Probably RMB4 Million is only the overall works done, hotel and flight costs by the new mgmt in China plus Auditors fee plus all misc and legal fees such as mandatory licences renewal in China, Bermuda and Msia. Seeking advises from all counterparts need expenses too. All anew. So no worries lah. Maybe there assets in China suddenly appear back into our Balance Sheet thus bringing back sudden gains for what Msports had written off all to losses in 2016.
True....wait till the ex-Chinaman boss and her daughter dump all their shares first afterall 0.5 sen is still the lowest we can get from both of them. Those cannot wait can buy now at 1.5 sen or 1.0 sen. Everything is possible. Buy some to keep for better announcements later coz I am sure there are something which the new mgmt found worth re-listing after doing their in-depth studies and personal interrogations and audits of the Msports properties in China. The new managements are a team of smart people, right?
Copied from their 2016 Annual Report : As set out in Note 30 to the financial statements, we have confirmed (to the best of our ability given limited rights of access to information), the existence of 24 litigation cases that were taken against the main subsidiary, JinjiangBaixing,from2014 till April 2018. The financial amounts involved in the lawsuits were approximately RMB 518.13 million yuan and in some of the cases, either or both Lin Liying and Lin Houzhi are named as defendants to the claims. 3. As set out in Note 20 to the financial statements, the new directors have concluded that they have no option but to deconsolidate the Company’s subsidiaries in the PRC as at 31 December 2016 based on a pre-existing loss of control and their inability to re-gain control of the subsidiaries since taking office. As such, the Company’s investment in the subsidiaries will be written down as a disposal and going forward, the subsidiaries financial statements shall not be consolidated into group accounts. In the event that the Company regains control over the subsidiaries or underlying assets, these will be captured and recognised in the Company’s accounts again.
11. Looking forward, pursuant to Paragraph 4.1(b) of Practice Note 17, the company is actively pursuing a regularisation plan and the Board of MSPORTS anticipates that the said Regularisation Plan may result in a significant change in the business direction or policy presently adopted by the Company. The Company is now seeking a suitable business or asset that will meet the criteria to maintain the listing status of MSPORTS on the Main Board of the Malaysian Stock Exchange within the timeframe allocated to the Company under its PN17 status.
Multi Sports Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries 77 Litigation The Company has sought the assistance of lawyers in China to identify and confirm the existence of litigation involving the subsidiaries and primarily, Jinjiang Baixing with a view to providing us with the official cause papers, pleadings and evidence filed in the suits. Due to difficulties in accessing information, the lawyers have only been able to access publicly available information. In April, 2018, we received a report on the status of the various cases affecting the subsidiaries based on which an announcement dated25 April 2018, the relevant portions of which are as follows: 1. Due to restrictions by the Chinese courts on the disclosure of and the means of gathering litigation information, and legal and bureaucratic barriers to the access of private information and company documents in China involving the PRC subsidiaries, the board in Malaysia has been forced to rely on available public information and whatever court information is available to non-parties to the litigation, which is by nature incomplete. 2. The following information is based on the best available information from searches carried out by lawyers in China that we have currently however it is presented with the caveat that we have been unable to access the actual pleadings and court documents to verify the secondary sources and there may be factual inaccuracies; further litigation; or subsequent developments in the litigation discussed below that we have yet to discover. 3. The board does warrant or undertake any liability for the accuracy and completeness of information and materials of the cases involved that have been gathered and organized based on publicly available information. 4. We refer to the table below setting out the key details of the litigation identified. 5. According to the available but incomplete data, Jinjiang Baixing Shoe Materials Co., Ltd. was involved in 24 lawsuits from 2014 till April 2018. The financial amounts involved in the lawsuits were approximately RMB 518.13 million yuan (excluding the objects/value of subject matter of litigation where not stated. 