let say there's only 2 parties left - Bursa will come in and say you have to delist because you don't comply with listing requirements. It gets delisted, QLC don't care, you are stuck with unlisted stock owning 22%. And QLC controls the dividends - he can simply cut down the dividends and your 22% now is not worth anything and doesn't even receive dividends. This guy controls everything. Nobody dares to try anything against him.
And guys like him, with tremendous resources, can live to a very advanced age. 80s is still young. Charlie Munger lives up to 99. Public bank founder Teh Hong Piau lives up to 92, and QLC may be longer than him. Technology to prolong lives gets better and better. As value investors, our timeframe is only 3 years - if it takes longer than 3 years, it will only cause our portfolio to lag. Value investors buy low, aiming to sell high. It's different than dividend investors who buys and hope to hold forever looking for rising dividends for a lifetime to replace active income with passive income. If HLFG dividends is higher at say mid point between EPF and FD, I will buy but at this rate, it's a long wait to see 2.77% rising to 4.5% say. At 3% growth, that's more than 15 years wait. Hence, not suitable for my goals.
ur right DividendGuy67 ..... at such a large sharehoding no one can come close, i still recall the good ol days when hong leong only had stock broking business and was hunting for bankng license but it was frozen, so word has it that QLC being a good kawan of anwar - fin minister then, persuaded latter to put mui bank in cold storage..... not allowed to increase branches or even atm..... and thus was forced to sell to QLC.... those were the days lah, wonder if the kwek singapore and quek malaysia still in good ties?
And DividendGuy67, could you explain why PPHB, quite a good stock (consistent earnings growth, but it is paying very insignificant dividends, less than 1%), why market still buy this share up?
Of course it is a bank. It has: 1) Investment banking, 2) Insurance business, 3) Commercial banking via HLBANK.
You see, MAYBANK, CIMB, RHBBANK, PBBANK also have all this commercial banking, investment banking and insurance business. The only thing different is HLFG listed its commercial banking separately.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
snowball2000
438 posts
Posted by snowball2000 > 2023-08-30 11:21 | Report Abuse
QR still pending on Merdeka eve... What is HLFG cooking?