PROTASCO BHD

KLSE (MYR): PRTASCO (5070)

You're accessing 15 mins delay data. Turn on live stream now to enjoy real-time data!

Last Price

0.28

Today's Change

0.00 (0.00%)

Day's Change

0.275 - 0.285

Trading Volume

184,400


16 people like this.

5,875 comment(s). Last comment by Dehcomic01 2 months ago

Bjcorp

42 posts

Posted by Bjcorp > 2014-11-27 13:26 | Report Abuse

Bursa sleeping tidur ke?

Suka suka let Chong and Hadenan misuse bursa announcement to change EGM to today!? Where got enough time to plan? Suppress minority shareholders time for these big monkey show is wrong. So where is Bursa?

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 13:38 | Report Abuse

EGM to remove king-of-thief Chong Ket Pen

28 November 2014 (tomorrow 10am)
Corus Hotel, Ampang KL.

1,000 people there watch how Chong cheat and play dirty, and point his dirty fingers.

Jerryc83

53 posts

Posted by Jerryc83 > 2014-11-27 13:50 | Report Abuse

Hahaha egm later at 3pm. Kick tpy out!!!!

Bjcorp

42 posts

Posted by Bjcorp > 2014-11-27 13:54 | Report Abuse

3pm EGM watch Chong dirty show first.
Then tomorrow watch Chong play dirty second round.

Jerryc83

53 posts

Posted by Jerryc83 > 2014-11-27 14:09 | Report Abuse

Tpy play dirty la... Whoever has brain knows it

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 14:12 | Report Abuse

TPY play cheat...LoL

stncws

10,584 posts

Posted by stncws > 2014-11-27 14:12 | Report Abuse

The big SAGA caase...TPY & Chong are culprit !

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 14:13 | Report Abuse

Buy buy buy tomorrow cheap price!

stncws

10,584 posts

Posted by stncws > 2014-11-27 14:13 | Report Abuse

both are pakat pakat to cheat shareholders money !

Bjcorp

42 posts

Posted by Bjcorp > 2014-11-27 14:43 | Report Abuse

Anyone there egm? Said illegal so go or no go?

TuaHuat

1,462 posts

Posted by TuaHuat > 2014-11-27 14:55 | Report Abuse

Are they able to set aside the injunction ?

master_tan

690 posts

Posted by master_tan > 2014-11-27 15:05 | Report Abuse

live commentator, anyone ??

master_tan

690 posts

Posted by master_tan > 2014-11-27 15:36 | Report Abuse

how ?? anyone can update ?

Posted by wannabeinvestor > 2014-11-27 16:00 | Report Abuse

too bad i cant make it today to attend the EGM, but I went yesterday's.. sigh!

master_tan

690 posts

Posted by master_tan > 2014-11-27 16:03 | Report Abuse

sign mean what ?

Posted by wannabeinvestor > 2014-11-27 16:13 | Report Abuse

means "Aihhhhhh"

ncsncs

23 posts

Posted by ncsncs > 2014-11-27 16:15 | Report Abuse

How today have EGM ? Pls any one can update......

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 16:16 | Report Abuse

It's illegal anyway. Anyone goes there just to do monkey show. Key point is it shows chairman is biased may not give any investor excuse to postpone again. So that stain is enough to later give authorities to remove all the incompetence directors. I think this cover up is too obvious, now we really don't have real "independent" directors if two fresh professionals were played out!

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 16:17 | Report Abuse

Today has monkey EGM. Give banana and talk lies. You can go to zoo if interested.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 16:18 | Report Abuse

I just want to add several facts with regards to the on going case:

1. Protasco’s allegation against Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun in their lawsuit are that the two directors try to deceive Protasco and making secret profits by establishing an Indonesian companies (PT Anglo Slavic Utama/ASU and PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia/ASI) and inducing Protasco to buy ASU’s shares in ASI without disclosing that they are the owners of ASU and ASI.

2. Tey Por Yee’s lawsuit through Kingdom Seekers are vexatious at best because after Dato Chong’s last press conference, Tey finally admits that the RM 10million wired to Dato Chong’s bank account was actually part of a payment for a RM 20million loan received by Tey so he would be able to finalize the purchase of Protasco’s share. Larry also said to media, to the effect that he refused to return the rest RM 10million he owed to Dato Chong.

