And why you continue to attack OTB, while he has never responded you for so long?

You must be jealous that your master now realized that who is a true friend, and who is a villain who has caused him to lose more than RM100m this two years from your persuasion to sailang and margin jaks and Sendai.

Posted by qqq3 > Apr 4, 2019 1:55 PM | Report Abuse
I would not accuse of KC of being a terminal value guy..........KC is a strictly PE guy and for that, he has never, not once bought a really good high quality company.
Similar to OTB who has never bought a single share which does not eventually collapse.

KC strictly PE guy?

That is why you have never comprehend any of my articles, and just quack quack quack.

Tell me, when we put money in a stock, must we always buy a "really good high quality company"?

Or should we hope to get the best return from our investment, whether we buy a great company or otherwise?

Oh, I just ask for fun, for I know you just can't comprehend what I ask, nor you know anything about investment, despite claiming that you are an accountant, but just know how to quack quack quack.

From 10 years ago in 2019, the adjusted share price of SKPR was about 6 sen. After ten years it is RM1.37 now. That is a 23 bagger in just 10 years. If we considered its peak price a year ago at RM2.30+, it is a 37 baggers.

Bursa got 900+ counters now. I don't think you even know a fraction of them well enough.

"I'm sure there are many ways of investing. But it depends on your risk appetite and your definition of the word successful."

I like your statement above. There is not a single human being behaving, and think exactly the same, and be successful with only one way.

Does a company always have to be able to compete overseas to excel and enhance shareholder value?

Come and sell your char kue tiow and curry laksa in Auckland here.

In our investment, must we always only look for this type of company to be able to be successful? The only way?

The same quack quack quack also talked non-stop how Sendai can compete all over the world for the last two years and he asked people to sailang and margin it when it was trading at RM1.40+.

Look what happened to Sendai now? And what will happen to it soon?

George Kent in one which depended on the previous government getting ultra lucrative job. Its financial performance has been good.

But I don't think they are good in managing the contracts. They have been depending on Gamuda previously on the implementation of the jobs. All GK knows is to play golf with "Bossku", and the money just flows in.

Without the lucrative contracts from ""Bossku"", and without capable partner, I am not sure it can perform.

We are talking about Bursa, and not the world market.

When investing, I don't think we must look for the best company in the world to invest in, not even the best company in Malaysia, if the price is not right.

Nobody here can beat Dyson, HSBC, Microsoft, Walmart, Apple etc ever.

An investment thesis just comes with a story without any number, is not good enough.

Similarly, a thesis just comes with the numbers, without a good story, is also not good enough.

The advantage of the later is, if you buy a diversified portfolio with good numbers, it is more likely to have better outcome overall. This is because in the earlier case, if you are wrong, you are gone case.

Investing is not that simple. When you buy, someone else is selling. So in buying just one or two stock, and if you are wrong, gone case.

Think about our super investor in sailang and margin in just two construction stocks the last two years.

V.S. or SKP Resources?

I have wrote a piece to compare this two companies one and a half year ago here,

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/136491.jsp

At that time, it was the same story; VS is more established, first mover advantage, its own original design, etc.

But the above is just part of the investment thesis, the story part.

I came with the number part as in the above link. SKPR in fact has higher margins, higher turnover, in percentage wise in relation to its assets. VS employs higher operating leverage.

But yet SKPR's ROE was and is higher. Think about DuPont analysis.

And yet VS's market valuation was much higher.


Fast forward one and a year later, both share price drop because of lower demand. SKPR drops 23%, but VS share price dropped by 56%, after adjustment of the 1 for 4 bonus issue.

A story is not good enough for the success in investing. It has to compliment with some numbers; business analysis wise as well as valuation wise.

Posted by tm9999 > Apr 4, 2019 7:35 AM | Report Abuse
Defensive mean? 2018 to now, cam beat fd rate or nt?

In the good years, my return were shown here with all the records in i3investor,

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/188915.jsp

Summary of 4 portfolios,

146% in 5 years versus 20% for the broad market from January 2013 to January 2018.

175% for 4 years from August 2013 to August 2018, versus 10% of the broad market

67.4% for the one and a half year from October 2015 to April 2017, versus the return of broad market of 3.8% of the broad market.

