Dear probability, I am not very clever as you and sslee with all these figures, I only understand the following which is good enough for me. Let me summarize your whole article as below:
1. Best case projection: PAT would be: = 853 Million MYR, EPS = 2.84 for Q3
2. Worse case projection: PAT would be: = 670 Million MYR, EPS = 2.23 for Q3 ( still exceeding Q2)
3. The whole Derivative thing: Best case: positive Worse case -187 Million.
Let Raider summarised Petron & hengyuan position loh!
1.Petron Q2 for 30-6-2022 2. Pet 6mts 30-6-2022
1a.Profit attributable to shareholder............Rm 183m 1b. Profit comprehensive to shareholder...Rm 183m number of shares Rm 270m 1a. Eps Rm 0.68 1b Eps Rm 0.68
Culmulative 6m 2a, Profit attributable to shareholders..... Rm 289m 2b. Profit comprehensive income shareholders Rm 289m
2a, EPS Rm Rm 1.07 2b. Eps Rm 1.07
Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh!
1a.Profit/{loss} attributable to shareholder............Rm 667m 1b. Profit/{loss? comprehensive to shareholder...Rm {412}m number of shares Rm 300m 1a. Eps Rm 2.22 1b Eps Rm {1.37}
Culmulative 6m 2a, Profit attributable to shareholders..... Rm 714m 2b. Profit comprehensive income shareholders Rm (475m}
2a, EPS Rm Rm 2.38 2b. Eps Rm {1.58}
Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh!
But hengyuan do not loh! It keep the hedging loss as no impact to EPS loh!
If we standardised the treatment like Petron....Hengyuan will be reporting huge losses loh!
Rightfully Hedging losses should flow thru P&L mah!
Thus Hengyuan performance appear very bad compare to Petron loh!
The most question for those people who invest in hengyuan is to ask whether the derivative executed are actually a faked device to siphon money from the company loh ?
The most danger question is the hedging instrument is completely unrelated to business hedging but it is a device instrument to siphon money from hengyuan loh!
The red flags can be seen by;
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
Aiyoh raider, that is snapshot of only one out of many of the refined product of hengyuan. As of that one you are looking at, you must surely know the number will change over time. You got crystal ball? Your crystal ball can pakai or not?
There is no justfication Hengyuan valuation should be supported due to wrongful reporting of its profit & huge losses of its derivative mah!
Let Raider summarised hengyuan position loh!
1.HRC Q2 for 30-6-2022 2. HRC 6mts 30-6-2022
1a.Profit/{loss} attributable to shareholder............Rm 667m 1b. Profit/{loss? comprehensive to shareholder...Rm {412}m number of shares Rm 300m 1a. Eps Rm 2.22 1b Eps Rm {1.37}
Culmulative 6m 2a, Profit attributable to shareholders..... Rm 714m 2b. Profit comprehensive income shareholders Rm (475m}
2a, EPS Rm Rm 2.38 2b. Eps Rm {1.58}
Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh!
But hengyuan do not loh! It keep the hedging loss as no impact to EPS loh!
If we standardised the treatment like Petron....Hengyuan will be reporting huge losses loh!
Rightfully Hedging losses should flow thru P&L mah!
Thus Hengyuan performance appear very bad compare to Petron loh!
The most danger question is the hedging instrument is completely unrelated to business hedging but it is a device instrument to siphon money from hengyuan loh!
The red flags can be seen by;
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
Stockraider, If you are not pepare to learn and understand the financial report but just follow the herd and make up your own imaginary story you won't go far in investing.
Just look at serba....how raider sound the alert leh ?
Posted by Sslee > 16 seconds ago | Report Abuse
Stockraider, If you are not pepare to learn and understand the financial report but just follow the herd and make up your own imaginary story you won't go far in investing.
Investors of Heng Yuan, notice the elaborated arguments put up by two opposing sides. They operate like two opposing sides in a court trial. Obviously both sides try to convince you their research arguments are the ones you should trust. I suspect both sides represents either opposing syndicates or opposing Investment Bankers. For them, if they can influence the market to go their planned way, they make millions in profits from someone else's misery. So take both arguments put up by both sides with a pinch of salt and do not bet your whole house on Heng Yuan. Just a humble opinion from an old timer.
"Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh! Petron reported a positive position after flowing thru its hedging losses to the P&L top line, this should be what hedging operation should be all about by smoothing out its profitability but not in hengyuan case with losses run into billions ?"
There is no justfication Hengyuan valuation should be supported due to wrongful reporting of its profit & huge losses of its derivative mah!
Let Raider summarised hengyuan position loh!