3. It is not that Dato Tan Sri takes side with Dato Chong, but he acted as what he did because Larry Tey/Tey Por Yee failed to produce any documents evidencing Dato Chong’s wrongdoing when he was given chance to during the board meetings.

4. The website http://www.angloslavic.com is registered under Abamon Technology Sdn Bhd who shares the same address as Nextnation Communication Berhad, the former name of Nexgram, where Tey and Ooi are substantial shareholders. Abamon is wholly owned by PT Inovisi through Code Wireless PTE LTD.

5. PT Green Pine who owned 60% of PT Inovisi’s shares is an alter ego of Tey Por Yee and Ooi Cock Aun. PT Inovisi is the subject matter of security.

6. Modern Profit LTD, a company owned by Tey Por Chen, the brother of Tey Por Yee is a subsidiary of PT Inovisi.

7. Ooi Cock Aun is a finance director of PT Inovisi.

8. The sole director of Acclaim is Lim Sue Fern, the wife of See Poh Yee who held substantial shares in Nexgram and together with Tey Por Yee graduated from the University of Manitoba, Canada, 1998. Acclaim is the third party security provider.

9. Tey Por Yee, Tey Por Chen, See Poh Yee are the founders of Nexgram and all of them currently offloading their Nexgram’s shares to the market. Nexgram’s directors resigned when Protasco filed it lawsuit against Tey and Ooi.

10. Protasco has lodged two lawsuits against Tey and Ooi, the first for contempt of court on grounds of tempering with witness, second for Ooi’s attempts to make secret profits from Protasco’s dealing with PT Goldchild Integritas Abadi, which should be add is another alter ego ofTey and Ooi.

11. Gideon Tan, lawyers for Tey and Ooi has discharged himself, meaning that he don't believe in his clients' case.

All of the above informations can be obtained by googling.

That being said, I found that the one who is without integrity is Larry Tey Por Yee and Adrian Ooi Kock Aun.

Facts giving rise to the case:

1. On November 2012, Tey Por Yee brought a potential investment opportunity to Protasco, which involve the purchase of 76% shares of the total issued share capital of ASI. ASI owned and controlled 49% of PT Firman Andalan Sakti/FAS which owned 70% of PT Hase Bumou Aceh/Haseba.. Haseba had entered into a partnership agreement with PT Pertamina to develop and produce oil and gas in the Aceh Province, Indonesia (the “Project”).

2. Protasco entered into a sale and purchase agreement with ASU for the acquisition of 76% of the share capital of ASI amounting to USD 55million (“SPA”). Pursuant to the SPA, Protasco deposit amount of RM 50million to ASU’s account.

3. Due to significant material discoveries made through the Due Dilligence, Protasco secured a reduction to the purchase price and signed the Amended and Restated Sale and Purchase Agreement. Some Conditions Precedents were not fulfilled on the side of ASU because it is actually not attainable.

4. During a board meeting of Protasco to discuss the issue of SPA’s which resulted in the formation of the investigation committee/IC, Larry Tey vigorously defended ASU.

5. The finding of the IC, inter alia, are as follows:
a. Larry Tey first approached Dato Chong in November 2012 through his vehicle, Global Capital Limited to jointly develop an oil and gas project based in Indonesia;
b. Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi are the beneficial owners of: ASU, PT Inovisi, Acclaim Investment Limited, and PT Green Pine (the largest single owners of PT Inovisi).

6. In view of the findings from the investigations, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by ASU, Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi since neither of them disclosed their personal interest in ASI to the board of directors of Protasco as they are required unde rthe law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length.

nich0las

2,787 posts

Posted by nich0las > 2014-11-27 16:27 | Report Abuse

wah, song. all share red, prtasco green green. haha.

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 16:45 | Report Abuse

Goodkiller Lets slap alice pet pet spam of lies.

We reproduce both below what alice spam and what others reply:

Alice said:

I just want to add several facts with regards to the on going case:
1. Protasco’s allegation against Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun in their lawsuit are that the two directors try to deceive Protasco and making secret profits by establishing an Indonesian companies (PT Anglo Slavic Utama/ASU and PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia/ASI) and inducing Protasco to buy ASU’s shares in ASI without disclosing that they are the owners of ASU and ASI.

