Posted by DreamCommander > 2015-07-08 19:53 | Report Abuse

Talk is cheap, TommyZai ... But when it comes to walking your talk, it often becomes a completely different kettle of fish altogether ...

Posted by DreamCommander > 2015-07-08 19:59 | Report Abuse

So, I think I might be going visiting Myanmar in around 2025 ... and I wud be lookin up someone named TommyZai who migrated from Malaysia ... He wud be a Myanmar citizen by then, I guess ...

Posted by tommyzai > 2015-07-08 19:59 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by DreamCommander > 2015-07-08 20:01 | Report Abuse

Lu manyiak kuat respek dia lu mintak dia recommend lu for Indo citizenship lor, TommyZai ... What is da problem ... Ah Jib tak kasi ah ...

Posted by DreamCommander > 2015-07-08 20:02 | Report Abuse

Habis, ciakap karut saja manyiak sinang, orang respond marah pulak ... mana boleh cam tu ...

Posted by tommyzai > 2015-07-08 20:07 | Report Abuse

that cb will get away scotfree. evidences are being destroyed by the so called inter-agency taskforce. these cbs will rot in hell. international observers should have been included in the taskforce if that cb doesnt want to go on leave. regardless, i wouldnt be surprised to see malaysia behind vietnam, indo, philiphines or even myanmar 10 years down the road. then malaysians need to go indo to be maid. pathetic. simply compare with indo, now malaysia is simply like suharto time. wonder how long it will take for malaysia to be like jokowi era, declared assets and tell ppl how he got his wealth. respect

Posted by DreamCommander > 2015-07-08 20:07 | Report Abuse

Mau jadi citizen Malaysia, lagi mau condemn Malaysia sama pemimpin Malaysia tak habis-habis ...

Pigi test jadi citizen negara lain yg lebih baik la pulak, yg pemimpin dia lagi baik pulak ...

Posted by soojinhou > 2015-07-08 20:10 | Report Abuse

Bodoh. Malaysia bukan UMNO

Posted by tommyzai > 2015-07-08 20:15 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:01 | Report Abuse

Just Three Questions for WSJ, Hafarizam please take note

http://www.malaysia-today.net/just-three-questions-for-wsj-hafarizam-please-take-note/


The SWIFT Code PNBPUS3NANYC belongs to Alfa-Bank Moscow. This is not just a tell tale sign that the document is an absolute hoax but a very firm confirmation that the document is a hoax or a fraud. How could WSJ missed this factual error?

Rocky’s Bru

Updated: The Malauysian Royal Police will have more than 3 questions for WSJ:
IGP says IGP under investigation over leaked bank info, MalayMail Online 8/7/15
p.s. IGP also says there’s NO link between murder of Ambank founder and 1MDB

Original posting:

To Whom It May Concern,

I have done my analysis for the evidence shared by WSJ. In my attempt to evaluate the veracity of the accusations made against Prime Minister Najib based on the documents shared online (at http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/info-MALPROBE070715b.html) by WSJ and Sarawak Report (who had said they have sighted similar documents as WSJ), I have the following three simple and straightforward questions:

Firstly, where is the substantive documentary evidence that confirms the account numbers depicted in the documents actually belongs to the Prime Minister?

The elementary diagram included by them explaining how the fund flowed is not relevant as it is clearly created by somebody else and it goes without saying that it is not a formal bank document. Any Tom, Dick and Harry could have drawn the diagram. This makes it an unreliable evidence. Moreover, the letter supposedly issued by someone by the name depicted under the signature did not refer to the Prime Minister in any way whatsoever. For all we know he was referring to somebody else altogether. This creates a very strong reasonable doubt.

All in all, the documents lack clarity. This makes it difficult to conclude that the documentary “evidence” shared is strong or good enough to be relied upon for an accusation to be leveled against the Prime Minister in the first instance. I hope WSJ can shed more light on this seemingly inaccurate and incomplete picture. How could they make the accusation with so called banking documents that never had Prime Minister Najib’s name reflected anywhere?

Secondly, why is the address of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) stated in the SWIFT message very different from its actual address?

It is stated in the SWIFT message that the address is 375 Park Avenue, NY 4080, NEW York, NY, US.

