Agree with P2P. Can be understood from the law of conservation of energy - energy cannot be created or destroyed, just transformed from one form to another. Property developers still wants to earn their fair return, the bank that created the loan wants their own fair return from lending, so does the first home buyer who wants to own an affordable home, if the interest of them have not changed, so does the risk. P2P is a repackaging of 'risk' to look as if the risk has disappeared.
Honeymoon for first 5 years, enjoy now pay later...just enjoy life now, life is short worry about the future loan later...later still no money, how? Why think so much, enjoy now!
Its just the government taking the easy way out. The other way is to actually let the property market crash. Which well, is probably politically untenable and quite painful (however neccesary, its not preferred by democratic governments unless there is absolutely no choice).
Its a matter of the government having a problem, and Tong, offering a solution. And since he knew this particular policy of the budget beforehand, he took steps to take advantage of it.
Not mahathir or the govt thinking specifically of ways to reward tong etc, and so came up with this.
Tong being able to benefit from it is likely just a happy conclusion for him. Not they key reason this was done.
Property market is not crashing.It's just undergoing a healthy correction right now. But the developers are impatient and just want to keep selling houses that majority cannot afford. What I can't accept is people pretending to be noble but in reality just want to rip off the poor that is financially vulnerable and are not aware of the risks involved
I believe mass public housing is the way to solve property issues for lower income while middle and high income group will be subject to market supply and demand. One day I might write another article to explore how this may work in real life
If the home renter cannot eat the prop after 5 years, they will definitely be the looser.
Chances are, a significant percentage won't be able to, and so the banks will want to dispose a large amount of property at that time.
Question is, can the bank hold the property? This is essentially risk free 5% PA gain from banks, assuming property prices do not fall beyond the 20% paid by the homeowner.
Its very interestingly structured, and achieves what they want. But from a long term perspective not the best.
But it buys some time, for the economy to recover, and the bet is that at the end of 5 years, the economy will have recovered enough for people to pick it up.
Which is the essence of almost all the solutions use to stave off recessions etc. Use debt to boost productivity, with the hope that productivity per dollar will grow and cover the the debt in the end.
==== Posted by godhand > Nov 5, 2018 09:44 AM | Report Abuse
unless they have penalty clause which will make more sense. otherwise the home renter is a winner
its depends on how u perceive the word 'crash'. do u only call it crash after it reaches its bottom or when it's in the process of sliding down. i recently just bought a house at a 40% discount at kl prime area because its going to get lelong anyway.
However, do note, before 2003, Homeowners in the US had to fork out 30% deposits to begin with. Only after, they cut to 20, 15, then 10%. In addition to all the NINA loans.
Malaysia has always been 10%. In tandem with every asian country that went from developing to developed.
As population density increase, this made people very very rich from property. This ingrained a certain mindset in asians about how buying property will make you rich, and you must buy one.
Average home prices to income in asian countries are usually significantly higher than western countries, if you take out the chinese influence.
Houses in malaysia were very overpriced to begin with. IMHO, any house selling for more than 15-16 times earnings, or 6% yield is considered speculative. Because you are now gambling on either animal spirits or increased population density.
And most houses in malaysia sell for below 6% yield. Population density aint gonna grow every single place.
=== Posted by Jay > Nov 5, 2018 09:48 AM | Report Abuse
Property market is not crashing.It's just undergoing a healthy correction right now. But the developers are impatient and just want to keep selling houses that majority cannot afford. What I can't accept is people pretending to be noble but in reality just want to rip off the poor that is financially vulnerable and are not aware of the risks involved
I believe mass public housing is the way to solve property issues for lower income while middle and high income group will be subject to market supply and demand. One day I might write another article to explore how this may work in real life
Crash, is when i can get a 8-10% yield property in prime area, wihout airbnb.
==== Posted by godhand > Nov 5, 2018 09:54 AM | Report Abuse
its depends on how u perceive the word 'crash'. do u only call it crash after it reaches its bottom or when it's in the process of sliding down. i recently just bought a house at a 40% discount at kl prime area because its going to get lelong anyway.
