. (updated from yesterday) The press/media has been acting up lately. What is surprising is that with so much negativity and revelations to audit issues to missed coupon payments which are hot off the press in lighting speed for the last 5 months, something has changed since last week. Never before the tone of the media been like this for Serba Dinamik.
Just as an example, it beggars belief that TheEdge reports on 16th November 2021,
While, this may be a positive news for Malaysia, why report this from a company that supposedly has governance and coupon payment issues? Begs to wonder. Even the investment community were quick to put this into the furnace as utter irrelevance to the issues at hand.
And what is more interesting is the TheEdge article on 13th November 2021,
provided a balance view on the issues at hand. Never before have I read a single piece of news from TheEdge that considers various issues from different perspectives. Its usually a piece that puts Serba Dinamik in bad light. This article was indirectly implying that "we have to study the details from every angle and come to a reasonable and fair conclusion for all parties".
But the most crucial stunner of them all is this, MSWG's CEO decides to use FocusMalaysia to air his personal opinion on 13th November 2021.
What is striking about this is a complete lack of decisive opinion from the writer. This is very unusual, since all opinions from the writer historically has always been accompanied with some highlights of issue and actions to be taken to resolve them quickly.
"MSWG is not aware of the contents of the ‘Factual Finding Update’ and as such is unable to opine on the materiality of the findings."
Shouldn't MSWG be the one to issue a statement?
The change in media tone is apparent and there are some dead giveaways as to what is really happening behind the scenes. Writing styles do tell lies.
For one, while MSWG is not aware of the contents ‘Factual Finding Update’, that doesn't mean that MSWG's CEO isn't. His use of syntax strongly suggest that he has read and understood its contents.
For two, TheEdge's writer and/or their interviewed sources may have read and understood its contents as they questioned the legitimacy of the appointment rather than the ‘Factual Finding Update. If it was illegitimate, such findings are null and void and assumed in-complete in the end.
Key Take Away
What this means, outside the realms of the meeting, 3rd parties have read and understood the contents of the ‘Factual Finding Update'.
It also means that many of the media have been misinformed as to the actual severity of the issue and perpetuated falsehoods. Who can corroborate this?
“Directors, independent ED’s and the audit committee need to be dynamic in looking into this, as well as other aspects of the firm. The ongoing business of the company has more importance than the audit issues themselves,”.
The Independent Directors' of Serba Dinamik seem to think so. .
Note : This is another falsehood being expunged. The ultimate regulator is Securities Commission Malaysia. They have the ultimate power and makes the final decision.
We say this to Serba Dinamik: If the information contained in the EY Consulting review is not “material”, meaning it is not significant, why don’t you just release them to prove that you are right and that KPMG, EY Consulting and Bursa are wrong? Wouldn’t it be very satisfying to show that you have nothing to hide?
To Bursa, we say this: If Serba Dinamik refuses to release the information, the exchange should lift the suspension in the trading of Serba Dinamik shares and warrants to let the market be the judge of what it thinks about this fiasco.
1.6 Bil in Bonds due to be repaid in a few months time, no audited accounts, an overdue interest payment of millions, a default credit rate of C! Who in their right mind would take this heap of dung private?
SC will leave it to the professional audit firm to conclude if SD has been operating in an orderly manner or not. The submission of the Audited report is not due yet.
As said, the lifting of suspension is to do with disclosure of factual findings done by EY in the spirit of transparency to all parties concerned. No disclosure , no lifting by SC. It is as simple as that.
SD has yet to pass the grace period of settlement of bond so it is still premature to say if SD is in default.
Well , Time is ticking ........ the cat will be let out of the bag very soon ......
Malaysian Newspapers are a very pitiful lot. One of the biggest scandal's since Najibs shocking theft and we have not been abele to find even one investigative journalism article on SDs accounts and declared assets, are they real or not? Only read nonsense articles I assume written by school girls n boys, like this mornings pathetic Edge article suggesting we all close eyes and let it be.
He who come and seek equity must come with clean hands. SD appointed EY and acknowledged by Bursa and SC. Now SD say illegitimate appointment after 5 months!
The Edge showed fairness. When SD has other announcement The Edge also gave coverage. If SD thinks The Edge is telling fibs, please sue them as it is in the blood of SD to do so.
5 cents max ______________________ Depeche In a Malaysia Reserve article, the writer ponder about the possibility of SD going private... at what price leh if SD does so...
@BobAxelrod, do u mean SC open one eye and close one eye and allow pump and dump, insider trading and leaked info before announcements made in other counters ??????????
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BobAxelrod If you make comparison, SC has been compliant and most lenient for most of the counters, players, institutions and foreign funds. So many pump and dump, insider trading and leaked info before announcements made. Yet they just hope in the best interest of players and seduction.
SD had blatantly and unceremoniously duped SC and shunned Audit report on Financial statements. SC allowed time and patience for them to have more opportunities to correct themselves. Yet they feel embolden and ignore Rules and Regulations, especially deadlines. So, in respect, SC had no alternatives but to act indifferently and within stipulated Law and time.
Just bring the Truth forward and all will be made clearly know without doubt as to who are the culprits.
BobAxelrod Hahaha...would I post anything to incriminate myself? I said there could be and only with sufficient evident, SC would prosecute. Otherwise, it's a waste of time. That's the meaning.
Do u think a listed company cannot provide his A/C , and they can continue to trade in the shares market to cheat those bilis ?? Two good suspended companies in Bursa ?? hahaha
Here is the story...EY issued a bad SIR...The SC investigation did not see anything wrong with the audit...what will happen to EY and KPMG?...willing to pay millions...hehe
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
muhfiq
759 posts
Posted by muhfiq > 2021-11-17 11:59 | Report Abuse
Time to see any changes
Should get it done
Will be lot sooner