The recent 1QCY14 reporting period was relatively muted. Aside from 1Q being a seasonally slower quarter, loan growth had a soft start while non-interest income was also subdued as markets-related income was weaker. On the flipside, costs were generally tightly controlled while asset quality improved further. We expect a pickup in lending and capital market activities ahead. Maintain OVERWEIGHT.
1QCY14 Results Roundup
The recent 1QCY14 reporting quarter saw six out of the seven banking stocks that we cover report results that were in line with our estimates. CIMB’s results came in at the lower end of estimates as, apart from a soft start for non-interest income, its effective tax rate was also higher than expected. Relative to consensus expectations, the seven banking stocks we cover came in broadly within estimates.
In the previous 4QCY13 reporting quarter, five out of the seven banking stocks that we cover reported results that were in line with our and consensus estimates. Affin (AHB MK, NEUTRAL, FV: MYR3.76) and Maybank’s results were slightly ahead of both our and consensus estimates, on the back of the former’s lower-than-expected credit cost and Maybank’s stronger-than-expected pre-impairment operating profit.
In terms of dividends, two banks that we cover declared dividends. AMMB’s final dividend was in line with expectations but AFG surprised with a special DPS of 10.5 sen, bringing its total net dividend payout ratio for FY14 to 81% (vs up to 50% dividend payout policy). Moving forward, AFG has adopted a dividend policy to pay out up to 60% of earnings. This was made possible thanks to its comfortable capital level - CET-1 ratio for the banking group was 10.4% (after dividends).
Aggregate 1QCY14 net profit eased 3% q-o-q (+1% y-o-y) to MYR5.4bn (4QCY13: -3% q-o-q; +8% y-o-y). The sequential decline in net profit was not surprising as 1Q tends to be a seasonally slower quarter. Apart from that, non -interest income was also weaker, cushioned by lower overheads. Y-o-y, excluding CIMB’s MYR315m net gain from the sale of CIMB Aviva and restructuring costs, pre-tax profit would have been up a decent 7% vs the reported growth of 3%. Overall, it was a relatively muted reporting quarter for the banks. Aside from seasonality, loan growth had a soft start (mainly corporate segment, impacted by repayments) while non -interest income was also subdued as markets-related income was muted. On the flipside, costs were generally tightly controlled while asset quality improved further, resulting in banks reporting credit cost that were lower than assumptions.
Aggregate net interest income was up 4% y-o-y but flat q-o-q. Gross loans rose 11% y-o-y (+2% q-o-q vs. 4Q13: +11% y-o-y/+3% q-o-q), partly offset by an estimated 9bps compression in sector NIM (-6bps q-o-q) with average asset yields down 10bps y-o-y (-5bps q-o-q) while the average funding cost was estimated to have been stable y-o-y and q-o-q. Annualised loan growth was just 8% as the corporate segment was impacted by repayments. Nevertheless, the banks appeared optimistic that lending activities should gather momentum ahead, underpinned by acceleration in big-ticket Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) projects.
Sector non-interest income slipped 5% y-o-y (-17% q-o-q), excluding the MYR515m gain from disposal of CIMB Aviva in 1Q13. This was mainly attributed to weaker markets-related income (equities and treasury). AMMB also reported weaker contribution from insurance (mainly life insurance) while HL Bank had a one-off reclassification exercise where it now reports credit card fees on a net basis (ie less related expenses) to be in line with the disclosure by peers.
Meanwhile, aggregate overheads inched down 1% y-o-y (-6% q-o-q), excluding the MYR200m restructuring costs incurred by CIMB. The banks generally continue to keep a tight rein on cost. With operating income muted, variable expenses were lower as well.
Thus, the sector’s underlying cost-to-income ratio (CIR) improved to 48% from 49.5% in 1QCY13 (4QCY13: 47.9%). Overall, underlying pre-impairment operating profit for the sector was up 5% y-o-y but down 6% q-o-q. Loan impairment allowances were slightly higher this quarter (+5% y-o-y; +1% q-o-q) but overall, annualised credit cost still stood at a low 17bps (1QCY13: 19bps; 4QCY13: 14bps). Absolute gross impaired loans declined 6% y-o-y and 1% q-o-q with most banks reporting an improvement in asset quality. Maybank was the exception, reporting a 4% q-o-q rise in absolute gross impaired loans (-9% y-o-y) with the uptick due to two domestic legacy accounts and some corporate accounts from the coal and plantation sectors in Indonesia.
Key highlights from results
Below are the highlights from banks’ recent reporting quarter:
i. NIM pressure – from asset yields to funding costs. Sector NIM fell 10bps y-oy and 6bps q-o-q, although the q-o-q trend tends to be seasonal due to the fewer number of days in 1Q. By our estimates, average sector yield fell 10bps y-o-y (-5bps q-o-q) while average funding cost was stable y-o-y and q-o-q. The continued downward pressure on average asset yield (mainly loan yields) is not too surprising, as a result of ongoing portfolio rebalancing. Lending yields, however, have been rather stable for the past few quarters now and we note that the compression in average asset yield in 1QCY14 is significantly lower than the 19bps y-o-y decline in 2013.
