If you look into the map, taiwan is like a droplet from the nose of china, even hk and macau china had vowed to take back and china had done it, as far this droplet is concern no way chinese is gonna compromise. US ? ha ha ha, bogus super power , it is in it to protect its own benefit in the pacific rim, once they find it is too hefty a bill to foot, it is out. Aussie? hahaha, most people has one such obedient pet at home.
If you look into the map, taiwan is like a droplet from the nose of china, even hk and macau china had vowed to take back and china had done it, as far this droplet is concern no way chinese is gonna compromise. US ? ha ha ha, bogus super power , it is in it to protect its own benefit in the pacific rim, once they find it is too hefty a bill to foot, it is out. Aussie? hahaha, most people has one such obedient pet at home.
*******
Really kah
Oh, so you think only your China bf alone only got big dikgkk la, all other guys all got small dikgkk only la
Dogs on a leash will never know what freedom is. Barking is all they can do.
The enemy of the dog owner is the dog enemy, but when the enemy fed the dog well, the dog get confused and goes quiet, too bad, some strays still bark here, wanting very hard to be leashed, no luck though, strays are unwanted.
Dogs on a leash will never know what freedom is. Barking is all they can do.
The enemy of the dog owner is the dog enemy, but when the enemy fed the dog well, the dog get confused and goes quiet, too bad, some strays still bark here, wanting very hard to be leashed, no luck though, strays are unwanted.
There are three weird responses to this reference. In the first place, UNCLOS has no right to rule on sovereignty. It is up to another global court to decide (Court of Justice).
The second weird response is that the US government has not officially approved the United Nation Convention of Law of the Sea yet.
The third weird response is that UNCLOS was formed in 1994, 47 years after China first drew the 11-dashed lines.
And by the way can the world keep a blind eye on US and UK show of ultra contempt to Court of Justice?
On 23 June 2017, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voted in favour of referring the territorial dispute between Mauritius and the UK to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in order to clarify the legal status of the Chagos Islands archipelago in the Indian Ocean. The motion was approved by a majority vote with 94 voting for and 15 against.[11][12]
In February 2019, the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that the United Kingdom must transfer the islands to Mauritius as they were not legally separated from the latter in 1965. The UK Foreign Office said the ruling is not legally binding.[13] In May 2019, the United Nations General Assembly affirmed the decision of the International Court of Justice and demanded that the United Kingdom withdraw its colonial administration from the Islands and cooperate with Mauritius to facilitate the resettlement of Mauritian nationals in the archipelago.[14][15] In a written statement, the U.S. government said that neither the Americans nor the British have any plans to discontinue use of the military base on Diego Garcia.
The Pedra Branca dispute was a territorial dispute between Singapore and Malaysia over several islets at the eastern entrance to the Singapore Strait, namely Pedra Branca (previously called Pulau Batu Puteh and now Batu Puteh by Malaysia), Middle Rocks and South Ledge. The dispute began in 1979 and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2008, which opined that Pedra Branca belonged to Singapore and Middle Rocks belonged to Malaysia. Sovereignty over South Ledge belongs to the state in the territorial waters of which it is located.
Yes Malaysia abide by the ICJ rulling.
UNCLOS has no right to rule on sovereignty otherwise many Greek Islands will belong to Turkey.
PUBLISHEDJUN 11, 2021, 5:12 PM SGT FACEBOOKWHATSAPP TOKYO - There is "no change" in Japan's position towards Taiwan, top government spokesman Katsunobu Kato said on Friday (June 11), two days after Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga stoked China's fury by calling Taiwan a "country".
Mr Kato told reporters that "there is no change in Japan's basic position of maintaining a non-governmental, practical relationship with Taiwan", in line with the 1972 Japan-China Communique.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93China_Joint_Communiqu%C3%A9 The Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China was signed on September 29, 1972 in Beijing. This established and normalized diplomatic relations between Japan and the People's Republic of China (PRC) resulted in the severing of official relations between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan. The document produced nine articles in a joint statement which found a compromise in previously ambiguous principles enunciated by both sides. Four points are worthy of attention: 1) peace treaty between Japan and China, 2) the status of Taiwan, 3) the question of hegemony in East Asia, and 4) Japan's reversed relations with China and Taiwan. In the end, the document ended the "abnormal relations between Japan and China", recognized the People's Republic of China as the "sole government of China", and renounced any claim for war reparations from World War II. In addition, it concluded various administrative agreements between the two countries in trade, fisheries, aviation, and navigation amongst others.[1] The document firmly maintains its stance under Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
stockraider
31,556 posts
Posted by stockraider > 2021-07-17 16:30 | Report Abuse
China can provide the info anytime mah!
But the west must also provide the info & subject to the audits too mah!
But country like USA refuse to cooperate mah!
Thus u can tell USA to fuuck off loh!
Posted by FortuneBlooming > Jul 17, 2021 12:55 PM | Report Abuse
WHO: China should provide raw data on pandemic's origins