When I searched online for the address of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch), I found it is 11 Penn Plaza, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10001. See http://www.banklocationslist.com/wells-fargo-bank/new-york-ny/branch.24723.html

So what is located at 375 Park Avenue? My first search led me to Wells Fargo Advisor, which is a non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company. See https://home.wellsfargoadvisors.com/001_PNZ2. The actual address is 375 PARK AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10152.

Nonetheless, I was not happy with this as there could still be a Wells Fargo bank branch in that same location as Wells Fargo Advisor so I searched online specifically for Wells Fargo Bank N.A. using the same address and upon further checking I found out that there is also another Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) at this same actual address, thus making the WSJ document seemingly authentic enough to those who does not scrutinize the document thoroughly.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:04 | Report Abuse

The SWIFT Code PNBPUS3NANYC belongs to Alfa-Bank Moscow. This is not just a tell tale sign that the document is an absolute hoax but a very firm confirmation that the document is a hoax or a fraud. How could WSJ missed this factual error?


To Whom It May Concern,

I have done my analysis for the evidence shared by WSJ. In my attempt to evaluate the veracity of the accusations made against Prime Minister Najib based on the documents shared online (at http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/info-MALPROBE070715b.html) by WSJ and Sarawak Report (who had said they have sighted similar documents as WSJ), I have the following three simple and straightforward questions:


Firstly, where is the substantive documentary evidence that confirms the account numbers depicted in the documents actually belongs to the Prime Minister?

The elementary diagram included by them explaining how the fund flowed is not relevant as it is clearly created by somebody else and it goes without saying that it is not a formal bank document. Any Tom, Dick and Harry could have drawn the diagram. This makes it an unreliable evidence. Moreover, the letter supposedly issued by someone by the name depicted under the signature did not refer to the Prime Minister in any way whatsoever. For all we know he was referring to somebody else altogether. This creates a very strong reasonable doubt.

All in all, the documents lack clarity. This makes it difficult to conclude that the documentary "evidence" shared is strong or good enough to be relied upon for an accusation to be leveled against the Prime Minister in the first instance. I hope WSJ can shed more light on this seemingly inaccurate and incomplete picture. How could they make the accusation with so called banking documents that never had Prime Minister Najib's name reflected anywhere?

Posted by fortunebullz > 2015-07-08 21:04 | Report Abuse

It really does not matter if Najib survive AmBank scandal! The point is, his reputation and Umno tarnish beyond repair! It's a sinking ship now! By the time election comes around, I very much doubt Najib lead Umno!

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:05 | Report Abuse

Secondly, why is the address of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) stated in the SWIFT message very different from its actual address?

It is stated in the SWIFT message that the address is 375 Park Avenue, NY 4080, NEW York, NY, US.

When I searched online for the address of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch), I found it is 11 Penn Plaza, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10001. See http://www.banklocationslist.com/wells-fargo-bank/new-york-ny/branch.24723.html

So what is located at 375 Park Avenue? My first search led me to Wells Fargo Advisor, which is a non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company. See https://home.wellsfargoadvisors.com/001_PNZ2. The actual address is 375 PARK AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10152.

Nonetheless, I was not happy with this as there could still be a Wells Fargo bank branch in that same location as Wells Fargo Advisor so I searched online specifically for Wells Fargo Bank N.A. using the same address and upon further checking I found out that there is also another Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) at this same actual address, thus making the WSJ document seemingly authentic enough to those who does not scrutinize the document thoroughly.

However, the actual address online for this bank is still very markedly and visibly different from what is stated in the document shared by WSJ. http://www.swift-code.com/m/united-states/swift-code-pnbpus3nnyc.html. The real address is 375 PARK AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10152. Please note post-code is very different - 10152 vs. 4080 and also how the address is written in the shared document by WSJ is quite wrong as follows 375 Park Avenue, NY 4080, NEW York, NY, US. (ie. the post-code put in the middle of the address).

This is typically one way how one could check the authenticity of a SWIFT message. The tell tale sign includes wrong name of bank and/or wrong address. Frauders will always make at minimum a slightly different name or address so that people would miss it upon first scrutiny. How could WSJ rely on documents that have such an apparent discrepancy found in the document to the information found at Wells Fargo website?

