save malaysia!

What happened to Teoh Beng Hock’s case, DAP MP queries

savemalaysia
Publish date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021, 09:15 PM

KEPONG MP Lim Lip Eng has called on the special committee to investigate the death of the late Teoh Beng Hock to complete its probe and reveal the findings soon. 

He added that the case, which happened 12 years ago, was reopened during the Pakatan Harapan administration; which was spearheaded by then-Home Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. 

“Therefore, there is already a moral responsibility for the case to be resolved as soon as possible,” Lim said, in a statement. 

Teoh, who was serving as an aide to a Selangor state executive councillor then, was found dead at Plaza Masalam after being interrogated overnight by the Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commision (MACC) in 2009. 

After much pressure from the Opposition and civil society movements, then prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak established a royal commission of inquiry to probe Teoh’s death. 

While the RCI found that Teoh committed suicide due to “aggressive interrogation tactics employed by three MACC officers”, his family dismissed the findings and held firm to the believe that he was murdered. 

Good move on Adib’s case 

Meanwhile, Lim hailed the Government’s decision to establish a 10-member special committee to investigate the death of fireman, Muhammad Adib Mohd Kassim.

He added that appropriate steps should be taken so as the ensure such cases are taken seriously, with the resolution being expedited. 

Lim Lip Eng

Lim also noted that panel members appointed to the special committee are not bigots as they are individuals with good stature and qualifications.

“To this day, there are still irresponsible individuals and political groups using Adib’s passing as political propaganda. They have also used it to fuel racial and religious issues.

“It is time for such cases to be given due attention. We can no longer allow extreme political interference to further cloud investigations like this,” he remarked.

Adib passed away at the National Health Institute (IJN) after being found unconscious during the violence at the Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman Temple. 

Inquest into his death ruled that the firefighter was assaulted “by three individuals or more” when he was responding to the incident in Seafield. 

However, then Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Hamid Bador said that the police could not find evidence that Adib was assaulted during their probe. – Nov 14, 2021. 

https://focusmalaysia.my/what-happened-to-teoh-beng-hocks-case-dap-mp-queries/

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 1 of 1 comments

WhatSayYou

When questioning about others investigation, may be Mr Lim should also investigate DAP's Malacca Candidate, Mr Damian Yeo, who betrayed the Plaintiff, and helped Dr TCL to get away from very serious offense in:

"Dalam Negeri Melaka, Writ No: (2) A53KP-02-04/Tahun 2016"

Just pick up a few more important issues:

1. Mr Yeo get rid of Plaintiff’s Witness Doctor by telling Dr TCL’s Lawyer before 1st hearing that he was not going to call Doctor; and caused Plaintiff unable to testify in Court.

2. Mr Yeo failed to strike out Dr TCL’s untrue Witness Statements who stated that he asked for consent of operation on the 5th day morning; when in Case Note, he postponed operation waiting for Peritonitis to set in.

3. In re-examination, Mr Yeo's Assistant who did not follow the case allowed Dr TCL to invalidate a document, which contained solid proof of Dr TCL postponed operation beyond Patient's death, and was certified by Malaysia Medical Council, just because of an error in the Title.

4. Also Dr TCL was allowed to change his own earlier testimony of Bowel obstruction at mid Ileum to no obstruction, so as to change the Patient's Bowel Obstruction into Ischemic Bowel.

5. Dr TCL was allowed to take his own words of 'relative reluctant' and 'daughter refused' added in two Case Notes, where he had advised them to wait for Patient's Peritonitis, to pass the blame of delay in operation to them without documented proof of their refusal.

6. Mr Yeo did not point out that Dr TCL failed to go to the Hospital at night; when the Patient was Peritonitis with Septic Shock that needs immediate operation, and denied her of her last chance of survival.

7. He failed to tell the Judge that cancellation of Medications after it were noted were tampering of Medical Documents.

8. He justified Dr TCL’s operation on Patient whose blood system was bleeding due to DIVC and was inoperable.

9. He added a fault statement of family member refused operation in the Submission to kill of the Case beyond Appeal.

2021-11-15 15:10

Post a Comment