Hangover replied:

Dear Mr Alice Chong,

In the name of all mighty, your boss days are numbered eaten by guilt inch by inch to judgement day. Watch how he rots.

If you wants to quote “facts”, show your underwear like Big Dog does – post a link to the “black and white” facts documents to substance your allegations. Enough lies on “character assassination” in the name of “facts”. Show us you have no balls or else you are man.

Lets open the mask one by one to see the ugly face of MD Chong, the only Executive Director in Mickey Mouse Club House.

1. A) Big lier Mr. Alice, you are so thick face or blind to keep lying in front of Big Dog on what “deceive protasco and making secret profits”?

Your MD Chong “knew and signed a shareholders agreement, knowing the consulting firm may own the rights/mandated or refers deals” for their client (protasco and vendor). So what “deceive and making secret profit”? If any, the one deceive is the one signing, so first to go to jail is MD Chong because he sign such agreement. The more you “deceive Big Dog”, the faster MD Chong goes to jail. Click Big Dog file and slap your own face every time you repeat this lie.

[Refer to our previous posting here which shows Chong as signatories in several agreements]

B) “Establishing indonesia companies and inducing protasco (means MD chong) in buying indonesia asset without telling they are owner of the companies etc.”

The consultants “by the order made by client”, (which is MD Chong and vendor), mandated the business advisory firm to help both of you structure the asset to clean up and fits your country needs, in legitimate way. If you never use business advisory services, don’t talk cock to again “deceive Big Dog” inteligence. Your nonsense would means Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan or even CIMB alike who do corporate structuring are “owners” of their projects? So these advisory firms are “inducing” their clients? They all use “woodoo” to hold your MD chong hand to sign contract, sign cheque? Show SSM share registrar to show if the consultants names are in any of your verbal alegations or not, does what Big Dog does – show document proofs. If no proof, don’t insult Big Dog inteligence here.

Alice alleged:

2. Tey Por Yee’s lawsuit through Kingdom Seekers are vexatious at best because after Dato Chong’s last press conference, Tey finally admits that the RM 10million wired to Dato Chong’s bank account was actually part of a payment for a RM 20million loan received by Tey so he would be able to finalize the purchase of Protasco’s share. Larry also said to media, to the effect that he refused to return the rest RM 10million he owned to Dato Chong.

Hangover replied:

2. Making up nonsense in point 1 still don’t feel shameful enough? Further made up defamation statement quoted “Tey admitted the rm10mil was to repay loan bla bla bla”. Most laughable “he refuse to repay bla bla bla”. Which Disneyland Tabloit did you saw Tey said such nonsense? Master of fact twister, put a link here to proof such report.

The fact is newspaper written that Tey has a loan for one of his company more like “security fund” to ensure that MD Chong don’t play cheat and ensure he fulfill his agreement, which only gets to repay AFTER MD Chong “completed oil asset acquisition”. Which means this is totally seperate dealing from the money MD Chong took, and MD Chong has not completed the oil asset acquisition, repay what? This criminal act if Indonesia told media is true, MD Chong does not know how to cover, pulled two unrelated dealing to match his lies. This is too much. Dare enough to show proof of “loan agreement”, which may imply MD Chong go further straight to jail? If no proof, don’t insult Big Dog further. If know the consequences, shut up or he goes in faster!

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 16:46 | Report Abuse

Goodkiller 3. It is not that Dato Tan Sri takes side with Dato Chong, but he acted as what he did because Larry Tey/Tey Por Yee failed to produce any documents evidencing Dato Chong’s wrongdoing when he was given chance to during the board meetings.
All of the above informations can be obtained by googling.
That being said, I found that the one who is without integrity is Larry Tey Por Yee and Adrian Ooi Kock Aun.

Hangover replied:

3. “The mickey mouse club Tan Sri, Dato etc whatever sided MD Chong bla bla bla” and did not see “evidence” nonsense.

Hallo mickeys? All media got a copy, you wide open eye says “you did not see evidence”? The hard evidence is photocopied even nasi bungkus newspaper also can find. Those are black and white copies. Dare to show loan agreement what terms MD chong signed? We forgot, he goes to jail if truth shows he is lying. If so, shut up on the covering.