5% for the year 2017 (under-performed)


So it is bad?

Posted by tm9999 > Apr 4, 2019 7:35 AM | Report Abuse
Defensive mean? 2018 to now, cam beat fd rate or nt?

My stock picks for a portfolio of 8 stocks for 2018 made an average of 12.7% as on 31 march 2019, compared to the loss of FBMKLCI and FBM Smallcap of 8.5% and 24.7% during the same period.

Is that bad?

5 years ago I shared my first piece on Magni in i3investor here,

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/51356.jsp

The adjusted share price of Magni was less than RM1.00.

It was the same issue; single main customer, traditional no moat business, none of its own brand etc.

Since then, its revenue has doubled, and operating and net income more than 2.5 times. Its share price went up to a peak of RM7.50 three and a half years later, for a gain of 650%.

At 4.65, magni is trading at a PE of just 8.2, enterprise value just 5.5 times operating profit, and a cash yield of 15%.

Again it has no debt and abundant cash in its balance sheet, stable and increasing earnings and cash flows. no wonder it has been paying very good dividend all these years.

Yes, single main customer is risky. But on the other side, if I am Nike and I am growing my business in such a speed, I will prefer a proven reliable and capable sub-contractor and supplier, especially his price is not much different from other new fellows. Nike's advantage comes from its brand, and not so much from the input cost.

FPI's business in speakers was deteriorating for many years until year 2016. Recently, it has some good prospect with some big names in speakers.

However, the attractiveness in FPI is in another business, the musical instrument components for piano, guitars, amplifiers and drums, and with higher margins. This transformation has already yielded results with revenue almost doubled and operating margin triple in the last two years.

Return on capital is great with return of more than 20% on capital. Great balance sheet with abundant cash and zero debt. Great cash flows, and hence high and sustainable dividend.

Yet it is trading at a normal PE and EV multiple.

That is the huge difference between trying to make fun of other's sharing, and constructive criticism. The earlier brings no value to anyone, except making the commentator a bloody fool of himself, while the later brings benefits to others, including the one being criticized, and it should be appreciated.

TopGlove and Hartalega were the other two companies which I tried to invite to our value investing retreat in Sepang, besides QL, as these are the 3 great companies which have created tremendous shareholder value. Unfortunately the event did not come through. Hence, there is no argument here that those companies are some of the best companies listed in Bursa.

Harta and Top Glove also have been in the right industry with a niche worldwide market. Of course their management are also superb. How everyone wishes to have started to invest in them long ago when they were selling cheap, even at PE ratio of 20s.

Yes, you are right, I am trying to catch on the potential higher growth prospect of a smaller company. Yes, a smaller company is not as efficient as bigger companies. We can clearly see that in the margins and return on capitals.

But my investing strategy is different, although we are both on FA. To me, "investing success is not from buying great companies, but buying well". And my investment in a company is not buy and hold very very long time. It can be short or long term, depending on the price versus estimated intrinsic vale of a company. This principle has served me very well for the last decade.

I can't put myself to buy Topglove or Harta end of last year when they were selling at PE ratios of close to 50, when I can buy the a still profitable company in the same niche industry with PE ratio at low teen.

The above serves me well too as from end of last year, Top Glove and harta's share price has dropped about 20%, while Comfotr's share price has in fact risen, and they have seemed to resolved their FDA problem.

But that is only short-term. In the long term a faster growing company will worth more. This we can make an educated guess, such as on the capital expenses being made, and the increment return on capitals spent, but of course it must be in percentage wise, not an absolute number.

The future is filled with uncertainties. We really know which company do better in the future, although we can make our own judgment, and often different people have different judgment.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 31, 2019 10:37 PM | Report Abuse
and by the way, I think KYY is happy and satisfied with his stock market performance ..........

I really don't know what to say.

Someone lost more than RM100m last year, enticed by margin and sailang by the snakeoil salesman with multiple nicks of Desa6769, Stockmanny, Brightsmart, quack quack quack etc etc., and had to sell land for another punt, still satisfied with his market performance?

You want to rub salt into the wound of the one who fed you?

