5 people like this.
6 comment(s). Last comment by Flintstones 2016-11-28 22:56
Posted by solomin > 2016-11-23 22:03 | Report Abuse
Mind to share your view?
Would like to hear from your analysis on DKSH. Thank you.
Posted by sumato88 > 2016-11-28 17:50 | Report Abuse
I am so surprised that the sell down in DKSH is so steep. I think the irrational sell down is overdone. My 2 cents on DKSH's 3Q16 result
1) record high impairment of receivable (RM14.5m) in 9m16 shouldn't be viewed as a broad base bad debt, management has mentioned this is one-off in the quarter results so I think it is an isolated case/client. Why would I so confident on this non-recurring impairment? Well, if you look at their past 5 yrs impairment on receivables, the avg impairment p.a was only RM0.2m (Don't just take my word for it, you can verify the numbers by checking its past annual reports). So I am not too concern on this impairment charges.
2) Profit is not that bad after you exclude the one-off impairment, which comes to about rm12m, as compared to RM4.5m in 3Q15. In terms of qoq, the profit is indeed a lot lower (2Q16 pat ex impairment = rm23.9m). This is mainly due to the 7% qoq revenue contraction. In absolute amount, revenue declined by rm98m qoq. Assuming 9% gross profit margin, the lost of profit is rm8.8m. So this adds up to rm20-21m quarterly profit if the revenue sustain at rm1.35bn, which is a consistent revenue base since 4Q15, before coming off in 3Q16.
3) Cash flow seems to deteriorated rapidly with many investor pondering where the cash has gone? Obviously, the cash lock up in working capital (receivables & inventory) after the sales disappointed. It would probably normalize in next quarter. If you noticed, the co's net cash position is always very volatile from quarter to quarter but the fact is, it has been in net cash since full year 2013.
In conclusion, DKSH's 3Q16 results was not very good, but definitely not in a crisis. If you exclude the rm14.5m impairment in 9M16, the co reported rm47m pat. If it makes another rm13m in 4q16 (+30% yoy), the co will probably match its record core profit of about rm60m in 2013 and 2014. Bear in mind, DKSH share price traded above rm8.50 in March 2014. Price has came off subsequently but avg traded price throughout 2014 was still above RM7.00.
Hence, it really doesn't make sense to see the price continue to trend down from current level. If revenue recover to 1.35bn per quarter, I think the profit will be closer to rm20m level.
Feel free to comment but appreciate constructive feedback. Thanks.
Posted by Flintstones > 2016-11-28 17:59 | Report Abuse
Hi sumato, whats the calculation behind the working capital required to support additional RM 500m in business?
Posted by sumato88 > 2016-11-28 20:27 | Report Abuse
You need to estimate the total receivables (estimate receivable turnover days/365 x sales), inventory and payables for the forecast revenue (fy15 sales + rm500m). Then get the net working capital required for this sales (receivable + inventory - payables), minus net working capital in previous year. For illustrative purposes, if I assume turnover days remain the same, the net additional working capital for RM500m new sales is rm39m.
No result.
2
3
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
4
5
BFM Podcast
6
7
BFM Podcast
8
Axcapital's investment blog
KAB - Executing its way to a record quarter. Could more Petronas contracts be coming?
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
zexon
330 posts
Posted by zexon > 2016-11-23 22:02 | Report Abuse
Because you are using their products that they carry in your daily life.