Gender-based violence stems from deeply ingrained beliefs about power and control. By addressing these issues in childhood and teaching non-violent conflict resolution, we can reduce the likelihood of future violence.

Knowledge about sex and gender empowers children to recognize and challenge discriminatory practices when they encounter them. An informed child is better equipped to speak out against unfair treatment, whether directed at themselves or others.

When children understand the concept of fairness and that discrimination is harmful, they are more likely to empathize with others and stand against injustice. This empathy can reduce the likelihood of Peter Pan syndrome and discriminatory behaviors as they grow older.

Educating children about the dangers of gender stereotypes (e.g., "boys are stronger," "girls are more emotional") can prevent these ideas from becoming ingrained. Stereotypes often form the basis of discrimination, so challenging them early on is key to creating a more equitable society.

Introducing concepts of gender beyond the binary (male and female) helps children appreciate and respect gender diversity. This understanding fosters inclusivity and prevents the marginalization of those who do not conform to traditional gender norms.

Teaching children that although boys and girls may have biological differences, these do not determine a person’s value or abilities is crucial. Emphasizing equality helps prevent the development of prejudices and stereotypes that often lead to discrimination.

By learning about sex chromosomes (X and Y) and the biological differences between males and females, children can develop a basic understanding of how gender is determined. This biological perspective helps to normalize these differences, making them less of a source of stigma or misunderstanding.

Teaching young school children about the concepts related to sex chromosomes, gender identity, and the importance of equality can play a critical role in preventing sex discrimination and related crimes.

The first organism to evolve from autosomes to X and Y chromosomes was likely a small, primitive chordate or early vertebrate with a simple body plan, minimal sexual dimorphism, and basic reproductive organs. It lived in an aquatic or semi-aquatic environment and exhibited the early stages of chromosomal differentiation that would eventually lead to the development of distinct sex chromosomes.

Chapter Six and so on:
The first organism to evolve from autosomes to X and Y chromosomes was likely a small, primitive chordate or early vertebrate with a simple body plan, minimal sexual dimorphism, and basic reproductive organs. It lived in an aquatic or semi-aquatic environment and exhibited the early stages of chromosomal differentiation that would eventually lead to the development of distinct sex chromosomes.

Chapter Five:
Continued Degeneration of the Y Chromosome:
Over millions of years, the Y chromosome would continue to lose non-essential genes, leading to its current form, which is much smaller than the X chromosome and carries fewer genes.
Development of Dosage Compensation: As the X and Y chromosomes diverged, mechanisms such as X-inactivation evolved to ensure that organisms with two X chromosomes (females) did not produce twice the amount of X-linked gene products as those with one X chromosome (males).

Chapter Four:
Early Chromosomal Differentiation:

The organism likely exhibited the first signs of chromosomal differentiation, with one chromosome beginning to carry a sex-determining gene and starting to diverge in structure and function from its counterpart.
Partial Loss of Function: The proto-Y chromosome might have started losing non-essential genes that were still present on the proto-X, leading to a slight reduction in genetic content on the Y chromosome.
Reproductive Isolation and Speciation:

The divergence of sex chromosomes could have led to reproductive isolation, where individuals with different chromosomal arrangements were less likely to interbreed. This isolation could drive speciation, where new species form as a result of these genetic differences.

Chapter Three: Suppression of Recombination:
Once a sex-determining gene became established, recombination (the exchange of genetic material between chromosomes) near this gene was suppressed to preserve the integrity of sex determination.
Chromosomal Divergence: Over time, the chromosome carrying the sex-determining gene (proto-Y) began to diverge from its homolog (proto-X). The proto-Y would lose genes and shrink, while the proto-X retained more of its original autosomal genes.

Chapter Two:
Mutation Leading to Sex Differentiation:
At some point, a mutation occurred on one of the homologous autosomes that provided a reproductive advantage by determining sex. This could have been a gene that promoted male characteristics (e.g., a primitive SRY gene).
Sexual Dimorphism: This mutation would have led to sexual dimorphism, where individuals begin to develop distinct male and female characteristics, which could be advantageous for reproduction and survival.

Here is the knowledge missing in their texts: On the origin of women

Chapter One:
Autosomal Ancestors:
The ancestors of organisms with X and Y chromosomes likely had a set of autosomes that were homologous, meaning they paired up during meiosis and were similar in size and genetic content.
Homomorphic Chromosomes: Initially, the chromosomes that would later evolve into X and Y were similar in structure and function, making them homomorphic (identical in shape and size).