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:06 | Report Abuse

Thirdly, why is the SWIFT Code used in the SWJ shared document is different?

The best and most straight forward way to check whether a SWIFT document is authentic is to check the SWIFT Code of the bank used in the document. If it is wrong then the whole thing is a fraud. This can also be done online through the relevant official website.


The SWIFT Code of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) located at 375 Park Avenue, NY 4080, NEW York, NY, US that is depicted on the shared SWIFT document is PNBPUS3NANYC. However, the actual SWIFT Code of Code of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (New York International Branch) located at 375 PARK AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10152 is actually PNBPUS3NNYC. See http://www.swift-code.com/m/united-states/swift-code-pnbpus3nnyc.html


The SWIFT Code PNBPUS3NANYC belongs to Alfa-Bank Moscow. This is not just a tell tale sign that the document is an absolute hoax but a very firm confirmation that the document is a hoax or a fraud. How could WSJ miss this factual error?

Three simple questions are enough to prove the documents shared cannot be relied upon as basis for the accusations against Prime Minister Najib. Anyone making and reaffirming the accusations based on the shared documents without asking these questions would unfortunately be seen as doing something frivolous, vexatious as well as totally and absolutely irresponsible.

Fraud using SWIFT message is real and it is shocking that WSJ fell for it. And it is even more unfortunate that some Malaysians also fell for it by relying on WSJ's good reputation. I hope WSJ will do its own checking base on the three simple questions here and if the result is similar to what I have shared here then they must withdraw their accusations and apologize to Prime Minister Najib.

Bru Notes: This is not the work of PGI but I'm sure the people who tracked down Justo would be impressed by the analysis done by this author, who by the way is a legally-trained Malaysian currently heading a banking/finance institution [and therefore, unfortunately, must remain anonymous].


Hafarizam, Najib's lawyer, has his work cut out for him.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 21:18 | Report Abuse

Aiyo sian ah to listen to moron trying to be investigator. How dumb can dumb be b4 they realize the whole country's coffers is gone. By then when caught, his answer will be swift and simple, Mahahtir also did it but because there was no internet then he got away with it. Looks like wrong is measure in comparison with others. As long as some one did worst than you, the other guy should be punished.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:25 | Report Abuse

http://www.malaysia-today.net/and-the-counter-coup-is-launched/

Does this not make you proud to be Malaysian? At last, after 58 years of Merdeka, Malaysia has finally seen its first coup d’état and a counter-coup the very next day.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Yesterday it appeared like Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak had been cornered and that there was no way out for him. It looked like Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s fingers were tightening around Najib’s neck and that it was a matter of hours before his life was going to be squeezed out of him.

Then, late last night, the tide turned. Yesterday, what was supposed to have been Malaysia’s first coup d’état (READ HERE) now appears to have transformed into a counter-coup.

What a classic comeback!

Just to reminisce a bit about a similar situation that happened in Thailand about 40 years or so ago. Some army generals (not Tan Sris though) who were planning a coup d’état sent three tank divisions to surround the Parliament building in a bid to topple the Prime Minister.

One tank division got lost along the way and could not find the road to Bangkok (that’s why it is important to have proper signboards, and in Thai). It had to stop to ask for directions and finally after some farmers pointed the road to Bangkok the tank division continued its journey.

The second tank division managed to find Bangkok but caught in a massive traffic jam and for hours could not move. Bangkok in those days was notorious for its four-hour or more traffic jams, which practically turned Bangkok into one massive parking lot. (Therefore when you made appointments you did not specify the time but just said ‘after lunch’ or ‘before lunch’).

The third tank division managed to find its way with no problems and arrived on time. But when it found that the other two tank divisions were missing it thought that it had been sold out so it surrendered.

By the time the other two tank divisions arrived the coup was over even before it started. That was probably the shortest coup of maybe more than a dozen coups in Thailand’s history (even Thais cannot remember how many coups they have had).

Malaysia’s first coup d’état yesterday was exactly like that. Some of the conspirators got lost. Some got caught in some sort of jam. And the others found that they were not playing with a full deck after all and decided they might as well run for cover before the bullets start flying.

