if you read the notes, it says lower profit compared to preceding quarter due to project facilitation fee which went down from 6 million to 4.25 million. Overall i think the profit is still quite good so it should go up a bit
hahaha...nice results, consistent! who said earlier bus kosong? who said earlier Kampar terminal abandon or late? who said earlier the figure is tipu? malu la sikit..where is your credibility brother? spreading lies..what is your intention? creating fear?
Taken from the report: The bus operations segment recorded revenue of RM7.80 million in the current quarter as compared to revenue of RM6.44 million in the 3-months FPE 30 September 2016, representing an increase in revenue of 21.12%. The revenue recorded for the current FPE 30 September 2017 of RM23.38 million as compared to RM17.58 million in the 9-months FPE 30 September 2016, representing an increase in revenue of 32.99%. The increase in revenue was mainly due to contribution by the Stage Bus Service Transformation programme as the operation runs all 19 approved routes since September 2016.
100M revenue for FY17 is achievable..then proceed with Mainboard listing by Q1.
1.2% ? i didnt said that it will loss, check properly my words. 1.2% so happy ? ask the price touch 0.35 LOL
Open your big eye watch again
-Gross profit down -General and administrative expensive down almost 50% ? no reason ? -Finance cost down ? the loan amount is increasing while finance cost can be deceasing ?
open your eye with price remain the same despite overall market down, continue with solid QR and will future earning will be increase with upcoming Kampar Terminal..
Correct me if I'm wrong, but based on reporter's arguments: 1. Gross profit went down due to investment in new terminals right? 2. General and administrative expense down - This is a good thing as cost went down. 3. Finance cost down while loan is increasing - This is also a good thing as debt became cheaper.
So what is he trying to say really? In favor or against the company?
Gross profit not related to investment on new terminal, the increasing of revenue lesser than increasing of cost caused the gross profit decreased. The revenue increased due to petrol station and bus operation. While the terminal decreased. Why terminal decreased ? Go see yourself.
General and administrative expense down ? Why ? There's new bus route launched, more driver and managers needed, New building bought for extension of office.... Yes, is a good thing for cost went down, but it should make sense. If you're a Malaysian living in Malaysia, is there anything's price went down based on one year record ? Wages ? Petrol ? Rental ? Bus maintenance fees ? Spare parts cost ?
Borrowing keeping on increasing and this will cause finance cost increase But the finance cost on the report decreased, what let you make sense that the debt became cheaper ? I can only assumed that the interest charges were charged few years later.
Once again, I'm looking good on PTRANS since beginning and i bought it earlier that all of you. I sold out all and waiting for below 0.25 because something is going wrong with the company. Did you take the bus ride for every week ? Did you talks with terminal operators ? Bus drivers ?
Go on bark at me, 1.2% so happy ? Is already be true on what i said or else the price will touch 0.35 this week.
They wont think neutrally because most of them facing loss. They are in fear, If they're so confidence they wont have to scare on what i'm talking about.
Mmm, sure you have your points. Would like to know if your statements are based on empirical observations or merely speculation?
I know that they are not relying solely on bus operations for revenue generation. However, since bus operations is their core business activity, it does warrant a concern. I guess what we should then try to identify is the source of revenue decline. Is it due to ticketing sales? Breaking down of busses? Decrease in demand in the general market?
General and administrative expenses decrement. Gotta look into that in conjunction with other factors. Is it due to improvement in processes? Or is it caused by layoff of workers due to lack in business?
Decreasing financing cost. Perhaps it’s a contract type of thing? One of the reasons a borrower can get a lower rate is good payback record. Can’t criticise solely on a single parameter. Perhaps it’s part of their debt financing strategy.
of course its just a speculation...haha...otherwise why is he in silence when kenanga make a target price...hahahahaha...this is a sideways game now...truly somebody is still collecting the share
Proposed PP: If current shareholders selling, you all fool only benefit the "Private Placees who subscribes"
Read the announcement properly, Clause 2.5, basis of pricing: Price of Private Placement will be determined by VWAP, 5 days average movement.
If Ptrans price is going down, Private Placees will only fork out "less money" to subscribe Ptrans shares at a good bargain which is given by " current shareholders". Private Placees say nothing thanks to you all.
Why someone would keen to subscribe PP if the future of Ptrans not in brightness ? - Businessmen always informed advance more than you all in this forum.
What should we all minority shareholders do? Buy-in, increasing the market share price for which the potential Private Placees need to pay more for subscription. - Share dilutions, what a joke. Not a worry at all. -What i'm concerned is " the Private Placees will get cheap price from all of you!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
lawrencegom78
5 posts
Posted by lawrencegom78 > 2017-11-27 18:52 | Report Abuse
Dapat break-even pun ok la esok. EP price 0.315 quite high. Ermmm