Early organisms might have used environmental factors (like temperature) or simple genetic mechanisms to determine sex, rather than relying on distinct sex chromosomes.

Taliban children fail to learn the up-to-date knowledge on "What is a woman?" and "How do they come about in evolution?"

The Taliban is notorious for imposing draconian restrictions on women. During their rule in the late 1990s and their resurgence in recent years, women have been banned from attending school, working outside the home, or even leaving their homes without a male guardian.
Dress Code: Women are required to wear the burqa, a full-body covering with a mesh screen over the eyes. This dress code is strictly enforced, and violations can result in severe punishment, including public beatings.

U want klse index to drop to 900 point kah?

Posted by speakup > 21 minutes ago | Report Abuse

american passport should be ban everywhere including malaysia!

1. Defining the Crime:
Theft and Corruption:
In faith jurisprudence, theft (sarqa) traditionally involves the unlawful taking of someone else's property. Hudud punishment, such as hand amputation, is prescribed as a severe deterrent.
Corruption, particularly when it involves the misuse of public office or resources for personal gain, is indeed a form of theft. Corruption takers are, in essence, stealing from the public, often harming the community more severely than petty theft.

2. Severity of Corruption:
Impact on Society:
Economic Harm: Corruption deprives the society of resources meant for public welfare, leading to poverty, inequality, and underdevelopment. In many cases, the amount involved in corruption far exceeds that of typical theft.

Moral Degradation: Corruption undermines trust in public institutions, leading to a breakdown in social and moral order. It breeds injustice, as the corrupt enrich themselves at the expense of the needy.
Widespread Consequences: While theft may affect one or a few individuals, corruption can negatively impact entire communities, or even a nation, by diverting funds from critical services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

3. Parallels with Theft in fatih Law:
Breach of Trust (Amanah):
Both theft and corruption involve a betrayal of trust. In theft, the thief betrays the trust of the individual or society by unlawfully taking what does not belong to them. Similarly, a corrupt official or individual betrays the public trust by misappropriating resources or accepting bribes.

Fatih Principle: The holy book condemns the betrayal of trust, which is at the heart of both theft and corruption. Applying hudud punishment for corruption would be seen as upholding the principle of amanah (trust) and justice.

4. Deterrence and Justice:
Deterrence:

The hudud punishment for theft is intended to serve as a powerful deterrent. Given the often devastating effects of corruption on society, applying similar punishments could serve as a strong deterrent against this crime.

Public Accountability: Severe punishments for corruption could reinforce the notion that those in positions of power are accountable to the public and must uphold the highest ethical standards.

Justice:
Equality Before the Law: In faith, all individuals are equal before the law, regardless of status. If a poor thief can have their hand amputated, why should a wealthy or powerful individual who commits an even greater theft (through corruption) be treated differently?
Restoring Balance: Hudud punishments are designed to restore balance in society. Corruption disrupts this balance on a large scale, and severe punishment could be a way to restore justice and fairness.

5. Historical and Legal Precedents:
Application of Hudud:
While traditional hudud punishments have primarily been applied to theft and adultery, Faith jurisprudence allows for adaptability in applying the law to ensure justice and the welfare of the community (maslahah).
Examples in History: There are instances where rulers took severe actions against corrupt officials, including public humiliation and harsh punishments, to maintain justice and order.

6. Ethical Considerations:
Moral Responsibility:
Those entrusted with public office or resources have a greater moral responsibility. When they engage in corruption, they are betraying not just individuals but entire communities, making their crime particularly egregious.

Faith teachings emphasize justice, honesty, and the protection of public interests. Applying hudud punishments for corruption aligns with these ethical principles by upholding justice and protecting society from harm.

Hand amputation hudud punishment, traditionally associated with theft, should be applied to corruption takers involves delving into the principles of faith law, ethics, and societal needs.

Weakening of Social Cohesion: As individuals become increasingly disillusioned with their work and personal lives, social cohesion begins to erode. The sense of community and shared purpose diminishes, leading to a fragmented society where trust in institutions and each other is weakened.