A good article with plenty of good investment stuff will always attract many comments, whether good or bad comments. But obviously the sharing of the author has been attracting many good comments, which the author deserves it.

Well done Philip. Take it as a joy to share.

Sapura
shares 16 billion @ 35 sen, MC $ 5.6 billion
RCPS 2 billion @ 40 sen, MC $ 0.8 billion
total market cap $ 6.4 billion.
warrants 1 billion


ARE YOU SURE YOU GOT THE "TOTAL MARKET CAP" CORRECT?


Cash $ 8 billion
Borrowings $ 16 billion
Net borrowings $ 8 billion
Enterprise value of $ 14.4 billion ( 6.4 + 8.0)

YOU SURE YOU GOT THE ENTERPRISE VALUE CORRECT?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 25, 2019 2:24 PM | Report Abuse
remember? Hengyuan, Jaks and sendai also got many rounds to benefit from before they crash.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 25, 2019 1:52 PM | Report Abuse
make money is smart, lose money is stupid.

I cannot imagine this person is so proud of making money from the newbies by shouting sailang and margin on Sendai and Jaks when they were selling at RM1.40+ and RM1.80+ respectively, and then ridicule them by calling them "stupid".

I cannot comprehend someone making so much money from his master by persuading him jacking the share prices of Sendai and Jaks for him to profit, and at the end, his master lost over RM100m in these two stocks. And then he ridiculed him by calling him "stupid".

I am very surprise this article came from Dali, one who has had great respect for the person he mentioned. He has published many articles written by him in his blog 5 to 6 years ago, even as an accomplice promoting his stocks. Most of those articles caused many people lost great deal of money. Thy are mostly had disappeared from his blog.

After reading his numerous articles, I have been contemplating to write a very similar article many times but decided not to, as his followers will accuse me of personal attacks, or that I step on someone to gain from it.

I can see more and more people who has been respecting him had distance from him, some like Dali even wrote such a stinging article.

Please wake up. Making more million is not important, especially you already seem to have so much wealth, and at your age. It is much more valuable to leave a great legacy so that people continue to respect you.

Those who are close to him should also give some advice to him. But this must exclude the quack quack quack.

This is my friendly advice, one who used to respect you too.

But seriously, I am looking forward to your response on the below so that I can learn something from you.


Posted by abang_misai > Mar 19, 2019 03:31 PM | Report Abuse
Don’t be silly lah. Dayang has the earnings to sustain its share price.

Interesting, but why you did this below?


Posted by abang_misai > Mar 19, 2019 12:17 PM | Report Abuse
Or to be precise, I cut loss at 1.40. I will buy back when the dust has settled.

Posted by abang_misai > Mar 19, 2019 03:40 PM | Report Abuse
KC, I’m surprised you tracked my comments.


No la, why should I? Just happen to read them. It is on the same day, that is today.

I know someone even tracked my sharing of stocks 5 years ago and made fun of them.

Posted by abang_misai > Mar 19, 2019 03:31 PM | Report Abuse
Don’t be silly lah. Dayang has the earnings to sustain its share price.


Interesting, but why you did this below?



Posted by abang_misai > Mar 19, 2019 12:17 PM | Report Abuse

Or to be precise, I cut loss at 1.40. I will buy back when the dust has settled.

Posted by i3Value > Mar 12, 2019 07:09 PM | Report Abuse
kchongnz, this:
“To me, they have good characters and humility,”
SSLee maybe.
Jonathan Choi Yi Kit good character and humble? I cannot agree. Absolutely not.

I did not read all his posts and comments so I don't know very well. The way so many people hantam him may have a reason. The young man may not have enough experience in dealing with people. May be a little too blunt and may be arrogance.

Nevertheless, he is quite good in investing, much better than me when I was at his age.

Well he will learn some life skill.

Posted by Connie555 > Mar 12, 2019 06:09 PM | Report Abuse
and you yourself also cannot answer my question about create value in i3, instead of create value, you are sucking value you knw?

people haven buy in any share already first lose 1k to you and you consider youself create value in i3, i diny create value so i stay silent but when i see something wrong i must stand up for the community. 路见不平 拔刀相助

Most individual investors lost money speculating in the stock market following tips and rumours. That is the statistics and what the research has shown.

