Posted by hoowk77 > 2020-06-16 12:25 | Report Abuse

buy ho hup then, huge potential

Posted by O'Brian > 2020-06-16 13:46 | Report Abuse

Ageson shares now going on sale......sapuuuuu

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-16 13:57 | Report Abuse

Cantek

Posted by amireza > 2020-06-16 14:41 | Report Abuse

Why so frozen...

Posted by ranacinggey > 2020-06-16 15:43 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by TSFH > 2020-06-16 15:46 | Report Abuse

sebelum korek pasir, kita mkn pasir dulu...... hahaha

Posted by Cornettolove > 2020-06-16 15:48 | Report Abuse

Stay tuned..

Posted by amireza > 2020-06-16 16:32 | Report Abuse

What happen to this counter? Very high profit but yet so quite..not moving at all

Posted by O'Brian > 2020-06-16 16:58 | Report Abuse

Offer time!!! Discount discount discount. Sapuuuu

Posted by Josephine Tan Su May > 2020-06-16 17:06 | Report Abuse

Tomorrow Q at 0.135, see whether can get or not.

Posted by happylucy > 2020-06-16 17:07 | Report Abuse

Wow Josephine, OK I follow your buy call tomorrow!

Posted by happylucy > 2020-06-16 17:08 | Report Abuse

Tomorrow Happy hunting guys! Cheers

Posted by jk20598 > 2020-06-16 17:30 | Report Abuse

Where is the money?Talk mou/contravt song song,6 mths later all cancelled!

Posted by teareader818 > 2020-06-16 17:56 | Report Abuse

ECRL, Ageson got chance?

Posted by O'Brian > 2020-06-16 19:34 | Report Abuse

Fast fast copy and paste over here, 6months later see all mou cancel or many here will kick your a.s.s later!

jk20598 Where is the money?Talk mou/contravt song song,6 mths later all cancelled!
16/06/2020 5:30 PM

Posted by syarkler > 2020-06-16 20:34 | Report Abuse

zzz....take a nap..please wake me up later...

Posted by goreng_kaki > 2020-06-17 09:50 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by TSFH > 2020-06-17 10:39 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Jason85 > 2020-06-17 11:09 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Sneakpeek > 2020-06-17 11:32 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by hoowk77 > 2020-06-17 11:44 | Report Abuse

right time to collect...

Posted by invisibleghost > 2020-06-17 11:57 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Jayson4896 > 2020-06-17 12:01 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Hein > 2020-06-17 12:06 | Report Abuse

Slowly come to 0.12

Posted by ranacinggey > 2020-06-17 12:23 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:03 | Report Abuse

Anwar Ibrahim: The Malaysian leader that never was

He once seemed set to claim the job of Malaysian prime minister, but Anwar Ibrahim's chances now look slim after a sudden twist of events saw him removed from the country's ruling coalition.

Mr Anwar has had a long and hard-fought political career. He was previously jailed on widely criticised charges of sodomy and corruption after a bitter feud with the government.

But in 2018, he received a full pardon, initiated by the then prime minister under whom he was first sent to prison - Mahathir Mohamad.

In an unexpected move, the duo joined forces to oust the previous ruling government, and came into power under a new alliance - Pakatan Harapan.

Mr Mahathir promised to hand over to power to Mr Anwar, but failed to give a specific date.

In February this year, the Pakatan Harapan coalition fell apart, in part due to internal rivalries. Mr Mahathir resigned and was replaced by Muhyiddin Yassin - the country's former interior minister.

Mr Muhyiddin's rise will only mean Mr Anwar's chances of becoming prime minister are growing slimmer by the day.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:03 | Report Abuse

Quick ascent
Mr Anwar first made his name as a student leader of an Islamic youth organisation, founding Malaysia's Islamic youth movement, ABIM.

He surprised many by joining Malaysia's dominant party, United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), in 1982 but it proved to be a canny political move - he enjoyed a quick ascent up the political ladder and held multiple ministerial posts.

