Understanding brain to war against substance abuse

ROE> 20 and profit margin almost 70%? Betul?

If so, can go 2.00 or not?

Fatality rate about 1 in 20?

Fair PE would be 15-25?

It's spreading via sexual transmission. Condom doesn't prevent infection.

Posted by leno > 4 hours ago | Report Abuse

mpox is like syphilis and hiv ... where got people wear glove on penis ? If u worri ... then must quickly go buy condom counter.

Sailang kah?

Fundamentalism, in particular, thrives on the notion of purity—whether moral, ideological, or belief system—implying that any alternative perspectives are inherently corrupt or dangerous. This creates an environment where curiosity is not just discouraged but actively suppressed. The fear of transgressing these boundaries can lead individuals to self-censor their thoughts and inquiries, reinforcing a cycle where curiosity is seen as a threat to stability and order.

They establish rigid frameworks of belief that leave little room for questioning or exploration. These approaches are designed to create a sense of certainty and obedience, often by promoting a singular worldview that is deemed absolute and non-negotiable. This singularity of thought discourages the natural human inclination to inquire, doubt, or seek out new knowledge, as any deviation from the established dogma is often met with social ostracism, guilt, or even punishment.

Indoctrination and fundamentalism are the most effective, powerful, popular and acceptable killers of curiosity. They extinguish curiosity by creating an environment where questioning is dangerous, critical thinking is suppressed, and exploration is limited. They replace the natural human desire to learn and grow with a forced conformity that values obedience over discovery. As a result, curiosity, the driving force behind innovation and understanding, is effectively extinguished.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

In a country where leadership is corrupt and the nation's wealth is being siphoned by those in power, encouraging curiosity among the youth is a threat to authority. For example, curious young minds would start asking uncomfortable questions about why their country is lagging behind its neighbors, like Singapore, which could lead to social unrest and demands for accountability. By stifling curiosity, leaders can maintain their grip on power without being challenged.

If young people begin to ask why their country isn't performing as well as others, such as world top performing Singapore, they might start to compare the two nations critically. This comparison could expose the failings of the leadership and the systemic corruption that impoverishes the nation. To prevent these comparisons, discouraging curiosity ensures that the youth remain unaware of alternative models of governance and success, thus preventing any potential questioning of their own country’s failures.

In a country plagued by corruption, the leadership may argue that maintaining social stability is more important than fostering curiosity. If young people begin to question their nation's direction, it could lead to social upheaval, protests, or even revolution. Leaders might claim that extinguishing curiosity is necessary to prevent chaos and keep society functioning, even if that society is morbidly and irrationally deluded.

By extinguishing curiosity, leaders can redirect the focus of the youth towards more controlled or superficial areas, such as fakeducation that does not encourage critical thinking. This way, the young population remains distracted and less likely to challenge the underlying issues that are causing their country to underperform.

In essence, from the perspective of corrupt leaders, extinguishing curiosity is a tool to maintain power, avoid uncomfortable questions, and ensure that the youth do not become agents of change. While this approach might preserve the current system, it ultimately comes at the cost of progress, innovation, and the nation’s long-term prosperity.

Strongest bear in bursa this year

Yet extinguishing curiosity among their citizens is of paramount importance in some countries neighbouring to Singapore - else they will ask how could their nations so backward compared to Singapore

Like all MPs, DGs and heads of GLCs, sudah diberi betis nak peha

And, Sslee, indoctrination and fundamentalism are the most effective killers of curiosity. They extinguish curiosity by creating an environment where questioning is dangerous, critical thinking is suppressed, and exploration is limited. They replace the natural human desire to learn and grow with a forced conformity that values obedience over discovery. As a result, curiosity, the driving force behind innovation and understanding, is effectively extinguished.

Still many parents fail their children by forcing, compelling and restrcting them to perceive and understand life, the world and the universe from the imperfect perspective and flawful conclusions of people of ancient or medieval past

7. In a society where people are easily offended, there is a constant pressure to self-censor. This suppresses free speech, stifling creativity, intellectual discourse, and the exchange of ideas. People may avoid discussing important issues for fear of backlash, leading to an echo chamber where only "safe" and "accepted" ideas are allowed to flourish.

6. Such societies often cultivate a victimhood mentality, where individuals or groups seek to gain moral superiority by portraying themselves as victims of perceived offenses. This can lead to a culture of entitlement, where the focus shifts from personal responsibility and resilience to demanding that others cater to their sensitivities.

5. An easily offended society is prone to deep divisions and polarization. When people are quick to take offense, they are also quick to form in-groups and out-groups, leading to social fragmentation. This erodes the fabric of community and fosters an "us versus them" mentality, where compromise and understanding are increasingly difficult to achieve.

4. Immature societies often respond to offense with intolerance, seeking to silence or punish those who offend them. This can lead to authoritarian tendencies, where the state or dominant groups enforce strict codes of conduct, often through censorship, punitive laws, or social ostracism. The result is a chilling effect on personal freedoms and a society that becomes increasingly repressive.

3. Personal growth often comes from facing challenges, including those that offend or discomfort us. In a society that prioritizes avoiding offense, individuals may be shielded from experiences that build resilience, critical thinking, and emotional maturity. This creates a cycle of immaturity, where people are ill-equipped to handle adversity or differing perspectives.