Sad to say, what was supposed to have been Malaysia’s first coup d’état has fallen flat, just like that one in Thailand of 40 years ago. The guns that were pointing at Najib’s head are now pointing at the heads of the coup conspirators. And, today, the conspirators are going to be flushed out one by one.

But no, they are not going to be lined up against the wall and shot for treason, although Malaysia does have a ‘waging war against the King’ law that makes treason a crime punishable by hanging, like what happened 15 years ago to the Al-Ma’unah people.

A quick death is not satisfactory. Instead they are going to be given a slow death. So stay tuned over the next few days as news of this counter-coup hits the Malaysian airwaves and one by one the coup conspirators are made to grovel in the mud while begging for mercy.

Does this not make you proud to be Malaysian? At last, after 58 years of Merdeka, Malaysia has finally seen its first coup d’état and a counter-coup the very next day.

Well, as the late Jimi Hendix said:

Purple haze, all in my brain

Lately things they don’t seem the same

Actin’ funny, but I don’t know why

Excuse me while I kiss the sky

Yes, excuse me while I kiss the sky…muah…

**********************************************

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 21:32 | Report Abuse

Ok dumb ass, read this carefully on the correction of Swift code which was transferred in 2008.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/cimb-banker-admits-error-in-analysis-of-wsjs-documents

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:37 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 21:38 | Report Abuse

Dr Mahathir is in a hurry. Najib is not. Short of a coup d’état, either through a vote of no confidence in Parliament or a military takeover, Najib has three years to get his affairs in order. And three years is a long time. In three years Najib could be ousted either by being challenged in the party elections or by his party being voted out in the general election. Until then he is safe for at least another three years.

Dr Mahathir has shifted the goalpost a number of times. It is no longer about Najib being too accommodating to the Chinese voters (at the risk of losing Malay votes) or too compliant to Singapore (and not building the Crooked Bridge). It is now about RM42 billion of 1MDB’s money disappearing into thin air.

Dr Mahathir is going to keep hammering that point home. And if Najib answers those charges and puts the 1MDB issue to sleep, then all that is going to happen is Dr Mahathir will just look for another issue to hit Najib with. So better Najib just let Dr Mahathir scream, jump, kick and punch while he dances, prances, ducks and dodges and when the time is right he pulls his rabbit out of the hat and face the voters in the general election and his party in the party elections with a very loud, “did I not tell you so?”

The problem with Dr Mahathir’s attacks is it is now no longer just about hurting Najib. It is also hurting Umno and Barisan Nasional. To kill Najib, Dr Mahathir must also bomb Umno and Barisan Nasional. This is akin to blowing up an entire plane of 300 passengers just to kill one person on that plane.

And this is what is unsettling most people. And the RM2.6 billion is a case in point. Did Najib steal that money or was it for the use of Barisan Nasional in the 2013 general election? If Najib did not pocket that money then someone else must have done so. And if Barisan Nasional pocketed that money instead, then it opens up an entirely new can of worms

If Najib can be hit with a sniper shot and no one else gets hurt then many would support Dr Mahathir’s effort to oust the Prime Minister. But if it means bringing down the entire Barisan Nasional then the ballgame changes. And this is precisely what the new ballgame is all about — kill Najib by blowing up the entire plane and everyone in it.

And this is the very reason why Najib can afford to play Taichi.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 21:40 | Report Abuse

No wander Singapore Malays are doing so well....hahahaha

Posted by joerakmo > 2015-07-08 21:49 | Report Abuse

See so easy to sidetrack ;until you are all arguing.

Dont bother with swift codes lah.

Where and whose money was transferred in.Who was sender? Who was receiver? Who had authorisation on those accounts.

If not 1MDB monies whose monies;why give 'him' why not give me?

Mafia money;drug money; arms smuggling money or snakehead(smuggling Rohingyas) money.These all comes under AMLA.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 22:32 | Report Abuse

Somebody here trying to mislead unknowing ppl with swift code. It is clear now the close was change to new owner in 2008. So the fact that the wsj report still holds

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 22:39 | Report Abuse

Prices of things go up...blame the Chinese
Fck, petrol price has nothing to do with Chinese dumb fool
Check the price of massimo bread vs Gardenia. Robert owns Massimo and it is a cheaper bread
How ant this one....prices of KR1M more expensive than tesco...Chinese problem??
How about tol? Who are the concessionaires? Who owns touchngo benefitting??
Is it Chinese problem when non Malays do well in exams?? Or countries with Chinese and base on merits are top I'm the world?