In 1993 he became Mr Mahathir's deputy and was widely expected to succeed him, but tensions grew between the two men, particularly over issues like corruption and the economy.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

In September 1998, Mr Anwar was sacked and led public protests against Mr Mahathir. He was arrested and eventually charged with sodomy and corruption.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

The trial which followed led to a six-year jail term for corruption and sparked further huge street protests.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

In 2000 he was found guilty of sodomy with his wife's driver and jailed for a further nine years, to be served concurrently with his other sentence.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

While hom.ose.xual acts are illegal in Malaysia, very few people are ever prosecuted. Mr Anwar has always maintained the charges were part of a political smear campaign to stop him being a political threat to Mr Mahathir.

In late 2004 Malaysia's Supreme Court overturned the sodomy conviction, freeing him from jail.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

'Shared policy'
Upon his release, he emerged as the de facto head of a newly invigorated opposition that registered a strong showing in the 2008 elections.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:05 | Report Abuse

The opposition gained more than a third of parliamentary seats and control of five states, partly due to public discontent over corruption and discrimination issues.

But claims of sodomy were again made against Mr Anwar in 2008, in what he said was another attempt by the government to sideline him.

A High Court eventually cleared Mr Anwar of the charges in January 2012, citing a lack of evidence.

In the 2013 general election, Mr Anwar led the opposition into what was seen as the most hotly contested election to date.

The three-party opposition comprised Mr Anwar's multi-racial party, a secular Chinese-majority party and a conservative party of Muslim Malays.

They didn't win, but the ballot delivered the worst ever showing for the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition.

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:06 | Report Abuse

Back to jail
But his political comeback was short-lived. Mr Anwar's 2004 acquittal was itself overturned a year later - as he was preparing to fight a state election he seemed likely to win - and he was sent back to jail.

In a shock turn of events earlier this year, his former nemesis Mr Mahathir announced he was going to run for top office again. He said he was sick of the corruption allegations plaguing the incumbent, his former protégé Najib Razak.

And rather bizarrely, that paved the way for Mr Anwar's return to public life.

He has remained popular with opposition supporters and Mr Mahathir won the 2018 election - as head of the Pakatan Harapan - partly on his pledge to free him from prison.

Mr Mahathir had also indicated he would hand power to Mr Anwar within two years.

On his first day in office, Mr Mahathir said the king, who has the power to pardon Mr Anwar, had agreed to do so "immediately" and on 16 May the politician received his pardon.

"Now there is a new dawn for Malaysia. I must thank the people of Malaysia," Mr Anwar told a news conference on his release.

"The entire spectrum of Malaysians, regardless of race or religion, have stood by the principles of democracy and freedom. They demand change."

Posted by LouisVuitton LV > 2020-06-17 13:06 | Report Abuse

Mr Anwar, together with Mr Mahathir and several other parties, formed the Pakatan Harapan coalition, which ruled the country for two years before it collapsed.

But Mr Mahathir threw the country's politics into turmoil in late February 2020 when he resigned, breaking his alliance with Mr Anwar.

After his resignation, he and Mr Anwar later announced that they had, in fact, reunited again and commanded majority support.

But the king, Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah, who had ultimate say on who should form a government, chose Mr Muhyiddin.

A former interior minister, Mr Muhyiddin once controversially described himself as "Malay first" - and Malaysian second.

Posted by YoungTycoonWILL > 2020-06-17 13:07 | Report Abuse

Nobody politician is perfect and all of them have their flaws. PKR president Anwar Ibrahim had gone through the toughest times but yet stands strong on his principles.

He could have easily walked away a rich man by compromising, but he stood through the times alone in a cell separated from his family. None of us could understand this as we have not spent any time behind bars.

Posted by UNITED KINGDOM > 2020-06-17 13:07 | Report Abuse

Yeah guys, So it is time we should give him the honour. As Anwar said, he may not be perfect, but look at the leaders the nation is under.

Look at some of those being freed from cases involving hundreds of millions of ringgit and even billions. These are the leaders that are now in charge of the Treasury.

The nation and its people are in danger. The pillars holding the nation are collapsing around them. All government agencies are now placed in compromising positions. Principles and integrity are thrown out of the window.

The new normal is money, position and power. And also, to attain it at any cost. Even to the extent if it destroys the nation.

