save malaysia!
Is Anwar Ibrahim government the beginning of a new political era or is it a false dawn? — Lim Kit Siang
savemalaysia
Publish date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022, 04:33 PM
DECEMBER 4 — Is the Anwar Ibrahim government the beginning of a new political era or is it a false dawn?
This is the most important question of the 15th General Election on November 19, 2022.
I fully support the DAP Secretary-General Anthony Loke in taking a stand prior to the formation of Anwar Ibrahim’s coalition government, pledging DAP’s unconditional support to the Pakatan Harapan chairman Anwar Ibrahim as Prime Minister.
But I can understand the frustrations, unhappiness and disappointments from DAP members, supporters and voters who felt that there was no fair reflection in the Cabinet composition based on DAP’s voting and parliamentary representation and this must be noted.
I was not a candidate in the 15th General Election but I have been to eight states and clocked some 15,000 kilometres in the two weeks of the election campaign, and everywhere I went, I did not come across any anti-Malay, anti-Chinese, anti-Indian, anti-Dayak, anti-Kadazan or anti-Muslim, anti-Buddhist, anti-Hindu, anti-Christianity sentiment on the ground, confirming that Malaysians are the most tolerant and sensitive of people.
But during elections, there are political parties and personalities who want Malaysians to believe that the Malays and Islam are under threat and face extinction.
Why is this so? Who want to threaten the Malays or wipe out Islam?
I am optimistic about the future.
If the Anwar government can last five years, and we can explain that the fear that the Malays and Islam are being downgraded is a figment of the propaganda and the toxic politics of lies, fear, hate, race and religion of irresponsible politicians in the information age, we stand a good chance to succeed in our mission to reset nation-building principles and policies as set out by nation’s founding fathers, which include the first four Umno Presidents, for Malaysia to be “a beacon of light in a difficult and distracted world”.
I always believe that Malaysia can be a great plural nation because Malaysia stand at the confluence of four great civilisations — Malay/Islamic, Chinese, Indian, and Western — and if we can leverage on the values and virtues of these four great civilisations, Malaysia can be a great nation, better than the countries in the Middle East, China, India, and Indonesia.
The most important challenge of the Anwar Ibrahim government is to ensure that it marks a new political era to reset the national agenda to return to the original nation-building principles of the nation’s founders, and that it is not a false dawn.
Now that I have withdrawn from the frontline of the DAP leadership, I will like to read the book Why Nations Fail which my friend, Kalimullah Hassan have given me many years back but I have had no time to read it.
I will like more leaders and academicians to discuss why Malaysia had failed in the last six decades to maintain her position as first-rate world-class nation to become a second-class mediocre nation, and how Malaysia can avoid becoming a failed, divided and kleptocratic state on Malaysia’s Centennial in another four decades.
The blurb on the book, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson, said;
“Brilliant and engagingly written, Why Nations Fail answers the question that has stumped the experts for centuries: Why are some nations rich and others poor, divided by wealth and poverty, health and sickness, food and famine?
“Is it culture, the weather, geography? Perhaps ignorance of what the right policies are?
“Simply, no. None of these factors is either definitive or destiny. Otherwise, how to explain why Botswana has become one of the fastest growing countries in the world, while other African nations, such as Zimbabwe, the Congo, and Sierra Leone, are mired in poverty and violence?
“Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson conclusively show that it is man-made political and economic institutions that underlie economic success (or lack of it). Korea, to take just one of their fascinating examples, is a remarkably homogeneous nation, yet the people of North Korea are among the poorest on earth while their brothers and sisters in South Korea are among the richest. The south forged a society that created incentives, rewarded innovation and allowed everyone to participate in economic opportunities.
“The economic success thus spurred was sustained because the government became accountable and responsive to citizens and the great mass of people. Sadly, the people of the north have endured decades of famine, political repression, and very different economic institutions — with no end in sight. The differences between the Koreas is due to the politics that created these completely different institutional trajectories.
“Based on fifteen years of original research Acemoglu and Robinson marshal extraordinary historical evidence from the Roman Empire, the Mayan city-states, medieval Venice, the Soviet Union, Latin America, England, Europe, the United States and Africa to build a new theory of political economy with great relevance for the big questions of today.”
The Anwar Ibrahim government should mark the turning point of the country from a failing state to reset nation-building principles to restore our original dream to be one of the first-rate world-class nations in the world.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or organisation and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
https://www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2022/12/04/is-anwar-ibrahim-government-the-beginning-of-a-new-political-era-or-is-it-a-false-dawn-lim-kit-siang/43425
More articles on save malaysia!
KLCI up 0.43% with focus on energy, plantation, financial stocks
Created by savemalaysia | Apr 19, 2024
Tax relief for sports training only if providers are registered, says Yeoh
Created by savemalaysia | Apr 19, 2024
Malaysia posts best first quarter trade, exports & imports in Q1 2024
Created by savemalaysia | Apr 19, 2024
Kuala Lumpur ranked 22 in list of 100 best cities for remote work
Created by savemalaysia | Apr 19, 2024
PN MPs leave it to opposition leader to negotiate allocations with Putrajaya
Created by savemalaysia | Apr 19, 2024
Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 33 of 33 comments
north and south korea........... written as if American policies got nothing to do with the poverty in North Korea.