2. Innovation thrives in environments where diverse ideas and perspectives can be freely expressed and challenged. In an easily offended society, the fear of backlash can stifle innovation, creativity, and cultural expression. Businesses may avoid taking risks or exploring new ideas, leading to economic and cultural stagnation.

1. Minor disagreements or misunderstandings can quickly escalate into major conflicts in a highly sensitive society. When people are quick to take offense, they are also quick to react emotionally, leading to a cycle of retaliation and escalation. This can result in ongoing feuds, legal battles, or even violence, destabilizing communities.

The dangers of an easily offended and immature society are profound and multifaceted. Such a society risks becoming a breeding ground for intolerance, polarization, and stagnation, ultimately undermining the principles of freedom, diversity, and progress that are essential for a healthy and thriving community. Encouraging resilience, open-mindedness, and constructive dialogue is crucial in countering these dangers and fostering a more mature and robust society.

Long red candle kah?

Cheap kah?

Right timing kah?

The stake is irrationally too high in a developing country - causing backdoor sheraton move etc etc. Lower the stake is the only way out- not anti frog or antihopping laws

Drop until budget out......................

In essence, the free exchange of genes in autosomes contrasts sharply with the more constrained genetic dynamics of sex chromosomes, reflecting their different roles and evolutionary pressures in maintaining genetic diversity and adaptation.

Gene Exchange Benefits for Autosomes: Autosomes benefit from extensive recombination and genetic exchange, which enhances genetic diversity, adaptive potential, and evolutionary flexibility. This recombination helps maintain a robust genetic pool and allows for effective repair and selection processes.

Restricted Exchange for Sex Chromosomes: Sex chromosomes, particularly the Y chromosome, experience limited recombination with their homologous partner (the X chromosome) and thus face different evolutionary pressures. This limited exchange can lead to reduced genetic diversity, gene loss, and specialization. The X chromosome still undergoes some recombination and benefits from the preservation of essential genes, but it also faces unique regulatory mechanisms like X inactivation.

Global recession coming....lagi add kah? Got experience market during COvid pandemic?

Going back to sub RM1 kah?

More epidemic coming on a more regular basis- catpox, fishpox, foxpox, akmalpox, etc etc

Unlike COVID-19, where vaccines were rapidly developed and distributed, effective vaccines and treatments for mpox are less advanced. Limited availability or slower development of vaccines could hinder control efforts.

Healthcare Burden: Severe cases of mpox could overwhelm healthcare systems, especially if the number of cases spikes rapidly. This would place additional strain on hospitals, medical professionals, and healthcare resources, potentially leading to higher mortality rates.

Potential for Increased Transmission: If mpox were to develop new mutations or variants that enhance its transmissibility or alter its modes of transmission, it could spread more widely. Factors like changes in viral shedding patterns or longer infectious periods could increase transmission rates.

And they don't have to spend for anything- holidays, transport, etc etc. These super rich ppl are sinfully spending overseas, impoverishing the nation and ballooning the country debt. When to put a full stop to their ridiculously dispropotionate take home$$$$$

And also they learn asymmetrical x and y genes- where boys and girls came about! This 21st Century syllabus will promote real understanding (not made-up delusional explanation) and end sex discrimination once and for all:

Autosomal Origins: The X and Y chromosomes are believed to have evolved from a pair of autosomes, which are chromosomes that are not involved in determining sex.

Genetic Differentiation: Over time, the chromosome that became the Y chromosome started accumulating genes related to male sex determination and spermatogenesis. The X chromosome retained genes that are essential for both sexes, as well as some that are beneficial for females.

Gene Loss and Degradation: The Y chromosome, due to its reduced recombination with the X chromosome, has undergone significant gene loss and degradation over evolutionary time. Many of the original genes present on the ancestral autosome have been lost or become non-functional on the Y chromosome.

Beware, a few pairs of sock could bungkus whole business

Autosomal Origins: The X and Y chromosomes are believed to have evolved from a pair of autosomes, which are chromosomes that are not involved in determining sex.

Genetic Differentiation: Over time, the chromosome that became the Y chromosome started accumulating genes related to male sex determination and spermatogenesis. The X chromosome retained genes that are essential for both sexes, as well as some that are beneficial for females.

Gene Loss and Degradation: The Y chromosome, due to its reduced recombination with the X chromosome, has undergone significant gene loss and degradation over evolutionary time. Many of the original genes present on the ancestral autosome have been lost or become non-functional on the Y chromosome.

Understanding the evolution of sex determination gene: The divergence of the X and Y chromosomes from autosomes is a process driven by the evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genetic changes, and differing selective pressures. As the Y chromosome accumulates genetic changes related to male-specific functions and loses many of its original genes, it becomes more distinct from the X chromosome. Meanwhile, the X chromosome retains a broader array of functions and genes critical for both sexes. This ongoing divergence is a dynamic aspect of evolutionary biology, reflecting how chromosomes adapt to their roles in sex determination and reproduction.

Ending gender discrimination

Buy below 7 ok

Make sense???