On the other hand, Tey and Ooi as per media recorded their board minutes shown, “the mickey mouse club” purposely rush a board meeting when they were on vacation, and board minutes shows NO paper proven evidence except “an office boy <>allegations” toilet paper called Statutory Declaration. Hallo mickeys, if a gardener alegations without giving hard evidence saying Tan Sri “rape him”, you straight report polis and sue Tan Sri to court? Without even asking Tan Sri “you rape the gardener?” At least ask him show his dick for lab examination. Wake up Disneyland jokers, you insult Big Dog like he don’t know what is “natural justice”? No matter how you cover up the mickey mouse failure in fulfilling their fiduciary duty as directors (of mickey mouse club), resign or be punished uglily. Shame on your seniority and what ajaran sesat teach you to bully two young people playing “seniority and sympathy”. Definately not infront of Big Dog.

Alice posted another allegation:

Facts giving rise to the case:

1. On November 2012, Tey Por Yee brought a potential investment opportunity to Protasco, which involve the purchase of 76% shares of the total issued share capital of ASI. ASI owned and controlled 49% of PT Firman Andalan Sakti/FAS which owned 70% of PT Hase Bumou Aceh/Haseba.. Haseba had entered into a partnership agreement with PT Pertamina to develop and produce oil and gas in the Aceh Province, Indonesia (the “Project”).
2. Protasco entered into a sale and purchase agreement with ASU for the acquisition of 76% of the share capital of ASI amounting to USD 55million (“SPA”). Pursuant to the SPA, Protasco deposit amount of RM 50million to ASU’s account.

Hangover replied:

The next sentence, again, same old MD Chong style, with defamation and allegation, shameful enough to question Tey and Ooi “integrity”. Hallo? Reading the ugly facts above being reveal, Mr. Alice Chong, you still qualified to even say the word integrity? By now, readers would shout “Snake and Mr. Alice, beat Alice first!” Lets open up more ugly lies below.

The traps lets slice the masked devil line by line:

Alice alleged:

3. Due to significant material discoveries made through the Due Dilligence, Protasco secured a reduction to the purchase price and signed the Amended and Restated Sale and Purchase Agreement. Some Conditions Precedents were not fulfilled on the side of ASU because it is actually not attainable.

Hangover replied:

3. Read the nonsense, you will find clear doubts the entire process. What material findings? Show the facts with proof here. No integrity and shameful to say that “MD Chong don’t want to honor a proven legitimate deal”, no face to admit such guilty motive? The explanation to media report was, MD Chong on purpose setting new terms and cause a supposedly less than 6 months deal as per his shareholders agreement, to delay over 18 months, by setting beyond industry “standards terms by himself” causing the deal to falls into dead lock. Hallo Mickey mouse! Who on the Mickey mouse club knows about a foreign oil business? In what Disneyland name you learn to do business setting “terms to ask government follow your Mickey Mouse way”? There is only YOU the Mouse Club follows what government SOP and terms, not the other way round, rats! If there is a will to HONOR and COMPLETE the feasible and legitimate oil deal, it would have been done by hiring Indonesia oil experts, and completed long time ago. There is no intention except Mickey mouse show, that is how the traps were set in the layers of subsequent Mickey mouse terms. The vendor could have sue the company for defamation and cheating by wasted their time and opportunity cost. Lucky the Indonesia is in new government transition period, no officer is free to sue the Mickeys.

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 16:47 | Report Abuse

Goodkiller 4. During a board meeting of Protasco to discuss the issue of SPA’s which resulted in the formation of the investigation committee/IC, Larry Tey vigorously defended ASU.

Hangover replied:

4. Tey as the whistle blower would have told straight forward to the Mickey mouse board members, the lengthen excused by company (MD Chong) to keep delay the due diligence proven asset, and keep adding new terms to a 2 years long deal, would be seen as “intention to not honor a deal”, by common sense if company recklessly set terms beyond industry norms, obviously it would be harmful to company if vendor sue for opportunity cost – it is not uncommon the economic value lost due to Mickey mouse way of handling oil project “all by themselves inside mouse club”, what the rats know about oil?!

Here comes the “burst of ugly face of MD Chong slap wide open the fake mask reveal his true intention”! He just don’t want to honor his words, be it how good the asset is. Why? Because he is a control freak, he does not want to honor his promise to what he signed on shareholders agreement. At the cost of company and at the devil calls to lie to whole world, starting from within his Mickey Mouse club board members!