1.HRC Q2 for 30-6-2022 2. HRC 6mts 30-6-2022
1a.Profit/{loss} attributable to shareholder............Rm 667m 1b. Profit/{loss? comprehensive to shareholder...Rm {412}m number of shares Rm 300m 1a. Eps Rm 2.22 1b Eps Rm {1.37}
Culmulative 6m 2a, Profit attributable to shareholders..... Rm 714m 2b. Profit comprehensive income shareholders Rm (475m}
2a, EPS Rm Rm 2.38 2b. Eps Rm {1.58}
Notice that Petron Eps attributable to shareholders & Petron comprehensive income to shareholders are the same bcos Petron treat Hedging gain & loss must flow thru the P&L which is the rightful treatment loh! Petron reported a positive position after flowing thru its hedging losses to the P&L top line, this should be what hedging operation should be all about by smoothing out its profitability but not in hengyuan case with losses run into billions ?
But hengyuan do not loh! It keep the hedging loss as no impact to EPS loh!
If we standardised the treatment like Petron....Hengyuan will be reporting huge losses loh!
Rightfully Hedging losses should flow thru P&L mah!
Thus Hengyuan performance appear very bad compare to Petron loh!
The most danger question is the hedging instrument is completely unrelated to business hedging but it is a device instrument to siphon money from hengyuan loh!
The red flags can be seen by;
1. Many qtr of hedging losses loh! 2. Very suspicious long dated of the hedging instrument loh! 3. Extremely large hedging value has been contracted mah! 4. Extremely Huge hedging losses incurred todate loh!
If the above suspicion is proven true.....then hengyuan will eventually be worthless just like Serba loh!
As a general rule, apply a 90% discount on all the China Boss's Cos.
Second, spend yr time to study the contents of the Author n try to understand n verify so.
Third, check the Author's track records.....I have seen Sifu Probability's earlier analysis in Heng Yuan 1 (2017), Lionind (Steel Party in 2018) ,I think Dayang as well (2019).....
While I cant deny his facts n figures fm his previous posts sometimes do look convincing, but the ending is all the same.
See if we shall see a different ending this round.
Last but not least, back to my first sentence (As a general rule, apply a 90% discount on all the China Boss's Cos), it's oredi being proven 100% correct in Bursa for the past 10 years.
Thanks to probability & SSlee for all the information provided. People with functioning logical brains will know what and where to analyse and see the end results.
Do not be surprised by the price drop after stellar results announcements. This is not the first time and won't be the last time. I have done enough backtest in the past with qtrly report verifications to know such situation happens quite often. Just hold on, you should be rewarded handsomely in the near future.
Yes vinc I am agree. That couple with bad market condition. I think have to give it a few weeks to see if market can really ignore eps 2.2. I think naysayers celebrate too early
Posted by CharlesT > Sep 3, 2022 10:06 AM | Report Abuse
As a general rule, apply a 90% discount on all the China Boss's Cos.
Second, spend yr time to study the contents of the Author n try to understand n verify so.
Third, check the Author's track records.....I have seen Sifu Probability's earlier analysis in Heng Yuan 1 (2017), Lionind (Steel Party in 2018) ,I think Dayang as well (2019).....
While I cant deny his facts n figures fm his previous posts sometimes do look convincing, but the ending is all the same.
See if we shall see a different ending this round.
Last but not least, back to my first sentence (As a general rule, apply a 90% discount on all the China Boss's Cos), it's oredi being proven 100% correct in Bursa for the past 10 years.
//// Third, check the Author's track records.....I have seen Sifu Probability's earlier analysis in Heng Yuan 1 (2017), Lionind (Steel Party in 2018) ,I think Dayang as well (2019).....
While I cant deny his facts n figures fm his previous posts sometimes do look convincing, but the ending is all the same.
See if we shall see a different ending this round. ////
People say Hengyuan is different from xinguan, bcos hengyuan operate in msia whereas xinguan is only listed in msia but business operations is in china mah!
But somehow....Hengyuan found a powerful instrument to kon....in the form of long term derivative loh!
Like that not much different....both also can kon loh!
Posted by CharlesT > 24 seconds ago | Report Abuse
His nephew was the Auditor of Xinquan then so he was very sure of the cash in bank balance of ard RM1.50+.
I think that's part of the reason SSLee bought Xinquan too.
Pardon me, when people gets elder they like to talk grandmother story.
Of course HY is not the same with Xinquan lah. Their petrol stations in Msia are all real one.
Posted by CharlesT > 49 seconds ago | Report Abuse
But so far all Chinaman's Cos in Bursa is no good woh.. Can Sifu OTB cares to name one good one?? Dont mention HY will do -------------- I invest in very good fundamental stocks only. The rest I do not know. You should know my stock selection criteria. I never invest in Xinquan and others, hence I do not know. I am very focus on good fundamental stocks only. Thank you.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
probability
14,500 posts
Posted by probability > 2022-09-02 21:04 | Report Abuse
Hope i3 investors Crack their head on the above over the weekend! Enjoy....