6. Litigation in 2014: There were 2 cases in 2014. The total amount that was the subject of the litigation was RMB 18.8 million yuan. a. The value of litigation brought by plaintiff Quanzhou branch of China Minsheng Bank Holdings Limited, Quanzhou Branch, was 13.8 million yuan. b. In the second case, the value of the Plaintiff’s claim, Jinjiang Yuancheng Microfinance Co., Ltd. was 5 million yuan. Lin Houzhi is listed as a defendant. The 2 cases were settled through reconciliation and withdrawal of the lawsuits. 7. Litigation in 2015: There were 5 cases found to have been taken in 2015. The total amount in the objects of litigation was above RMB 30.002 million yuan (excluding the objects of litigation of unknown cases). a. The value of the claim filed by Wang Qingyun as plaintiff was 5.8 million yuan, and the case was settled through reconciliation and withdrawal of the lawsuit. Lin Houzhi is listed as a defendant; b. the value of the claim filed by Xiamen Port Trading Co., Ltd. Was 2.44 million yuan; c. the value of the claim filed by Fujian Straits Finance and Leasing LLC was 21.843 million yuan. Both Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are listed as defendants; d. the value of the claim filed by Wanjiang Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. was unknown. Lin Houzhi is listed as a defendant; e. the value of the claim filed by JingjiangYigao Exhibition Equipment Co., Ltd. was 0.919 million yuan. 8. Litigation in 2016: There were 14 cases from 2016 and the total amount in the objects of litigation was above RMB 450.972 million yuan (excluding the objects of litigation of unknown cases). a. There were 2 claims by Shishi branch of the China Construction Bank Holdings Limited, the value of the claim was 296.54 million yuan. Both Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are listed as defendants; b. the value of the claim by the Fengze sub-branch of Rural Commercial Bank of Quanzhou Limited was 29.86 million yuan. Both Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are listed as defendants; Multi Sports Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries 78 c. the value of the claim by Bank of Quanzhou Holdings Limited was 18.335 million yuan. Both Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are listed as defendants; d. the value of the claim by the Fuzhou branch of Ping An Bank Holdings Limited was 52.89 million yuan. Lin Houzhi is listed as a defendant; e. the value of the claim by the Quanzhou branch of China Everbright Bank Holdings Limited was unknown. Lin Houzhi is listed as a defendant; f. the value of 2 claims by the Jinjiang branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Holdings Limited was 29.499 million yuan; g. the value of the claim by Fujian Straits Finance and Leasing LLC was 19.79 million yuan. Both Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are listed as defendants; h. the value of the claim by Deng Yunhua was 0.265 million yuan; i. the value of the claim by Cai Mingyue was 1.169 million y
Looks like Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying are full of shits being sued by so many bankers and others. As long as the company now comes clean with the blessings and agreements of all the authorities concerned...Msports can start anew as a brand new Public Listed Company in Malaysia.
Think Msports should punish Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying shares and put them all to be zerorised. Can Msports do that? Or just cold storage their shares and cannot be traded until they re-appear again to see our new management under Paramjit Singh and Erwin.
BOD should make a police report on Lin Houzhi and Lin Liying for CBT in cheating the minority shareholders of msports..The report should also be extended to Bursa for further action.
most of these fujian cheaters were small, backyard or totally non existed company, account/ report are manipulated & submitted to bursa for listed here. later using our IPO monies for pay back their debtors or buy car renovate their house. what a JOKE?
Buying 3Mil Shares is not enough to convince investors, Erwin. Someone posted to sell 27Mil shares at 2.5sen at one point of time in the afternoon session, but retracted the post after seeing the ppl throwing at 2.0sen because the 2.5 sen waiting to sell is huge.
kampung boy , after 27Mil Sell at 0.025 , then 33Mil sell at 0.025 , wink eyes then 41Mil sell at 0.025 , wink again 34Mil sell at 0.025. average that fella q 500,000/hands
Fatty Lin big crook but has no ball to attend meeting , Anyway he n his daughter automatically booted out as director. Will be charge under CBT sooner or later. I can see light at the end of tunnel under new government.
Imposition and reprimand under section 354 of KLSE rules looks like good news as new directors have been appointed to regularise the PN 17 status by September 2018..,,,,,
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
relaks
836 posts
Posted by relaks > 2018-06-18 19:26 | Report Abuse
Empty shell. No biz?! Still stir fry at 2 sen! Play masak2 ya, u org?! Wakakah!
So how much is this co worth? Why shareholders bother to hang on?