Alice alleged:

5. The finding of the IC, inter alia, are as follows:

a. Larry Tey first approached Dato Chong in November 2012 through his vehicle, Global Capital Limited to jointly develop an oil and gas project based in Indonesia;

b. Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi are the beneficial owners of: ASU, PT Inovisi, Acclaim Investment Limited, and PT Green Pine (the largest single owners of PT Inovisi).

Hangover replied:

5. This lie goes on, lucky Big Dog busted Mr. Alice ugly face behind the mask:

A. Bingo! IC what? Investigation Committee or Incapable Cocks?

Hello! Shameful enough to post on Big Dog blog, where Big Dog has MD Chong’s shareholders agreement dated 3rd November, 2012 showing all the ugly cries and tears he promised, and here you repeat the lies of “Tey approach chong in November bla bla bla”, then Chong forgot his lie that he told The Sun paper “he don’t know Tey until December 2012. (Read http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1227235) “!?

Lier lier lier. The more lie make up stories to cover his wrong doing and bad intentions, the worst off he lost his credibility. Mr Alice, Copy and paste lies also learn a bit, don’t be so lazy.

B. “Tey and Ooi are Goldman Sachs, CIMB, Genting owners and shareholders bla bla bla”. Oh really? Challenge Big Dog, show black and white SSM share registrar record to prove so. No hard evidence, run for cover or Big Dog will bite your balls off.

Alice alleged:

6. In view of the findings from the investigations, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by ASU, Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi since neither of them disclosed their personal interest in ASI to the board of directors of Protasco as they are required under the law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length.

Hangover replied:

6. Here’s the amusing part or jewel of Mickey Mouse Club house IC (incapable cocks) conclusion:
Based on ALL above lies, and an office boy Verbal Lie statement, with zero hard evidence, the Club chairman Latuk Kuching Kurap, Dato Kambing and Mr. hantu concluded “gardener said that Tan Sri rape the gardener is confirm, real, send Syariah court NOW, be stoned today this evening, cannot wait”.

Tan Sri cries “wait, let me explain….”, Latuk Kuching Kurap said “shhhh, Tan Sri, go explain to Your God, after you are stoned in Syariah court. You cannot talk (truth) in Mickey Mouse Club or else board meeting will record (truth), we all Mouseketeer will be shown made mistake, you die better than we die. Shhhh. F off!” Board meeting dismissed.

That’s how corporate governance are conducted and justice are served in Disneyland. Interesting?

Anyone who painfully coughed out RM97 million to later face all this, will be angry. Did Hangover paid that RM97 million?

Leave that as it may.

Due dilligence

Interestingly, the owner of the removed blog Right To Be Heard responded to our private e-mail. After two emails, we received the full agreements and the due diligence report.

So its Chong who screw up a legitimate deal which he signed up on around 1 Nov 2012 and put a blame to cover up his mistake. He has to spam to cover up further else truth show up he is going to jail!

Keep telling lies. Finally Chong will get his judgement day for his cover up. I believe investors will play long game to put justice in place. Haunt him every might until his last moments.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 16:54 | Report Abuse

shamelessly copy paste response from other website LOL

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 16:54 | Report Abuse

so scary.. write himself and shiok himself

Posted by wannabeinvestor > 2014-11-27 16:55 | Report Abuse

Any updates in the EGM?

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 16:55 | Report Abuse

Opps, is copy & paste himself and shiok himself

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 17:00 | Report Abuse

Based on Chong signed up on 3 Nov 2012 agreement trade off obligation to complete a legitimate oil asset with proven third party due diligence, it is clear that Chong put a blame to his victims is a cover up for his mistakes.

In view of the findings from agreements and documents, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by Chong Ket Pen, since he never disclosed his personal interest in 3 November 2012 agreement to the board of directors of Protasco as he is required unde the law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length but actually insider trading. Chong is on beach of Company Act, Bursa and SC, as well as his Executive Directorship in breach of fiduciary duty, to defraud, scam and cheat his victims, and setup a blame for the cover up for his failure in handling asset acquisition.

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 17:01 | Report Abuse

Shameful alice chong lol lol lol. Copy and paste same lies. Bursted.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 17:02 | Report Abuse

I just want to add several facts with regards to the on going case:

1. Protasco’s allegation against Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun in their lawsuit are that the two directors try to deceive Protasco and making secret profits by establishing an Indonesian companies (PT Anglo Slavic Utama/ASU and PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia/ASI) and inducing Protasco to buy ASU’s shares in ASI without disclosing that they are the owners of ASU and ASI.