While stable loan yields have been a positive, banks are increasingly seeing upward pressure on funding costs. Thus far, we gather that the pressure stems end of the quarter. We also believe part of the funding cost pressure is due to overseas operations, especially for banks with operations in Indonesia. From Figure 6 (on page 4), we note that the individual banks generally saw funding costs rise y-o-y. As such, the banks have resorted to liquidity management to help cushion NIM pressures, with most banks now operating at a higher LDR,compared to a year ago (please see Figure 7 on page 4). Banks with solid deposit franchises also appear more willing to operate at the upper end of their LDR comfort range, eg Maybank – where the LDR has been at the top end of the 85-90% LDR guided range. This quarter, CIMB allowed its LDR to run up as well. The rise came mainly from the domestic business as management believes CIMB should have no problems raising deposits when the need arises, given its strong local deposit franchise.
Going forward, we expect competition for deposits to remain keen, given that the LDRs for the larger banks are already at the top end of guided levels and, especially, if loan growth picks up pace. That said, a hike in the overnight policy rate (OPR) should provide some near-term relief to NIM pressure. We expect a 25bps hike in the OPR in late 3Q14.
ii. Loan growth – business lending to pick up pace. Loan growth was muted in 1QCY14, rising 2% q-o-q (+11% y-o-y) vs +3% q-o-q (+11% y-o-y) in 4QCY13. The corporate segment had a slow start, with repayments curbing growth. Nevertheless, the soft start to the year is rather similar to a year ago and the banks remain optimistic that domestic business lending activities should continue to benefit from the ongoing rollout of ETP projects. Domestic consumer lending was broadly resilient in 1QCY14, aided by drawdowns from loan pipelines, we believe.
iii. Weaker markets-related income, but some improvement in 2Q. Capital markets-related as well as treasury income was softer this quarter. For example, realised gains from the sale of securities fell 55% y-o-y (-13% q-o-q). Nevertheless, expectations are for an improvement ahead. Maybank said it has already noticed an improvement in capital markets in 2Q. Banks that we expect to benefit from an improvement in capital markets include Maybank, CIMB and AMMB. Banks such as AFG and HL Bank, apart from the abovementioned banks, also have active treasury teams and could stand to benefit from better opportunities in the fixed income space.
iv. Operating efficiency – leverage to bottomline growth. As mentioned above, tight cost control was a positive takeaway this quarter. This was important, especially given the softness in operating income. Going forward, we would expect a pickup in variable spending (eg personnel cost, marketing expenses) should income levels trend higher but on the whole, improved operating efficiency is generally one of the key levers cited by banks to drive earnings ahead.
v. Asset quality improved. Asset quality improvement was another positive. With the exception of Maybank, the other banking groups saw a sequential improvement in asset quality or, at worst, stable impaired loans. Sector net impaired loan formation was also lower at 74bps vs 88bps in 4QCY13 and 93bps in 1QCY13. As such, sector annualised credit costs were kept low at 17bps while credit costs for the individuals banks were below guidance. Looking ahead, the banks remained mindful of the rising inflation levels and the impact this will have on the lower income group. Also, recoveries are tapering off, which should lead to higher credit costs ahead as well. Thus, credit cost guidance remains unchanged. The banks also do not expect a 25bps hike to impact asset quality but a sustained rise could be cause for concern.
Risks
The risks include: i) slower-than-expected loan growth, ii) weaker-than-expected NIMs, iii) a deterioration in asset quality, and iv) changes in market conditions that may adversely affect investment portfolio.
Forecasts
We update our FY15F projections for AFG and AMMB following the release of their full-year numbers. We also lower our FY14F-15F net profit projections for CIMB by 4% per annum after raising our effective tax rate assumption to 24.5% flat from 21% per annum, in line with its 1Q14 results. Our forecasts for the other banks were unchanged.
Valuations and recommendations
Overall, 1QCY14 was a relatively muted quarter but given seasonal patterns and expectations of a pickup in lending as well as capital market activities ahead, we do not expect major revisions to earnings from the consensus at this juncture. 2014 targets for the various banks were unchanged as well.
We remain OVERWEIGHT on the sector, as the banks are well-poised to benefit from an expected pickup in GDP growth this year, underpinned by the various ETP initiatives. We see both Maybank and CIMB as excellent proxies to the ETP and key beneficiaries as capital markets improve. As for HL Bank, valuations are decent. NIM pressure has been kept in check as the group has stayed disciplined in pricing for deposits while asset quality is still among the best in its class.
Source: RHB
Created by kiasutrader | Jun 14, 2016
Created by kiasutrader | May 05, 2016