That is why we need leaders with principles. We can only dream of a perfect leader. But a leader like Anwar who stood by his principles must be given that opportunity to prove his words and promises.

The time is now - or it might be too late to save this nation.

Posted by Ivanka Trump USA > 2020-06-17 13:08 | Report Abuse

we have been hearing this song since the Reformasi days. Those days are long dead and gone. The question is whether you will be able to make it. Not to forget the silent majority who are not for you.

Can you turn things around? You carry a good amount of garbage from the past too. Every day in Malaysia, we wash dirty linen in public. The same old soiled and stinky garbage that gets recycled by the same recycled politicians.

Posted by Sandcactus > 2020-06-17 13:14 | Report Abuse

Why removed post related to ages?

Posted by OCTAGON > 2020-06-17 13:24 | Report Abuse

haha

Posted by AGESON IS THE BEST > 2020-06-17 13:29 | Report Abuse

Grounds for granting citizenship

refer to the granting of Malaysian citizenship to footballer Liridon Krasniqi of Kosovo.

There have been mixed reactions to the move, from outright anger to celebration.

A large majority of concerned citizens seem to think that he was granted citizenship simply because he is a footballer. A group campaigning for equal citizenship has also brought it into question.

The question in my mind is — was it easier for him to procure citizenship because Krazniqi is favoured, known and somewhat revered? This as opposed to the thousands who were born here but whose cases never see the light of day.

The next question then becomes — why does it have to be one or the other?

The issue then is that there is a tendency to amalgamate separate conversations into one discourse.

This is to the ultimate detriment of the causes that are supposedly being championed or advocated. When separate issues are coalesced, it does not do justice to any of those issues.

According to a local Sarawakian group, stateless children continue to suffer the plight of being stateless with years of legal battles and very few cases are granted citizenship.

These are valid concerns and speak volumes on the application of the Federal Constitution, namely, Article 15A (Special power to register children — which provides special powers to federal administrators to register a person under the age of 21 as a citizen) and Article 19 (Citizenship by naturalisation — that upon application made by any person of or over the age of 21 years who is not a citizen, grant a certificate of naturalisation to that person).

However, as is clear from the provisions themselves, the citizenship granted are on two very different grounds.

Article 15A applies to children below the age of 21 whereas Article 19 applies to any persons above the age of 21. Therefore, they are two distinct and separate occasions in which citizenship is granted.

This brings me back to the issue of discourse. Here, there are two separate occasions of granting citizenship which have been muddled together — when they really should not have been — leading to a lack of coverage given to both concerns.

We are then not giving any of these concerns enough focus to be properly ventilated.

Granting citizenship on the basis of achievement, of contributions, is not an entirely new situation. Many countries grant citizenship to extraordinary contributors of arts, sports, sciences and more.

Article 19 (2) of the Federal Constitution accounts for this: “the federal government may, in such special circumstances as it thinks fit, upon application made by any person of or over the age of 21 years who is not a citizen, grant a certificate of naturalisation to that person if satisfied…”.

There is a level of discretion on the federal government here that exists and that should be noted.

Krasniqi has domiciled in Malaysia for the period required by Fifa (having lived in Malaysia for five years, thereby fulfilling Article 17 of the Fifa Eligibility Rules) and is playing football for Harimau Malaya. It is not a completely unworthy granting of citizenship.

That would be similar to saying that Mo Farah does not deserve the dual citizenship that he has (Somalia and the United Kingdom) and that he should not have been knighted. Why is there a need to deprive one person in an attempt to advocate for other causes?

Among netizens, for instance, there are many assumptions being made as to how easy it was for him to acquire citizenship.

All this is merely speculation which appears to stem out of misconceived virtue signalling.

If there was a real concern over the rights of stateless children (in Sarawak or the rest of Malaysia), there needs to be a proper collective effort to bring the issue to the forefront.

On this note, Lawyer Kamek for Change (LK4C) raised important points on a new special committee being formed and on standard operating procedures (SOPs).