2. Tey Por Yee’s lawsuit through Kingdom Seekers are vexatious at best because after Dato Chong’s last press conference, Tey finally admits that the RM 10million wired to Dato Chong’s bank account was actually part of a payment for a RM 20million loan received by Tey so he would be able to finalize the purchase of Protasco’s share. Larry also said to media, to the effect that he refused to return the rest RM 10million he owed to Dato Chong.

3. It is not that Dato Tan Sri takes side with Dato Chong, but he acted as what he did because Larry Tey/Tey Por Yee failed to produce any documents evidencing Dato Chong’s wrongdoing when he was given chance to during the board meetings.

4. The website http://www.angloslavic.com is registered under Abamon Technology Sdn Bhd who shares the same address as Nextnation Communication Berhad, the former name of Nexgram, where Tey and Ooi are substantial shareholders. Abamon is wholly owned by PT Inovisi through Code Wireless PTE LTD.

5. PT Green Pine who owned 60% of PT Inovisi’s shares is an alter ego of Tey Por Yee and Ooi Cock Aun. PT Inovisi is the subject matter of security.

6. Modern Profit LTD, a company owned by Tey Por Chen, the brother of Tey Por Yee is a subsidiary of PT Inovisi.

7. Ooi Cock Aun is a finance director of PT Inovisi.

8. The sole director of Acclaim is Lim Sue Fern, the wife of See Poh Yee who held substantial shares in Nexgram and together with Tey Por Yee graduated from the University of Manitoba, Canada, 1998. Acclaim is the third party security provider.

9. Tey Por Yee, Tey Por Chen, See Poh Yee are the founders of Nexgram and all of them currently offloading their Nexgram’s shares to the market. Nexgram’s directors resigned when Protasco filed it lawsuit against Tey and Ooi.

10. Protasco has lodged two lawsuits against Tey and Ooi, the first for contempt of court on grounds of tempering with witness, second for Ooi’s attempts to make secret profits from Protasco’s dealing with PT Goldchild Integritas Abadi, which should be add is another alter ego of Tey and Ooi.

11. Gideon Tan, TPY and OKA’s lawyers have discharged himself, meaning he don’t believe that his clients have any case whatsoever.

All of the above informations can be obtained by googling.

That being said, I found that the one who is without integrity is Larry Tey Por Yee and Adrian Ooi
Kock Aun.

Facts giving rise to the case:

1. On November 2012, Tey Por Yee brought a potential investment opportunity to Protasco, which involve the purchase of 76% shares of the total issued share capital of ASI. ASI owned and controlled 49% of PT Firman Andalan Sakti/FAS which owned 70% of PT Hase Bumou Aceh/Haseba.. Haseba had entered into a partnership agreement with PT Pertamina to develop and produce oil and gas in the Aceh Province, Indonesia (the “Project”).

2. Protasco entered into a sale and purchase agreement with ASU for the acquisition of 76% of the share capital of ASI amounting to USD 55million (“SPA”). Pursuant to the SPA, Protasco deposit amount of RM 50million to ASU’s account.

3. Due to significant material discoveries made through the Due Dilligence, Protasco secured a reduction to the purchase price and signed the Amended and Restated Sale and Purchase Agreement. Some Conditions Precedents were not fulfilled on the side of ASU because it is actually not attainable.

4. During a board meeting of Protasco to discuss the issue of SPA’s which resulted in the formation of the investigation committee/IC, Larry Tey vigorously defended ASU.

5. The finding of the IC, inter alia, are as follows:

a. Larry Tey first approached Dato Chong in November 2012 through his vehicle, Global Capital Limited to jointly develop an oil and gas project based in Indonesia;

b. Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi are the beneficial owners of: ASU, PT Inovisi, Acclaim Investment Limited, and PT Green Pine (the largest single owners of PT Inovisi).