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 22:47 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 22:48 | Report Abuse

KOWTOWING TO THE CHINESE IS NOT GOING TO SAVE NAJIB

http://www.malaysia-today.net/kowtowing-to-the-chinese-is-not-going-to-save-najib/

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah was the first choice of successor to Pak Lah but, unfortunately, he rejected the idea of the Presidential Council. Ku Li replied that if he became Prime Minster then he is not going to be a puppet prime minister or become anyone’s proxy. As Prime Minister he would make all the decisions and not allow a de facto Prime Minister to tell him what to do.

Understandably, because of this attitude and rejection of the terms, Ku Li said he was dropped and the job was offered to Najib instead. Unfortunately, as Dr Mahathir said, after becoming Prime Minister, Najib reneged on the terms of his appointment and refused to take advice from Dr Mahathir.

In the initial stages Najib would pretend to listen to what Dr Mahathir wanted. But then Dr Mahathir began to realise that Najib would just smile and nod and not actually do all those things that he was asked to do.

When Dr Mahathir began to get a bit more aggressive and Najib could no longer take it, he just avoided the old man. According to Dr Mahathir, for six months Najib ignored him and refused to meet him or talk to him. That was when Dr Mahathir made up his mind that Najib has to go.

And that opportunity offered itself when the 1MDB issue came along.

In the beginning Dr Mahathir cited Najib’s ‘giving in’ to the Chinese with the ‘2013 election disaster’ backdrop as the reason he has to go. Dr Mahathir accused Najib of favouring the Chinese and of neglecting the Malays who are going to be the voters who will ensure that Umno stays in power.

Then Dr Mahathir said that Najib is ‘giving in’ to Singapore and that is why he refuses to build the Crooked Bridge, which he had initially promised to do but did not because Singapore is not in favour of the bridge. Dr Mahathir said he does not understand why Najib listens to Singapore. “What is it that Singapore has on him?” asked Dr Mahathir.

But all that did not really move the ground until Dr Mahathir played up the 1MDB issue. Only then did all hell break loose. So now Dr Mahathir is like a dog with a bone. He has got his teeth into the 1MDB bone and is growling and is not letting go.

A number of Umno leaders have suggested that Najib should sit down with Dr Mahathir and resolve their differences. But it is too late for that. Dr Mahathir has gone beyond the point of no return and there is no turning back any more. Dr Mahathir has to see this to the end and complete what he started.

There are no more deals to be made with Najib. The deals must now be made with Najib’s successor, Muhyiddin. First is to ensure that Umno does not waste time with the Chinese voters and focus instead on the Malay voters.

Next, Muhyiddin must build that Crooked Bridge to Singapore and bail out Proton and not allow it to collapse.

Finally, Muhyiddin has to unfreeze the transfer of all those assets that Dr Mahathir wants his proxies to transfer to him. This, it seems, was the straw that broke the camel’s back and which forced Dr Mahathir to come to a decision that peace with Najib is no longer possible and that it has to be a duel to the death.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 22:52 | Report Abuse

Hear say from factless information of opinion.
Show me swift and I show you the facts to oppose it. Now don't dare to talk swift??

Don't b a kiss ass lar.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 23:03 | Report Abuse

https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/304512

However, Badlisyah correctly pointed out that the particular Wells Fargo bank branch should have a standard Swift Code of "PNBPUS3NNYC" instead of "PNBPUS3NANYC" as listed on the documents released by WSJ.

Checks showed that the "PNBPUS3NANYC" Swift Code was used by its predecessor, Wachovia Bank, which was subsequently taken over by Wells Fargo Bank in 2008.

Further checks showed the discrepancy, specifically on the additional "A" on the ninth character of the Swift Code in the WSJ document, merely denotes the logical terminal and has no bearing on the bank identity.

