Posted by Flintstones > 2018-01-09 07:58 | Report Abuse

Good try. Article is a bit long. Shorter will be an easier read

Posted by skeleton > 2018-01-09 08:14 | Report Abuse

good article

Posted by csl1991 > 2018-01-09 10:11 | Report Abuse

Good article

Posted by HENGYUAN Sexy Babe @ RM21 > 2018-01-09 10:20 | Report Abuse

Reading 500 pages annual rpt is for fun than reading this.

Posted by Equityengineer > 2018-01-09 12:57 | Report Abuse

All stocks have risks attached, risk can be interpreted differently so even if some stock analyst pretty bullish and decide to dilute the risks it’s the author opinion. What if someone picked up the risks and amplify it and diluting the strength. There is many perspective too look at investment write up. I agree that many risks associated reading others works , but don’t you think all our life all our knowledge is acquired by reading some one else work. Reading is knowledge , knowledge is not wisdom.

Posted by Ricky Yeo > 2018-01-09 13:51 | Report Abuse

You are totally right. That's why read with a critical mind. I never say you shouldn't read. But most people read without care. Read so you can think.

That's one reason if I want to know if I should read someone's work or if it is worth my time, I go to his valuation first. I scroll all the way down to his valuation section. The way someone does valuation tells me about his thinking process. If someone start pulling PE x EPS, I know I can stop reading. Or if someone throw out a bunch of macro economics forecast, I'll be very very skeptical believing him.

Posted by KLCI King > 2018-03-02 11:10 | Report Abuse

Ricky Yeo, look forward to read your article in analysing stock