There is no denying that citizenship in Malaysia is murky waters and warrants criticism (when necessary) but that does not mean we have to criticise Krasniqi and it does not mean that we deprive him of a valid celebration. Is he not, at the end of the day, playing ‘demi Malaysia’?

Posted by DatoSeriJohnnyWalker > 2020-06-17 13:31 | Report Abuse

Thousands that are born here that are still stateless through no fault of their own, yet preference is given to outsiders who play good football and have a decent grasp of Bahasa Malaysia.

In this case, it’s footballer Liridon Krasniqi of Kosovo who is now a Malaysian citizen.

Now, many of the stateless probably play good football too and definitely have a great grasp of the language as they were born here.

It seems like there is one particularly low standard for foreign shining stars, and another harsher standard for those born here. Can you not see the travesty in this?

Posted by GoodieTwoShoe > 2020-06-17 13:32 | Report Abuse

Does Krasniqi still hold his Kosovan citizenship or did he surrender it as Malaysia’s constitution does not allow dual citizenship?

I will be interested to know if that requirement applies to him.

I am not sure why the citizenship was granted to him when a work permit would have been sufficient. I think it’s time we look into this.

Rule of law applies to everyone irrespective of their popularity.

Posted by Josephine Tan Su May > 2020-06-17 13:32 | Report Abuse

The Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) has not even exhausted all avenues to ensure that all Malaysian players are given a chance to play at the national level, and now they’re going to let foreigners represent our country by making them Malaysian citizens.

The selection committee of FAM has got their priority wrong. No way should the national team be membered by anyone without actual Malaysian parents. What a shame. Not that this player will immediately catapult us to the World Cup.

Citizenship is irreversible and should be awarded with great care.

Posted by UZUMAKI YAKUZA > 2020-06-17 13:33 | Report Abuse

It’s normal for any country to fast track citizenship of someone they think will do the country proud or simply said, people they consider "superstars" - CEOs of big corporations, Nobel winners, Olympic gold medallists, etc.

The main point of contention in this article is twofold:

1. Why do "superstars" always come from a certain group?

2. Why does normal naturalisation take such a long time?

Item 1 is here to stay and probably will get worse after GE15. Only item 2 can be solved and our dear MPs should work on it.

Posted by Kingsley > 2020-06-17 13:34 | Report Abuse

It’s normal for any country to fast track citizenship of someone they think will do the country proud or simply said, people they consider "superstars" - CEOs of big corporations, Nobel winners, Olympic gold medallists, etc.

The main point of contention in this article is twofold:

1. Why do "superstars" always come from a certain group?

2. Why does normal naturalisation take such a long time?

Item 1 is here to stay and probably will get worse after GE15. Only item 2 can be solved and our dear MPs should work on it.

Posted by USHER > 2020-06-17 13:35 | Report Abuse

"In spite of a regime change after the 14th General Election, dark hidden hands seem to prevail and monopolise the awarding of citizenship to certain people, bending rules and also contradicting the spirit of laws in the country that unfortunately everyone else is subject to," wrote Kasturi.

So, who exactly dictates these approvals? What is the protocol? What are the reasons for the delays? Who are the hidden hands?

If changing the government can't or does not expose all these, then seriously what will?

It's frustrating that we as Malaysians have to tolerate these insidious dark hidden hands. By all means, expose them in broad daylight.

Posted by Ginger Spice > 2020-06-17 13:35 | Report Abuse

Another towering monument of injustice. A self-serving shameless group of powerful individuals, some in shadows, again showing Malaysians and the world that injustice and selfish short-term policy initiatives are their way of life.

This is unacceptable and an abomination to democratic principles practised by one truly civilised.

Posted by UraniumKing68 > 2020-06-17 13:37 | Report Abuse

What's worse is that children of parents who are illiterate, and do not know the procedures to register their children (with some even given the run around by authorities) and those born in the estates, are unable to obtain citizenship.

Even after years of appealing to the relevant authorities, they are unsuccessful. So, where's the equality or compassion to our own Malaysians?

Posted by HELLO, I AM GOD! > 2020-06-17 13:37 | Report Abuse

The moral of this story is stateless kids born to Malaysian parent(s) must be a talented footballer. haha