Loss of Innovation and Dynamism: Centralized systems that prioritize control over creativity stifle innovation. When workers are forced to adhere strictly to bureaucratic procedures, there is little room for experimentation and new ideas, leading to stagnation in both the public and private sectors

Societal Implications: A declining birth rate has broader societal implications, including an aging population and a shrinking workforce, which can further strain social services and economic systems. As fewer young people enter the workforce, the burden on the remaining workers increases, perpetuating the cycle of stress and dissatisfaction.

Economic Insecurity and Decision-Making: The stress and instability caused by a centralized, bureaucratic work environment can also discourage people from starting families. Economic insecurity, coupled with the fear of being unable to provide a stable environment for children, leads many couples to delay or forgo having children altogether​

Strain on Relationships and Family Life: The stress and frustration from work often affect personal relationships. Workers may become emotionally unavailable or physically absent, leading to strained marriages and higher divorce rates. The inability to spend quality time with family due to work pressures exacerbates these issues, weakening family bonds.

Stress and Poor Work-Life Balance: The stress induced by excessive bureaucracy and centralized control often spills over into personal lives. Long hours, constant scrutiny, and the pressure to comply with ever-changing regulations can lead to poor work-life balance, contributing to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression​ .

Diminished Work Quality and Morale: The constant need to navigate through bureaucratic red tape can lead to burnout and a decline in morale. Workers spend more time dealing with administrative hurdles than focusing on their core tasks, leading to lower quality work and a disengaged workforce.

Proliferation of Red Tape: As centralization increases, so does the proliferation of rules and regulations, often enforced by mid-level bureaucrats who may lack the authority to make significant decisions but wield enough power to obstruct progress. These "little Napoleons" create unnecessary obstacles that slow down work processes, increase frustration among workers, and lead to a culture of compliance rather than innovation​.

The over-centralization of authority often results in inefficient processes where decisions take longer to implement, and local nuances are ignored. This can lead to a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to address specific needs, resulting in poorer outcomes. For example, in a highly centralized healthcare system, decisions made by distant bureaucrats may not reflect the realities on the ground, leading to subpar healthcare delivery​

Centralization and Micromanagement: As organizations and governments centralize control, decision-making power is often removed from local entities and individuals. This can lead to a culture of micromanagement, where workers feel their autonomy is stripped away, diminishing their motivation and engagement. When employees lack control over their work, job satisfaction plummets, leading to poorer performance and lower productivity

The increasing centralization of control and the proliferation of bureaucratic red tape can lead to a cascading series of negative effects on society, ultimately degrading the quality of life for workers, straining personal relationships, and contributing to declining birth rates.

Spiraling Down and Societal Degradation Due to Centralization, Bureaucracy, and Red Tape

The current system may not sufficiently promote a mindset of lifelong learning. As knowledge and technology evolve, students need to be prepared for continuous self-improvement and skill development beyond their formal education. The existing blueprint might not adequately foster this mindset.

Curricular Rigidity: There is serious rigidity in the curriculum that does not easily accommodate the integration of new subjects or teaching methods. This rigidity can hinder the incorporation of modern skills and knowledge areas that are increasingly important in today’s world.

The revolutionary change in the role of schools should involve a fundamental shift from delivering fixed knowledge to equipping students with essential skills for the information age. By focusing on critical thinking, information literacy, and practical application, schools can better prepare students for both academic success and real-world challenges, ensuring they are equipped to thrive in a dynamic and complex world.

Personalizing Learning: Traditional education often follows a one-size-fits-all approach. In contrast, the information age allows for more personalized learning experiences. Schools should leverage technology and data to tailor education to individual students' needs, interests, and learning styles. This personalization can make learning more relevant and engaging for each student.

Preparing for a Dynamic Workforce: The modern job market demands more than just knowledge—it requires the ability to adapt and apply that knowledge in various contexts. Schools should prepare students for this reality by focusing on skills like collaboration, creativity, and digital literacy. By fostering these skills, schools can help students become more versatile and capable in a rapidly changing work environment.

Shifting focus from rote memorization to Fostering Critical Thinking: As information becomes more accessible, the ability to think critically about it becomes increasingly important. Schools should prioritize teaching students how to question assumptions, evaluate arguments, and understand different perspectives. This not only helps students make informed decisions but also prepares them to engage thoughtfully in a diverse and complex world.

