Dear IR@JAKS,

Thank you for informing me that the JAKS 18^th AGM, the Key Matters Discussed/Q&A have already been uploaded to JAKS website.

By the way, I welcome SC and Bursa to look into my comments at https://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/stk/4723.jsp and judge whether am I selectively posted some responses from the company with potentially lead to other meanings/interpretations as compared to the message that the company is conveying in its original full response?

As of your insertion that there seems to be no accountability and boundaries of what is said in the forum by certain parties, some perhaps with ulterior motives. As this forum is not regulated by any authorities, we are concerned that this may lead to investors taking advice from unlicensed advisors and be subject to manipulation which may result in these investors losing money.

May I suggest if you are really concerned should you take action in policing the forum and report those unlicensed advisors to SC for action to be taken against them?  

Talking about regulation by authorities and accountability, as a minority shareholder I exercise shareholder’s right to hold the Board accountable and responsible for the running of our company and posted my legitimate/lawful AGM questions to the Board. But alas it was the Board with something to hide using reasons only known to them to avoid answering the hard/probing questions with unsubstantiated excuses:

1. in answering the questions, it would not result in a fair and orderly dissemination of information to the market as required under the Bursa listing rules;
2. confidential and/or price sensitive in nature;
3. involves speculation or matters that cannot be ascertained accurately;
4. beyond the scope of shareholder communication;
5. Inappropriate, unreasonable, or irrelevant and hence the Company is not obligated to answer the question; or
6. Inaccurate interpretation or misunderstanding of the facts and matters and hence does not warrant a response from the Company.