In my course which yes, I charge a fee. Someone said it is like treating me a teh tarik and roti canai for a few months, learning all the fundamentals of investing, and valuations and behavioural finance.

The course will first and utmost teaches you how to look at risks in investing avoid losses in the stock market; how to look at a business, understand how it makes money, how good is the making money, and most of all, is it selling at good prices.

Participants following the course closely will first avoid losses, in tens of thousands, million, and then making reasonable return over a long period of time. Many of my course participants have become great investors on their own rights, some of them went into fund management.

Teaching people the right way of investing has become my joy and my past time after retirement.


These were some feedback. Tell me am I "sucking value"" from anyone?

Posted by Intelligent Investor >
An investment in Mr. Chong course provide me the ever best return.

Posted by coolio >
I just want to take this opportunity to say thank you again because recently I have achieved 7 figure in my investing journey...hehehe.. Thanks for your investing methods, no 8 wonders in the world is really amazing!

Posted by joe2703 >
An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.... I've learned so much from your online course and I made quite some good profit with the knowledge that you taught me, thank you very much and Merry X'mas!

Posted by i3Value > Mar 12, 2019 05:59 PM | Report Abuse
kcchongnz, you are a man who bring positives to i3. Lets not because some personal dislike another person affect your reputation. You do not belong to same egoistic-insult-throwing gang of people like choivo, sslee, 3iii, calvintaneng etc

i3Value,

Thank you very much to your compliments. Really appreciate it. I will try to follow your advice.

However, I don't see the same as what you said about the other 4 persons above. To me, they have good characters and humility, many times better than the one who continuously attacking me, OTB and almost all others except one or two whom he will PLP to sky high.

Well I know, in the public space, there are people who just don't agree with you. And they like others and dislike you. It is ok.

But certain kind of character and behaviour is simply deplorable, disgusting not acceptable in the society.

Posted by i3Value > Mar 12, 2019 05:28 PM | Report Abuse
kcchongnz, i think you nit pick on qqq3 lah. qqq3 is active member here. He trades so many counters and comments everywhere. True Jaks and Sendai collapse after he said buy, but he also help many members make money from other counters. How be correct all the time. If you hammer him make bad calls, then lots and lots of people in i3 are guilty too. What about calvintaneng endless list of buy calls?
If you call qqq3 conman for buy call of Jaks at RM1.50++, then to be fair you should call him sifu for making buy call on Jaks at 40+ sen.
Not defending qqq3. Just that in investing, everyone should do their own research and be responsible for own investing buy/sell. People say and you blindly follow, your own fault.


i3Value, thanks for the advice. But I think you don't read enough of what quack quack quack did, and know his disgusting behaviour.

I don't pick on him. I only have some fun on him when he starts to attack me personally, every time. I got no time for him actually, but he never stop attacking me. So I also have some fun here too. I never was the one who started first.

Call quack quack quack sifu? Great joke, thanks but no thanks.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 05:20 PM | Report Abuse
Talking about Jaks w bot at 25 sen also doing very well despite Kc's calculate here calculate there.............that is what I wrote.....


quack quack quack, this was what you wrote as below. Is this the same as you mentioned above?


Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 03:59 PM | Report Abuse
Jaks W........KcChong from NZ needs to apologies to the forum and to icon specifically.
KCChong, the calculate here calculate there guy wrote an article asking people not to buy Jaks W at offer price of 25 sen. Because of that article, many people makes so much less money.


And quack quack quack, this was my reply,


KCChong must apologise to you and Icon when I shared an option pricing example?

Here is the link I shared titled, ":Is Jaks’ Rights of Warrants Subscription Worth Investing kcchongnz"

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/183371.jsp

Read through the whole article, try understand it, and if you don't, get an English tutor to teach you what the article is talking about. And ask your analyst son who has a CFA title (if he has) to explain to you what the option pricing is about.

Is it about forecasting the share price of Jaks, or its warrants?

Quack quack quack, I have given you free advice many times. If you ddon't know or understand anything, keep your bloody mouth shut, and then nobody knows you are an idiot!