6. In view of the findings from the investigations, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by ASU, Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi since neither of them disclosed their personal interest in ASI to the board of directors of Protasco as they are required under the law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 17:05 | Report Abuse

Why Protasco and not nexgram:

1. Nexgram's directors don't believe their founders.
2. Nexgram's lawyers don't believe Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun.
3. RM 90million worth of hole in the financial report.
4. TPY and OKA will get the boot from Protasco today.
5. TPY will get the boot from MP Corp as earliest as next year.
6. Nexgram don't have any assets.
7. Nexgram financial condition is in dire state.
8. All nexgram projects is hoax or dead.
9. TPY and OKA is soon to be charged with criminal offense in three jurisdictions: Malaysia, Indon, BVI.
10. Nexgram's share will fall into 0,01 soon enough.

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 17:10 | Report Abuse

Good...Agreed ...

Jerryc83

53 posts

Posted by Jerryc83 > 2014-11-27 17:27 | Report Abuse

Yes!!! TPY and OKA are OUT!!!!

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 17:28 | Report Abuse

LoL LoL LoL

Posted by wannabeinvestor > 2014-11-27 17:31 | Report Abuse

good..next is to claim back the $$$$...

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 17:39 | Report Abuse

TPY and OKA out....tomorrow their EGMs will also blew up in their face...early next year Wintoni and MP Corp will give TPY the iron boot...one year from now nexgram will collapsed.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 17:40 | Report Abuse

Today Protasco win TKO....tomorrow another TKO LOL....

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 17:42 | Report Abuse

Egm is just the beginning. Was told its to do a public proof that chairman is biased and objective made. That a nail on Chong coffin who do all these allegation for his cover up. Spammer like chong staff would be used against chong eventually. The end of monkey show.

To Repeat (use chong son method) on going case against chong:

Focus on "proven facts":

Based on Chong signed up on 3 Nov 2012 agreement trade off obligation to complete a legitimate oil asset with proven third party due diligence, it is clear that Chong put a blame to his victims is a cover up for his mistakes. Get substantiated documents here: http://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com

In view of the findings from agreements and documents, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by Chong Ket Pen, since he never disclosed his personal interest in 3 November 2012 agreement to the board of directors of Protasco as he is required unde the law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length but actually insider trading. Chong is on beach of Company Act, Bursa and SC, as well as his Executive Directorship in breach of fiduciary duty, to defraud, scam and cheat his victims, and setup a blame for the cover up for his failure in handling asset acquisition.

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 17:43 | Report Abuse

Good job ...!!

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 17:46 | Report Abuse

Any good news?

jackel63

12 posts

Posted by jackel63 > 2014-11-27 17:46 | Report Abuse

K.O......

sl3ge

140 posts

Posted by sl3ge > 2014-11-27 17:50 | Report Abuse

who ko who?

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 17:54 | Report Abuse

Can share with some articles? No matter who ko who.

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 17:59 | Report Abuse

Protasco hit TPY and OKA with a fatal uppercut to their dumb ass face till the kingdom come LOL

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 18:01 | Report Abuse

Alice..

AliceTey

802 posts

Posted by AliceTey > 2014-11-27 18:03 | Report Abuse

I just want to add several facts with regards to the on going case:

1. Protasco’s allegation against Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun in their lawsuit are that the two directors try to deceive Protasco and making secret profits by establishing an Indonesian companies (PT Anglo Slavic Utama/ASU and PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia/ASI) and inducing Protasco to buy ASU’s shares in ASI without disclosing that they are the owners of ASU and ASI.

2. Tey Por Yee’s lawsuit through Kingdom Seekers are vexatious at best because after Dato Chong’s last press conference, Tey finally admits that the RM 10million wired to Dato Chong’s bank account was actually part of a payment for a RM 20million loan received by Tey so he would be able to finalize the purchase of Protasco’s share. Larry also said to media, to the effect that he refused to return the rest RM 10million he owed to Dato Chong.

3. It is not that Dato Tan Sri takes side with Dato Chong, but he acted as what he did because Larry Tey/Tey Por Yee failed to produce any documents evidencing Dato Chong’s wrongdoing when he was given chance to during the board meetings.

4. The website http://www.angloslavic.com is registered under Abamon Technology Sdn Bhd who shares the same address as Nextnation Communication Berhad, the former name of Nexgram, where Tey and Ooi are substantial shareholders. Abamon is wholly owned by PT Inovisi through Code Wireless PTE LTD.

5. PT Green Pine who owned 60% of PT Inovisi’s shares is an alter ego of Tey Por Yee and Ooi Cock Aun. PT Inovisi is the subject matter of security.