When [The Edge Media Group chairman Datuk] Tong [Kooi Ong] came and met me, we talked about many things, one of which was this (FundMyHome.com). I told him he has to prove to the government that it works, I want to see the house and the buyer. He has proven it to Finance Minister [Lim Guan Eng] to the extent that the minister actually mentioned it (P2P) in his Budget 2019,” the premier added.
FundMyHome is the brainchild of Tong, who developed the platform through EdgeProp. ============
me? I think Tong, LGE and Mahathir smarter than i3 forum members.
I think people in Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns etc also very smart.
You should listen to them as well.
===== Posted by qqq3 > Nov 5, 2018 10:11 AM | Report Abuse
When [The Edge Media Group chairman Datuk] Tong [Kooi Ong] came and met me, we talked about many things, one of which was this (FundMyHome.com). I told him he has to prove to the government that it works, I want to see the house and the buyer. He has proven it to Finance Minister [Lim Guan Eng] to the extent that the minister actually mentioned it (P2P) in his Budget 2019,” the premier added.
FundMyHome is the brainchild of Tong, who developed the platform through EdgeProp. ============
me? I think Tong, LGE and Mahathir smarter than i3 forum members.
At least, Tong Kui Ong can come up with short term measures to solve property over-hung issues, much better than armchair critics with no solution lei. wakaka
Posted by chinaman > Nov 5, 2018 10:15 AM | Report Abuse
At least, Tong Kui Ong can come up with short term measures to solve property over-hung issues, much better than armchair critics with no solution lei. wakaka
the developers are stupid. they deserve to hug their overprice products and die with it.
Long term: why property price so expensive? Two big things must be settled. Land cost and conversion/ compliance cost. So, what have govt. land on this part-compliance cost?? govt. also make big money lei in compliance cost. wakaka
Instead of blindly believing something will work, or is correct, just because the other person appear to be competant, or you consider them to be sharper than you.
==== Posted by qqq3 > Nov 5, 2018 10:18 AM | Report Abuse
jon.......
this is crowd funding...not concentrated in Lehman.....and not a derivative.....
of course details matter.....so, role of SC is important.
why there's glut in the first place? expensive , unaffordable to most locals. Banks don't want to lend bcoz of risk, credit quality of the one wanting to borrow.
P2P this one is more about shifting the risk to the investors. But the credity quality of borrowers will still be same.
But for p2p, it doesnt mean that banks won't have risk. Where is the money from these investors coming from?
I symphatise with developers over land cost, compliance cost, bumiputra quota etc. But I believe in market forces. If the market is telling you it's oversupplied now, you slow down building, not take the easy way out to make the market work for you
As for certain someone, I don't think he has the people or the nation's interest at heart. Maybe just to help his developer friends and make a quick buck himself
I disagree with PM when he said he was convinced because he was shown the property and buyer. Of course developers are happy to list their property on that portal and buyers (or speculators) are also more than happy to get involved in such schemes which "sounds too good to be true"
Why compliance cost so expensive? again, due to bloated state civil servants. No free lunch in this world. Without conversion premium, govt. mau makan apa? so, again the poor buyers have to foot it eventually. Why govt. federal to state do nothing on bloated civil servants causing everything expensive??? Budget dont announce any cost cutting on this part. myr100billion per annum for fed. civil servants alone. State another big cost.
they should also stop misleading people. P2P scheme does not promote home ownership, it merely kicks the mortgage application 5 years down the road. In the meantime, instead of paying rental, you pay the 20% amount upfront (which is a lot)
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Ricky Yeo
1,637 posts
Posted by Ricky Yeo > 2018-11-05 07:31 | Report Abuse
Agree with P2P. Can be understood from the law of conservation of energy - energy cannot be created or destroyed, just transformed from one form to another. Property developers still wants to earn their fair return, the bank that created the loan wants their own fair return from lending, so does the first home buyer who wants to own an affordable home, if the interest of them have not changed, so does the risk. P2P is a repackaging of 'risk' to look as if the risk has disappeared.