Posted by justcurious555 > Mar 12, 2019 05:11 PM | Report Abuse

The other victims must be the silence newbies wh got conned by him.
________

you think, you prejudice or got cold hard evidence?oh yeah you talk kok lol only.


Where got evidence? Yeah just talk kok only as I have said, who would listen to him. But also hard to say. When he kept on bombarding to them the sailang and margin thingy, they could just be confused and misjudged a conman as Santa Claus.

Just speculating.

But where else his "killing"came from? Fund managers? No lah, fund managers where got so stupid one.

It was quite clear actually that it was from the individual who trusted him with all the PLs and listened to him and bought the share up to RM1.80+ with huge margin finance as persuaded by him. And at the back he profited by selling off to him.

Posted by justcurious555 > Mar 12, 2019 04:52 PM | Report Abuse
What happened to those who enticed by you to use margin to buy say at RM1.60 with 50% margin?
So, shouldn't you be the one who should make public apology here for making them losing their pants, or should it be kcchongnz who shared the knowledge of option pricing, which is taught in every finance and investment clssses in i3investor for free?
__________

seriously qqq3 where got so powerful got follower...this kc really talk kok


I can see you are very curious as you are very new to this forum. Don't need to be too serious in life. Have some fun and talk kok a bit ok one.

Whether quack quack quack got so powerful, I also just joke only. A person with his kind of mentality, with zero knowledge about investing, and every time talking nonsense, who would want to follow him? Who would give a damn to him? Ghost ah?

But that was exactly what he did, shouting everywhere and asked everyone to sailang and margin on Jaks and Sendai at their peak prices for the last two years, and nothing else, and he said he made a killing from Sendai and Jaks. Think about it, that huge profit from who?

One is from the "super investor" he kept on PLP, but I am not sure as quack quack quack still appears to be his best buddy.

The other victims must be the silence newbies wh got conned by him.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 04:36 PM | Report Abuse
kc...........first I told u many times already....when I wrote about Jaks and sendai, they have not reached their peak prices yet.........


So when you asked people to sailang and margin, Jaks was RM1.50+, and conned people to buy and jak it up to RM1.80+. How much have they lost? What happened to those who enticed by you to use margin to buy say at RM1.60 with 50% margin?

So, shouldn't you be the one who should make public apology here for making them losing their pants, or should it be kcchongnz who shared the knowledge of option pricing, which is taught in every finance and investment clssses in i3investor for free?

quack quack quack, the more you launch personal attack on me, the more you expose the dark side of you which is nothing to be proud of.

You may even be implicated in pumped and dumped activities.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 04:26 PM | Report Abuse
well...I made 200% in the two years everybody else lost their pants......

Even I take what you said at face value which I highly doubt so. After retiring at 60+ with only RM100k to invest, and made RM200k in the last two years, is nothing great.

More so it is so disgusting by cheating the newbies in i3investor to sailang and margin your Jaks and Sendai at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+, and at the back you sold to them.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 04:17 PM | Report Abuse
ed by kcchongnz > Mar 12, 2019 04:10 PM | Report Abuse
Some more so proud and called those victims stupid.
=========
the objective is to make money...lose money must admit stupid..........


You made a lot of money ah? I doubt so. You have exposed your tail everywhere.

So at the age of 60+ still haven't made meaningful money from the stock market, you damn stupid loh!

quack quack quack,

Does it look like you have any qualification, experience and results to lecture me?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 04:01 PM | Report Abuse
In the case of sendai and Jaks...If I can make money and others lose money, its because they are stupid......what more can I say?


Wow, what kind of a person you are?

Write everyday in i3investor and asked people to sailang and margin Jaks and Sendai at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+ and at the back sold to them and made a killing.

Some more so proud and called those victims stupid.

Good on you!

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 03:59 PM | Report Abuse
Jaks W........KcChong from NZ needs to apologies to the forum and to icon specifically.
KCChong, the calculate here calculate there guy wrote an article asking people not to buy Jaks W at offer price of 25 sen. Because of that article, many people makes so much less money.
kc...I wrong meh?

quack quack quack, show me which part in the article asked you not to buy Jaks W.