6. Modern Profit LTD, a company owned by Tey Por Chen, the brother of Tey Por Yee is a subsidiary of PT Inovisi.

7. Ooi Cock Aun is a finance director of PT Inovisi.

8. The sole director of Acclaim is Lim Sue Fern, the wife of See Poh Yee who held substantial shares in Nexgram and together with Tey Por Yee graduated from the University of Manitoba, Canada, 1998. Acclaim is the third party security provider.

9. Tey Por Yee, Tey Por Chen, See Poh Yee are the founders of Nexgram and all of them currently offloading their Nexgram’s shares to the market. Nexgram’s directors resigned when Protasco filed it lawsuit against Tey and Ooi.

10. Protasco has lodged two lawsuits against Tey and Ooi, the first for contempt of court on grounds of tempering with witness, second for Ooi’s attempts to make secret profits from Protasco’s dealing with PT Goldchild Integritas Abadi, which should be add is another alter ego ofTey and Ooi.

11. Gideon Tan, lawyers for Tey and Ooi has discharged himself, meaning that he don't believe in his clients' case.

All of the above informations can be obtained by googling.

That being said, I found that the one who is without integrity is Larry Tey Por Yee and Adrian Ooi Kock Aun.

Facts giving rise to the case:

1. On November 2012, Tey Por Yee brought a potential investment opportunity to Protasco, which involve the purchase of 76% shares of the total issued share capital of ASI. ASI owned and controlled 49% of PT Firman Andalan Sakti/FAS which owned 70% of PT Hase Bumou Aceh/Haseba.. Haseba had entered into a partnership agreement with PT Pertamina to develop and produce oil and gas in the Aceh Province, Indonesia (the “Project”).

2. Protasco entered into a sale and purchase agreement with ASU for the acquisition of 76% of the share capital of ASI amounting to USD 55million (“SPA”). Pursuant to the SPA, Protasco deposit amount of RM 50million to ASU’s account.

3. Due to significant material discoveries made through the Due Dilligence, Protasco secured a reduction to the purchase price and signed the Amended and Restated Sale and Purchase Agreement. Some Conditions Precedents were not fulfilled on the side of ASU because it is actually not attainable.

4. During a board meeting of Protasco to discuss the issue of SPA’s which resulted in the formation of the investigation committee/IC, Larry Tey vigorously defended ASU.

5. The finding of the IC, inter alia, are as follows:
a. Larry Tey first approached Dato Chong in November 2012 through his vehicle, Global Capital Limited to jointly develop an oil and gas project based in Indonesia;
b. Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi are the beneficial owners of: ASU, PT Inovisi, Acclaim Investment Limited, and PT Green Pine (the largest single owners of PT Inovisi).

6. In view of the findings from the investigations, it became evident that Protasco had been a victim of deception, and fraud by ASU, Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi since neither of them disclosed their personal interest in ASI to the board of directors of Protasco as they are required unde rthe law. In fact, Protasco was wrongly led to believe that the business opportunity to invest in ASI with ASU is undertaken at arms length.

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 18:04 | Report Abuse

Not this Alice..

Posted by Goodkiller > 2014-11-27 18:10 | Report Abuse

Why Nexgram and not Protasco:

1. Protasco has biased chairman and directors to cover up MD Chong misconduct, a scam board
2. Chong dirty lawyer false suing TPY and OKA lawyer baseless just to make him step back; while TPY and OKA lawyer did not use unethical dirty method to sue Chong lawyer earlier for misleading client staff to make fake statement
3. Billions of Ringgit worth of hole in the financial report in Protasco stolen from government in construction, huge cover up
4. TPY and OKA get the point taken and objective achieved proving of chairman biased and not independent in breach of his duty facing shareholder request or egm postponement.
5. Chong will get arrested next week and in jail as earliest as next year.
6. Protasco has stolen government assets.
7. Protasco stolen government money in big cover up
8. Chong fails many lost making projects, he cover up
9. Chong is soon to be charged with criminal offense in three authority: Polis, Bursa and SC.
10. Protasco will be suspended and full investigation on stolen government money

bing

3,794 posts

Posted by bing > 2014-11-27 18:12 | Report Abuse

Not this too..

Post a Comment
Market Buzz