Adapting to Bad, Fake and Delusional Information Overload: The internet provides access to more information than ever before, but it also requires new skills to manage and make sense of it all. Schools need to teach students how to navigate this overload by focusing on how to search for relevant information, evaluate its credibility, and synthesize it into meaningful insights. This shift prepares students for a world where being able to manage and make use of vast amounts of data is crucial.

From 3M to ALP: From Knowledge Delivery to Skill Development: Traditionally, schools have been primarily focused on delivering a fixed body of knowledge. However, in the information age, the sheer volume and rapid evolution of knowledge make this model outdated. Schools should shift towards developing critical skills such as information literacy, problem-solving, and adaptability. By emphasizing these skills, schools can prepare students to not only absorb information but also to critically analyze and use it effectively.

The Changing Role Of Schools: Tthe role of education should evolve to reflect the new realities of the information age. By focusing on critical thinking and information literacy, we can equip students with the skills they need to navigate the vast and complex world of information, ensuring they are well-prepared for both academic and real-world challenges.

Critical Thinking Over Memorization: In the past, education often emphasized rote memorization of facts. However, in a world where information is constantly changing and expanding, memorization alone is insufficient. Critical thinking skills enable students to analyze, interpret, and question information, which is essential for navigating today’s complex and often contradictory information landscape. By prioritizing critical thinking, education can prepare students to handle ambiguity and make informed decisions.

The job market has evolved, with new industries and roles emerging that didn’t exist a few decades ago. Traditional curricula often emphasize subjects and skills that are less relevant in today’s economy. Modern education needs to be more flexible and responsive to these changes, incorporating skills like entrepreneurship, digital fluency, and interdisciplinary knowledge.

The internet has revolutionized how we access and consume information. In the past, education was about transferring a fixed set of knowledge. Today, with information readily available online, the role of education should shift from merely delivering facts to teaching students how to find, evaluate, and apply information effectively. This requires a focus on critical thinking and information literacy rather than rote memorization.

The rapid pace of technological innovation has transformed nearly every aspect of our lives. Traditional education systems often lag behind in integrating modern technology into the curriculum. In the new millennium, educational tools and methods must embrace digital literacy, coding, and the use of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and virtual reality to prepare students for the future workforce.

while traditional education methods have served well in the past, the needs and expectations of the new millennium require a significant overhaul. Embracing technological advancements, addressing diverse learning styles, and focusing on relevant skills can create a more effective and future-ready education system.

While the initial use of substances may be driven by the desire to feel better or to overcome feelings of inadequacy or low mood, the long-term consequences often include addiction, physical dependence, and a further deterioration of mental health. What starts as an attempt to correct an imbalance or fulfill an evolutionary drive for reward and satisfaction ends up creating a much more serious problem.

Dopamine: Many addictive substances directly stimulate dopamine release, creating a powerful sense of reward. Over time, the brain's natural dopamine production is diminished, leading to dependence on the substance for pleasure and motivation.
Serotonin: Drugs like MDMA (ecstasy) cause massive releases of serotonin, leading to intense feelings of well-being and connection. However, this can deplete serotonin levels and lead to a crash, which may drive repeated use.
Endorphins: Opiates and alcohol mimic the effects of natural endorphins, leading to pain relief and euphoria. Chronic use can lead to reduced natural endorphin production, increasing reliance on the substance.

The problem with using substances to self-medicate is that while they provide temporary relief, they also alter the brain's chemistry over time. As the brain becomes accustomed to the heightened levels of neurotransmitters, it begins to reduce its own production of these chemicals, leading to tolerance. This means that more of the substance is needed to achieve the same effect, creating a vicious cycle that can lead to addiction.

Alcohol, drugs, and other addictive substances provide a quick and potent way to stimulate the brain's reward system. These substances artificially elevate levels of neurotransmitters like dopamine, serotonin, and endorphins, which temporarily alleviate feelings of depression or dissatisfaction. For individuals whose mood set points are low, these substances might seem like an effective way to self-treat their mood disorders.

Humans are biologically wired to seek out activities that stimulate the brain's reward system. In the past, this drive was met through exploration, social bonding, physical activity, and other behaviors that enhanced survival and well-being. However, in modern society, many people face environments that do not naturally provide these kinds of stimulating experiences. This mismatch between our evolved needs and the modern world can lead to feelings of boredom, restlessness, or low mood.