After being challenged by Najib's supporters, the WSJ released nine documents yesterday to back their claim that nearly US$700 million made its way into his personal accounts.

Badalisyah made a Facebook post later this evening, maintaining that the documents were fraudulent.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:07 | Report Abuse

Yea lar his point was swift code, now swift code proven to be correct and he admited it!

He says he still think it's fraudulent....but what is the fact for him to say that?? He dare not mention because he get shot down with proof which he has to admit wrong later.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 23:08 | Report Abuse

Badalisyah made a Facebook post later this evening, maintaining that the documents were fraudulent.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-08 23:09 | Report Abuse

You headlines are misleading. Badlishah is still correct in saying that the report may be inaccurate.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:17 | Report Abuse

What is fraudulent? If he say swift is fraudulent earlier, he has corrected his statement. If he still maintain It's fraudulent, he must be specific. He cannot make sweeping statement.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:18 | Report Abuse

Which part of report is inaccurate? He must be clear so that it can be properly address.

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:19 | Report Abuse

Writer fraudulent? Or amt fraudulent?....

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:22 | Report Abuse

Sweeping statement not accepted!....hear say not accepted!!.....opinion not accepted!!....
Ist Ramadan month, be truthful. Remember it between you and God....not me if you are lying

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:25 | Report Abuse

Again swearing not having met Saiful and later to admit has nothing to do w anybody BUT because someone's life depended on the truth makes it an interest to many

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:35 | Report Abuse

Yes argue with facts put on the table not base on someone's opinion...

Posted by HakChai > 2015-07-08 23:37 | Report Abuse

If badalisyah got fact or evidence, show it, if RPK got proof share it. Don't talk on opinion and hear say. badalisyah show fact on swift but was shot down

Posted by tommyzai > 2015-07-08 23:42 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by warrenbucket > 2015-07-08 23:45 | Report Abuse

yeaa...I'm with you bulz....

Posted by Ny036 > 2015-07-08 23:53 | Report Abuse

We cannot do anything. As usual majority cabinet back najis as they are same as najis. Will only see different when change party.

Posted by Ny036 > 2015-07-08 23:55 | Report Abuse

However mamak is the creater country in this situation.

Posted by Ny036 > 2015-07-09 00:03 | Report Abuse

No Taliban life n dead same value.

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-09 00:06 | Report Abuse

http://www.malaysia-today.net/and-the-counter-coup-is-launched/

PRESS RELEASE

A Wall street Journal had published an article dated 3rd July 2015, implicating our client Datuk Seri Najib. Immediately, our client had instructed us, Messrs Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak, to scrutinize the said article. The article is tainted with numerous allegations against our client which involved several companies and transactions.

Combing through the said article, we have concluded that the language is intentionally or otherwise has made reference to several facts and companies which are vaguely described. Reference is made to the said article wherein it has been stated that our client had been directly probed into 1MDB, however contents of the article refers to indirect transactions where our client has been implicated with 1MDB-linked companies. A clear contradiction which requires further clarification.

This article by WSJ was issued, published and circulated through WSJ web portal www.wsj.com . Firstly, we have been instructed to identify the parties involved in the authorship, distribution and publishing, for the purpose of naming the appropriate parties in any potential actions which requires deliberation and research as the article does not reflect extensive details for service of any legal letter or court documents.

Secondly, another issue of concern is, jurisdictional issues of which the publication originates from United States of America and accessible worldwide. We have been also instructed that a local presence of WSJ is also available and we are pursuing further clarification and details on this matter.

Since the article involves several parties, we have also been instructed to consider a joint action or an action against, in the event evidence shows a conspiracy against our client. Kindly note that the companies named as conspirators with our client, in the article are; International Petroleum Investment Co, Tanore Finance Corp, SRC International Sdn. Bhd, and Ihsan Perdana Sdn. Bhd.

Several names of companies or organizations had only been referred to as the related companies or companies belonging to certain organizations or companies, and also the sources or destinations or the alleged transactions has not been disclosed. This in itself either intentionally or otherwise has caused further identification of facts been required.

Once we have identified the parties, the jurisdiction, and the involvement of conspirators or are they merely parties which also had been innocently imputed in the article, we can then proceed to address the third issue.