2022-12-05 14:10
I think is alright for dap in the unity govt to prevent the extremist from taking over the unity govt loh!
But Dap need to draw a line to prevent it becoming a lap dog to anwar govt loh!
That is a limit, Dap willing to help anwar loh!
2 months ago
So much harm was done to housing market when 5% tax levy on your grand fathers house even after 50 years. How much when you bought your house 50 years ago? When you son want to sell, he had to pay 5% tax on the 'profit' on the house you bought.
1 month ago
Within 2 short years, we have suffered more damages to the housing market than cumulated 20 years.
1 month ago
LKS and LGE should abstain from making any policy statement on behalf on DAP. Let Secretary General of the day to decide on the political path.
1 month ago
Just old wine in new bottle. Nothing new- else ringit will not continue to slide
1 month ago
o even if you’ve never tried editing videos with a computer before, you might consider that you don’t have more than 20 minutes to master this application
https://zslicensekey.com/movavi-video-editor-crack/
1 month ago
Still a gomen plagued by pack of hungry wolves in sheep's clothing
Full of self-serving parasitic political leaders who exploit religious issues for personal gain
Opportunistic leaders often use religious issues strategically to appeal to certain groups to make themselves relevant in the 21st Century; while disregarding the broader impact on societal harmony and economical prosperity of the nation
1 month ago
Still a political system that often prioritizes ethnic and religious considerations over genuine progress and inclusivity. It underscores the need for political leaders to prioritize unity, fairness, and inclusivity in their governance, transcending ethnic divides and fostering trust among all segments of society.
1 month ago
Still building a society of ...................of BULLIES
taking matters into one's own hands to abduct people and force them to apologize for their social media comments is not only criminal but also antithetical to the principles of democracy, free speech, and respect for individual rights. It is essential to uphold legal avenues for addressing grievances and fostering a culture of tolerance, accountability, and peaceful resolution of disputes.
1 month ago
Still building a society of ...................of criminals
Vigilante actions such as abduction and forced apologies bypass the legal system and undermine the rule of law. In a democratic society, disputes and grievances should be resolved through legal channels that uphold due process and protect the rights of all parties involved.
1 month ago
Still a society of boikot
Boycotts can have severe economic consequences, especially for small businesses and workers who rely on these businesses for their livelihoods. A blanket boycott encouraged by political leaders without considering the broader economic impact is irresponsible and can lead to job losses and financial hardship for many individuals and families.
1 month ago
Political leaders who call for boycotts contribute to polarization and divisiveness within society. Instead of fostering unity and dialogue, they promote an "us versus them" mentality, which can further deepen social tensions and hinder efforts to find common ground.
1 month ago
Consumers have the right to make their own informed choices about where to spend their money based on their values and preferences. Encouraging boycotts based on political motives restricts this freedom of choice and can be seen as coercive or manipulative.
1 month ago
........................of immaturely emotional ppl
Rather than resorting to boycotts, political leaders should seek constructive solutions through dialogue, negotiation, and collaboration. Working with businesses and stakeholders to address concerns and find mutually beneficial solutions is a more productive approach than resorting to boycotts as a knee-jerk reaction.
1 month ago
Boycotts can have long-term effects on relationships between businesses, consumers, and communities. They can create distrust and animosity that may take years to repair, impacting the overall social and economic fabric of society.
1 month ago
Political leaders should exercise caution and responsibility when calling for boycotts, considering the broader implications on the economy, social cohesion, and individual freedoms. Encouraging constructive dialogue and seeking collaborative solutions is essential for addressing concerns effectively without resorting to divisive and potentially harmful tactics.
1 month ago
Integrity. Intelligent. Industrious. 3iii (iiinvestsmart)$â¬Â£Â¥
When will the Bumiputra wake up! It is the leaders who they need to monitor, not their fellow Malaysians.
4 weeks ago
Post a Comment
Featured Posts
Apps
Top Articles
1
2
3
4
Good Articles to Share
5
6
7
Good Articles to Share
Slower US Fed pivot weakens rate-cut bets across emerging Asia
8
Good Articles to Share
#
Stock
Score
Daily Stocks
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
MQ Trading Signals
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Featured Advertisers / Partners
Ride The Bull Short The Bear
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Income
K.I.S.S. lah…
The summary:
“Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson conclusively show that it is man-made political and economic institutions that underlie economic success (or lack of it). Korea, to take just one of their fascinating examples, is a remarkably homogeneous nation, yet the people of North Korea are among the poorest on earth while their brothers and sisters in South Korea are among the richest. The south forged a society that created incentives, rewarded innovation and allowed everyone to participate in economic opportunities.
“The economic success thus spurred was sustained because the government became accountable and responsive to citizens and the great mass of people. Sadly, the people of the north have endured decades of famine, political repression, and very different economic institutions — with no end in sight. The differences between the Koreas is due to the politics that created these completely different institutional trajectories.
2022-12-04 20:16