I THINK WITH A LITTLE BIT OF GREASING FROM THE MAIN ACTOR....SOME FUND MANAGER MAY BITE LOH....!!
OUR STARRING ACTOR....IS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION IND....HE IS CAPABLE TO GREASE MAH......!!
ANYHOW....WHETHER HIS BUSINESS MODEL WORK OR NOT....IT DEPEND ON EXECUTION LOH....!! IT ALSO DEPEND WHETHER THE PUBLIC CAN BE MANIPULATED IN THE CURRENT ENVIRONMENT OR NOT LOH....!!
Isnt it this is malaysian way that you know? So shameful. Pity for all malaysian. Anyway, if what you said is true, it shows that you know the game just started and more to come. You won't be victim unless you buy later. Later means not later than when 1Q or 2Q is annouced.
Posted by stockraider > Apr 9, 2017 11:24 AM | Report Abuse I THINK WITH A LITTLE BIT OF GREASING FROM THE MAIN ACTOR....SOME FUND MANAGER MAY BITE LOH....!!
OUR STARRING ACTOR....IS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION IND....HE IS CAPABLE TO GREASE MAH......!!
When it was 1.00, you said the same. When 1.30, you said the same. When 1.50, you said the same again. When 2.00, you will say the same. When 2.50, you too will say the same. When 3.00, you will sing the same song. In the end, you sure will strike once awhile. But you already a laughing stock by then. Pity
Conman....is pushing up....he bought 30% of the equity mah...!! I m surprise despite....buying 30% the price run up 50% and not 300% for other company loh....!!
Now conman running out bullets & option as it going to exceed 33%....what shall we do leh ??
For KYY will have no choice but continue promoting & promoting loh...!!
(In JAKS's thread ytd) Posted by Kukuman > Apr 8, 2017 07:28 PM | Report Abuse
Mark my word. Jaks will surpass 3.00. I am not promoting. I am telling you. Yes. You people of malaysians which i always said most are bunch of stupid people, be it on ecomonic or on politic
When Koon made money from u he may donate 1% of yr money to poor students...
When U made money from Koon after listening to my sharings later I hope u will at least donate 10% of his money to poor students...anyway u can choose to donate either under yr own name or under Koon's name...
My take is, 50: 50....that oldman will win, why leh ??
Positive side he will win; Oldman cost is cheap around Rm 1.00 Oldman pakat with owner...he gets informal inside info loh..!! Oldman good at promotion loh....! Placement at Rm 1.36 if successful will support KYY quest loh...!! The owner hold less share than kyy...thus very unlikely he will dumped his official share holding loh....!!
Negative side he will lose; This is a lemon stock with no margin of safety The project they are talking about is an oversea long term project. Gestation period about 5 yrs loh....!! KYY too greedy....hold too much jaks at 30%...very difficult for him to escape loh....!! This do not take into account share that kyy and the owner kept under proxy loh...!! Kyy only can officially support another 3% more loh Kyy could run out ammunition loh.....!! The owner may betray kyy or vice versa....thats mean the followers and naive will at their mercy loh....!!
Raider advice....better sell loh....don be greedy and get con loh...!!
Wow... this cartoon worst than charlessT. This cartoon is talking rubbish ! Left pocket right pocket ?! This is so typical malaysian mentality. But cant blame him, too intoxicated with malaysia way of life. Pity
Posted by stockraider > Apr 9, 2017 01:18 PM | Report Abuse The Jaks EPC...is left pocket & right pocket mah....it is own monies paying ownself from left pocket to right pocket mah...!! Also remember...the taiko of the project... is CHINA co the JV partner...not Jaks who is only a minority partner loh...!! No cash will flow into Jaks for the next 5 yrs loh...!!
The above is always in my mind.
Jaks and China company forms a JV to develop a power plant. They get borrowings from the banks.
Start construction. JV pays the contractor. The contractor makes construction profit. Where does the profit of the contractor comes from? From Santa Claus the banks?
Now who is the contractor? Who will be the main party who does the construction?
You pay money to the one who does the construction, right?
In normal contract, the one who does the work gets paid, and paid by the JV.
So who gets the construction profit? The contractor, of course.
Of course a deal can be structured in such a way that whoever does the work, another JV, say JV1 gets the money.