The third issue is to tackle all possible or plausible legal remedies of which our client shall be given advise on an action of defamation, further tortuous actions and remedies including any statutory violations by WSJ and related companies and (if any) conspirers.

This is not a straightforward legal action due to the national and international imputations. We have been instructed to identify facts and lay full facts, before our client, is able to proceed with further instructions.

The purpose of clear explanation is to avoid unnecessary objections by WSJ on the imputations that are made. Once our client has obtained all necessary facts and the position of WSJ is ascertained, we have strict instructions to immediately exhaust legal avenues and remedies.

Yours faithfully,

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MESSRS HAFARIZAM WAN & AISHA MUBARAK

WAN AZMIR BIN WAN MAJID

***************************************************

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-09 00:07 | Report Abuse

http://www.malaysia-today.net/and-the-counter-coup-is-launched/

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC

ARTICLES WRITTEN BY SIMON CLARK AND TOM WRIGHT IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL CONCERNING YAB DATO’ SRI MOHD NAJIB BIN TUN HAJI ABDUL RAZAK ENTITLED “MALAYSIA LEADER’S ACCOUNTS PROBED” PUBLISHED ON 2ND JULY 2015 AND “SCANDAL IN MALAYSIA” PUBLISHED ON 6TH JULY 2015 (“ THE ARTICLES”)

We act for the Right Honourable Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak, the Prime Minister of Malaysia, in his personal capacity.

We refer to the Articles dated 2nd July 2015 and 6th July 2015 in your Wall Street Journal which, we state, contains a plethora of convoluted, scurrilous and vague allegations against our client.

In the circumstances, we are instructed by our Client to seek confirmation as to whether it is your position as taken in the Articles that our Client misappropriated nearly USD 700 million from 1Malaysia Development Berhad?

We are instructed to procure your position because the Articles collectively suggest that you are unsure of “the original source of the money and what happened to the money” whilst on the other hand, the general gist of the Articles create a clear impression that our Client has misappropriated about USD 700 million belonging to 1Malaysia Development Berhad.

In the circumstance and in the interests of our Client, we would expect a Newspaper of your international standing and reputation to state unequivocally and with clarity as to whether it is your contention that our Client misappropriated about USD 700 million belonging to 1Malaysia Development Berhad. You will no doubt appreciate the seriousness of the allegations made against our Client in the said Articles and this confirmation is sought to enable us to advise our Client on the appropriate legal recourse he can take to seek redress in relation to the publication of these Articles.

We demand a reply within fourteen (14) days of the date hereof and please let us know whether you have appointed solicitors in Malaysia to accept service of legal proceedings on your behalf and on behalf of the reporters who wrote the Articles in the event that legal proceeding become necessary.

We hereby reserve all our Client’s rights in this matter.

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MESSRS HAFARIZAM WAN & AISHA MUBARAK

Posted by Probability > 2015-07-09 00:16 | Report Abuse

a drowning man...will even try to grasp a splinter floating.

Posted by arv18 > 2015-07-09 00:17 | Report Abuse

bunch of BS. Just Deny you have such accounts AND deny receiving any 700mil USD. Been 6 days already. STOP wasting our time!

Posted by Probability > 2015-07-09 00:17 | Report Abuse

often we have to get news from outside source to know whats happening inside.. remember MH370.

Posted by arv18 > 2015-07-09 00:25 | Report Abuse

Simple Right? Just DENY and DENY. If you didn't do it, DENY. Call the bluff.

6 DAYS! Still waiting for a Denial.

He is such an imbicile, that he says he wouldn't be dumb enough to do it here! Moron!

Even Bill Clinton denied 'having sexual relations' with Monica Lewinsky. What a dumbass!

Posted by izoklse > 2015-07-09 00:29 | Report Abuse

wakakakk tak boleh tahan dan terima kenyataan. hahahhahahahah. so funny.

Posted by Ven Felix > 2015-07-09 00:32 | Report Abuse

Poisonous devil live in a hollow skeleton.Desires , greediness, ignorance, shameless, hell lot of lies, misplacing , regardless the price to his peoples will pay in generations due to his so wrongful decision.