https://news.bitcoin.com/after-the-boss-calls-bitcoin-a-fraud-jp-morgan-buys-the-dip/

More Juice

https://news.bitcoin.com/after-the-boss-calls-bitcoin-a-fraud-jp-morgan-buys-the-dip/

More incoming :)

Am really glad you guys are finally getting the whole picture. Thank you all.

Keyman, obviously the IB's don't pay enough to hire professionals.They pay peanuts to get monkeys like you to work.

Short selling was banned EXCEPT for "PERMITTED SHORT SELLING". Permitted short sellers are IB's. Bursa very clearly states the reson too:

To allow them to conduct Market Making activity. However, they don't say that Manipulation is not allowed :)

WOW !!!

101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?

JP Morgue is definitely cadaver

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf

WOW !!!

101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?

JP Morgue is definitely cadaver

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf

WOW !!!

101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?

JP Morgue is definitely cadaver

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf

WOW !!!

101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?

JP Morgue is definitely cadaver

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201...

WOW !!!

101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?

JP Morgue is definitely cadaver

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf

Hahaha....And they all your Bullshit ?

A company that reports higher Profit than its Revenue. WOW

woah, must be big target. Shows the IB is set lose a ton of money

stockraider, how many words is your target for you to get paid ?

I hope atleast now you realise the whole system is rigged. Take the fight to their turf.

JPMorgans holding percentages are % of their own portfolio. Not % ownership of the company. The world would be a better place without crooks and Bursa would be a much better place without JP Morgan, Macquarie and their ilk

IB dogs alert

IB dogs alert

Wow so desperate these IB dogs

Notice the desperation of the IB's ? Must be paying a good packet to these barking dogs

stockraider, our team includes data Analysts who are very capable of scraping you and your ilk out of your misery of trying too hard to convince people that JP Morgan and Macquarie are right. DO NOT MAKE US DO THAT.

There is no excuse to allow Funds and Investment Banks to continue making money while retail investors lose their hard earned money and livelihood. Retailers invested in Glove stocks based on very fundamental strength of the industry and they were right. Investment Banks have made plenty of money all these years sucking the retailers dry. Enough is enough. Time for a change.

abang, why do you doubt ? All Investment Banks have plenty of Call Warrants. The ones on Glove companies are at very low exercise prices.

Brilliant assessment buddy. This manipulation needs to stop. Why is it that the system is designed to favour only the Investment Banks in every sense of the word? There needs to some regulation to atleast make it seem like a level playing field for the retail investors.

Engineering, never thought of that :)

That creep gemfinder is a paid IB stooge

gemfinder, why ? History not relevant ? Character is formed by making a habit of doing things.

In 2008, JP Morgan was the first in line for a bailout for their own misdeeds

gemfinder, funny, I thought fish can only live in water

In 2008, JP Morgan was the first in line for a bailout for their own misdeeds. Need we sat more ?

Go check before you speak

No foreign markets have Structured Warrants. Some have Contract For Difference. Why can't the IB call it that ? No balls ? But they are banned in many countries, including the USA.

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. What kind of an investment
platform is this ?

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere?

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

It's up to you !

Just stopping Structured Warrants is good enough. Atleast assets will be priced fairly.

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

Sharmila, I hope so too

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

Take it up with the authorities. If everyone speaks up, some changes can be expected.

I am sure the valuations of the companies will be substantially different without these paper thrash.

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

To be fair the Investment Bank's,the Structured Warrants on the Glove companies were a Really Bad Judgement call. Un-expected. Whatever it is, they are the death on investors. Imagine the huge sums of money the IB's are sucking out of the investors.

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)


In the Money:

https://imgur.com/cEk679H

Out of Money:

https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ

It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.

Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.

https://imgur.com/zPEaNub

The point here is simple.

1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.

2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.

3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.

4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"

In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).

To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"

FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?

From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.

My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.

DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?

It's up to you !

JP Morgan Malaysia contact:

teen.fai.lee@jpmorgan.com / mun.w.thong@jpmorgan.com

Ask them what they meant.

2 Points :

1. Why on earth did Top Glove issue a 2:1 Bonus if their share price was only going to be RM 3.5 ?
2. JP MORGUE obviously thinks very highly of themselves and very poorly of the Investors in Malaysia to assume that the investors will swallow their vomit whenever they decide to spit it. Bit***s

You stink

stockraider, go brush your teeth

'Contracts For Difference' are issued on INDEXES & CURRENCY World over.

Only Futures & Options are issued on Equity. There is a difference. In Futures & Options the Underlying Asset (The Share) is actually delivered. In CFD's it's a Cash Settlement.

Like a Casino. Does the Casino Pay you in Cards ? Spades, Clubs, Hearts, Diamonds ?