This company is doing initial part of construction therefore payment collection safe side and it a lot of solid cash. Cash = King in construction line.
Posted by up_up_up > Apr 18, 2014 05:17 PM | Report Abuse Need guidance from sifu KC
I fully agree with your statement below:
Posted by up_up_up > Apr 18, 2014 03:01 PM | Report Abuse When I read back few articles comment about DSonic falls last two day while watching DSonic shooting up now, I realize there is really no expert in stock market. ;)
Nobody can predict the movement of share price correctly consistently, especially in a short term. That is a undeniable fact. If not there will be many people who get very rich doing so. In the long term, we can only gauge from the fundamentals of its business and make a view about its long term prospect. That is the only thing we have a higher probability, I said probability, of getting it right.
Kinsoon Kok, don't regret your own action. Take this positively, learn something from here. Companies with good fundamentals would always react positively upon announcement of newly secured projects or release of analysis by research houses. Their share prices would always continuously move upwards even after days the announcement made. The concept of "sell on news" is only applicable for company with poor management, e.g. Salcon, Azrb to name a few. Pintaras Jaya moved from 2.65 on the 2nd Feb 2014 and closed at 3.95 today, resulting in a gain of whopping 50% within a period of less than 3 months. No counters that include the good ones would continue to go upwards. Time for profit taking? Wait for a retrace to add Pintaras. Good luck folks.
After 1:1 share bonus, the NTA diluted to 1.7. At current price of 3.95 it seems 2expensive. However, since it's a professional firm, and it's asset is the people, we ignore NTA and focus on earning.
Dividing the current EPS 0.33 (after dilution) by 3.95, we get initial rate of reture 8.35%. Sounds good.
Looking at the historical EPS 4the past 5yrs, I get an EPS growth rate of 16.7%pa. Assume it can sustain the same EPS growth rate, the projected EPS 5yrs from now is 0.70. Multiply the projected EPS of 0.70 to average PE for the past 5yrs, which is 6, we get future share price (yr2019) = $4.20
What did i miss? Pls correct me if my study sounds illogical.
Posted by KinSoon Kok > Apr 18, 2014 10:13 PM | Report Abuse After 1:1 share bonus, the NTA diluted to 1.7. At current price of 3.95 it seems 2expensive. However, since it's a professional firm, and it's asset is the people, we ignore NTA and focus on earning. Dividing the current EPS 0.33 (after dilution) by 3.95, we get initial rate of reture 8.35%. Sounds good. Looking at the historical EPS 4the past 5yrs, I get an EPS growth rate of 16.7%pa. Assume it can sustain the same EPS growth rate, the projected EPS 5yrs from now is 0.70. Multiply the projected EPS of 0.70 to average PE for the past 5yrs, which is 6, we get future share price (yr2019) = $4.20 What did i miss? Pls correct me if my study sounds illogical.
Your reasoning is fundamentally sound. Yes, valuation of Pintaras should be based on earnings, not asset. The assets in its balance sheet does not include its growth assets.
Do you think a PE ratio of 6 is reasonable, or a little too low for Pintaras in view of its high margin, ROE, ROIC, dividend, cash flows etc? And also its high cash level? And also the bullish prospect of the construction industry in the next few years?
My opinion of Pintaras fair PE ratio is as followed link:
Does Katsenelson’s Absolute PE applicable to all categories of stocks?
Take GAB as an example. It's EPS growth rate is 11.7% for the past 10yrs. The P/E at the chart corresponding to the growth rate is 15.6. Adding Div yeild of 4.8%, the basic P/E = 20.4. Applying 10% discount to business risk, financial risk & earning visibility we get P/E = 27.15. Intrinsic value = EPS (0.72) * 27.15 = $19.5. GAB share price droped from the peak value of $21 to $14 & doesn't show any sign of recovery.
If we apply Lynch's PEG ( PE/ EPS growth rate) we get 19/ 11.7 = 1.15 > 1. We can't deny tat the growth rate can't support the high PE. This method seems 2b contradictory to Katsenelson's PE method. Pls advice.
kcchongnz, i am using the PE of 6 too because that is their actual average PE, but i m using a projected eps growth rate of 15%, just wonder how u got 16.7%, i got it more, maybe i am wrong somewhere, hope to learn more from u. (I only started trading for 2 years, still consider newbies)
kcchongnz, i am using the PE of 6 too because that is their actual average PE, but i m using a projected eps growth rate of 15%, just wonder how u got 16.7%, i got it more, maybe i am wrong somewhere, hope to learn more from u. (I only started trading for 2 years, still consider newbies)
Finance and investment is an art, far away as a science. It is the judgement which is important. This can be achieved from some education through reading widely, experience and practice.
Sign of technical reversal has emerged. Shooting star on Monday followed by a black candle the next day, MACD: 4G1R, Stochastic overbought. Sold half of holdings, add when selling has subsided.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
peiyee
178 posts
Posted by peiyee > 2014-04-18 09:30 | Report Abuse
so fast it reaches affin target price.