It would be fantastic that Jaks hold 50% of JV1, get paid 50% for the construction works, without having to do any work.
rMoi... you are right but there are more juicy details on the whole JV structure. This is foreign investment matters. In view of the latest BNM rules on repatriation of foreign money, many great accountants are working around this to comply to this rules and at the same time make the best out of it. The deferred profit has a reason. Everything happened has a reason
Posted by Kukuman > Apr 9, 2017 02:10 PM | Report Abuse You are not quite right on the 50% of the JV. Also JAKS not having to do any works is not quite right too. It is simply not possible!
Of course Chinese won't give 50% of JV1 to Jaks. But if the JV stake is 70:30, and JV1 is also 70:30. JV pays JV1. What is the big deal about Jaks in construction profit?
Of course if Jaks doesn't have to do any work, or much work and still get 30%, that is good.
I just cannot understand why the Chinese are so generous if that is the case.
On the other hand, if the Chinese says, I do all the work and you do nothing, so I only give you 5% of the construction profit. Then Jaks may be at a big disadvantage as the Chinese get 95% during construction, and the money is paid by the JV, which 30% belongs to Jaks.
Nobody is generous here. business and politic. But that's another topic for another day. suffice to say it is the same strategy why china bailed out 1MDB
Posted by kcchongnz > Apr 9, 2017 02:15 PM | Report Abuse Of course if Jaks doesn't have to do any work, or much work and still get 30%, that is good.
I just cannot understand why the Chinese are so generous if that is the case.
On the other hand, if the Chinese says, I do all the work and you do nothing, so I only give you 5% of the construction profit. Then Jaks may be at a big disadvantage as the Chinese get 95% during construction, and the money is paid by the JV, which 30% belongs to Jaks.
On the other hand, if the Chinese says, I do all the work and you do nothing, so I only give you 5% of the construction profit. Then Jaks may be at a big disadvantage as the Chinese get 95% during construction, and the money is paid by the JV, which 30% belongs to Jaks.
Posted by Kukuman > Apr 9, 2017 02:26 PM | Report Abuse This is pure assumption, dude. An academia like you should not do this kind of assumption. it is a very bad Malaysian twisted mindset
I admit I do not know the deal and just trying to understand it. No need to differentiate fellow human being whether one is a Malaysian or agweilo.
If JV1 is also 70-30, then no party is disadvantaged.
But I see no party is advantaged too as the money is still paid by JV, the same parties. The right pocket to left pocket as mentioned by Raider. Am I right?
I have heard of many cognitive biases on investment...but first time i am seeing super-investor bias. Not one of these fellows (kuku & amoi) presented a logical explanation on how they can generate profit...but singapore kuku put a target price 3.0 stating he had presented 'facts'.
what kind of argument is this?
"JAKS is getting the easy money. Probably... kind of a commission for getting the IPP.. for the China taiko JV company"
"You are not quite right on the 50% of the JV. Also JAKS not having to do any works is not quite right too. It is simply not possible!"
Appears like pure denial. Brain damaged from recycled waste water consumption perhaps..
JAKS through wholly-owned JPH jv with CPESS to form Jaks Pacific Power Ltd at 50:50 arrangement. After full subscription of RCPS, CPECC will have effective stake of 70% of the IPP. CPECC will not allow this IPP to fail. Check out who CPECC is. China too will not allow this to fail either. CPECC is business, China is politic.
Understand? Many have limited knowledge on this and the stock market and started to give many twisted facts and discredit everything under the sun ! Stupid as stupid does
I addressed this intellectual information with you because I see you are more credible character unlike others
Posted by kcchongnz > Apr 9, 2017 02:39 PM | Report Abuse I admit I do not know the deal and just trying to understand it. No need to differentiate fellow human being whether one is a Malaysian or agweilo.
If JV1 is also 70-30, then no party is disadvantaged.
But I see no party is advantaged too as the money is still paid by JV, the same parties. The right pocket to left pocket as mentioned by Raider. Am I right?
No point present any logical explanation because almost all here have very narrow mindset of criticizing for the sake of criticizing. Most think the stock market is a charity venue. Expect everything for free. sucker ready !
Posted by probability > Apr 9, 2017 02:43 PM | Report Abuse
I have heard of many cognitive biases on investment...but first time i am seeing super-investor bias. Not one of these fellows (kuku & amoi) presented a logical explanation on how they can generate profit...but singapore kuku put a target price 3.0 stating he had presented 'facts'.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
stockraider
31,556 posts
Posted by stockraider > 2017-04-09 11:01 |
Post removed.Why?