Apologise to who, Icon?

Icon, do I need to apologize to you in Jaks warrant?

Who do you think need to apologize in i3investor?

Don't you think the one who con everyone to sailang and margin Jaks and Sendai at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+ need to? He has to kneel down, burn some incense and apologize and ask for forgiveness non-stop man!

And quack quack, shouldn't you kneel down and apologise to all the forumers in i3investors for your conning them in buying Jaks and Sendai when they were selling at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+ respectively, and at the back you made a killing as professed by you.

Don't you feel any shame at all?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 12, 2019 11:43 AM | Report Abuse
Jaks W........KcChong from NZ needs to apologies to the forum and to icon specifically.
KCChong, the calculate here calculate there guy wrote an article asking people not to buy Jaks W at offer price of 25 sen. Because of that article, many people makes so much less money.


KCChong must apologise to you and Icon when I shared an option pricing example?

Here is the link I shared titled, ":Is Jaks’ Rights of Warrants Subscription Worth Investing kcchongnz"

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kcchongnz/183371.jsp

Read through the whole article, try understand it, and if you don't, get an English tutor to teach you what the article is talking about. And ask your analyst son who has a CFA title (if he has) to explain to you what the option pricing is about.

Is it about forecasting the share price of Jaks, or its warrants?

Quack quack quack, I have given you free advice many times. If you ddon't know or understand anything, keep your bloody mouth shut, and then nobody knows you are an idiot!

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 08:43 PM | Report Abuse
y Connie555 > Mar 10, 2019 04:50 PM | Report Abuse
Ricky, Choivo, KC all have similar traits
==========
spot on. A few more in the camp. Don't know why but its not a coincidence they all call themselves Value Investors.......

I don't see any contrarian investors in the camp, Don't see anyone with a big Q in the camp, only see scared scared players in the camp.


quack quack quack, as a 60+ years old retiree with your kind of mentality, not to say your extremely shallow knowledge or rather non-existent knowledge in investing, you are no way close to the capability of those two young men. So, if I were you, I would just keep quiet, instead of personally attacking them.

Look at you this two years, quack quack quack the whole day and everyday in i3investor, what positive value have you brought?

I say you brought in huge negative value to i3investor community, like conning the newbies and youngsters, ask them to use margin and sailang on your Jaks and Sendai at peak prices, while you collaborated and sold to them and made killings. You said that.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 06:44 PM | Report Abuse
anyway, this choivo boy is more nuisance than any useful stuffs....


Who is a nuisance in i3investor?

I don't think you can forget the times when all the comments of your nicks of Dasa9697, stockmammy, etc were flagged by hundreds of forumers, despite me telling them not to do so, and removed by administration.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 05:03 PM | Report Abuse
cheoky...not my problem...Its KCChong problem......


Well quack quack quack, I haven't got any fun with you for quite some time because you haven't been personally attacking me for quite a while.

I only have fun again when you started to attack me. Bring your horse over.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 06:41 PM | Report Abuse
kc...why? cannot find a share to buy but can always be counted on to look at shares that have collapsed and say, I told u so?
Your business model built on fears?
right or wrong?
I think u need to change your business model, u really do......

Well I think investing with your hard earned money must be fearful. Then only you are careful not to lose it.

Imagine if one is not fearful when someone promoting Jaks and Sendai with sailang and margin at their peak prices, which has been done for the last two years by the quack quack quack, how much would you have lost?

From RM1.80 to 60 sen now for Jaks, 67% loss without margin, 134% with 50% margin as conned by quack quack quack.

From RM1.40 to 60 sen for Sendai, 57% loss without using margin finance, 114% if you were conned by quack quack quack using 50% margin.

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 04:58 PM | Report Abuse
look at this kc...
KYY shares his moments of success. Hoping to inspire people
KC time is spend treating u as idiots, as babies to be protected by KC....stopping u from success.....


Who is spending time treating you guys as idiots, and stopping your from success?

1) KC who shared his views on the riskiness of Jaks and Sendai last two years when they were promoted aggressively at peak prices with sailang and margin finance, and as a result saving many from plunging into them with sailang and margin, or

2) The quack quack quack who promoted Jaks and Sendai aggressively asking everyone to sailang and margin on them at peak prices the last two years?

SSLee,

You are right. When I was at the age of Jon, I already started buying shares. But practically knew nothing much about investing, but following tips, rumours etc. I have to say I have been losing money for many years.

If I have the knowledge of what Jon has now when I was at his age, and improved it "further and with experience, I could safely said, Ï knew I would be rich".

Posted by Connie555 > Mar 10, 2019 04:50 PM | Report Abuse
Ricky, Choivo, KC all have similar traits, they only come out when the share price collapse and start condemning on those who lose money and advertise their own product like what KC did on Jaks, Sendai, but when he try to condemn on KYY's VS, he failed, and share price go up few hundred %, 连鸟也不敢鸟了.
One thing i dont really like is that you kcchong always step on peoples pain to make money, case study mat lan mat lan, end up also promote your thing....puiiii
if you really got intention to teach people, then do it like a real man, instead of stepping on other people injured bodies to make money, not by using condemning on the share price collapse and then telling people your valuation is correct la this and that....

Tell me when did I condemn anybody personally. All I have done was to share my opposite opinion when I found someone promoting stocks, which I thought were risky, vigorously and enticing everyone to use margin finance to buy them when they were already goreng up sky high.

Most recently I shared my views on Hengyuan, Sendai and Jaks when they were promoted vigorously with shouts of margin finance. I have also shared my view on VS 5 years ago. Yes, I was wrong on VS but what else was I wrong, out of so many stocks which I shared my opposite views? Mind you sharing opposite views is not condemning.

Imagine, if people just paid attention of my opposite views on Jaks and Sendai, instead of listening to quack quack quack promoting them, and shouts of margin and sailing, how much they would have saved?

And think about it, what have you contributed to i3investor, instead of condemning, yes personal attacks on other?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 04:17 PM | Report Abuse
no margin no sailng want to be rich? where got like that one?


Yeah kah?

What happened in the last two years you have been PLP someone rich but at the end made him lost more than RM100m?

What happened to those newbies and youngsters following your sailang and margin Jaks and Sendai when they were trading at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+?

You have no remorse, and instead keep on quack quack quack on sailang and margin.

What have you sailang and margin so far? Jaks and Sendai as you enticed everyone to do so here?

How rich are you now?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 04:17 PM | Report Abuse
no margin no sailng want to be rich? where got like that one?


Yeah kah?

What happened in the last two years you have been PLP someone rich but at the end made him lost more than RM100m?

What happened to those newbies and youngsters following your sailang and margin Jaks and Sendai when they were trading at RM1.80+ and RM1.40+?

You have no remorse, and instead keep on quack quack quack on sailang and margin.

What have you sailang and margin so far? Jaks and Sendai as you enticed everyone to do so here?

How rich are you now?

Posted by qqq3 > Mar 10, 2019 04:15 PM | Report Abuse
kc chong.....
Its S=Qr
doesn't say any thing about England and English.........
u got KYY Q or not?


quack quack quack, zero value. Stop that quack quack quack and make i3investor a better place to share knowledge.

I am puzzled people, some seemingly good investors, getting into personal attack on an enthusiastic, Not rich (yet), and confident young man in his sharing on investing, even continuously attacking him.

A young man who is not rich (yet) from investing doesn't mean he is not knowledgeable and sharing good stuff. In my opinion, he has shared with many good stuff. On the other hand, an old rich man who has made a lot of money in the stock market(seemingly too) doesn't mean he is a good investor and everyone must worship him, and more so if he is sharing with noble intention.

Personally, I find the author of this thread has good knowledge investing in his own way, bearing in mind that if one follows a right way of investing, and there are many right ways, he will do well in the future.

I believe the author has great future in his investing journey. Keep it up young man.

The propagation to the public about getting rich quick, without spending much or any effort but by just following tips and rumours, is so pervasive, even in a blog like i3investor. Most of all know the end results. They had happened before, again and again.

Hence it is good to have some refreshing ideas such as that of Choivo capital here, and some others, including also S=QR of Philip.